多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in the stances of the speaker who said ‘and then we do it on live’ and the speaker who said ‘the guy who hits it should have to flip’ throughout the entire conversation? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: On the development of the game concept: attitude has always been [to make the game more interesting by creating and refining rules]; Speaker B: On the development of the game concept: from [passively participating in and understanding the current rules] → to [actively conceptualizing and proposing a large-scale live stream event].
- B. Speaker A: Their opinion on games changes as the conversation progresses; Speaker B: Shows a flexible attitude in the discussion.
- C. Speaker A: Attitude towards the game's penalty: from 【Gladly accepting】→【Becoming strongly resistant】; Speaker B: Attitude towards the game's rules: from 【Insisting on their own opinion】→【Completely yielding to the other's plan】.
- D. Speaker A: Development of the game concept: From 【passively participating and understanding the current rules】 → 【actively conceiving and proposing a large-scale live streaming event】; Speaker B: Development of the game concept: attitude has always been 【making the game more interesting by creating and refining the rules】.

Speaker A: On the development of the game concept: From [passively participating and understanding the current rules] → [actively conceiving and proposing a large-scale live-streaming event]; Speaker B: On the development of the game concept: The attitude has always been [to make the game more interesting by establishing and refining the rules].


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the respective changes in stance of the second speaker and the third speaker throughout the conversation? Please choose the option that best fits.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Development of the game concept: From 【passively participating and understanding the current rules】→【actively conceiving and proposing a large-scale live stream event】; Speaker B: Development of the game concept: attitude has always been 【making the game more interesting by formulating and refining the rules】.
- B. Speaker A: On the development of the game concept: attitude has always been [to make the game more interesting by establishing and refining rules]; Speaker B: On the development of the game concept: from [passive participation] → [actively designing live stream activities].
- C. Speaker A: Attitude towards the game's punishment: from【Willing acceptance】→【Strong resistance】; Speaker B: Attitude towards the game's rules: from【Insistence on their own view】→【Complete compromise】.
- D. The views of both speakers developed during the conversation, but their core positions did not fundamentally change.

Speaker A: Development of the game concept: from [passively participating and understanding the current rules] → [shifting to actively conceiving and proposing a large-scale live-streaming event].
Speaker B: Development of the game concept: attitude has always been [making the game more interesting by creating and refining rules].

Yeah, and then we do it on live, and then when someone, and when they're gone, I would bring a new person in, and whoever's hosting it live keeps going or Right?

I think the guy who hits it should have to flip, take a break and flip it.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in stance throughout the entire conversation for the speaker in the audio who said ‘and then we do it on live’ from 85.06s to 94.9s and ‘the guy who hits it should have to flip’ from 47.57s to 50.89s? Please choose the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: On the development of the game concept: attitude has always been【to make the game more interesting by establishing and refining rules】; Speaker B: On the development of the game concept: from【passively participating and understanding the current rules】→【actively conceiving and proposing a large-scale live streaming event】.
- B. Speaker A: Development of the game concept: from 【passively participating and understanding the current rules】→【actively conceiving and proposing a large-scale livestream event】; Speaker B: Development of the game concept: attitude has always been 【making the game more interesting by establishing and refining the rules】.
- C. Speaker A: Attitude towards the game's penalty: From [Willingly accepting] → [Strongly resisting]; Speaker B: Attitude towards the game's rules: From [Insisting on one's own opinion] → [Completely giving in to the other's plan].
- D. Speaker A: Their attitude towards games changes as the conversation progresses; Speaker B: shows a flexible attitude in the discussion.

Speaker A: Development of the game concept: From [passively participating and understanding the current rules] → [actively conceiving and proposing a large-scale live stream event]; Speaker B: Development of the game concept: Attitude has always been [to make the game more interesting by establishing and refining rules].


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: The following is a monologue from a speaker; in the complete conversation, the most likely response is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B: What's up?
- B. Speaker B: My name is Gilbert.
- C. Speaker B: My name is Frankie.
- D. Cannot determine (insufficient information to locate the response)

What's your name?

My name is Gilbert.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: Based on the conversation, the reply from other people to what a speaker said from 322.77 to 323.37 seconds is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B: My name is Frankie.
- B. Unable to determine (Insufficient information to locate the response)
- C. Speaker B: What's up?
- D. Speaker B: My name is Gilbert.

What's your name?

My name is Gilbert.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: Based on the conversation, the response from others to the speaker's question 'What's your name?' is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B: My name is Gilbert.
- B. Speaker B: My name is Frankie.
- C. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to locate the response)
- D. Speaker B: What's up?

What's your name?

My name is Gilbert.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: According to the dialogue content, the response from other people to a speaker's utterance of ‘What's your name?’ between 322.77s and 323.37s is:

Choices:
- A. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to pinpoint a reply)
- B. Speaker B: What's up?
- C. Speaker B: My name is Gilbert.
- D. Speaker B: My name is Frankie.

What's your name?

My name is Gilbert.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: In the following audio of a single person speaking, what accent is the speaker using?

Choices:
- A. British English accent
- B. American English with characteristics of African American Vernacular English (AAVE)
- C. General American English
- D. Accent is not pronounced, unable to judge.

American English with features of African American Vernacular English (AAVE)

You ain't responded to any of that shit, Janet, we don't fuck like Janet don't come up unless she mad about not getting her money from Kenya, or she mad at will, like, come on now.

General American English, with African American Vernacular English (AAVE) features

And the second thing is, girlfriend, there's a lot of shit going on in the world


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: The speaker's accent in the audio from 199.2 seconds to 208.93 seconds is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. American English with features of African American Vernacular English (AAVE)
- B. The accent is not obvious, unable to judge.
- C. General American English
- D. Australian English accent

American English with features of African-American Vernacular English (AAVE)


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: The person who said “You ain't responded to any of that shit, Janet” in the audio has an accent that is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. General American English
- B. Indian English accent
- C. American English with features of African American Vernacular English (AAVE)
- D. Accent not obvious, unable to judge.

American English with features of African-American Vernacular English (AAVE)


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, what accent is used by the 1st speaker in the conversation?

Choices:
- A. General American English
- B. The accent is not obvious, unable to determine.
- C. American English with features of African American Vernacular English (AAVE)
- D. British English accent

American English with features of African American Vernacular English (AAVE)


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: The male speaker who said “You ain't responded to any of that shit, Janet” from 199.2 to 208.93 seconds has an accent closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. American English with features of African American Vernacular English (AAVE)
- B. General American English
- C. The accent is not obvious, making it impossible to determine.
- D. Singapore English accent

American English with features of African American Vernacular English (AAVE)


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: Which speakers in the entire audio use a General American English accent (with no other significant dialectal features)? (Answer in order of speaker appearance) Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. First speaker, second speaker
- B. The accent is not obvious, so it cannot be determined.
- C. the second speaker, the third speaker
- D. the first speaker, the second speaker, the third speaker


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, how many speakers use a General American English accent (without other significant dialectal features)? Please select the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. 1
- B. 2
- C. 3
- D. The accent is not obvious and cannot be determined.


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话背景推理

Question: This conversation most likely takes place in which of the following scenarios?

Choices:
- A. Two hosts are recording an informal podcast show in a home living room.
- B. Reporters are asking questions to a celebrity at a press conference.
- C. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence)
- D. Two hosts are recording a podcast show in a recording studio.

Two hosts are recording a podcast program in a recording studio.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior between the two speakers in the corresponding segment of the audio below? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Opinion Revision: Speaker A makes a vague criticism, and Speaker B clarifies and revises it, making it more aggressive.
- B. Direct rebuttal: Speaker B presents a view, and Speaker A immediately points out its logical fallacy.
- C. Cooperative Attack: Speaker A makes an accusation, and Speaker B immediately follows up and escalates the attack with questioning.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence)

Cooperative Attack: Speaker A makes an accusation, Speaker B immediately follows up and escalates the attack with an interrogating question.

Now, let's not act like this, let's not act like you out here doing all this shit.

Yeah, where's your videos about the black violence and all this stuff that you bringing up in the hunger and in all these places and shit?


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior between the speaker from 209.65s to 213.37s and the speaker from 213.37s to 219.93s in the audio, as demonstrated in their respective segments? Please select the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Unable to determine (insufficient evidence)
- B. Cooperative Attack: Speaker A makes an accusation, and Speaker B immediately follows up and escalates the attack with a challenging question.
- C. Viewpoint Correction: Speaker A offers a vague criticism, and Speaker B clarifies and revises it, making it more aggressive.
- D. Direct refutation: Speaker B makes an argument, and Speaker A immediately points out its logical fallacy.

Cooperative attack: Speaker A makes an accusation, Speaker B immediately follows up and escalates the attack with questioning.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior demonstrated in the corresponding segment between the speaker who said ‘let's not act like you out here doing all this shit’ and the speaker who said ‘where's your videos about the black violence’? Please select the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Direct Rebuttal: Speaker B presents a viewpoint, and Speaker A immediately points out its logical fallacy.
- B. Viewpoint Revision: Speaker A makes a vague criticism, and Speaker B clarifies and revises it, making it more aggressive.
- C. Cannot determine (Insufficient evidence)
- D. Cooperative Attack: Speaker A makes an accusation, and Speaker B immediately follows up and escalates the attack by questioning.

