多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior between the speaker who speaks from 60.38s to 60.94s and the speaker who speaks from 63.16s to 64.56s, as demonstrated in their respective segments in the audio? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)
- B. Speaker A affectionately urges Speaker B to stay, while Speaker B resolutely says goodbye.
- C. Speaker A asks to retreat out of cowardice, while Speaker B severely reprimands his cowardly behavior.
- D. Speaker A gives an agitated warning, while Speaker B calmly rebuts and emphasizes the consequences.

Speaker A emotionally warns, while Speaker B calmly refutes and emphasizes the consequences.

He's gonna die!

We go now, we all die.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interaction shown in the corresponding segments between the speaker who said ‘He's gonna die!’ and the speaker who said ‘We go now, we all die.’? Please select the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A gives an agitated warning, while Speaker B calmly refutes it and emphasizes the consequences.
- B. Speaker A requests to retreat out of cowardice, while Speaker B sternly reprimands their cowardly behavior.
- C. Speaker A affectionately urges Speaker B to stay, while Speaker B resolutely says goodbye.
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)

Speaker A gives an agitated warning, while Speaker B calmly refutes it and emphasizes the consequences.

He's gonna die!

We go now, we all die.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior demonstrated in the corresponding segments between the speaker who said ‘He's gonna die!’ from 60.38 to 60.94 seconds in the audio, and the speaker who said ‘We go now, we all die.’ from 63.16 to 64.56 seconds? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A affectionately asks Speaker B to stay, while Speaker B resolutely says goodbye.
- B. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)
- C. Speaker A gives an emotional warning, while Speaker B calmly refutes it and emphasizes the consequences.
- D. Speaker A asks to retreat out of cowardice, while Speaker B severely reprimands their cowardly behavior.

Speaker A agitatedly gives a warning, while Speaker B calmly refutes it and emphasizes the consequences.

He's gonna die!

We go now, we all die.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the speaker in the following single-person audio throughout the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. Believes that traditional therapies such as bloodletting with leeches should continue to be used to treat the queen.
- B. Is highly skeptical of and opposed to Doctor Dolittle's intervention and his methods.
- C. Initially supported inviting Doctor Dolittle, but became opposed after seeing the animals he brought.
- D. Cannot be determined (The evidence is insufficient to uniquely deduce the conclusion/change).

Highly skeptical of and opposed to Doctor Dolittle's intervention and his methods.

Animals! In the queen's chamber! I demand their immediate removal!

Standard British English (Received Pronunciation).

There is great concern for Her Majesty's health.

She'll be lucky to last the week.

Why is he here?

Utterly ridiculous.

I shall continue to leech, to circulate the vapors in the bloodstream.

Uh, Lady Rose, my apologies.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the speaker from 56.83 to 60.91 seconds in the audio throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Initially supported inviting Doctor Dolittle, but turned to opposition after seeing the animals he brought.
- B. Believed that traditional therapies such as leech bloodletting should continue to be used to treat the queen.
- C. Cannot be determined (The evidence is insufficient to uniquely determine the conclusion/change).
- D. Highly skeptical of and opposed to Doctor Dolittle's intervention and his methods.

Highly suspicious of and opposed to Doctor Dolittle's intervention and his methods.

She'll be lucky to last the week.

Why is he here?

Utterly ridiculous.

Uh, Lady Rose, my apologies.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance in the entire conversation of the speaker in the audio who said ‘I demand their immediate removal!’?

Choices:
- A. Highly skeptical of and opposed to Doctor Dolittle's intervention and his methods.
- B. Cannot be determined (The evidence is insufficient to uniquely support the viewpoint/change).
- C. Initially supported inviting Doctor Dolittle, but became opposed after seeing the animals he brought.
- D. Believed that traditional therapies, such as leech bloodletting, should continue to be used to treat the queen.

Highly skeptical of and opposed to Doctor Dolittle's intervention and his methods.

She'll be lucky to last the week.

Why is he here?

Utterly ridiculous.

Uh, Lady Rose, my apologies.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance, throughout the entire conversation, of the speaker who says ‘I demand their immediate removal!’ between 56.83 and 60.91 seconds in the audio?

Choices:
- A. Believes that traditional therapies such as bloodletting with leeches should continue to be used to treat the queen.
- B. Initially supported inviting Doctor Dolittle, but became opposed after seeing the animals he brought.
- C. Highly suspicious of and opposed to Doctor Dolittle's intervention and his methods.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine the viewpoint/change).

Highly skeptical of and opposed to Doctor Dolittle's intervention and his methods.

She'll be lucky to last the week.

Why is he here?

Utterly ridiculous.

Uh, Lady Rose, my apologies.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the first speaker (spk_1) throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine the conclusion/change).
- B. Initially supported inviting Doctor Dolittle, but became opposed after seeing the animals he brought.
- C. Highly skeptical of and opposed to Doctor Dolittle's intervention and his methods.
- D. Believed that traditional therapies such as leech bloodletting should continue to be used to treat the queen.

