说话人识别能力-说话人反向检索任务

Question:
In the following statements, what did the first speaker (spk_1) in the conversation say? Please select the best-fitting option.
Candidate statements:
1) the bottom one always stays still
2) and the top one is where your pressure comes in.
3) You have to use your thumb to stabilize the top stick.
4) Yeah, but thats how it, it kinda works in a relationship.
5) You remember when we had the dinner party with John and his girlfriend?
6) So if you actually hold it higher up, you actually get more control.

Choices:
- A. 1, 2, 3, 5
- B. 1, 4, 5, 6
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine)
- D. 1, 2, 5, 6


说话人识别能力-说话人检索任务

Question: The speaker in the audio from 20.92 seconds to 24.5 seconds, what is their order of appearance in the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. spk_3
- B. spk_1
- C. spk_5
- D. Unable to determine (Insufficient information to identify the speaker)

You remember when we had the dinner party with John and his girlfriend?

It doesnt matter how, what you explain to me; I dont, I dont get it. I dont get it. I dont get it.


说话人识别能力-说话人检索任务

Question: The speaker who said ‘You remember when we had the dinner party with John and his girlfriend?’ is which speaker to appear in the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. spk_3
- B. spk_5
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the speaker)
- D. spk_1


说话人识别能力-说话人检索任务

Question: In the audio, the male speaker who said ‘You remember when we had the dinner party with John and his girlfriend?’ between 20.92 and 24.5 seconds, which speaker is he in order of appearance in the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to identify the speaker)
- B. spk_3
- C. spk_1
- D. spk_5


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the speaker in the following single-person audio throughout the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. Believes that with enough practice, any way of holding chopsticks is fine.
- B. Believes that holding chopsticks higher up allows for better control
- C. Cannot determine (The evidence is insufficient to lead to a single conclusion/change)
- D. Thinks that holding chopsticks closer to the middle is easier.

Believe that holding chopsticks higher up allows for better control.

I grate it.

I, so I use to fine chop it until we went

Se- I have more control when Im closer to it though.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the speaker from 0.0s to 2.35s in the audio, throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Thinks that holding chopsticks closer to the middle is easier
- B. Believes that with enough practice, any way of holding chopsticks is acceptable
- C. Believes that holding chopsticks higher up allows for better control
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely conclude the viewpoint/change)

Believes that a higher grip on chopsticks allows for better control.

I grate it.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance in the entire conversation of the speaker in the audio who said, ‘hold it higher up, you actually get more control’?

Choices:
- A. Believes that holding chopsticks higher up allows for better control.
- B. Believes that holding chopsticks closer to the middle is easier
- C. Thinking that with enough practice, any way of holding chopsticks is acceptable
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine the viewpoint/change)

Believes that holding chopsticks higher up provides better control.

I grate it.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the first speaker to appear (spk_1) in the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. With enough practice, any way of holding chopsticks is acceptable.
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely draw the conclusion/change)
- C. Thinks that holding chopsticks closer to the middle is easier
- D. Believes that holding chopsticks higher up allows for better control

Believes that holding the chopsticks higher up provides better control.

I grate it.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker in the following single-person audio change throughout the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (The evidence is insufficient to uniquely support the conclusion/change).
- B. The view on holding chopsticks changed from thinking a higher grip is better to thinking a grip closer to the middle is better.
- C. The method of preparing ginger changed from the customary chopping to grating, inspired by a restaurant.
- D. The attitude towards sharing food, from initially being unwilling to share recipes to later being happy to invite friends to the restaurant

The method for preparing ginger changed from the usual chopping to grating, inspired by a restaurant.

I grate it.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker from 0.0s to 2.35s in the audio change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. The attitude towards sharing food, from initially being unwilling to share recipes to later happily inviting friends to the restaurant.
- B. The view on holding chopsticks changed from thinking a higher position is better to thinking a position closer to the middle is better.
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine the conclusion/change)
- D. The method for preparing ginger, changing from the habit of chopping it to grating it after being inspired by a restaurant.

The way of preparing ginger has changed from the usual chopping to grating, after being inspired by a restaurant.

I grate it.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker who said ‘hold it higher up, you actually get more control’ in the audio change throughout the conversation?

Choices:
- A. The method of preparing ginger changed from the customary chopping to grating, after being inspired by a restaurant.
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine the conclusion/change)
- C. The attitude towards sharing food, from initially being unwilling to share recipes to later being happy to invite friends to the restaurant
- D. The view on holding chopsticks changed from thinking a higher position is better to thinking a position closer to the middle is better.

The way of handling ginger changed from the habitual chopping to grating, inspired by a restaurant.

I grate it.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: Throughout the entire conversation, how does the stance of the first speaker to appear (spk_1) change?

Choices:
- A. The view on holding chopsticks has shifted from a higher position being better to a position closer to the middle being better.
- B. The attitude towards sharing food, from being unwilling to share recipes at first to later enjoying inviting friends to the restaurant
- C. The method of preparing ginger changed from a habit of chopping to grating after being inspired by a restaurant.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine the conclusion/change)

The way ginger is prepared has changed from the customary chopping to grating, after being inspired by a restaurant.

I grate it.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Are the speakers in the two audio clips below the same person?

Choices:
- A. Yes, it is the same person.
- B. No, not the same person.
- C. The two speakers' voices are similar in some aspects, but not completely identical.
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)

tackle the one thing thats in front of you that will have the most impact, right? I think thats

I appreciated it, like, I think this is a coo- I, I could see myself wanting to live in a place like this.

I felt so uncomfortable there. Like, Im not gonna lie, I felt so uncomfortable.

Gross and sweaty, and, like, I just felt gross.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is it the same speaker in the two audio clips below?

Choices:
- A. No, not the same person
- B. Cannot determine (insufficient information)
- C. Yes, they are the same person.
- D. The two speakers' voices are similar in some aspects, but not completely identical.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker from 11.31 seconds to 16.14 seconds in the audio the same person as the speaker from 38.38 seconds to 43.78 seconds?

Choices:
- A. No, not the same person
- B. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)
- C. Yes, it is the same person.
- D. The two speakers' voices are similar in some aspects, but not completely identical.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker from 11.31 to 16.14 seconds in the audio the same as the speaker from 71.04 to 76.34 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)
- B. No, not the same person
- C. The two speakers' voices are similar in some ways, but not completely identical.
- D. Yes, they are the same person.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker who said ‘tackle the one thing thats in front of you’ the same speaker who said ‘I felt so uncomfortable’?

Choices:
- A. Yes, it is the same person
- B. The two speakers' voices are similar in some ways, but not completely identical.
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)
- D. No, not the same person.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker who said ‘tackle the one thing thats in front of you’ the same speaker as the one who said ‘I could see myself wanting to live in a place like this’?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)
- B. Yes, it's the same person.
- C. No, not the same person
- D. The two speakers' voices are similar in some aspects, but not completely identical.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: In the audio, is the speaker who said ‘tackle the one thing thats in front of you’ from 11.31 to 16.14 the same speaker as the one who said ‘I felt so uncomfortable’ from 38.38 to 43.78?

Choices:
- A. Yes, it is the same person.
- B. No, they are not the same person.
- C. The two speakers' voices are similar in some ways, but not completely identical.
- D. Cannot determine (insufficient information)


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker who said ‘tackle the one thing thats in front of you’ from 11.31 to 16.14 seconds in the audio the same as the speaker who said ‘I could see myself wanting to live in a place like this’ from 71.04 to 76.34 seconds?

Choices:
- A. The two speakers' voices are similar in some ways, but not completely identical.
- B. Cannot determine (insufficient information)
- C. No, not the same person
- D. Yes, they are the same person.


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话背景推理

Question: In which of the following scenarios does this conversation most likely take place?

Choices:
- A. Colleagues are doing team-building activities at a rented party venue.
- B. Friends are having a social gathering and chatting at one of their homes.
- C. Friends get together to chat in public places like restaurants or cafes.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence)

Friends are having a social gathering and chatting at one of their homes.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior between the two speakers in the corresponding segment of the audio below? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A proudly describes their residence, and Speaker B's direct criticism sparks an argument.
- B. Speaker A poses a specific hypothetical question to Speaker B to verify their viewpoint, but Speaker B responds with a firm denial.
- C. Speaker A takes the initiative to ask for the other's opinion, and Speaker B shares negative feelings with humorous exaggeration.
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)

Speaker A takes the initiative to ask for the other person's opinion, and Speaker B shares their negative feelings in a humorous and exaggerated way.

What did you think my Railtown place when you first got there?


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior demonstrated by the speaker from 31.67 seconds to 34.17 seconds and the speaker from 38.38 seconds to 43.78 seconds in their corresponding segments of the audio? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A proactively asks for the other's opinion, and Speaker B shares negative feelings in a humorous and exaggerated way.
- B. Speaker A proudly described their home, and Speaker B's direct criticism sparked an argument.
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)
- D. Speaker A asks Speaker B a question about a specific scenario to verify their viewpoint, and Speaker B gives a firm denial.