Cooperative Attack: Speaker A makes an accusation, Speaker B immediately follows up and escalates the attack with questioning.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior demonstrated by the first speaker and the second speaker in the dialogue? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Cooperative Attack: Speaker A makes an accusation, Speaker B immediately follows up and escalates the attack with questioning.
- B. Viewpoint Revision: Speaker A makes a vague criticism, and Speaker B clarifies and revises it, making it more aggressive.
- C. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence)
- D. Direct Rebuttal: Speaker B presents a viewpoint, and Speaker A immediately points out its logical fallacy.

Cooperative attack: Speaker A makes an accusation, and Speaker B immediately follows up and escalates the attack with questioning.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior demonstrated in the corresponding segments between the speaker in the audio who said ‘let's not act like you out here doing all this shit’ from second 209.65 to second 213.37, and the speaker who said ‘where's your videos about the black violence’ from second 213.37 to second 219.93? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Direct rebuttal: Speaker B puts forward a viewpoint, and Speaker A immediately points out its logical fallacy.
- B. Collaborative Attack: Speaker A makes an accusation, and Speaker B immediately follows up and escalates the attack with questioning.
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)
- D. Viewpoint Revision: Speaker A makes a vague criticism, and Speaker B clarifies and revises it, making it more aggressive.

Cooperative Attack: Speaker A makes an accusation, and Speaker B immediately follows up, escalating the attack with questioning.


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: Which of the following is closest to the speaker's emotion in the single-speaker audio below?

Choices:
- A. Sad
- B. Anger
- C. Happy
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to determine emotion)

And then I can follow Jeff, and I can see and learn what he's learning through that, and I think that's really cool now.

Problem is Tumblr had no great business model or or revenue stream a around it, so it just kind of went away.


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: The speaker's emotion in the audio from 248.63 seconds to 254.15 seconds is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Sorrow
- B. Happy
- C. Anger
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient evidence to determine emotion)


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: The emotion of the speaker who said ‘I think that's really cool now’ in the audio is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Happy
- B. Sorrow
- C. Unable to determine (Insufficient evidence to determine emotion)
- D. Anger


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: For the speaker who said ‘I think that's really cool now’ from 248.63s to 254.15s, their emotion is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Anger
- B. Happy
- C. Sorrow
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient evidence to determine the emotion)


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: Throughout the entire audio, which speakers have expressed the emotion of sadness? (Answer in the order of global speakers) Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. spk_1, spk_2
- B. spk_3
- C. Cannot determine (Insufficient evidence to determine emotion)
- D. spk_1


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, how many speakers in total expressed the emotion of sadness? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence to determine emotion)
- B. 3
- C. 2
- D. 1


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: Which of the following best describes the speaker's profile in the single-speaker audio below?

Choices:
- A. Gender: Male voice; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Sad; Accent: General American English
- B. Gender: Female; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Angry; Accent: British English
- C. Gender: Male; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American English
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine)

Gender: Male voice; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American English

What I did really get, and if you go to Levi's post, I believe it's the next one, Jay, he kind of explained it as it might not be revenue generating, it could be, but it's more, he says, the behavior of liking content on TikTok.


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: Which of the following is closest to the speaker profile of the speaker in the audio between 6.99 and 17.63 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Gender: Male; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American English
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine)
- C. Gender: Female voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Angry; Accent: British English
- D. Gender: Male voice; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Sad; Accent: General American English

Gender: Male; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: Which of the following best describes the profile of the speaker in the audio who said ‘the behavior of liking content on TikTok’?

Choices:
- A. Gender: Male; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Sad; Accent: General American English
- B. Gender: Male; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American English
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine)
- D. Gender: Female; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Angry; Accent: British English

Gender: Male voice; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American English


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: For the speaker who said ‘the behavior of liking content on TikTok’ between 6.99s and 17.63s, which of the following speaker profiles is the closest match?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine)
- B. Gender: Male voice; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Sad; Accent: General American English
- C. Gender: Female voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Angry; Accent: British English
- D. Gender: Male voice; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American English

Gender: Male voice; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American English


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: In the entire audio, which speakers have the profile: "Gender: Male voice; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Sad"? (Answer using spk_index) Please select the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. spk_1
- B. spk_3
- C. spk_1、spk_3
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine)


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: In the entire audio, how many speakers are there with the profile "Gender: Male voice; Age: Young adult; Emotion: Sad"? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. 1
- B. 3
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine)
- D. 2


说话人识别能力-说话人检索任务

Question: The speaker from 21.83s to 27.47s in the audio is which speaker by order of appearance in the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. spk_2
- B. spk_1
- C. spk_4
- D. Cannot determine (insufficient information to identify the speaker)

And I'd argue the latter is more powerful and serves more opportunities in the future, as your collector base outpaces your follower account.

We as humans really crave the opportunity to show our own identity, and we do that often through what we like, right?


说话人识别能力-说话人检索任务

Question: The speaker in the audio who said ‘And I'd argue the latter is more powerful and serves more opportunities in the future’ is which speaker to appear in the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. spk_4
- B. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to identify the speaker)
- C. spk_1
- D. spk_2


说话人识别能力-说话人检索任务

Question: What is the order of appearance in the entire conversation of the male speaker who said 'And I'd argue the latter is more powerful' in the audio between 21.83s and 27.47s?

Choices:
- A. spk_1
- B. spk_4
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to identify the speaker)
- D. spk_2


说话人识别能力-说话人计数任务

Question: How many different speakers are there in this audio?

Choices:
- A. 2 digits
- B. 3 digits
- C. 5 digits
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)

I just I don't understand the bull case of why someone is going to pay lots of money for like my, I don't know, a social post or whatever.

Yeah, the few things to add on my end is just building off what you guys are saying.


说话人识别能力-说话人计数任务

Question: How many different speakers in total appeared in the audio between 280 and 285 seconds?

Choices:
- A. 2 people
- B. 4 bits
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information)
- D. 1 person


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior between the two speakers in the corresponding audio segment? Please select the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A summarizes the viewpoint, and Speaker B collaboratively extends upon it and provides supplementary arguments.
- B. Speaker A uses a historical product as an analogy, while Speaker B analyzes that product's business model problems.
- C. Speaker A puts forward an uncertain speculation, while Speaker B directly denies it with a firm tone.
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)

Speaker A summarizes the viewpoint, and Speaker B collaboratively extends upon it and provides supplementary arguments.

But I definitely see this as like a new metric kind of like a retweet or a like, an ability to create some really cool experiences because they're gonna start saving them in your wallet.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior demonstrated in the corresponding segments by the speaker from 102.12 to 109.92 seconds and the speaker from 112.66 to 116.06 seconds in the audio? Please select the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A cites a historical product as an analogy, while Speaker B analyzes the problems with its business model.
- B. Speaker A summarizes the viewpoint, and Speaker B collaboratively extends it and provides supplementary arguments based on it.
- C. Cannot determine (Insufficient evidence)
- D. Speaker A makes an uncertain guess, while Speaker B directly denies it in a firm tone.

Speaker A summarizes the viewpoint, and Speaker B collaboratively extends upon it and provides supplementary argumentation.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interaction behavior exhibited in the corresponding segments by the speaker who said “I definitely see this as like a new metric kind of like a retweet or a like” and the speaker who said “the few things to add on my end is just building off what you guys are saying”? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A makes an uncertain guess, and Speaker B directly denies it with a firm tone.
- B. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)
- C. Speaker A summarizes the viewpoint, and Speaker B collaboratively extends and adds supplementary arguments on that basis.
- D. Speaker A cites a historical product as an analogy, while Speaker B analyzes the problems with that product's business model.

Speaker A summarizes the viewpoint, and Speaker B builds on it with collaborative extensions and supplementary arguments.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior demonstrated by the first speaker and the second speaker in the entire dialogue? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A summarizes the viewpoint, and Speaker B collaboratively extends upon it and provides supplementary arguments.
- B. Speaker A cites a historical product as an analogy, while Speaker B analyzes its business model problems.
- C. Speaker A makes an uncertain guess, but Speaker B denies it directly and in a firm tone.
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)

Speaker A summarizes the viewpoint, and Speaker B collaborates by extending it and providing supplementary arguments.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: In the audio, what is the interaction behavior demonstrated in the corresponding segments between the speaker who said "an ability to create some really cool experiences" from 102.12s to 109.92s and the speaker who said "building off what you guys are saying" from 112.66s to 116.06s? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence)
- B. Speaker A proposes an uncertain guess, but Speaker B firmly and directly denies it.
- C. Speaker A uses a historical product as an analogy, while Speaker B analyzes the problems with its business model.
- D. Speaker A summarizes the viewpoint, and Speaker B collaboratively elaborates on it and provides supplementary arguments.

Speaker A summarizes the viewpoint, and Speaker B collaboratively extends and provides supplementary arguments based on it.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: In the following solo audio, what accent is the speaker using?

Choices:
- A. African American English accent
- B. Standard American English accent
- C. British English accent
- D. The accent is not obvious and cannot be determined.