Highly skeptical of and opposed to Doctor Dolittle's intervention and his methods.

She'll be lucky to last the week.

Why is he here?

Utterly ridiculous.

Uh, Lady Rose, my apologies.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the speaker in the following monologue audio change their stance throughout the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. From being full of confidence in one's medical skills → to becoming flustered and eager to apologize for a slip of the tongue in front of the powerful.
- B. From having hope for the Queen's recovery → to falling into complete despair after seeing Doctor Dolittle.
- C. From expressing pessimistic concerns about the Queen's health → to expressing strong anger and opposition towards Dr. Dolittle's arrival and methods.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely deduce the conclusion/change)

From pessimistic concerns about the Queen's health → to strong anger and opposition towards Doctor Dolittle's arrival and methods.

She'll be lucky to last the week.

Why is he here?

Utterly ridiculous.

Uh, Lady Rose, my apologies.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker from 56.83s to 60.91s in the audio change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely conclude the viewpoint/change).
- B. From pessimistic concerns about the Queen's health → to strong anger and opposition towards Doctor Dolittle's arrival and methods.
- C. From being full of confidence in his own medical skills → to becoming flustered and rushing to apologize for misspeaking in front of the powerful and influential.
- D. From being hopeful for the queen's recovery → to falling into complete despair after seeing Doctor Dolittle.

From expressing pessimistic concerns about the Queen's health → to expressing strong anger and opposition towards Doctor Doolittle's arrival and methods.

She'll be lucky to last the week.

Why is he here?

Utterly ridiculous.

Uh, Lady Rose, my apologies.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker in the audio, who said ‘I demand their immediate removal!’, change throughout the conversation?

Choices:
- A. From being hopeful for the Queen's recovery → to completely despairing after seeing Doctor Dolittle.
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine the viewpoint/change).
- C. From being full of confidence in one's medical skills → to becoming flustered and hastily apologizing for misspeaking in front of the powerful and influential.
- D. From expressing pessimistic concerns about the Queen's health → to expressing strong anger and opposition towards Doctor Dolittle's arrival and methods.

From pessimistic concerns about the queen's health → to strong anger and opposition towards Doctor Dolittle's arrival and methods.

She'll be lucky to last the week.

Why is he here?

Utterly ridiculous.

Uh, Lady Rose, my apologies.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker, who says ‘I demand their immediate removal!’ in the audio from 56.83 to 60.91 seconds, change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. From pessimistic concern about the Queen's health → to strong anger and opposition to Doctor Dolittle's arrival and methods.
- B. From being completely confident in one's medical skills → to becoming flustered and rushing to apologize after misspeaking in front of the powerful.
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to lead to a unique conclusion/change).
- D. From hoping for the queen's recovery → completely despairing after seeing Doctor Dolittle.

From expressing pessimistic concerns about the Queen's health → to strong anger and opposition towards the arrival and methods of Doctor Dolittle.

She'll be lucky to last the week.

Why is he here?

Utterly ridiculous.

Uh, Lady Rose, my apologies.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: Throughout the entire conversation, how does the stance of the first speaker (spk_1) change?

Choices:
- A. From being full of confidence in his own medical skills → to becoming flustered and eager to apologize for a slip of the tongue in front of the powerful and influential.
- B. From being hopeful about the Queen's recovery → to falling into complete despair after seeing Doctor Dolittle.
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to draw a unique conclusion/change).
- D. From pessimistic concern for the Queen's health → strong anger and opposition to Doctor Dolittle's arrival and methods.

From expressing pessimistic concerns about the Queen's health → to expressing strong anger and opposition to Doctor Dolittle's arrival and methods.

She'll be lucky to last the week.

Why is he here?

Utterly ridiculous.

Uh, Lady Rose, my apologies.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: What accent does the speaker use in the single-speaker audio below?

Choices:
- A. American English accent
- B. Standard British English (RP) accent
- C. Welsh English accent
- D. The accent is not obvious, unable to determine.

The Queen's symptoms are due to the effect of a rare Sumatran plant known as the nightshade flower.

What a fine painting.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: The speaker's accent in the audio from 11.57 to 17.73 seconds most closely resembles which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Welsh accent
- B. American English accent
- C. The accent is not obvious and cannot be determined.
- D. Standard British English (RP) accent

What a fine painting.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: In the audio, the accent of the person who said "The Queen's symptoms are due to the effect of a rare Sumatran plant" is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Standard British English (RP) accent
- B. Welsh English accent
- C. Accent not pronounced, cannot determine.
- D. Australian English accent

What a fine painting.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, what accent does the second speaker in the conversation use?

Choices:
- A. Welsh English accent
- B. Standard British English (RP) accent
- C. American English accent
- D. Accent not obvious, impossible to judge.

What a fine painting.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: For the male speaker who said “The Queen's symptoms are due to” between 11.57s and 17.73s, which of the following is his accent closest to?