Speaker A took the initiative to ask for the other person's opinion, and Speaker B shared their negative feelings in a humorous and exaggerated way.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior demonstrated in the corresponding segment by the speaker who said ‘What did you think my Railtown place when you first got there?’ and the speaker who said ‘I felt so uncomfortable there’? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A poses a specific situational question to Speaker B to verify their viewpoint, but Speaker B firmly denies it.
- B. Speaker A proactively asks for the other person's opinion, and Speaker B shares negative feelings in a humorous and exaggerated way.
- C. Cannot determine (Insufficient evidence)
- D. Speaker A proudly describes their residence, while Speaker B offers direct criticism, sparking an argument.

Speaker A takes the initiative to ask for the other person's opinion, and Speaker B shares their negative feelings in a humorous and exaggerated way.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior shown in the corresponding segments between the speaker who said ‘What did you think my Railtown place’ in the audio from 31.67s to 34.17s and the speaker who said ‘I felt so uncomfortable there’ from 38.38s to 43.78s? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A proudly describes their residence, and Speaker B's direct criticism sparks an argument.
- B. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)
- C. Speaker A poses a specific hypothetical question to Speaker B to verify their point, and Speaker B responds with a firm denial.
- D. Speaker A takes the initiative to ask for the other's opinion, and Speaker B shares their negative feelings in a humorous and exaggerated way.

Speaker A takes the initiative to ask for the other person's opinion, and Speaker B shares their negative feelings in a humorous and exaggerated way.


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: In the single-speaker audio below, the speaker's emotion is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Sorrow
- B. Cannot determine (Insufficient evidence to determine the emotion)
- C. Happy
- D. Disgust

Its just like natural selection; the clothes that are worthy to survive will survive.

Oh, tying on toes is the worst.


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: Which of the following is closest to the speaker's emotion in the audio from 75.37s to 79.04s?

Choices:
- A. Aversion
- B. Happy
- C. Sadness
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient evidence to determine the emotion)

Oh, tying on toes is the worst.


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: The emotion of the speaker who said ‘natural selection’ in the audio is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Disgust
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to determine emotion)
- C. Happy
- D. Sorrow

Oh, tying on toes is the worst.


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: The emotion of the speaker who said ‘natural selection’ between 75.37 and 79.04 seconds is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Sorrow
- B. Happy
- C. Aversion
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient evidence to determine emotion)

Oh, tying on toes is the worst.


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, which speakers have expressed the emotion of disgust? (Answer in global speaker order) Please select the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. spk_1、spk_2、spk_4
- B. spk_1、spk_3、spk_4
- C. Cannot determine (Insufficient evidence to determine emotion)
- D. spk_2

Oh, tying on toes is the worst.


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, how many speakers in total expressed the emotion of disgust? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. 2
- B. 5
- C. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence to determine emotion)
- D. 3

Oh, tying on toes is the worst.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: The following is a monologue segment from a speaker. In the complete dialogue, the most likely response to this utterance is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B: It's better for the environment and saves electricity.
- B. Speaker B: Yeah, and cuz I dont wanna shrink.
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to locate the response)
- D. Speaker B: Its just like natural selection; the clothes that are worthy to survive will survive.

Speaker B: Yeah, and cuz I dont wanna shrink.

Is it because of what its made of?

Yeah, and cuz I dont wanna shrink.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: According to the conversation, the other speakers' response to what a certain speaker said between 24.9 and 26.23 seconds is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B: It's better for the environment and saves electricity.
- B. Speaker B: Yeah, and cuz I dont wanna shrink.
- C. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to locate the response)
- D. Speaker B: Its just like natural selection; the clothes that are worthy to survive will survive.

Speaker B: Yeah, and cuz I dont wanna shrink.

Is it because of what its made of?

Yeah, and cuz I dont wanna shrink.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: According to the dialogue, the response from others to a speaker's statement ‘Is it because of what its made of?’ is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B: It's better for the environment and saves electricity.
- B. Speaker B: Yeah, and cuz I dont wanna shrink.
- C. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to locate the response)
- D. Speaker B: Its just like natural selection; the clothes that are worthy to survive will survive.

Speaker B: Yeah, and cuz I dont wanna shrink.

Is it because of what its made of?

Yeah, and cuz I dont wanna shrink.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: According to the conversation, the response from others to the statement made by a speaker between 24.9s and 26.23s about ‘what its made of’ is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B: It's better for the environment and saves electricity.
- B. Speaker B: Yeah, and cuz I dont wanna shrink.
- C. Cannot determine (insufficient information to locate the response)
- D. Speaker B: It's just like natural selection; the clothes that are worthy to survive will survive.

Speaker B: Yeah, and cuz I dont wanna shrink.

Is it because of what its made of?

Yeah, and cuz I dont wanna shrink.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: What accent is the speaker using in the single-person audio below?

Choices:
- A. British English accent
- B. American accent
- C. Indian English accent
- D. Accent is not obvious, cannot be determined.

I said I didnt buy salt, did you not read?

Yeah the salt is more important for the mash than the steaks.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: Which of the following is the speaker's accent from 27.16 to 29.06 seconds in the audio closest to?

Choices:
- A. Australian accent
- B. British English accent
- C. American English accent
- D. No obvious accent, cannot determine.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: The accent of the speaker in the audio who said “I said I didnt buy salt, did you not read” is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. American English accent
- B. British English accent
- C. Mainland Chinese English
- D. The accent is not obvious, cannot determine.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, what accent does the second speaker in the dialogue use?

Choices:
- A. Australian accent
- B. American English accent
- C. British English accent
- D. The accent is not obvious, cannot be determined.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: The male speaker who said “I said I didnt buy salt” between 27.16 and 29.06 seconds, which of the following does his accent most closely resemble?

Choices:
- A. Indian English accent
- B. British English accent
- C. American English accent
- D. Accent is not pronounced, unable to determine.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: Which speakers throughout the audio have an American English accent? (Answer in order of appearance.) Please select the best option.

Choices:
- A. The first speaker, the second speaker, the third speaker
- B. First speaker, Second speaker, Fifth speaker
- C. First speaker, Second speaker, Third speaker, Fourth speaker
- D. Accent is not obvious, unable to determine.

First speaker, Second speaker, Third speaker, Fourth speaker


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: How many speakers with an American English accent are there in the entire audio? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. 4
- B. 3
- C. 1
- D. Accent is not obvious, unable to determine.


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: In the single-speaker audio below, which of the following is the speaker's age group closest to?

Choices:
- A. Teenager (13-17 years old)
- B. Middle-aged (30-59 years old)
- C. Young people (18-29 years old)
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine the age group)


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: The age group of the speaker in the audio from 27.16 to 29.06 seconds is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Young adults (18-29 years old)
- B. Middle-aged (30-59 years old)
- C. Teenager (13-17 years old)
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: Which of the following is closest to the age range of the speaker in the audio who said ‘I said I didnt buy salt, did you not read?’?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)
- B. Middle-aged people (30-59 years old)
- C. Young adults (18-29 years old)
- D. Seniors (60 years and over)


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: In the entire conversation, the age group of the 3rd speaker to appear (spk_3) is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Adolescent (13-17 years old)
- B. Young people (18-29 years old)
- C. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine the age group)
- D. Middle-aged people (30-59 years old)


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: The age group of the male speaker who said ‘I said I didnt buy salt’ between 27.16 and 29.06 seconds is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Middle-aged people (30-59 years old)
- B. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine the age group)
- C. Teenager (13-17 years old)
- D. Young adults (18-29 years old)


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, which speakers are in the Young Adult (18-29 years old) age group? (Answer in global speaker order) Please choose the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. spk_1、spk_2、spk_3
- B. spk_1、spk_2、spk_3、spk_4
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)
- D. spk_1、spk_2、spk_4、spk_5


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, how many speakers are there in the Young Adult (18-29 years old) age group? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. 4
- B. 1
- C. 3
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: In the following single-speaker audio, what is the speaker's gender?

Choices:
- A. Female
- B. Male
- C. Uncertain gender
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine gender)

Yeah, true. Season it with something else.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the speaker from 18.76 seconds to 20.94 seconds in the audio?

Choices:
- A. Male
- B. Gender uncertain
- C. Female
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine gender)


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the speaker who said ‘Yeah, true. Season it with something else.’ in the audio?

Choices:
- A. Female
- B. Undetermined gender
- C. Cannot determine (insufficient information to determine gender)
- D. Male


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: In the entire dialogue, what is the gender of the 3rd speaker to appear (spk_3)?

Choices:
- A. Male
- B. Female
- C. Cannot determine (insufficient information to determine gender)
- D. Undetermined gender


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the speaker who said ‘Yeah, true. Season it with something else.’ between 18.76 and 20.94 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Cannot determine (insufficient information to determine gender)
- B. Male
- C. Unspecified gender
- D. Female


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, who are the male speakers? (Answer using spk_index) Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. spk_1、spk_3
- B. spk_1、spk_3、spk_4
- C. Cannot determine (insufficient information to determine gender)
- D. spk_2、spk_5


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: Who are the female speakers in the entire audio? (Answer with spk_index) Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. spk_2
- B. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine gender)
- C. spk_1
- D. spk_2、spk_3


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: How many male speakers are there in the entire audio? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. 2
- B. 4
- C. 3
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine gender)


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: How many female speakers are there in the entire audio? Please select the best option.

Choices:
- A. 1
- B. 3
- C. 2
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine gender)


说话人识别能力-说话人计数任务

Question: How many different speakers are in this audio?