Like, have you ever looked at a light skin person in the sun, and you'd be like, damn, you just as transparent as I thought you was.

You don't put comedy on the spot, you gotta pay me first.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: The speaker's accent in the audio from 64.6 seconds to 70.12 seconds is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Standard American English accent
- B. British English accent
- C. African American English accent
- D. The accent is not obvious and cannot be determined.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: The accent of the speaker in the audio who said “damn, you just as transparent as I thought you was” is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. British English accent
- B. African American English accent
- C. Standard American English accent
- D. Accent not obvious, unable to judge


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, what accent is used by the first speaker to appear in the dialogue?

Choices:
- A. Standard American English accent
- B. British English accent
- C. African American English accent
- D. Accent not obvious, unable to judge.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: The male speaker who said “damn, you just as transparent as I thought you was” from 64.6 to 70.12 seconds has an accent closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. African American English accent
- B. Standard American English Accent
- C. British English accent
- D. The accent is not obvious, and cannot be determined.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: Throughout the entire audio, which speakers use an African American English accent? (Answer in order of speaker appearance) Please select the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. First speaker, second speaker
- B. the third speaker
- C. The first speaker, the third speaker
- D. Accent not obvious, cannot be determined.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, how many speakers are there with an African American English accent? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. 1
- B. 3
- C. 2
- D. Accent is not obvious, unable to determine.


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: Which of the following is closest to the speaker's age group in the solo audio below?

Choices:
- A. Middle-aged people (30-59 years old)
- B. Young adults (18-29 years old)
- C. Adolescent (13-17 years old)
- D. Unable to determine (Insufficient information to determine the age group)

I'm still trying to do that, but I I haven't found the time to do it yet.

So this man want to get it cuz it's a comedy.


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: Which of the following is closest to the age group of the speaker in the audio from 4.28 to 8.12 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Middle-aged people (30-59 years old)
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)
- C. Teenager (13-17 years old)
- D. Young adults (18-29 years old)


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: The age group of the speaker in the audio who said ‘I haven't found the time to do it yet’ is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Young people (18-29 years old)
- B. Middle-aged adults (30-59 years old)
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine the age group)
- D. Adolescent (13-17 years old)


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: In the entire conversation, the age group of the second speaker to appear (spk_2) is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine the age group)
- B. Middle-aged adults (30-59 years old)
- C. Young adults (18-29 years old)
- D. Teenager (13-17 years old)


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: Which of the following is the closest age range for the male speaker who said ‘I'm still trying to do that’ between 4.28 and 8.12 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Young adults (18-29 years old)
- B. Teenager (13-17 years old)
- C. Middle-aged (30-59 years old)
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: Throughout the entire audio, who are the speakers in the young adult (18-29 years old) age group? (Answer in global speaker order) Please select the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Unable to determine (Insufficient information to determine the age group)
- B. spk_1、spk_2
- C. spk_1、spk_2、spk_3
- D. spk_1、spk_4


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, how many speakers are in the Young Adult (18-29 years old) age group? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. 1
- B. 3
- C. 2
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine the age group)


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: In the following single-speaker audio, the speaker's emotion is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Surprised
- B. Sorrow
- C. Happy
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence to determine emotion)

Yeah we laughed. It was a long day. We laughed because we wanted you to feel comfortable with yourself. Go ahead.

What?


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: Which of the following is closest to the emotion of the speaker talking from 48.05 to 53.33 seconds in the audio?

Choices:
- A. Sorrow
- B. Happy
- C. Surprised
- D. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence to determine emotion)

What?


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: Which of the following is closest to the emotion of the speaker who said ‘We laughed because we wanted you to feel comfortable’ in the audio?

Choices:
- A. Cannot determine (Insufficient evidence to determine the emotion)
- B. Surprised
- C. Happy
- D. Sorrow

What?


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: The emotion of the speaker who said ‘We laughed because we wanted you to feel comfortable’ from 48.05s to 53.33s is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Happy
- B. Sorrow
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence to determine the emotion)
- D. Surprise

What?


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, which speakers have expressed the emotion of surprise? (Answer in global speaker order) Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. spk_1、spk_3
- B. spk_1
- C. spk_2
- D. Unable to determine (Insufficient evidence to determine emotion)

What?


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, how many speakers in total expressed the emotion of happiness? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. 3
- B. 2
- C. 0
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient evidence to determine emotion)

What?


说话人识别能力-说话人反向检索任务

Question:
Which of the following statements was said by the first speaker in the conversation? Please select the best option.
Candidate statements:
1) I'm still trying to do that, but I I haven't found the time to do it yet.
2) We gon' give True thirty seconds to give us a comedy bit.
3) Remember I told you I was gonna try to get into comedy?
4) I've been writing some jokes, but I'm not sure if they're ready yet.
5) You don't put comedy on the spot, you gotta pay me first.

Choices:
- A. 1, 2, 3
- B. 1, 3, 5
- C. 1, 4, 5
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine)

Yes, you did say that.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Are the speakers in the two audio clips below the same person?

Choices:
- A. Cannot determine (Insufficient information)
- B. Yes, the same person
- C. No, not the same person
- D. The two speakers' voice qualities are similar in some ways.

Light skin people are just funny looking.

so you gotta be careful, you gotta be really careful with it.

Hey man, Everybody laughed at that shit.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is it the same speaker in the two audio clips below?

Choices:
- A. The two speakers' timbres are similar in some respects.
- B. No, they are not the same person.
- C. Cannot determine (Insufficient information)
- D. Yes, the same person


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker from 60.4s to 61.92s in the audio the same as the speaker from 1.4s to 3.44s?

Choices:
- A. Unable to determine (insufficient information)
- B. No, they are not the same person.
- C. Yes, the same person
- D. The two speakers' timbres have similarities in some respects.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: In the audio, is the speaker from 60.4s to 61.92s the same person as the speaker from 80.53s to 82.77s?

Choices:
- A. No, not the same person
- B. Cannot determine (Insufficient information)
- C. Yes, the same person
- D. The timbres of the two speakers have similarities in some aspects.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker who said ‘Light skin people are just funny looking.’ the same speaker who said ‘Remember I told you I was gonna try to get into comedy?’?

Choices:
- A. No, not the same person
- B. Yes, the same person
- C. The timbres of the two speakers are similar in some aspects.
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: In the audio, is the speaker who said ‘Light skin people are just funny looking.’ the same as the speaker who said ‘so you gotta be careful, you gotta be really careful with it.’?

Choices:
- A. Cannot determine (insufficient information)
- B. The two speakers' timbres have similarities in some aspects.
- C. No, not the same person
- D. Yes, the same person


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker in the audio from 60.4 to 61.92 seconds who said ‘Light skin people are just funny looking.’ the same as the speaker from 1.4 to 3.44 seconds who said ‘Remember I told you I was gonna try to get into comedy?’?

Choices:
- A. The two speakers' timbres are similar in some respects.
- B. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)
- C. Yes, the same person
- D. No, not the same person


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker who said ‘Light skin people are just funny looking.’ from 60.4 to 61.92 seconds in the audio the same as the speaker who said ‘so you gotta be careful, you gotta be really careful with it.’ from 80.53 to 82.77 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Yes, the same person
- B. No, not the same person
- C. Cannot determine (Insufficient information)
- D. The two speakers' timbres have similarities in some aspects.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: In the dialogue, an utterance by the second speaker (<spk_2>) had a strong impact on the first speaker (<spk_1>). Please determine what <spk_2>'s primary emotion was at the time, and what was the specific impact on <spk_1>?

Choices:
- A. The emotion is happiness/excitement, which caused confusion and questioning from the third speaker (<spk_3>).
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine)
- C. The emotion is happiness/excitement, causing the first speaker (<spk_1>) to feel extremely surprised and at a loss.
- D. The emotion is dissatisfaction/provocation, which angered the first speaker (<spk_1>) and made him prepare to retaliate.

The emotion is happy/excited, which makes the first speaker (<spk_1>) feel extremely surprised and at a loss.

We gon' give True thirty seconds to give us a comedy bit.

What?


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: In the audio below, what is the speaker's emotion? How did this emotion affect the other people throughout the conversation?

Choices:
- A. The emotion is dissatisfaction/provocation, which angered the first speaker (<spk_1>) and made him prepare to strike back.
- B. The emotion is happiness/excitement, which makes the first speaker (<spk_1>) feel extremely surprised and at a loss.
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence to uniquely determine)
- D. The emotion is happiness/excitement, which caused confusion and questioning from the third speaker (<spk_3>).

The emotion is happiness/excitement, which makes the first speaker (<spk_1>) feel extremely surprised and at a loss.

What?


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What is the emotion of this speaker (<spk_2>) from 14.11 to 16.99 seconds in the audio? What impact did this emotion have on others in the conversation?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine)
- B. The emotion is dissatisfaction/provocation, which provokes the first speaker (<spk_1>) and makes him prepare to retaliate.
- C. The emotion is happiness/excitement, which caused confusion and questioning from the third speaker (<spk_3>).
- D. The emotion is happy/excited, which makes the first speaker (<spk_1>) feel extremely surprised and at a loss.