Choices:
- A. 2 bits
- B. 4 bits
- C. 7 digits
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)

Time. Um do you have salt Ibs?

Yeah here. Uh, where is it?


说话人识别能力-说话人计数任务

Question: How many different speakers appeared in the audio between 25 and 34 seconds?

Choices:
- A. 5 digits
- B. 2 bits
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information)
- D. 4 digits

Time. Um do you have salt Ibs?

Yeah here. Uh, where is it?


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: What accent is the speaker using in the single-speaker audio below?

Choices:
- A. British English accent
- B. American accent
- C. Indian English accent
- D. The accent is not obvious, and cannot be determined.

No, it says you have to use your full legal name as its written on your passport.  States it explicitly in the contract.

Theres no way you can reasonably do that. Theres no way you can reasonably expect someone to buy a new ticket.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: The speaker's accent in the audio from 21.54 to 27.6 seconds is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Australian accent
- B. Singapore English accent
- C. American English accent
- D. Accent not obvious, unable to determine.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: The accent of the speaker who said ‘you have to use your full legal name’ in the audio is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Mainland Chinese accent English
- B. The accent is not obvious and cannot be determined.
- C. British English accent
- D. American English accent


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, what accent does the 1st speaker in the conversation use?

Choices:
- A. Indian English accent
- B. American English accent
- C. Accent not obvious, unable to determine.
- D. British English accent


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: The male speaker who said ‘States it explicitly in the contract’ between 21.54 and 27.6 seconds has an accent closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. No obvious accent, cannot be determined.
- B. Australian English accent
- C. American English accent
- D. Mainland Chinese English


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: Throughout the audio, which speakers have an American English accent? (Answer in order of speaker appearance) Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. First speaker, Second speaker, Third speaker, Fourth speaker
- B. First speaker, Second speaker, Fifth speaker
- C. The accent is not obvious, unable to determine.
- D. First speaker, second speaker, third speaker

First speaker, second speaker, third speaker, fourth speaker


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: How many speakers with an American English accent are there in the entire audio? Please select the best option.

Choices:
- A. 3
- B. The accent is not obvious, making it impossible to tell.
- C. 4
- D. 1


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: Which of the following age groups is the speaker in the audio below closest to?

Choices:
- A. Middle-aged people (30-59 years old)
- B. Young adults (18-29 years old)
- C. Adolescent (13-17 years old)
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine the age group)

Mkay, well Ill call, if they ask, if they charge me then Ill be like, Yo, fuck you. Then Ill just risk it.


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: Which of the following is closest to the age group of the speaker in the audio from 5.56 to 10.24 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Young adults (18-29 years old)
- B. Elderly (age 60 and over)
- C. Middle-aged (30-59 years old)
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine the age group)


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: Which of the following is closest to the age group of the speaker who said ‘Theres no way you can reasonably expect someone to buy a new ticket’ in the audio?

Choices:
- A. Middle-aged adults (30-59 years old)
- B. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine the age group)
- C. Child (under 12 years old)
- D. Young adults (18-29 years old)


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: In the entire conversation, which of the following is closest to the age range of the 3rd speaker to appear (spk_3)?

Choices:
- A. Teenager (13-17 years old)
- B. Young people (18-29 years old)
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)
- D. Middle-aged adults (30-59 years old)


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: Which of the following is closest to the age range of the male speaker who said ‘Theres no way you can reasonably do that’ from 5.56 to 10.24 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine the age group)
- B. Middle-aged adults (30-59 years old)
- C. Young adults (18-29 years old)
- D. Seniors (over 60 years old)


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, which speakers are in the Young Adult (18-29 years old) age group? (Answer using the global speaker order) Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. spk_1、spk_2、spk_3
- B. spk_1、spk_2、spk_3、spk_4
- C. spk_1、spk_2、spk_5
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, how many speakers are in the Youth (18-29 years old) age group? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. 3
- B. 1
- C. 4
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: In the following single-speaker audio, what is the speaker's gender?

Choices:
- A. Female
- B. Male
- C. Unspecified gender
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine gender)

But that is his name. Its just not his full name.

Tiger. Tiger, right? Or Small Hoss?


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the speaker in the audio from 19.8 to 21.52 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Uncertain gender
- B. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine gender)
- C. Male
- D. Female

Tiger. Tiger, right? Or Small Hoss?


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the speaker who said ‘But that is his name. Its just not his full name.’ in the audio?

Choices:
- A. Male
- B. Female
- C. Unspecified
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine gender)

Tiger. Tiger, right? Or Small Hoss?


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: In the entire conversation, what is the gender of the 3rd speaker to appear (spk_3)?

Choices:
- A. Female
- B. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine gender)
- C. Unspecified gender
- D. Male

Tiger. Tiger, right? Or Small Hoss?


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the speaker who said ‘But that is his name. Its just not his full name.’ from 19.8 seconds to 21.52 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Male
- B. Female
- C. Cannot determine (insufficient information to determine gender)
- D. Uncertain gender

Tiger. Tiger, right? Or Small Hoss?


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: Who are the male speakers in the entire audio? (Answer with spk_index) Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. spk_1、spk_2、spk_3
- B. Unable to determine (Insufficient information to determine gender)
- C. spk_1、spk_5
- D. spk_1、spk_2、spk_3、spk_4

Tiger. Tiger, right? Or Small Hoss?


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: How many male speakers are there in the entire audio? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. 3
- B. 4
- C. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine gender)
- D. 1

Tiger. Tiger, right? Or Small Hoss?


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: In the monologue audio below, which of the following best describes the speaker's profile?

Choices:
- A. Gender: Male voice; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Happy; Accent: General American English
- B. Gender: Female; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American English
- C. Gender: Male; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Disgust; Accent: General American English
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine)

Gender: Male voice; Age: Young adult; Emotion: Disgust; Accent: General American English

For no reason, cuz no one wants to go there anymore.

If theyre having a good day.


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: Which of the following speaker profiles most closely matches the speaker in the audio from 39.46 seconds to 41.3 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Gender: Male Voice; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Disgust; Accent: General American English
- B. Gender: Male voice; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Happy; Accent: General American English
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine)
- D. Gender: Female; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American English

Gender: Male voice; Age: Young adult; Emotion: Disgust; Accent: General American English

If theyre having a good day.


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: Who is the most likely speaker of the quote 'For no reason, cuz no one wants to go there anymore.' from the audio?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information)
- B. Gender: Male; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Disgust; Accent: General American English
- C. Gender: Male voice; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Happy; Accent: General American English
- D. Gender: Female; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American

Gender: Male voice; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Disgust; Accent: General American English

If theyre having a good day.


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: For the speaker who said ‘For no reason, cuz no one wants to go there anymore.’ from 39.46 seconds to 41.3 seconds, which of the following is the closest speaker profile?

Choices:
- A. Gender: Male voice; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Happy; Accent: General American English
- B. Gender: Female voice; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American English
- C. Gender: Male; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Disgust; Accent: General American English
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine)

Gender: Male voice; Age: Youth; Emotion: Disgust; Accent: General American English

If theyre having a good day.


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: In the entire audio, which speakers have the profile "Gender: Male; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Disgust; Accent: General American English"? (Answer with spk_index) Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. spk_1
- B. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)
- C. spk_3
- D. spk_3、spk_4

If theyre having a good day.


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: In the entire audio, how many speakers are there with the profile: "Gender: Male; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Disgust; Accent: General American English"? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. 5
- B. 1
- C. 2
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine)

If theyre having a good day.


说话人识别能力-说话人检索任务

Question: The speaker from 21.54 seconds to 27.6 seconds in the audio, which speaker are they in order of appearance in the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. spk_3
- B. spk_1
- C. spk_5
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to identify the speaker)


说话人识别能力-说话人检索任务

Question: The speaker in the audio who said ‘No, it says you have to use your full legal name as its written on your passport. States it explicitly in the contract.’ is which speaker to appear in the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. spk_5
- B. spk_3
- C. spk_1
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the speaker)


说话人识别能力-说话人检索任务

Question: The male speaker in the audio who said ‘you have to use your full legal name’ between 21.54 and 27.6 seconds, what is his speaking order in the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine the speaker)
- B. spk_1
- C. spk_5
- D. spk_3


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话背景推理

Question: In which of the following scenarios does this conversation most likely take place?

Choices:
- A. Airline staff are having a meeting in an office, discussing a ticket name change appeal case.
- B. A few friends are dining together at a restaurant or at home, while discussing the topic of regulations for booking airline tickets.
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence).
- D. A few friends are in an airport lounge, discussing the topic of airline ticket booking regulations.

Several friends are having a meal together at a restaurant or at home, while discussing the topic of regulations for booking airline tickets.


说话人识别能力-说话人反向检索任务

Question:
In the statements below, what did the second speaker in the dialogue say? Please select the best option.
Candidate sentences:
1) I do, what would you like?
2) I dont care what it is, just give me another card.
3) How bout this? Two sheep for two wheat.
4) I will accept one wheat for one wood.
5) I drive a hard bargain man you gotta give it to me.
6) Gotta give me something else man.

Choices:
- A. 1, 2, 5, 6
- B. 1, 3, 5
- C. 2, 4, 6
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine)

Gotta give me a wheat and something else man.

How bout this? Two sheep for two wheat.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Are the speakers in the two audio clips below the same person?

Choices:
- A. Cannot determine (insufficient information)
- B. The speakers in the two audio clips have similar timbre but different intonation, possibly an imitation.
- C. No, they are not the same person.
- D. Yes, the same person

Yeah, but you dont have access to it.

How bout this? Two sheep for two wheat.

Id Id just trade in wood.

No, give me anything, just anything at all.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Are the speakers in the following two audio clips the same?

Choices:
- A. Yes, the same person
- B. No, not the same person
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)
- D. The speaker seems to be deliberately changing their voice.

Yeah, but you dont have access to it.

How bout this? Two sheep for two wheat.

Id Id just trade in wood.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker in the audio from 17.76 seconds to 19.38 seconds the same as the speaker from 19.17 seconds to 20.79 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Yes, the same person
- B. No, not the same person
- C. Cannot determine (Insufficient information)
- D. There are multiple speakers in the two audio segments, so a determination cannot be made.

Yeah, but you dont have access to it.

How bout this? Two sheep for two wheat.

Id Id just trade in wood.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker from 17.76 seconds to 19.38 seconds in the audio the same speaker as the one from 29.42 seconds to 30.84 seconds?

Choices:
- A. No, not the same person
- B. Cannot determine (insufficient information)
- C. Yes, the same person
- D. The background noise in the two audio clips is too different, making it impossible to compare the voices.

Yeah, but you dont have access to it.

How bout this? Two sheep for two wheat.

Id Id just trade in wood.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker who said ‘Yeah, but you dont have access to it.’ the same as the speaker who said ‘Id Id just trade in wood.’?

Choices:
- A. The speaker seems to be deliberately changing their voice.
- B. Yes, the same person
- C. Cannot determine (insufficient information)
- D. No, not the same person

Yeah, but you dont have access to it.

How bout this? Two sheep for two wheat.

Id Id just trade in wood.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker who said ‘Yeah, but you dont have access to it.’ in the audio the same as the speaker who said ‘How bout this? Two sheep for two wheat.’?

Choices:
- A. No, not the same person
- B. Yes, the same person
- C. The speaker's timbre in the two audio clips is similar, but the intonation is different, possibly an imitation.
- D. Unable to determine (insufficient information)

Yeah, but you dont have access to it.

How bout this? Two sheep for two wheat.

Id Id just trade in wood.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker who said ‘Yeah, but you dont have access to it.’ from 17.76 to 19.38 in the audio the same as the speaker who said ‘Id Id just trade in wood.’ from 19.17 to 20.79?

Choices:
- A. Yes, the same person
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information)
- C. No, not the same person
- D. There are multiple speakers in the two audio clips, unable to determine

Yeah, but you dont have access to it.

How bout this? Two sheep for two wheat.

Id Id just trade in wood.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker who said ‘Yeah, but you dont have access to it.’ from 17.76s to 19.38s in the audio the same as the speaker who said ‘How bout this? Two sheep for two wheat.’ from 29.42s to 30.84s?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)
- B. Yes, the same person
- C. No, not the same person
- D. The speaker seems to be deliberately changing their voice.

Yeah, but you dont have access to it.

How bout this? Two sheep for two wheat.

Id Id just trade in wood.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the stance of the two speakers in the following audio throughout the entire conversation? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: On the deal to sell the sheep: was willing to trade, but consistently maintained a tough stance demanding extra compensation. Speaker B: On the deal to acquire the sheep: initiated the trade, but due to insufficient bargaining chips, eventually compromised from proposing an equal exchange to accepting the other party's harsher terms.
- B. Speaker A: For the trade to get the sheep: initiated the deal, but lacking sufficient leverage, ultimately compromised from proposing an equal exchange to accepting the other party's harsher terms. Speaker B: For the trade to sell the sheep: was willing to trade, but always maintained a firm stance demanding extra compensation.
- C. Speaker A: On the transaction goal: The main goal is to weaken Speaker B's power, not to acquire resources. Speaker B: On the transaction goal: Hopes to establish a long-term alliance with other players through the transaction.
- D. Speaker A: made various attempts regarding the deal. Speaker B: controlled the pace of the negotiation throughout the entire conversation.

Speaker A: Regarding the trade for the sheep: Initiated the trade, but due to insufficient bargaining chips, ultimately compromised from proposing an equal exchange to accepting the other party's harsher terms.
Speaker B: Regarding the sale of the sheep: Was willing to trade, but always maintained a firm stance demanding extra compensation.

Dude, come on man, I dont have another alternative.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the stance of the speaker from 45.82s to 49.26s and the speaker from 9.71s to 13.35s in the entire conversation? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Regarding the trade to acquire the sheep: proactively initiated it, but due to insufficient leverage, eventually compromised from proposing an equal exchange to accepting the other party's harsher conditions. Speaker B: Regarding the trade to sell the sheep: was willing to trade, but consistently maintained a firm stance demanding extra compensation.
- B. Speaker A: Made various attempts regarding the transaction. Speaker B: Dominated the pace of the negotiation throughout the conversation.
- C. Speaker A: Regarding the deal to sell the sheep: willing to trade, but consistently maintains a tough stance demanding extra compensation. Speaker B: Regarding the deal to acquire the sheep: initiates the trade, but due to a lack of leverage, ultimately compromises from proposing an equal exchange to accepting the other party's harsher terms.
- D. Speaker A: Trading goal: The main goal is to weaken Speaker B's power, not to acquire resources. Speaker B: Trading goal: To build a long-term alliance with other players through the trade.

Speaker A: Regarding the trade to acquire the sheep: Actively initiated it, but due to insufficient bargaining chips, ultimately compromised from proposing an equal exchange to accepting the other party's harsher terms.
Speaker B: Regarding the trade to sell the sheep: Was willing to trade, but consistently maintained a firm stance, demanding extra compensation.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the stance of the speaker who said ‘I dont have another alternative’ and the speaker who said ‘Gotta give me a wheat and something else man’ throughout the entire conversation? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Made multifaceted attempts regarding the deal. Speaker B: Dominated the pace of the negotiation throughout the conversation.
- B. Speaker A: Trading goal: The main goal is to weaken Speaker B's strength, not to acquire resources. Speaker B: Trading goal: Hopes to build a long-term alliance with other players through the trade.
- C. Speaker A: Regarding the deal to sell the sheep: willing to trade, but held a firm stance, insisting on extra compensation. Speaker B: Regarding the deal to get the sheep: initiated the trade, but due to a lack of bargaining power, ultimately compromised from proposing a fair exchange to accepting the other party's harsher terms.
- D. Speaker A: Regarding the trade to acquire the sheep: initiated it, but due to insufficient bargaining chips, eventually compromised from proposing an equal exchange to accepting the other party's harsher conditions. Speaker B: Regarding the sale of the sheep: was willing to trade, but consistently maintained a firm stance demanding extra compensation.

Speaker A: Regarding the trade for the sheep: Initiated the trade, but due to insufficient bargaining chips, ultimately compromised from proposing an equivalent exchange to accepting the other party's harsher terms.
Speaker B: Regarding the sale of the sheep: Was willing to trade, but consistently maintained a firm stance demanding extra compensation.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the respective stances of the first speaker and the second speaker in the dialogue? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Regarding the trade to acquire the sheep: initiated it, but due to a lack of leverage, ultimately compromised from proposing an equal exchange to accepting the other party's harsher terms. Speaker B: Regarding the sale of the sheep: was willing to trade, but consistently maintained a firm stance, demanding extra compensation.
- B. Speaker A: On the deal to sell the sheep: willing to trade, but maintains a firm stance, consistently demanding extra compensation. Speaker B: On the deal to acquire the sheep: initiated the trade, but due to a lack of leverage, ultimately compromised from proposing an equal exchange to accepting the other party's harsher terms.
- C. Speaker A: Made multifaceted attempts regarding the transaction. Speaker B: Controlled the pace of the negotiation throughout the entire conversation.
- D. Speaker A: Trading goal: The primary goal is to weaken Speaker B's power, not to acquire resources. Speaker B: Trading goal: Hopes to establish a long-term alliance with other players through the trade.

Speaker A: Regarding the trade to acquire sheep: actively initiated, but due to insufficient bargaining chips, ultimately compromised from proposing an equal exchange to accepting the other party's harsher conditions. Speaker B: Regarding the trade to sell sheep: willing to trade, but consistently maintained a firm stance demanding extra compensation.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the stance in the entire conversation of the speaker who said ‘I dont have another alternative’ from 45.82s to 49.26s in the audio and the speaker who said ‘Gotta give me a wheat and something else man’ from 9.71s to 13.35s? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Trade objective: The main goal is to weaken Speaker B's strength, not to acquire resources. Speaker B: Trade objective: Hopes to build a long-term alliance with other players through the trade.
- B. Speaker A: Regarding the trade to acquire the sheep: initiated it, but due to insufficient bargaining chips, ultimately compromised from proposing an equal exchange to accepting the other party's harsher conditions. Speaker B: Regarding the trade to sell the sheep: was willing to trade, but consistently maintained a firm stance demanding extra compensation.
- C. Speaker A: Made multi-faceted attempts regarding the transaction. Speaker B: Dominated the pace of the negotiation throughout the conversation.
- D. Speaker A: Regarding the deal to sell the sheep: Willing to trade, but maintains a tough stance, consistently insisting on extra compensation. Speaker B: Regarding the deal to acquire the sheep: Initiates the trade, but due to insufficient bargaining chips, ultimately compromises from proposing an equal exchange to accepting the other party's harsher terms.