The emotion is happiness/excitement, which makes the first speaker (<spk_1>) feel extremely surprised and overwhelmed.

What?


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: In the audio, what emotion is the speaker (<spk_2>) expressing when they say, “We gon' give True thirty seconds to give us a comedy bit.”? What effect did this emotion have on others in the conversation?

Choices:
- A. The emotion is happiness/excitement, which makes the first speaker (<spk_1>) feel extremely surprised and at a loss.
- B. The emotion is dissatisfaction/provocation, which angered the first speaker (<spk_1>) and made him prepare to retaliate.
- C. The emotion is happiness/excitement, which caused confusion and questioning from the third speaker (<spk_3>).
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence to uniquely determine)

The emotion is happy/excited, which makes the first speaker (<spk_1>) feel extremely surprised and at a loss.

What?


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What is the emotion of the speaker (<spk_2>) who says “give True thirty seconds to give us a comedy bit” between 14.11 and 16.99 seconds in the audio? What effect did this emotion have on others?

Choices:
- A. The emotion is dissatisfaction/provocation, which angered the first speaker (<spk_1>) and made him prepare to strike back.
- B. The emotion is happiness/excitement, which caused confusion and questioning from the third speaker (<spk_3>).
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine)
- D. The emotion is happiness/excitement, which makes the first speaker (<spk_1>) feel extremely surprised and overwhelmed.

The emotion is happiness/excitement, which makes the first speaker (<spk_1>) feel extremely surprised and at a loss.

What?


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: In the following single-speaker audio, which of the following is the speaker's profile closest to?

Choices:
- A. Gender: Male; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American English
- B. Cannot determine (Insufficient information)
- C. Gender: Female voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American English
- D. Gender: Female voice; Age: Young adult; Emotion: Positive; Accent: British English

Gender: Female voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American English

um, You know, in my whole career was in like sales and business development, and and somebody was either seeking to solve a problem or to get rid of a pain.

seeking pleasure or going away from pain, essentially is the essence of sales and every ad on TV, you're either It's either you know headache medicine or you're getting a sexy car.


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: Which of the following is closest to the speaker profile of the speaker in the audio from 5.72 seconds to 14.05 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine)
- B. Gender: Female; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Positive; Accent: British English
- C. Gender: Male; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American English
- D. Gender: Female voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American English

Gender: Female voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American English


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: Which of the following is the closest profile for the speaker in the audio who said ‘my whole career was in like sales and business development’?

Choices:
- A. Gender: Female; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American English
- B. Gender: Male; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American English
- C. Unable to judge (insufficient information to determine)
- D. Gender: Female voice; Age: Young adult; Emotion: Positive; Accent: British English

Gender: Female voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American English


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: What is the gender of the 1st speaker in the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Unlabeled
- B. Female voice
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine)
- D. Male voice


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: Which of the following is the closest speaker profile for the speaker who said ‘my whole career was in like sales and business development’ between 5.72 and 14.05 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American English
- B. Gender: Female voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American English
- C. Gender: Female voice; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Positive; Accent: British English
- D. Cannot determine (insufficient information to determine)

Gender: Female voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American English


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: In the entire audio, which speakers have the profile "Gender: Female; Age: Middle-aged; Accent: General American English"? (Answer with spk_index) Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. spk_2
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine)
- C. spk_1
- D. spk_1、spk_3


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: In the entire audio, how many speakers are there with the profile "Gender: Female voice; Age: Middle-aged; Accent: General American English"? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. 2
- B. 1
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine)
- D. 5


说话人识别能力-说话人检索任务

Question: The speaker in the audio from 15.99 seconds to 20.69 seconds, what is their order of appearance in the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. spk_2
- B. spk_6
- C. spk_1
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to identify the speaker)

What I thought I missed on the first scan, so I did a second scan, but that just confirmed what you see.

Like she's supposed to be an X-ray technician.

General American English with African-American Vernacular English (AAVE) features


说话人识别能力-说话人检索任务

Question: The speaker who said ‘What I thought I missed on the first scan, so I did a second scan, but that just confirmed what you see.’ is which speaker by order of appearance in the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. spk_1
- B. spk_2
- C. spk_6
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to identify the speaker)


说话人识别能力-说话人检索任务

Question: What is the order of appearance in the entire conversation of the male speaker who says ‘What I thought I missed on the first scan, so I did a second scan, but that just confirmed what you see.’ in the audio between 15.99 and 20.69 seconds?

Choices:
- A. spk_6
- B. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to identify the speaker)
- C. spk_2
- D. spk_1


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What emotion is the speaker (<spk_1>) expressing when they say "I'm sorry." in the audio? What impact did this emotion have on others in the conversation?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Sadness/Grievance; Impact: This expression successfully soothed <spk_3>, calming their emotions.
- B. Emotion: Indifferent/Distant; Impact: This expression triggered <spk_3>'s anger and questioning.
- C. Emotion: Cold/Distant; Impact: This expression made another commenter <spk_5> dissatisfied.
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence to uniquely determine)

Emotion: Cold/Distant; Impact: This expression triggered <spk_3>'s anger and questioning.

I'm sorry.

You're sorry?

Well, I'm sorry.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What is the emotion of the speaker (<spk_1>) from 106.23 to 106.79 seconds in the audio? What impact did this emotion have on others in the conversation?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Sadness/Grievance; Impact: This expression successfully soothed <spk_3>, calming their emotions.
- B. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence to uniquely determine)
- C. Emotion: Cold/Distant; Impact: This expression made another commentator <spk_5> dissatisfied.
- D. Emotion: Cold/Distant; Impact: This expression triggered <spk_3>'s anger and questioning.

Emotion: Cold/Distant; Impact: This statement provoked <spk_3>'s anger and questioning.

I'm sorry.

You're sorry?

Well, I'm sorry.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What is the emotion of the speaker (<spk_1>) who said “I'm sorry.” from second 106.23 to second 106.79 in the audio? What impact did this emotion have on others?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Cold/Distant; Impact: This expression provoked <spk_3>'s anger and questioning.
- B. Emotion: Cold/Distant; Impact: This expression made another commentator <spk_5> feel dissatisfied.
- C. Emotion: Sadness/Grievance; Impact: This expression successfully comforted <spk_3>, calming them down.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine)

Emotion: Cold/Distant; Impact: This expression triggered <spk_3>'s anger and questioning.

I'm sorry.

You're sorry?

Well, I'm sorry.


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: Based on the entire conversation, what is the relationship between the two speakers in the audio below? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Police—Victim
- B. Doctor—patient
- C. Colleague (podcast host)
- D. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence)

We're looking at the results of a virus you have.

And this. I'm sorry, Georgia, but the virus has caused a very advanced case of Lampington's lesions.

I'm afraid in your condition, you've got about three weeks to live.

What about my case?

Christ.

Oh my God.

You're sorry?


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship in the entire conversation between the speaker from 15.99s to 20.69s and the speaker from 14.5s to 15.46s in the audio? Please choose the one that fits best.

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)
- B. Colleague (podcast host)
- C. Doctor—Patient
- D. Police—Victim

What about my case?

Christ.

Oh my God.

You're sorry?


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship in the entire conversation between the speaker who said ‘I did a second scan’ and the speaker who said ‘What about my case?’? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Doctor—Patient
- B. Police—Victim
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)
- D. Colleague (podcast host)

What about my case?

Christ.

Oh my God.

You're sorry?


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: In the audio, what is the relationship in the entire conversation between the speaker who said ‘I did a second scan’ from 15.99 to 20.69 seconds and the speaker who said ‘What about my case?’ from 14.5 to 15.46 seconds? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Colleague (podcast host)
- B. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence)
- C. Police—Victim
- D. doctor—patient

What about my case?

Christ.

Oh my God.

You're sorry?


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the stances of the two speakers throughout the entire conversation in the audio below? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: believes the crowded seating is caused by the airline's greed and expresses strong dissatisfaction; Speaker B: believes the passenger's dissatisfaction stems from their own cabin choice and proposes a paid upgrade as a solution.
- B. Speaker A: apologizes to the passenger for the airline's seating arrangement issue and promises to report it to a superior; Speaker B: demands a full refund from the airline and threatens to file a complaint.
- C. Speaker A: Believes the passenger's dissatisfaction stems from their own choice of cabin class and proposes the solution of a paid upgrade; Speaker B: Believes the crowded seating is caused by the airline's greed and expresses strong dissatisfaction with it.
- D. Speaker A: Attempts to communicate with the passenger in a friendly manner, but lacks a clear position; Speaker B: Is very emotional, but their core demand is not clear.

Speaker A: Believes the passenger's dissatisfaction stems from their own choice of cabin class and proposes the solution of paying for an upgrade; Speaker B: Believes the crowded seating is caused by the airline's greed and expresses strong dissatisfaction about it.

And you chose to fly first class instead of economy, you would have plenty of room in one of our cocoons.

This greedy airline put all these seats so close together just so they can make more money.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the stance in the entire conversation of the speaker who speaks from 69.611 to 74.251 seconds and the speaker who speaks from 41.861 to 46.621 seconds? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: believes the passenger's dissatisfaction stems from their own choice of cabin class, and proposes the solution of paying for an upgrade; Speaker B: believes the crowded seating is caused by the airline's greed, and expresses strong dissatisfaction with it.
- B. Speaker A: believes the crowded seating is caused by the airline's greed and is strongly dissatisfied; Speaker B: believes the passenger's dissatisfaction is due to their own cabin choice and suggests paying for an upgrade as a solution.
- C. Speaker A: Attempts to have a friendly conversation with the passenger, but has no clear stance; Speaker B: Is very emotional, but their core demand is unclear.
- D. Speaker A: apologizes to the passenger for the airline's seat arrangement issue, and promises to report it to a superior; Speaker B: demands a full refund from the airline, and threatens to file a complaint.

Speaker A: Believes the passenger's dissatisfaction stems from their own choice of cabin class and proposes a paid upgrade as a solution; Speaker B: Believes the crowded seating is caused by the airline's greed and expresses strong dissatisfaction with it.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the stances of the speaker who said ‘you chose to fly first class instead of economy’ and the speaker who said ‘This greedy airline put all these seats so close together’ in the entire conversation? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: believes the crowded seating is a result of the airline's greed and expresses strong dissatisfaction; Speaker B: believes the passenger's dissatisfaction stems from their own choice of cabin class and proposes paying for an upgrade as a solution.
- B. Speaker A: believes the passenger's dissatisfaction stems from their own choice of cabin class and proposes paying for an upgrade as a solution; Speaker B: believes the crowded seating is caused by the airline's greed and expresses strong dissatisfaction with it.
- C. Speaker A: apologizes for the airline's seating arrangement issue and promises to report it to a superior; Speaker B: demands a full refund from the airline and threatens to file a complaint.
- D. Speaker A: Is trying to communicate in a friendly manner with the passenger, but has no clear position; Speaker B: Is very emotional, but their core demand is unclear.

Speaker A: Believes the passenger's dissatisfaction stems from their own choice of cabin class and proposes the solution of paying for an upgrade; Speaker B: Believes the crowded seating is caused by the airline's greed and expresses strong dissatisfaction with it.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the respective stances of the first speaker and the third speaker in the entire conversation? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Attempts to have a friendly conversation, but lacks a clear stance; Speaker B: Is very emotional, but their core demand is unclear.
- B. Speaker A: believes the crowded seating is caused by the airline's greed and expresses strong dissatisfaction; Speaker B: believes the passenger's dissatisfaction stems from their own cabin class choice and proposes paying for an upgrade as a solution.
- C. Speaker A: believes the passenger's dissatisfaction stems from their own cabin class choice and proposes a paid upgrade as a solution; Speaker B: believes the crowded seating is caused by the airline's greed and expresses strong dissatisfaction with it.
- D. Speaker A: apologizes to the passenger for the airline's seat arrangement problem, and promises to report it to a superior; Speaker B: demands a full refund from the airline, and threatens to file a complaint.

Speaker A: Believes the passenger's dissatisfaction stems from their own choice of cabin class and proposes paying for an upgrade as a solution; Speaker B: Believes the crowded seating is caused by the airline's greed and expresses strong dissatisfaction with it.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the stance in the entire conversation of the speaker who said ‘you chose to fly first class’ from 69.611s to 74.251s in the audio and the speaker who said ‘This greedy airline’ from 41.861s to 46.621s? Please choose the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Apologizes to the passenger for the airline's seat arrangement issue and promises to report it to a superior; Speaker B: Demands a full refund from the airline and threatens to file a complaint.
- B. Speaker A: believes the passenger's dissatisfaction stems from their own cabin class choice and proposes a paid upgrade as a solution; Speaker B: believes the crowded seating is caused by the airline's greed and expresses strong dissatisfaction with it.
- C. Speaker A: Attempts to have friendly communication with the passenger, but has no clear stance; Speaker B: Is very agitated, but their core demand is unclear.
- D. Speaker A: believes the crowded seating is caused by the airline's greed and expresses strong dissatisfaction with it; Speaker B: believes the passenger's dissatisfaction stems from their own choice of cabin class and proposes the solution of paying for an upgrade.

Speaker A: Believes the passenger's dissatisfaction stems from their own choice of cabin class and proposes paying for an upgrade as a solution; Speaker B: Believes the crowded seating is caused by the airline's greed and expresses strong dissatisfaction with it.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in the stances of the two speakers in the audio below throughout the entire conversation? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: On how to handle the seating issue: from [attempting to mediate direct conflict between passengers] → [to pointing out the root cause is passengers' individual choices]; Speaker B: On the cause of the crowded seating problem: has consistently believed [it is caused by the airline's greed].
- B. Speaker A: Attitude towards the passenger: From 【Making stern demands】→【Shifting to soothing and apologizing】; Speaker B: Attitude towards the solution: From 【Refusing any communication】→【Shifting to accepting a free upgrade】.
- C. Speaker A: Shows a change in attitude when dealing with the problem, but the specific change is unclear; Speaker B: Complains from beginning to end and shows no change in stance.
- D. Speaker A: Attribution for the crowded seating problem: consistently 【believes it's caused by the airline's greed】; Speaker B: On how to handle the seating issue: from 【attempting to mediate direct conflicts between passengers】→【shifting to point out that the root cause is passengers' individual choices】.

Speaker A: Regarding the approach to the seating issue: from [attempting to mediate direct conflict between passengers] → [shifting to pointing out that the root cause is the passengers' personal choices]; Speaker B: Regarding the attribution for the crowded seating issue: the stance has always been [that it is caused by the airline's greed].


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in stance throughout the entire conversation of the speaker who speaks from 69.611s to 74.251s and the speaker who speaks from 41.861s to 46.621s in the audio? Please select the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Shows a change in attitude when handling the issue, but the specific change is unclear; Speaker B: Complains from beginning to end and shows no change in stance.
- B. Speaker A: On how to handle the seat issue: shifts from [trying to mediate the direct conflict between passengers] → to [pointing out the root cause is the passengers' personal choices]; Speaker B: On the cause of crowded seats: consistently believes [it is caused by the airline's greed].
- C. Speaker A: Attribution for the crowded seating problem: attitude has consistently been 【that it is caused by the airline's greed】; Speaker B: On how to handle the seating problem: from 【trying to mediate the direct conflict between passengers】→【shifts to pointing out that the root of the problem is the passengers' personal choices】.
- D. Speaker A: Attitude towards the passenger: from 【harsh demands】→【appeasement and apology】; Speaker B: Attitude towards the solution: from 【refusing any communication】→【accepting a free upgrade】.

Speaker A: Regarding how to handle the seat issue: From [trying to mediate the direct conflict between passengers] → [to pointing out that the root cause is the passengers' personal choices]; Speaker B: Regarding the attribution for the crowded seating issue: The attitude has always been [that it is caused by the airline's greed].


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in stance of the speaker who said ‘you chose to fly first class instead of economy’ and the speaker who said ‘This greedy airline put all these seats so close together’ throughout the entire conversation? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Attribution for the crowded seating issue: attitude has consistently been [that it is caused by the airline's greed]; Speaker B: On how to handle the seating issue: from [trying to mediate the direct conflict between passengers] → [shifts to pointing out the root of the problem is the passengers' individual choices].
- B. Speaker A: Shows a change in attitude when dealing with the problem, but the specific change is unclear; Speaker B: Complains from beginning to end, showing no change in stance.
- C. Speaker A: Attitude towards the passenger: From 【Forceful demands】→【Appeasement and apology】; Speaker B: Attitude towards the solution: From 【Refusal of any communication】→【Acceptance of a free upgrade】.
- D. Speaker A: On how to handle the seating issue: from [attempting to mediate the direct conflict between passengers] → [to pointing out that the root cause is passengers' personal choices]; Speaker B: On the cause of the crowded seating problem: has always maintained the attitude [that it is caused by the airline's greed].

Speaker A: Regarding how to handle the seating issue: From 【attempting to mediate the direct conflict between passengers】→【to pointing out that the root of the problem is the passengers' personal choices】; Speaker B: Regarding the attribution for the crowded seating problem: attitude has always been 【that it is caused by the airline's greed】.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the respective changes in stance of the 1st speaker and the 3rd speaker during the conversation? Please select the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Has had a change in attitude about handling the problem, but the specific change is unclear; Speaker B: Has been complaining throughout and has shown no change in stance.
- B. Speaker A: Attitude towards the passenger: from 【making firm demands】→【shifting to soothing and apologizing】; Speaker B: Attitude towards the solution: from 【refusing any communication】→【shifting to accepting a free upgrade】.
- C. Speaker A: Attribution for the crowded seating problem: attitude has consistently been 【that it is caused by the airline's greed】; Speaker B: On how to handle the seating problem: from 【attempting to mediate the direct conflict between passengers】→【shifts to pointing out the root of the problem is the passengers' personal choices】.
- D. Speaker A: Regarding how to handle the seating issue: from [attempting to mediate the direct conflict between passengers] → to [pointing out that the root of the problem is the passengers' personal choices]; Speaker B: Regarding the attribution for the crowded seating issue: the attitude has consistently been [that it is caused by the airline's greed].