Speaker A: Regarding the trade for the sheep: Initiated the trade, but due to insufficient bargaining chips, ultimately compromised from proposing an equal exchange to accepting the other party's harsher terms.
Speaker B: Regarding the sale of the sheep: Willing to trade, but consistently maintained a firm stance demanding extra compensation.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in the stances of the two speakers in the audio below throughout the entire conversation? Please choose the one that fits best.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: On acceptable deals: From [insisting on a direct, single-resource swap] → [to accepting a package with future commitments]. Speaker B: On extra compensation: From [demanding an immediate extra resource] → [to proposing future trading priority as compensation].
- B. Speaker A: On extra compensation for the deal: From [insisting on an immediate extra resource] → [proposing priority in future deals as compensation]. Speaker B: On acceptable deal proposals: From [insisting on an equivalent exchange of a single resource] → [accepting a proposal that includes future commitments].
- C. Speaker A: On whether a transaction is needed: From 【Believing the transaction is the only option】 → 【Giving up after discovering it's not necessary】. Speaker B: Attitude towards the transaction: From 【Firmly refusing any transaction】 → 【Ultimately agreeing to the other party's initial proposal】.
- D. Speaker A: Attitude towards the deal: Consistently 【very urgent and pleading】. Speaker B: Stance on the deal: Always 【remains firm, without any change】.

Speaker A: Regarding acceptable trade proposals: from [insisting on an equivalent exchange with a single resource] → [to accepting a plan that includes future commitments].
Speaker B: Regarding the form of additional compensation for the trade: from [insisting on an immediate additional resource] → [to proposing future trading priority as compensation].


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in stance throughout the entire conversation for the speaker talking from 45.82s to 49.26s and the speaker talking from 9.71s to 13.35s in the audio? Please select the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Attitude towards the deal: was always 【very urgent and pleading】. Speaker B: Stance on the deal: always 【remained tough, with no change】.
- B. Speaker A: On whether to trade: From 【believing the trade was the only option】→【giving up after discovering the trade was not necessary】. Speaker B: Attitude towards the trade: From 【firmly refusing any trade】→【finally agreeing to the other party's initial proposal】.
- C. Speaker A: Regarding acceptable transaction plans: from 【insisting on a single-resource equivalent exchange】→【to accepting a plan with future commitments】. Speaker B: Regarding the form of additional compensation: from 【insisting on an immediate additional resource】→【to proposing future trade priority as compensation】.
- D. Speaker A: Form of extra compensation for the deal: from [insisting on an immediate extra resource] → [to proposing future trading priority as compensation]. Speaker B: Acceptable deal proposals: from [insisting on a single-resource equivalent exchange] → [to accepting a proposal containing a future commitment].

Speaker A: On acceptable transaction plans: from 【insisting on an equivalent exchange of a single resource】→【to accepting a plan that includes future commitments】.
Speaker B: On the form of extra compensation for the transaction: from 【insisting on an immediate additional resource】→【to proposing future transaction priority as compensation】.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in stance throughout the conversation for the speaker who said ‘I dont have another alternative’ and the speaker who said ‘Gotta give me a wheat and something else man’? Please select the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: On extra compensation for the deal: from 【insisting on an immediate extra resource】→【switched to proposing future deal priority as compensation】. Speaker B: On acceptable deal proposals: from 【insisting on a single-resource equivalent exchange】→【switched to accepting a proposal that includes a future commitment】.
- B. Speaker A: Attitude towards the deal: Has always been 【very urgent and pleading】. Speaker B: Stance on the deal: Has always 【remained firm, with no change】.
- C. Speaker A: On acceptable deal proposals: from【insisting on an equivalent, single-resource exchange】→【shifting to accepting a proposal that includes future commitments】. Speaker B: On the form of extra compensation: from【insisting on an immediate additional resource】→【shifting to proposing future trade priority as compensation】.
- D. Speaker A: On the necessity of the transaction: from 【believing the transaction was the only option】→【giving up after discovering it wasn't necessary】. Speaker B: Attitude towards the transaction: from 【firmly refusing any transaction】→【eventually agreeing to the other party's initial proposal】.

Speaker A: Regarding acceptable trade proposals: from 【insisting on an equivalent, single-resource exchange】 → 【shifting to accepting proposals that include future commitments】.
Speaker B: Regarding the form of additional compensation for the trade: from 【insisting on an immediate additional resource】 → 【shifting to proposing future trade priority as compensation】.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the respective changes in stance for the 1st speaker and the 2nd speaker throughout the conversation? Please select the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Attitude towards the deal: Consistently 【very urgent and pleading】. Speaker B: Stance on the deal: Always 【remains firm, with no change】.
- B. Speaker A: On acceptable trade deals: from 【insisting on an equivalent exchange with a single resource】→【to accepting a deal that includes future commitments】. Speaker B: On the form of additional compensation for the trade: from 【insisting on an immediate additional resource】→【to proposing future trade priority as compensation】.
- C. Speaker A: On extra compensation for the deal: from [insisting on an immediate extra resource] → [shifting to proposing future trade priority as compensation]. Speaker B: On acceptable deal proposals: from [insisting on an equivalent exchange with a single resource] → [shifting to accepting a proposal that includes a future commitment].
- D. Speaker A: On whether to trade: from 【believing the trade was the only option】→【giving up after discovering it wasn't necessary】. Speaker B: Attitude towards the trade: from 【firmly refusing any trade】→【eventually agreeing to the other party's initial proposal】.

Speaker A: Regarding acceptable deal proposals: From 【insisting on an equivalent exchange using a single resource】→【to accepting a proposal that includes future commitments】.
Speaker B: Regarding the form of extra compensation for the transaction: From 【insisting on an immediate extra resource】→【to proposing future transaction priority as compensation】.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in stance throughout the entire conversation for the speaker in the audio who said ‘I dont have another alternative’ from 45.82 to 49.26 seconds and the speaker who said ‘Gotta give me a wheat and something else man’ from 9.71 to 13.35 seconds? Please choose the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: On the necessity of the deal: From 【believing the deal was the only option】→【abandoning it after discovering it wasn't necessary】. Speaker B: Attitude towards the deal: From 【firmly refusing any deal】→【ultimately agreeing to the other party's initial proposal】.
- B. Speaker A: Form of extra compensation for the deal: from [insisting on an immediate extra resource] → to [proposing future trading priority as compensation]. Speaker B: Acceptable deal proposals: from [insisting on an equivalent exchange of a single resource] → to [accepting a proposal that includes a future commitment].
- C. Speaker A: Attitude towards the deal: Has always been 【very urgent and pleading】. Speaker B: Stance on the deal: Consistently 【remains firm, with no change】.
- D. Speaker A: Stance on acceptable deals: from 【insisting on an equivalent, single-resource exchange】 → 【to accepting a deal that includes future commitments】. Speaker B: Stance on additional compensation: from 【insisting on an immediate extra resource】 → 【to proposing future trading priority as compensation】.

Speaker A: On acceptable transaction plans: from 【insisting on an equivalent, single-resource exchange】→【shifting to accepting a plan that includes future commitments】.
Speaker B: On the form of additional compensation for the transaction: from 【insisting on an immediate extra resource】→【shifting to proposing future trading priority as compensation】.


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship between the two speakers in the following audio, based on the entire conversation? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Advisor—Advisee
- B. Video game player
- C. Board game player
- D. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence)

Ill give you a wheat.

What do you, sorry what do you wanna give me?


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship in the entire conversation between the speaker from 5.78 seconds to 6.58 seconds and the speaker from 4.35 seconds to 5.77 seconds in the audio? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. Board game player
- B. Advisor—Advisee
- C. Video game player
- D. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence)

Ill give you a wheat.


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship in the entire conversation between the speaker who said ‘Ill give you a wheat.’ and the speaker who said ‘what do you wanna give me?’? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Video game player
- B. Board game player
- C. Advisor—Advisee
- D. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence)

Ill give you a wheat.


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship between the first speaker and the second speaker in the entire conversation? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Advisor—Advisee
- B. Board game player
- C. Video game player
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)

Ill give you a wheat.


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship in the entire conversation between the speaker who said ‘Ill give you a wheat.’ from 5.78 to 6.58 seconds and the speaker who said ‘what do you wanna give me?’ from 4.35 to 5.77 seconds in the audio? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. video game player
- B. Advisor—Advisee
- C. Unable to determine (insufficient evidence)
- D. Board game player

Ill give you a wheat.


说话人识别能力-说话人反向检索任务

Question:
Which of the following statements were made by the first speaker in the dialogue? Please select the most suitable option.
Candidate statements:
1) Okay, does anyone have stone?
2) Cmon, I f- I fell into your bargain last time.
3) What are you gonna build?
4) I'll give you two wheat for one stone.
5) Hold all the power in the game. Im good.

Choices:
- A. 1, 2, 4
- B. 1, 3, 5
- C. 1, 2, 5
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine)

Cuz I know you dont have a supply of that. One for one.

Mmm, I do but whatre you gonna give me?