Speaker A: On how to handle the seat issue: from [trying to mediate the direct conflict between passengers] → [to pointing out that the root of the problem is the passengers' personal choices]; Speaker B: Regarding the cause of the crowded seat problem: their attitude has always been [that it is caused by the airline's greed].


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in stance throughout the entire conversation for the speaker in the audio who said ‘you chose to fly first class’ from 69.611 seconds to 74.251 seconds and ‘This greedy airline’ from 41.861 seconds to 46.621 seconds? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: On handling the seat issue: shifts from [trying to mediate the direct conflict between passengers] → to [pointing out the root cause is passengers' personal choices]; Speaker B: On the cause of crowded seats: has always believed [it's caused by the airline's greed].
- B. Speaker A: Attribution for the crowded seating issue: consistently 【believes it is caused by the airline's greed】; Speaker B: On how to handle the seating issue: from 【trying to mediate the direct conflict between passengers】 → 【shifts to pointing out that the root cause is passengers' personal choices】.
- C. Speaker A: Shows a change in attitude when handling the problem, but the specific change is unclear; Speaker B: Complains from beginning to end and shows no change in stance.
- D. Speaker A: Attitude towards the passenger: from 【a firm stance】→【to appeasement and apology】; Speaker B: Attitude towards the solution: from 【refusing to communicate】→【to accepting a free upgrade】.

Speaker A: Regarding how to handle the seating issue: from [attempting to mediate the direct conflict between passengers] → to [shifting to point out that the root of the problem is the passengers' personal choices]; Speaker B: Regarding the attribution for the crowded seating problem: their attitude has consistently been [believing it's caused by the airline's greed].


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: Based on the entire conversation in the following audio, what is the relationship between the two speakers? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Police—The public
- B. Podcast co-host
- C. Flight attendant—Passenger
- D. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence)

Is there a problem here?

uh, Ma'am, would you mind lowering your knees so the gentleman in front of you can put the seat back down?

Thank you, ma'am.

Am I going to have to call the air marshal down?

People been calling me ma'am a lot lately, and I, you know, I'm hardly old enough to be new. Do people call you ma'am? And no, ma'am. No, they don't.

Yes.

Yes, yes there is.

I'm gonna tell you what the problem is.

All right, now I'm not flying all the way to Prague with some stranger on my lap.

How much is it?


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship in the entire conversation between the speaker who speaks from 24.031 seconds to 24.911 seconds and the speaker who speaks from 41.861 seconds to 46.621 seconds in the audio? Please select the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Flight attendant—Passenger
- B. Police—Public
- C. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence)
- D. Podcast co-host

Is there a problem here?

Thank you, ma'am.

Yes.

Yes, yes there is.

I'm gonna tell you what the problem is.

How much is it?


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship in the entire conversation between the speaker who said ‘Is there a problem here?’ and the speaker who said ‘This greedy airline put all these seats so close together just so they can make more money.’? Please select the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Podcast partner
- B. Flight attendant—Passenger
- C. Police—Public
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)

Is there a problem here?

Thank you, ma'am.

Yes.

Yes, yes there is.

I'm gonna tell you what the problem is.

How much is it?


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship in the entire conversation between the speaker who said ‘Is there a problem here?’ from 24.031 to 24.911 seconds and the speaker who said ‘This greedy airline put all these seats so close together just so they can make more money.’ from 41.861 to 46.621 seconds? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence)
- B. Police—The public
- C. Podcast co-host
- D. Flight attendant—Passenger

Is there a problem here?

Thank you, ma'am.

Yes.

Yes, yes there is.

I'm gonna tell you what the problem is.

How much is it?


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interaction between the two speakers in the corresponding segment of the following audio? Please choose the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A raises a problem, and Speaker B actively offers an upgrade solution to try to resolve the conflict.
- B. Speaker A complains angrily, while Speaker B counters with a calm suggestion.
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)
- D. Speaker A and Speaker B are role-playing together to make fun of the person in the video.

Speaker A complains angrily, while Speaker B responds with a calm and countering suggestion.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior exhibited by the speaker from 41.861 to 46.621 seconds and the speaker from 69.611 to 74.251 seconds in the audio within their corresponding segments? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)
- B. Speaker A raises a problem, and Speaker B actively offers an upgrade solution to try to resolve the conflict.
- C. Speaker A and Speaker B are role-playing together to make fun of the person in the video.
- D. Speaker A complains angrily, while Speaker B responds with a calm suggestion that serves as a rebuttal.

Speaker A complains angrily, while Speaker B responds with a calm and rebutting suggestion.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: In the audio, what is the interaction shown in the corresponding segment between the speaker who said ‘This greedy airline put all these seats so close together’ and the speaker who said ‘you would have plenty of room in one of our cocoons’? Please select the one that fits best.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A and Speaker B cooperate to role-play, jointly teasing the character in the video
- B. Speaker A complains angrily, while Speaker B responds with a calm and countering suggestion.
- C. Speaker A raises a problem, and Speaker B actively offers an upgrade solution, attempting to resolve the conflict.
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)

Speaker A complains angrily, and Speaker B responds with a calm, somewhat refuting suggestion.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior demonstrated in the corresponding segments between the speaker in the audio who said ‘This greedy airline put all these seats so close together’ from second 41.861 to second 46.621, and the speaker who said ‘you would have plenty of room in one of our cocoons’ from second 69.611 to second 74.251? Please choose the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A and Speaker B collaborate on a role-play to jointly make fun of the person in the video.
- B. Unable to determine (insufficient evidence)
- C. Speaker A complains angrily, and Speaker B responds with a calm suggestion that is also a rebuttal.
- D. Speaker A raises a problem, and Speaker B actively provides an upgrade solution, attempting to resolve the conflict.

Speaker A complains angrily, while Speaker B responds with a suggestion that is calm and has a tone of rebuttal.


说话人识别能力-说话人计数任务

Question: How many different speakers are there in this audio?

Choices:
- A. 3 digits
- B. 5 digits
- C. 2 bits
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient information)

She still got that goddamn scar on her head.

American English with features of African American English (AAVE)

Well, I mean, I think that's like her actual, uh huh, actual scar.


说话人识别能力-说话人计数任务

Question: How many different speakers appeared in the audio from the 21st to the 25th second?

Choices:
- A. 4-digit
- B. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)
- C. 2 digits
- D. 1 digit


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: In the solo audio below, what accent is the speaker using?

Choices:
- A. British English accent
- B. African American English accent
- C. Indian English accent
- D. The accent is not obvious, unable to judge

Now you feel like you feel like a piece of shit.

Ain't nothing like learning a bit of circumstance to make you feel like shit.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: The speaker's accent in the audio from 14.97 to 17.33 seconds is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Standard American English accent
- B. African American English accent
- C. Australian English accent
- D. Accent not obvious, unable to judge.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: The accent of the speaker in the audio who said ‘you feel like a piece of shit’ is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. British English accent
- B. The accent is not distinct, unable to determine.
- C. African American English accent
- D. Indian English accent


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, what accent does the second speaker in the conversation use?

Choices:
- A. African-American English accent
- B. Standard American English accent
- C. Accent not distinct, impossible to tell.
- D. Australian accent


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: The accent of the male speaker who said ‘Now you feel like you feel like a piece of shit’ between 14.97s and 17.33s is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. British English accent
- B. The accent is not obvious, unable to judge.
- C. Indian English accent
- D. African-American English accent


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, which speakers use an African American English accent? (Answer in order of appearance) Please choose the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Only the first speaker
- B. The first speaker, the second speaker
- C. The accent is not obvious and cannot be determined.
- D. The first speaker, the third speaker


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: How many speakers are using an African American English accent in the entire audio? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. 1
- B. 3
- C. 2
- D. The accent is not obvious, unable to determine.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the speaker in the following single-speaker audio throughout the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. Believes the male character in the movie was blinded by love.
- B. Believes that the experience of studying under pressure, although painful, is ultimately beneficial for personal growth.
- C. Believes the male characters in the movie sold themselves out to cater to others.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine the viewpoint/change)

Thinks that the male character in the movie sold himself out to cater to others.

I just don't like Oh, she right.

He's selling himself out.

My nigga is smitten.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the speaker from 65.88s to 70.76s in the audio, throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Believes the male character in the movie sold himself out to cater to others.
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely support the viewpoint/change)
- C. Believes that the experience of studying under pressure, although painful, is ultimately beneficial for personal growth.
- D. Thinks that the male character in the movie was blinded by love.

Thinks that the male character in the movie sold himself out to cater to others.

I just don't like Oh, she right.

He's selling himself out.

My nigga is smitten.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the speaker who said "I just don't like Oh, she right" throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Believes that the experience of studying under pressure, while painful, is ultimately beneficial for personal growth.
- B. Believes that the male character in the movie sold himself out to please others.
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely deduce the viewpoint/change)
- D. Thinks that the male character in the movie lost his head over love.

Believes that the male character in the movie sold himself out in order to cater to others.

I just don't like Oh, she right.

He's selling himself out.

My nigga is smitten.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance in the entire conversation of the speaker who said “I just don't like Oh, she right” from 65.88s to 70.76s in the audio?

Choices:
- A. Believes that the male character in the movie was blinded by love.
- B. Believes the male character in the movie sold himself out to please others.
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely deduce the conclusion/change)
- D. Believes that the experience of learning under pressure, while painful, is ultimately beneficial for personal growth.

Believes that the male character in the movie sold himself out to cater to others.

I just don't like Oh, she right.

He's selling himself out.

My nigga is smitten.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the second speaker (spk_2) in the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. Thinks that the male characters in the movie lost their heads over love.
- B. Believes the male characters in the movie sold themselves out to cater to others.
- C. Cannot determine (Insufficient evidence to draw a single conclusion/change)
- D. Believes that the experience of studying under pressure, although painful, is ultimately beneficial for personal growth.

Thinks that the male character in the movie sold himself out to cater to others.

I just don't like Oh, she right.

He's selling himself out.

My nigga is smitten.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker in the following monologue change throughout the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. From initial doubt to acceptance after a sudden realization.
- B. From supporting a character in the movie to severely criticizing that character.
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely derive the conclusion/change)
- D. From neutral commentary to mockery of the unprepared.

From initial doubt to acceptance after a sudden realization.

I just don't like Oh, she right.

He's selling himself out.

My nigga is smitten.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker from 65.88s to 70.76s in the audio change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. From neutral commentary to mockery of the underprepared.
- B. From initial doubt to acceptance after a sudden realization.
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely deduce the conclusion/change)
- D. From supporting a character in the movie to severely criticizing the character.

From initial doubt to acceptance after a sudden realization.

I just don't like Oh, she right.

He's selling himself out.

My nigga is smitten.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker in the audio who said "I just don't like Oh, she right" change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. From supporting a character in the movie to severely criticizing them.
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely deduce the conclusion/change)
- C. From neutral commentary to mockery of the unprepared.
- D. From initial doubt to acceptance after a sudden realization.

From initial doubt to acceptance after a sudden realization.

I just don't like Oh, she right.

He's selling himself out.

My nigga is smitten.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker who said “I just don't like Oh, she right” from 65.88 to 70.76 seconds in the audio change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. A shift from initial doubt to acceptance after a sudden realization.
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely derive the conclusion/change)
- C. From supporting a character in the movie to severely criticizing the character.
- D. From neutral commentary to mockery of the unprepared.

From initial doubt to acceptance after a sudden realization.

I just don't like Oh, she right.

He's selling himself out.

My nigga is smitten.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the second speaker (spk_2) change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (The evidence is insufficient to uniquely derive the viewpoint/change)
- B. Changing from supporting a character in the movie to severely criticizing that character.
- C. Changing from initial doubt to acceptance after a sudden realization.
- D. From neutral commentary to mockery of the unprepared.

From initial doubt to acceptance after a sudden realization.

I just don't like Oh, she right.

He's selling himself out.

My nigga is smitten.


说话人识别能力-说话人反向检索任务

Question:
In the following statements, which were spoken by the first speaker in the dialogue? Please select the best option.
Candidate statements:
1) That ain't, that's some sensible.
2) That's followed up by a proposal.
3) That was a cold, that was some cold shit right there, boy.
4) He should just tell her how he feels right now.
5) Right, I'm trying to save this man's life.
6) Look, people don't be waiting to tell, tell people when you like 'em.

Choices:
- A. 1, 2, 4, 5
- B. 1, 3, 5, 6
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine)
- D. 1, 2, 5, 6

That's followed up by a proposal.


说话人识别能力-说话人计数任务

Question: How many different speakers are there in this audio?

Choices:
- A. 3 digits
- B. 1 bit
- C. 4 bits
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information)

I know everybody looking at her like she's psycho. They never seen that bitch smile like that.

Ever. That bitch been working there thirty years. I never heard her laugh, a chuckle, ha ha ha, no more than a snicker.


说话人识别能力-说话人计数任务

Question: How many different speakers are there in total in the audio from the 10th second to the 22nd second?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information)
- B. 3 digits
- C. 1 bit
- D. 5 digits


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interaction between the two speakers in the corresponding audio segment? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A presses Speaker B for the reason for their resignation, expressing confusion.
- B. Speaker A makes a prediction, and Speaker B agrees and confirms.
- C. Speaker A proposes a hypothesis, and Speaker B expresses doubt and uncertainty about it.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence)

Speaker A makes a prediction, and Speaker B agrees and confirms.

That's followed up by a proposal.

hmm, Facts.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior shown in the respective audio segments by the speaker from 40.71s to 42.35s and the speaker from 43.51s to 44.07s? Please select the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Cannot determine (Insufficient evidence)
- B. Speaker A proposes a hypothesis, and Speaker B expresses doubt and uncertainty.
- C. Speaker A presses Speaker B for the reason for resigning, expressing confusion.
- D. Speaker A makes a prediction, and Speaker B agrees and confirms it.

Speaker A makes a prediction, and Speaker B agrees and confirms.

That's followed up by a proposal.

hmm, Facts.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interaction between the speaker who said “That's followed up by a proposal.” and the speaker who said “Facts.” in the corresponding audio segment? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A makes a prediction, and Speaker B agrees and confirms.
- B. Speaker A proposes a hypothesis, and Speaker B expresses doubt and uncertainty.
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)
- D. Speaker A presses Speaker B on why they resigned, expressing confusion.

Speaker A makes a prediction, and Speaker B agrees and confirms.

That's followed up by a proposal.

hmm, Facts.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interaction between the first speaker and the second speaker in the entire dialogue? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A questions Speaker B about the reason for their resignation, expressing a lack of understanding.
- B. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)
- C. Speaker A proposes a hypothesis, and Speaker B expresses doubt and uncertainty about it.
- D. Speaker A makes a prediction, and Speaker B agrees and confirms.

Speaker A makes a prediction, and Speaker B agrees and confirms it.

That's followed up by a proposal.

hmm, Facts.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior demonstrated in the corresponding segments between the speaker who said “That's followed up by a proposal.” in the audio from 40.71 to 42.35 seconds, and the speaker who said “Facts.” from 43.51 to 44.07 seconds? Please select the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A proposes a hypothesis, and Speaker B expresses doubt and uncertainty about it.
- B. Speaker A presses Speaker B about why they resigned, showing confusion.
- C. Speaker A makes a prediction, and Speaker B agrees and confirms.
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)

Speaker A makes a prediction, and Speaker B agrees and confirms.

That's followed up by a proposal.

hmm, Facts.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: In the following audio of a single speaker, what is the speaker's gender?

Choices:
- A. Female
- B. Male
- C. Undetermined gender
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine gender)

She could be a hero.

That's the question, I'm I mean, it's so funny, cause she's e- e- Arizona has this like weird obsession with like John McCainism and being a maverick.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the speaker in the audio from 0.36 seconds to 1.24 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Male
- B. Female
- C. Unspecified gender
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine gender)

She could be a hero.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the speaker who said “She could be a hero” in the audio?

Choices:
- A. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine gender)
- B. Female
- C. Uncertain gender
- D. Male

She could be a hero.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: In the entire dialogue, what is the gender of the second speaker to appear (spk_2)?

Choices:
- A. Undetermined gender
- B. Male
- C. Female
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine gender)

She could be a hero.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the speaker who said “She could be a hero” between 0.36 and 1.24 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Male
- B. Uncertain gender
- C. Female
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine gender)

She could be a hero.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: Who are the female speakers in the entire audio? (Answer with spk_index) Please select the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. spk_1, spk_3
- B. spk_2
- C. spk_1
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine gender)

She could be a hero.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: How many female speakers are there in the entire audio? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. 1
- B. 4
- C. 2
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine gender)

She could be a hero.


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话背景推理

Question: In which of the following scenarios does this conversation most likely take place?

Choices:
- A. A few friends have an informal chat about political topics in someone's living room or a cafe.
- B. A political science professor engages in a class discussion with students about current political affairs in a university classroom.
- C. The host and guests are recording a political commentary podcast or talk show in a recording studio/broadcast studio.
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)

The host and guests are recording a political commentary podcast or talk show in a recording/broadcasting studio.


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: In the single-speaker audio below, the speaker's age range is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Middle-aged people (30-59 years old)
- B. Young people (18-29 years old)
- C. Teenager (13-17 years old)
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine the age group)

I'm gonna go with tails, but I feel like it's gonna be heads, so tails.

All right, tails never fails.


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: The age group of the speaker in the audio from 20.12 to 23.28 seconds is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Middle-aged people (30-59 years old)
- B. Teenager (13-17 years old)
- C. Young people (18-29 years old)
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)

All right, tails never fails.


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: Which of the following is the closest age range for the speaker who said ‘I feel like it's gonna be heads’ in the audio?

Choices:
- A. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine the age group)
- B. Middle-aged people (30-59 years old)
- C. Teenager (13-17 years old)
- D. Young people (18-29 years old)

All right, tails never fails.


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: In the entire conversation, which of the following is closest to the age range of the third speaker to appear (spk_3)?