说话人识别能力-说话人检索任务

Question: The speaker in the audio from 16.05s to 21.41s is which speaker to appear in the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. spk_3
- B. spk_1
- C. spk_5
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine the speaker)

And it was a good price for me to pay for that one sheep that I got from you last time.

But you have eight cards.


说话人识别能力-说话人检索任务

Question: The speaker who said ‘And it was a good price for me to pay for that one sheep that I got from you last time.’ is which speaker to appear in the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. spk_5
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the speaker)
- C. spk_1
- D. spk_3

But you have eight cards.


说话人识别能力-说话人检索任务

Question: For the male speaker who says ‘And it was a good price for me to pay for that one sheep that I got from you last time.’ in the audio between 16.05s and 21.41s, what is his order of appearance in the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. spk_1
- B. spk_3
- C. spk_5
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to identify the speaker)

But you have eight cards.


说话人识别能力-说话人计数任务

Question: How many different speakers are there in this audio?

Choices:
- A. 3 digits
- B. 4 digits
- C. 7 digits
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information)

Okay, does anyone have stone?

Mmm, I do but whatre you gonna give me?


说话人识别能力-说话人计数任务

Question: How many different speakers are there in the audio from the 22nd second to the 28th second?

Choices:
- A. 6 digits
- B. 2 digits
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)
- D. 3 digits

Okay, does anyone have stone?

Mmm, I do but whatre you gonna give me?


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: Based on the entire conversation in the following audio, what is the relationship between the two speakers? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Strategy mentor and player
- B. Game ally
- C. Counterparty
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)

Cmon, I f- I fell into your bargain last time.

What are you gonna build?


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship in the entire conversation between the speaker talking from 12.11 to 14.43 seconds and the speaker talking from 22.18 to 22.96 seconds? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Game ally
- B. Strategist and Player
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)
- D. Counterparty

What are you gonna build?


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship in the entire conversation between the speaker who said ‘I fell into your bargain last time’ and the speaker who said ‘What are you gonna build?’? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Counterparty
- B. Strategist and Player
- C. Gaming Ally
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)

What are you gonna build?


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship in the entire conversation between the speaker in the audio who said ‘I fell into your bargain last time’ from 12.11 to 14.43 seconds and the speaker who said ‘What are you gonna build?’ from 22.18 to 22.96 seconds? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Strategy instructor and player
- B. Counterparty
- C. Game ally
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)

What are you gonna build?


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: Which of the following is closest to the speaker's emotion in the single-speaker audio below?

Choices:
- A. Sorrow
- B. Fear
- C. Angry
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to determine the emotion)

What do you mean I dont play fair? I just play strategically and I get all the stuff.

Joy is me.


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: Which of the following is closest to the emotion of the speaker talking in the audio from 74.48 seconds to 77.56 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Fear
- B. Sorrow
- C. Cannot determine (Insufficient evidence to determine emotion)
- D. Angry

Joy is me.


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: In the audio, the emotion of the speaker who said ‘I just play strategically’ is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Fear
- B. Angry
- C. Cannot determine (Insufficient evidence to determine emotion)
- D. Sorrow

Joy is me.


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: The emotion of the speaker who said ‘What do you mean I dont play fair?’ between 74.48 and 77.56 seconds is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Angry
- B. Fear
- C. Sadness
- D. Unable to determine (Insufficient evidence to determine emotion)

Joy is me.


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, which speakers have expressed the emotion happy? (Answer in global speaker order) Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. spk_2、spk_4
- B. spk_1、spk_3
- C. Cannot determine (Insufficient evidence to determine emotion)
- D. spk_3

Joy is me.


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, how many speakers in total have expressed the emotion of happiness? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. 1
- B. 4
- C. 2
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient evidence to determine emotion)

Joy is me.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: In the following audio, what is the speaker's emotion? How did this emotion affect the other people throughout the conversation?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Happy/Excited; Impact: This joke lightened the mood and made <spk_1> laugh heartily.
- B. Emotion: Dissatisfaction; Impact: Causes <spk_1> to feel accused and start defending their gameplay style.
- C. Emotion: Dissatisfaction; Impact: Causes <spk_3> to feel that the conversational atmosphere is becoming tense and to attempt to change the subject.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence for a unique determination)

Emotion: Dissatisfaction; Impact: Caused <spk_1> to feel accused and start defending their own playstyle.

I play fair, unlike some people. Go.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What is the emotion of the speaker (<spk_2>) from 71.08 to 73.72 seconds in the audio? What impact did this emotion have on others in the conversation?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Dissatisfaction; Impact: Causes <spk_3> to feel the conversation is becoming tense, and to try to change the topic.
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine)
- C. Emotion: Happy/Excited; Impact: This joke eased the atmosphere and made <spk_1> laugh heartily.
- D. Emotion: Dissatisfaction; Impact: Causes <spk_1> to feel accused and start defending their playstyle.

Emotion: Dissatisfaction; Impact: Caused <spk_1> to feel blamed and start defending their playstyle.

I play fair, unlike some people. Go.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What emotion is the speaker (<spk_2>), who says “I play fair, unlike some people” in the audio, expressing? What impact did this emotion have on others in the conversation?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Dissatisfaction; Impact: Causes <spk_3> to feel the conversation becoming tense, and to attempt to change the subject.
- B. Emotion: Dissatisfaction; Impact: Caused <spk_1> to feel blamed and start defending their playstyle.
- C. Emotion: happy/excited; Impact: This joke eased the atmosphere and made <spk_1> laugh heartily.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine)

Emotion: Dissatisfaction; Impact: Caused <spk_1> to feel accused and begin to defend their style of play.

I play fair, unlike some people. Go.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What emotion is the speaker (<spk_2>) expressing when saying ‘I play fair, unlike some people’ from 71.08 to 73.72 seconds in the audio? What effect did this emotion have on others?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Dissatisfaction; Impact: Causes <spk_1> to feel blamed and start defending their playstyle.
- B. Emotion: Happy/Excited; Impact: This joke eased the atmosphere and made <spk_1> laugh heartily.
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine)
- D. Emotion: Dissatisfaction; Impact: Caused <spk_3> to feel that the conversation was becoming tense and to attempt to change the topic.

Emotion: Dissatisfaction; Impact: Causes <spk_1> to feel accused and start defending their way of playing.

I play fair, unlike some people. Go.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interaction demonstrated by the two speakers in the corresponding segment of the audio below? Please select the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A directly accuses Speaker B of playing unfairly, while Speaker B counters that they were just using strategy.
- B. Speaker A makes an indirect criticism by generalizing about others, and Speaker B feels targeted and immediately defends themself.
- C. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence)
- D. Speaker A makes a deal proposal to Speaker B and tries to persuade them, while Speaker B counters by pointing out that they have other options.

Speaker A uses a general reference to others to make a veiled criticism, and Speaker B feels targeted and immediately defends themself.

I play fair, unlike some people. Go.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior demonstrated in the corresponding segments by the speaker talking from 71.08 to 73.72 seconds and the speaker talking from 74.48 to 77.56 seconds in the audio? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)
- B. Speaker A proposes a deal to Speaker B and tries to persuade them, while Speaker B counters by pointing out that they have other options.
- C. Speaker A makes a veiled criticism by generalizing about others, and Speaker B feels targeted and immediately defends themself.
- D. Speaker A directly accuses Speaker B of playing unfairly, while Speaker B counters that they were just using a strategy.

Speaker A makes a veiled criticism by referring to people in general, while Speaker B feels targeted and immediately defends themself.

I play fair, unlike some people. Go.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior demonstrated in the corresponding segment by the speaker who said ‘I play fair, unlike some people’ and the speaker who said ‘What do you mean I dont play fair?’? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A makes a subtle criticism by generalizing about others, and Speaker B feels targeted and immediately defends themself.
- B. Speaker A directly accuses Speaker B of playing unfairly, while Speaker B counters that they were simply using a strategy.
- C. Speaker A proposes a deal to Speaker B and tries to persuade them, while Speaker B counters by pointing out that they have other options.
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)

Speaker A makes a veiled criticism by generalizing about others, and Speaker B feels targeted and immediately defends themself.

I play fair, unlike some people. Go.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior demonstrated in the corresponding segments between the speaker in the audio who said ‘I play fair, unlike some people. Go.’ from 71.08 seconds to 73.72 seconds, and the speaker who said ‘What do you mean I dont play fair? I just play strategically and I get all the stuff.’ from 74.48 seconds to 77.56 seconds? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A proposes a deal to Speaker B and attempts to persuade them, while Speaker B counters by pointing out that they have other options.
- B. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)
- C. Speaker A directly accuses Speaker B of playing the game unfairly, and Speaker B counters by arguing that they are just using a strategy.
- D. Speaker A makes a veiled criticism by generalizing about others, and Speaker B feels targeted and immediately defends themself.

Speaker A makes a veiled criticism by making a general reference to others, and Speaker B believes they are being targeted and immediately defends themself.

I play fair, unlike some people. Go.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Are the speakers in the two audio clips below the same person?

Choices:
- A. Yes, they are the same person.
- B. No, not the same person.
- C. One of the speakers might be deliberately imitating the other.
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient information)

I- if it falls face up it should count as something.

Way to build longest road.  Can someone please get a monopoly card?

No its not. You dont get to just re-roll just because.

No, this ones better, cuz I dont get sheep anywhere else.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Are the speakers in the two audio clips below the same person?

Choices:
- A. The speaker is the same person, but one of the segments has been voice-altered.
- B. Yes, they are the same person.
- C. No, not the same person
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information)


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker in the audio from 7.47 to 10.01 seconds the same as the speaker from 4.1 to 6.88 seconds?

Choices:
- A. One of the speakers may be deliberately imitating the other
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information)
- C. No, not the same person
- D. Yes, they are the same person.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker in the audio from 7.47 to 10.01 seconds the same as the speaker from 58.57 to 64.53 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Yes, they are the same person
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information)
- C. No, not the same person.
- D. The speaker is the same person, but one of the segments has been voice-modified.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker who said ‘if it falls face up it should count as something’ the same speaker who said ‘You dont get to just re-roll just because’?

Choices:
- A. No, not the same person
- B. Cannot determine (insufficient information)
- C. Yes, they are the same person.
- D. One of the speakers may be deliberately imitating the other.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker who said ‘if it falls face up it should count as something’ the same as the speaker who said ‘Can someone please get a monopoly card’?

Choices:
- A. No, not the same person.
- B. The speaker is the same person, but one of the segments has been voice-modified.
- C. Yes, they are the same person.
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: In the audio, is the speaker who said ‘if it falls face up it should count as something’ from 7.47s to 10.01s the same person as the speaker who said ‘You dont get to just re-roll just because’ from 4.1s to 6.88s?

Choices:
- A. Yes, it is the same person.
- B. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)
- C. No, not the same person
- D. One of the speakers may be deliberately imitating the other.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: In the audio, is the speaker who said ‘if it falls face up it should count as something’ from 7.47s to 10.01s the same as the speaker who said ‘Can someone please get a monopoly card’ from 58.57s to 64.53s?

Choices:
- A. Yes, it's the same person.
- B. No, not the same person.
- C. Cannot determine (Insufficient information)
- D. The speaker is the same person, but one of the segments has been voice-altered.


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话背景推理

Question: In which of the following scenarios does this conversation most likely take place?

Choices:
- A. Game developers are testing and discussing the rules of a new game in the company's conference room.
- B. Friends are playing board games together at someone's home.
- C. Players take part in a game competition at a board game cafe (or board game store).
- D. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence)

Friends playing board games together at someone's home.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interaction between the two speakers in the corresponding segment of the audio below? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. While Speaker A is thinking, Speaker B mockingly comments on their situation.
- B. Speaker A proposes an alternative, and Speaker B tactfully persuades.
- C. Speaker A complains about the rule, and Speaker B strongly rebuts and explains.
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)

Speaker A complains about the rule, Speaker B forcefully refutes and explains.

That thats BS.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior demonstrated by the speaker talking from 1.96s to 3.34s and the speaker talking from 4.1s to 6.88s in the audio, within their respective segments? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A complains about the rule, and Speaker B strongly refutes and explains.
- B. While Speaker A is thinking, Speaker B makes a mocking comment about their situation.
- C. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence)
- D. Speaker A proposes a workaround, and Speaker B gently tries to persuade.

Speaker A complains about the rules, Speaker B forcefully refutes and explains.

That thats BS.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What interaction is demonstrated in the corresponding clip between the speaker who said ‘That thats BS’ and the speaker who said ‘You dont get to just re-roll just because’? Please choose the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A makes a request for a workaround, and Speaker B tactfully dissuades them.
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence)
- C. Speaker A complains about the rule, and Speaker B strongly refutes and explains.
- D. While Speaker A is thinking, Speaker B makes a mocking comment about their situation.

Speaker A complains about the rule, and Speaker B forcefully refutes and explains.

That thats BS.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior demonstrated by the first speaker and the second speaker in the conversation? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. While Speaker A is thinking, Speaker B makes a mocking comment about their situation.
- B. Speaker A complains about the rule, and Speaker B strongly refutes and explains.
- C. Speaker A requests a flexible arrangement, and Speaker B tactfully persuades.
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)

Speaker A complains about the rules, Speaker B forcefully refutes and explains.

That thats BS.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interaction behavior demonstrated in the corresponding segments between the speaker who said 'That thats BS.' from 1.96s to 3.34s in the audio, and the speaker who said 'You dont get to just re-roll just because.' from 4.1s to 6.88s? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A requests a workaround, and Speaker B gently persuades.
- B. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)
- C. While Speaker A is thinking, Speaker B makes a mocking comment about his/her situation.
- D. Speaker A complains about the rules, and Speaker B forcefully refutes and explains.

Speaker A complains about the rule, Speaker B strongly refutes and explains.

That thats BS.


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: In the monologue audio below, the speaker's emotion is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Happy
- B. Surprised
- C. Sadness
- D. Unable to determine (Insufficient evidence to determine emotion)

Hey, thats like fifty percent of your jokes.

Oh yeah!


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: Which of the following is closest to the emotion of the speaker speaking from 25.05 seconds to 27.59 seconds in the audio?

Choices:
- A. Surprised
- B. Sorrow
- C. Happy
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to determine emotion)

Oh yeah!


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: In the audio, the emotion of the speaker who said “thats like fifty percent of your jokes” is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Sorrow
- B. Cannot determine (Insufficient evidence to determine emotion)
- C. Surprise
- D. Happy

Oh yeah!


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: For the speaker who said ‘Hey, thats like fifty percent of your jokes’ from 25.05s to 27.59s, which of the following is closest to their emotion?

Choices:
- A. Surprised
- B. Happy
- C. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence to determine the emotion)
- D. Sorrow

Oh yeah!


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, which speakers have shown the emotion of surprise? (Answer in global speaker order) Please select the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. spk_2、spk_3
- B. spk_2、spk_4
- C. spk_1、spk_4
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient evidence to determine the emotion)

Oh yeah!


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: How many speakers in total expressed the emotion of surprise in the entire audio clip? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. 1
- B. 4
- C. 2
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to determine the emotion)

Oh yeah!


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: In the single-speaker audio below, which of the following best describes the speaker's profile?

Choices:
- A. Gender: Male; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American English
- B. Gender: Female; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Angry; Accent: British English
- C. Gender: Female; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American English
- D. Cannot determine (insufficient information to determine)

Gender: Female; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American English

Wait, what if, what if theres a situation where youre making fun of your own

And people lately seem to be really easily doxed somehow.


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: Which of the following speaker profiles most closely matches the speaker in the audio from 34.6 seconds to 39.42 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)
- B. Gender: Female; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American English
- C. Gender: Male voice; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American English
- D. Gender: Female voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Angry; Accent: British English

Gender: Female voice; Age: Youth; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American English


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: The speaker profile of the person in the audio who said ‘what if theres a situation where youre making fun of your own’ is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Gender: Female; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Angry; Accent: British English
- B. Gender: Male; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American English
- C. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine)
- D. Gender: Female; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American English

Gender: Female voice; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American English


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: What is the gender of the 3rd speaker to appear in the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Male voice
- B. Mixed gender
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine)
- D. Female voice


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: For the speaker who said ‘what if theres a situation’ between 34.6 and 39.42 seconds, which of the following is the closest speaker profile?

Choices:
- A. Gender: Female; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American English
- B. Gender: Male; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American English
- C. Cannot determine (insufficient information to determine)
- D. Gender: Female voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Angry; Accent: British English

Gender: Female voice; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American English


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: In the entire audio, which speakers have the profile “Gender: Female; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Neutral”? (Answer with spk_index) Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. spk_2
- B. spk_3、spk_5
- C. spk_3
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information)


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: In the entire audio, how many speakers are there with the profile "Gender: Female voice; Age: Youth; Emotion: Neutral"? Please select the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. 2
- B. 1
- C. 5
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine)


说话人识别能力-说话人反向检索任务

Question:
From the statements below, what did the first speaker in the dialogue say? Please select the most fitting option.
Candidate statements:
1) Racist jokes off limit right now?
2) Im just gonna shut up now.
3) Oh yeah, theres people listening.
4) And people lately seem to be really easily doxed somehow.
5) I guess we should keep the conversation light.
6) That was a nose, not another part.

Choices:
- A. 1, 2, 4, 6
- B. 1, 2, 3, 5
- C. 1, 2, 3, 6
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine)

Im just gonna shut up now.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the speaker in the following monologue audio, throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Believes that posting inappropriate comments online carries the risk of being "doxxed", and that one should be cautious.
- B. Insist that the freedom to joke should not be restricted under any circumstances.
- C. Humorously accepted the view that it is inappropriate to make racist jokes in this context.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine the conclusion/change)

Humorously accepted the idea that it's inappropriate to make racist jokes in this context.

Im just gonna shut up now.

So, are racist jokes off limit?

Oh yeah, theres people listening.

Probably, cuz its gonna be online.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the speaker from 29.44 to 31.22 throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Believe that posting inappropriate comments online carries the risk of being “human flesh searched”, and one should be cautious.
- B. Humorously accepted the view that it was inappropriate to make racist jokes in this context.
- C. Insist that the freedom to joke should not be restricted under any circumstances.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine the conclusion/change)

Humorously accepted the view that it was inappropriate to make racist jokes in this context.

Im just gonna shut up now.

So, are racist jokes off limit?

Oh yeah, theres people listening.