Choices:
- A. Middle-aged people (30-59 years old)
- B. Youth (18-29 years old)
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine the age group)
- D. Seniors (60 years and over)

All right, tails never fails.


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: Which of the following is the closest age group for the female speaker who said ‘I'm gonna go with tails’ between 20.12 and 23.28 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine the age group)
- B. Youth (18-29 years old)
- C. Middle-aged adults (30-59 years old)
- D. Adolescent (13-17 years old)

All right, tails never fails.


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, which speakers are middle-aged (30-59 years old)? (Answer using the global speaker order) Please choose the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. spk_1、spk_2
- B. spk_2
- C. spk_3
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)

All right, tails never fails.


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, how many speakers are in the Middle-aged (30-59 years old) age group? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. 1
- B. 3
- C. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine the age group)
- D. 2

All right, tails never fails.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: In the following single-speaker audio, what is the speaker's gender?

Choices:
- A. Female
- B. Undetermined Gender
- C. Male
- D. Cannot determine (insufficient information to determine gender)

So, Zepplers are a whole 'nother thing.

Oh, I'm gonna be disappointed.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the speaker in the audio from 1.64 seconds to 3.36 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Uncertain gender
- B. Male
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine gender)
- D. Female

So, Zepplers are a whole 'nother thing.

Oh, I'm gonna be disappointed.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the speaker who said ‘So, Zepplers are a whole 'nother thing’ in the audio?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine gender)
- B. Female
- C. Male
- D. Undetermined gender

So, Zepplers are a whole 'nother thing.

Oh, I'm gonna be disappointed.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: In the entire dialogue, what is the gender of the 2nd speaker to appear (spk_2)?

Choices:
- A. Male
- B. Female
- C. Unspecified gender
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine gender)

So, Zepplers are a whole 'nother thing.

Oh, I'm gonna be disappointed.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the speaker who said ‘So, Zepplers are a whole 'nother thing’ from 1.64 to 3.36 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Uncertain gender
- B. Unable to determine (Insufficient information to determine gender)
- C. Female
- D. Male

So, Zepplers are a whole 'nother thing.

Oh, I'm gonna be disappointed.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, who are the female speakers? (Answer with spk_index) Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. spk_2
- B. Unable to determine (insufficient information to determine gender)
- C. spk_3
- D. spk_2、spk_3

So, Zepplers are a whole 'nother thing.

Oh, I'm gonna be disappointed.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: How many male speakers are there in the entire audio? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. 1
- B. 2
- C. 4
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine gender)

So, Zepplers are a whole 'nother thing.

Oh, I'm gonna be disappointed.


说话人识别能力-说话人检索任务

Question: The speaker in the audio from 3.72 to 5.16 seconds, is which speaker in order of appearance in the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. spk_3
- B. spk_2
- C. spk_4
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the speaker)

This could knock you out


说话人识别能力-说话人检索任务

Question: In the audio, the speaker who said ‘This could knock you out’ is which speaker in order of appearance in the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. spk_4
- B. spk_1
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine the speaker)
- D. spk_2

This could knock you out


说话人识别能力-说话人检索任务

Question: The male speaker in the audio who said ‘This could knock you out’ between 3.72 and 5.16 seconds, what is his order of appearance in the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. spk_2
- B. spk_3
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to identify the speaker)
- D. spk_5

This could knock you out


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the speaker in the following single-person audio, throughout the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. Believes all Tony Hawk series games are superior to the Skate series
- B. Has strong and specific personal preferences for different games, and can simultaneously like and criticize different titles within the same game series.
- C. Always disliked the Skate series, because I cannot accept its game mechanics
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely deduce the conclusion/change)

Has strong and specific personal likes and dislikes for different games, and will simultaneously like and criticize different works in the same game series.

I like the the first one, never played the second one, then I tried the third, and I was like, ugh.

Oh, THUG 2 was ass, when they had like every secret character ever.

The first THUG was way better.

I don't like Skate.

I don't like the mechanics of it.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance in the entire conversation of the speaker from 61.65s to 66.01s in the audio?

Choices:
- A. Has strong and specific personal likes and dislikes for different games, and will simultaneously like and criticize different titles in the same game series.
- B. Always disliked the Skate series, being unable to accept its game mechanics
- C. Thinks all games in the *Tony Hawk* series are better than the *Skate* series
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely derive the viewpoint/change)

Has strong and specific personal likes and dislikes for different games, and will simultaneously like and criticize different titles within the same game series.

The first THUG was way better.

I don't like Skate.

I don't like the mechanics of it.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance, throughout the entire conversation, of the speaker in the audio who said ‘I like the the first one, never played the second one’?

Choices:
- A. Always disliked the 《Skate》 series because I couldn't accept its game mechanics.
- B. Cannot be determined (Evidence is insufficient to uniquely determine the conclusion/change)
- C. Believes all games in the Tony Hawk series are better than the Skate series
- D. Has strong and specific personal likes and dislikes for different games, and will both like and criticize different works within the same game series.

Has strong and specific personal likes and dislikes for different games, and will simultaneously like and criticize different works in the same game series.

The first THUG was way better.

I don't like Skate.

I don't like the mechanics of it.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: Throughout the entire conversation, what is the overall stance of the first speaker (spk_1)?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely lead to the conclusion/change)
- B. Has strong and specific personal likes and dislikes for different games, and will simultaneously like and criticize different titles in the same game series.
- C. Always disliked the Skate series, because I cannot accept its game mechanics
- D. Believes all games in the Tony Hawk series are better than the Skate series

Has strong and specific personal likes and dislikes for different games, and will simultaneously like and criticize different works within the same game series.

The first THUG was way better.

I don't like Skate.

I don't like the mechanics of it.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the speaker in the following monologue change their stance throughout the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. Going from initially disliking the “Tony Hawk” series to finally approving of one of its works.
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine the conclusion/change)
- C. Opinion on the 《Skate》 series changed from liking the first to hating the third.
- D. Always had a negative opinion of the Skate series.

My opinion of the Skate series went from loving the first one to hating the third.

The first THUG was way better.

I don't like Skate.

I don't like the mechanics of it.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker from 61.65s to 66.01s in the audio change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Has always held a negative view of the "Skate" series.
- B. From initially disliking the “Tony Hawk” series to eventually appreciating one of the games.
- C. Cannot determine (Insufficient evidence to uniquely deduce the viewpoint/change)
- D. View on the *Skate* series changed from liking the first one to hating the third one

My opinion on the 《Skate》 series changed from liking the first installment to hating the third.

The first THUG was way better.

I don't like Skate.

I don't like the mechanics of it.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker who said ‘then I tried the third, and I was like, ugh’ in the audio change throughout the conversation?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (The evidence is insufficient to uniquely infer the conclusion/change)
- B. My view of the Skate series changed from liking the first one to hating the third.
- C. Has always had a negative opinion of the Skate series.
- D. From initially disliking the “Tony Hawk” series to eventually approving of one of its installments.

My opinion of the 《Skate》 series went from loving the first one to hating the third one.

The first THUG was way better.

I don't like Skate.

I don't like the mechanics of it.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the first speaker's (spk_1) stance change throughout the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. Opinion on the 《Skate》 series changed from liking the first to hating the third.
- B. From initially disliking the “Tony Hawk” series to eventually approving of one of its works.
- C. Held a negative view of the 《Skate》 series from beginning to end
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine the conclusion/change)

My opinion of the *Skate* series went from loving the first one to hating the third.

The first THUG was way better.

I don't like Skate.

I don't like the mechanics of it.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: The following is a monologue segment from a speaker. In a complete dialogue, the most likely response to this utterance is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B: Yeah, it's one of my all-time favorites.
- B. Speaker B: I don't like Skate.
- C. Speaker B: I like the the first one, never played the second one, then I tried the third, and I was like, ugh.
- D. Speaker B: Cannot determine (Insufficient information to locate the response)

You ever play Skate, Gilbert?

I don't like Skate.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: According to the dialogue, the reply from others to the speaker's statement between 56.61 and 57.61 seconds is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B: I like the the first one, never played the second one, then I tried the third, and I was like, ugh.
- B. Speaker B: Yeah, it's one of my all-time favorites.
- C. Speaker B: Cannot determine (Insufficient information to pinpoint the response)
- D. Speaker B: I don't like Skate.

You ever play Skate, Gilbert?

I don't like Skate.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: According to the conversation, the response from others to a speaker's statement 'You ever play Skate, Gilbert?' is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B: Yeah, it's one of my all-time favorites.
- B. Speaker B: I like the the first one, never played the second one, then I tried the third, and I was like, ugh.
- C. Speaker B: I don't like Skate.
- D. Speaker B: Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the response)

You ever play Skate, Gilbert?

I don't like Skate.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: Based on the content of the dialogue, the response from other people to the statement ‘You ever play Skate’ made by a speaker between 56.61 and 57.61 seconds is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B: I don't like Skate.
- B. Speaker B: Cannot be determined (insufficient information to locate the response)
- C. Speaker B: Yeah, it's one of my all-time favorites.
- D. Speaker B: I like the the first one, never played the second one, then I tried the third, and I was like, ugh.

You ever play Skate, Gilbert?

I don't like Skate.