Probably, cuz its gonna be online.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance, throughout the entire conversation, of the speaker in the audio who said ‘Im just gonna shut up now’?

Choices:
- A. Humorously accepted the view that making racist jokes was inappropriate in this scenario.
- B. Believes that posting inappropriate comments online carries the risk of being “doxxed”, and one should be cautious.
- C. Insist that the freedom to joke should not be restricted under any circumstances.
- D. Cannot be determined (The evidence is insufficient to uniquely derive the conclusion/change)

Humorously accepted the point that it was inappropriate to make racist jokes in this scenario.

Im just gonna shut up now.

So, are racist jokes off limit?

Oh yeah, theres people listening.

Probably, cuz its gonna be online.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance in the entire conversation of the speaker who said ‘Im just gonna shut up now’ from 29.44 to 31.22 seconds in the audio?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine the conclusion/change)
- B. Insist that the freedom to make jokes should not be restricted in any situation.
- C. Believes that posting inappropriate comments online carries the risk of being “doxed”, and one should be cautious.
- D. Humorously accepted the point that it was inappropriate to make racist jokes in this context.

Humorously accepted the view that it was inappropriate to make racist jokes in this context.

Im just gonna shut up now.

So, are racist jokes off limit?

Oh yeah, theres people listening.

Probably, cuz its gonna be online.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the first speaker (spk_1) in the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Believes that posting inappropriate comments online carries the risk of being “doxxed”, and that one should be cautious.
- B. Humorously accepted the view that it was inappropriate to make racist jokes in this context.
- C. Insist that the freedom to make jokes should not be restricted under any circumstances.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to draw a single conclusion/change)

Humorously accepted the view that it was inappropriate to make racist jokes in this context.

Im just gonna shut up now.

So, are racist jokes off limit?

Oh yeah, theres people listening.

Probably, cuz its gonna be online.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker in the single-person audio below change throughout the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. From being surprised by the rule → to raising the question of whether self-deprecating humor is an exception.
- B. From tentatively asking about the rules → to understanding and accepting the restriction, and responding with humor.
- C. From staunchly defending the freedom to joke → to turning against all forms of sensitive humor.
- D. Cannot be determined (The evidence is insufficient to uniquely support the viewpoint/change)

From tentatively inquiring about the rules → to understanding and accepting the limitation, and responding in a humorous way.

Im just gonna shut up now.

So, are racist jokes off limit?

Oh yeah, theres people listening.

Probably, cuz its gonna be online.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker from 29.44 to 31.22 seconds in the audio change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. From tentatively asking about the rules → to understanding and accepting the restriction, and responding with humor.
- B. From firmly defending the freedom to joke → to turning against all forms of sensitive humor.
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely conclude the viewpoint/change)
- D. From being surprised at the rule → to questioning whether self-deprecating humor is an exception.

From tentatively asking about the rules → to understanding and accepting the restriction, and responding with humor.

Im just gonna shut up now.

So, are racist jokes off limit?

Oh yeah, theres people listening.

Probably, cuz its gonna be online.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker in the audio who said ‘Im just gonna shut up now’ change throughout the conversation?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (The evidence is insufficient to lead to a single conclusion/change)
- B. From staunchly defending the freedom to joke → to turning against all forms of sensitive humor.
- C. From tentatively inquiring about the rules → to understanding and accepting the limitation, and responding with humor.
- D. From being surprised by the rule → to raising the question of whether self-deprecating humor is an exception.

From tentatively inquiring about the rules → to understanding and accepting the restriction, and responding in a humorous way.

Im just gonna shut up now.

So, are racist jokes off limit?

Oh yeah, theres people listening.

Probably, cuz its gonna be online.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: For the speaker who said ‘Im just gonna shut up now’ from 29.44 to 31.22 seconds in the audio, how does their stance change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. From being surprised by the rule → to raising the question of whether self-deprecating humor is an exception.
- B. From tentatively inquiring about the rules → to understanding and accepting the restriction, and responding in a humorous way.
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine the conclusion/change)
- D. From firmly defending the freedom to joke → to shifting to oppose all forms of sensitive humor.

From tentatively asking about the rules → to understanding and accepting the restriction, and responding in a humorous way.

Im just gonna shut up now.

So, are racist jokes off limit?

Oh yeah, theres people listening.

Probably, cuz its gonna be online.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the first speaker (spk_1) change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. From being surprised at the rule → to raising the question of whether self-deprecating humor is an exception.
- B. From staunchly defending the freedom to joke → to turning to oppose all forms of sensitive humor.
- C. From tentatively asking about the rules → to understanding and accepting the limitation, and responding with humor.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely deduce the conclusion/change)

From tentatively asking about the rules → to understanding and accepting the restriction, and responding with humor.

Im just gonna shut up now.

So, are racist jokes off limit?

Oh yeah, theres people listening.

Probably, cuz its gonna be online.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: The following is a solo utterance from a speaker. In the full conversation, the most likely response to this utterance is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B: Hey, thats like fifty percent of your jokes.
- B. Speaker B: Probably, cuz its gonna be online.
- C. Speaker B: I think we should avoid them to be safe.
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to locate the response)

Speaker B: Probably, cuz its gonna be online.

Racist jokes off limit right now?

Probably, cuz its gonna be online.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: Based on the dialogue, the reply from others to what a speaker said between 2.6 and 4.31 seconds is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B：Hey, thats like fifty percent of your jokes.
- B. Speaker B: I think we should avoid them to be safe.
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to locate the response)
- D. Speaker B: Probably, cuz its gonna be online.

Speaker B: Probably, cuz its gonna be online.

Racist jokes off limit right now?

Probably, cuz its gonna be online.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: According to the conversation, the response of other people to a speaker's statement about ‘Racist jokes off limit’ is:

Choices:
- A. Unable to determine (Insufficient information to locate a response)
- B. Speaker B: I think we should avoid them to be safe.
- C. Speaker B: Probably, cuz its gonna be online.
- D. Speaker B: Hey, that's like fifty percent of your jokes.

Speaker B: Probably, cuz its gonna be online.

Racist jokes off limit right now?

Probably, cuz its gonna be online.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: According to the dialogue, the others' response to the speaker's statement from 2.6s to 4.31s about ‘Racist jokes off limit right now’ is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B: Probably, cuz its gonna be online.
- B. Speaker B: I think we should avoid them to be safe.
- C. Speaker B: Hey, thats like fifty percent of your jokes.
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to locate the response)

Speaker B: Probably, cuz its gonna be online.

Racist jokes off limit right now?

Probably, cuz its gonna be online.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the speaker in the following single-speaker audio throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Believes that the perception of “slow motion” in critical moments is a real and common phenomenon, and strongly identifies with the narrator's experience.
- B. Personally experienced an explosion and felt time slow down, like the "bullet time" in movies.
- C. Initially doubted the authenticity of the story, but was later convinced by the details.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely support the viewpoint/change).

Believes that perceiving "slow motion" during critical moments is a real and common phenomenon, and strongly identifies with the narrator's experience.

No, no no no its so true. Like when something bad happens y- everything is like almost like milliseconds, like you can feel it.

Aw. Oh my gosh.

Oh fuck, you were like Neo! Yes!

I was so certain that I was about to burn to death and die that this felt like slow motion. I actually had like time to consider what Im gonna do when I hit the ground. So Im like thinking okay, Im gonna be, my clothes are gonna be blazing, my skin is gonna be burning off, I gotta hit the ground rolling as hard as I can just to save my life.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the speaker from 55.24 to 64.07 in the audio, throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Initially doubted the authenticity of the story, but was later convinced by the details.
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to lead to a single conclusion/change).
- C. Believes that perceiving "slow motion" in critical moments is a real and common phenomenon, and strongly identifies with the narrator's experience.
- D. Personally experienced an explosion and felt time slow down, like "bullet time" in the movies.

Believes that the perception of "slow motion" in critical moments is a real and common phenomenon, and strongly identifies with the narrator's experience.

Aw. Oh my gosh.

Oh fuck, you were like Neo! Yes!


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance in the entire conversation of the speaker who said in the audio, ‘its so true. Like when something bad happens’?

Choices:
- A. Personally experienced an explosion and felt time slow down, like the "bullet time" in movies.
- B. Believes that perceiving "slow motion" in critical moments is a real, widespread phenomenon, and strongly identifies with the narrator's experience.
- C. Cannot be determined (The evidence is insufficient to uniquely support the viewpoint/change).
- D. Initially doubted the authenticity of the story, but was later convinced by the details.

Believes that perceiving "slow motion" in critical moments is a real, common phenomenon, and expresses strong agreement with the narrator's experience.

Aw. Oh my gosh.

Oh fuck, you were like Neo! Yes!


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance in the entire conversation of the speaker who said ‘its so true. Like when something bad happens’ between 55.24s and 64.07s in the audio?

Choices:
- A. Believes that the perception of “slow motion” during critical moments is a real and common phenomenon, and strongly agrees with the narrator's experience.
- B. Initially doubted the authenticity of the story, but was later convinced by the details.
- C. Personally experienced an explosion and felt time slow down, like the "bullet time" in movies.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine the conclusion/change).

Believes that the perception of "slow motion" in critical moments is a real and common phenomenon, and expresses strong agreement with the narrator's experience.

Aw. Oh my gosh.

Oh fuck, you were like Neo! Yes!