Choices:
- A. The accent is not obvious and cannot be determined.
- B. American English accent
- C. Standard British English (RP) accent
- D. Welsh English accent

What a fine painting.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: Which speakers in the entire audio use a standard British English (RP) accent? (Answer in order of speaker appearance) Please select the best option.

Choices:
- A. The first speaker, the third speaker, the fourth speaker, the sixth speaker
- B. the first speaker, the second speaker, the sixth speaker
- C. The accent is not obvious, so it cannot be determined.
- D. The second speaker

The first speaker, the third speaker, the fourth speaker, the sixth speaker

What a fine painting.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, how many speakers use a standard British English (RP) accent? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. 1
- B. The accent is not obvious, unable to determine.
- C. 4
- D. 5

What a fine painting.


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: In the single-person audio below, the speaker's emotion is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Fear
- B. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence to determine the emotion)
- C. Angry
- D. Happy

You dismiss my mother in her own house.

You must do everything that your mother tells you.


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: Which of the following is closest to the emotion of the speaker in the audio from 11.43 to 12.87 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Angry
- B. Fear
- C. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence to determine sentiment)
- D. Happy

You dismiss my mother in her own house.


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: In the audio, the emotion of the speaker who said ‘You dismiss my mother in her own house’ is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Cannot determine (Insufficient evidence to determine emotion)
- B. Fear
- C. Happy
- D. Angry

You dismiss my mother in her own house.


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: The emotion of the speaker who said ‘You dismiss my mother’ between 11.43 and 12.87 seconds is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Angry
- B. Happy
- C. Fear
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient evidence to determine emotion)

You dismiss my mother in her own house.


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: Throughout the entire audio, which speakers have expressed the emotion Fear? (Answer in global speaker order) Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. spk_3
- B. spk_2, spk_3
- C. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence to determine emotion)
- D. spk_1, spk_2

You dismiss my mother in her own house.


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, how many speakers expressed the emotion of fear? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. 1
- B. Cannot determine (Insufficient evidence to determine emotion)
- C. 3
- D. 2

You dismiss my mother in her own house.


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: Which of the following is closest to the speaker's emotion in the solo audio clip below?

Choices:
- A. Surprised
- B. Sorrow
- C. Angry
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient evidence to determine emotion)

I just wondered whose map, um, is Britain using, when it completely ignores the United Nations and decides to invade Iraq.

Well, uh, I... I can't speak for Sir Bernard.


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: Which of the following is closest to the emotion of the speaker speaking in the audio from 5.12 seconds to 12.76 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Sorrow
- B. Angry
- C. Surprised
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient evidence to determine emotion)


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: The emotion of the speaker in the audio who said ‘when it completely ignores the United Nations’ is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Angry
- B. Surprised
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to determine the emotion)
- D. Sadness


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: The emotion of the speaker who said ‘when it completely ignores the United Nations’ from 5.12 to 12.76 seconds is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Surprised
- B. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence to determine sentiment)
- C. Sorrow
- D. Angry


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, which speakers have shown the emotion angry? (Answer in global speaker order) Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. spk_1、spk_2
- B. spk_2、spk_3
- C. spk_1、spk_4
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient evidence to determine the emotion)


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, how many speakers in total expressed the emotion of anger? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. 3
- B. 2
- C. 1
- D. Cannot judge (insufficient evidence to determine the emotion)


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance in the entire conversation of the speaker in the following single-speaker audio?

Choices:
- A. Strongly condemn the UK's decision to invade Iraq, believing it was motivated by commercial interests and disregarded international law.
- B. Defend the role of diplomats, arguing that military action is a last resort after all peaceful means have been exhausted.
- C. Believes the United Nations should be responsible for the war, but that there are problems with Britain's method of execution.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine the viewpoint/change)

Strongly condemn the UK's decision to invade Iraq, believing it was for commercial interests and in disregard of international law.

Or... or do you... do you think it's more diplomatic to bend the will of a superpower, and and politely take part in Vietnam?

Bullshit. That's bullshit. You have to take responsibility. You are being paid to apologize for this pathetic country Britain, and you can explain to us why we've burned our diplomatic credentials, and why, why we're killing, you know, thousands of innocent people just for, just for s- some barrels of oil and and and a photo opportunity on the White House lawn.

I mean diplomats have to go where they're sent.

Well, I think Sir Bernard would, would no doubt argue that when, um, peaceful means are exhausted...


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: For the speaker from 5.12 to 12.76 seconds in the audio, what is their overall stance in the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Believes the United Nations should be responsible for the war, but Britain's execution was problematic.
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine the conclusion/change)
- C. Defending the role of diplomats, arguing that military action is a last resort after peaceful means have been exhausted.
- D. Strongly condemn Britain's decision to invade Iraq, believing it was motivated by commercial interests and disregarded international law.

Strongly condemn the UK's decision to invade Iraq, believing it was motivated by commercial interests in disregard of international law.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the speaker who said ‘when it completely ignores the United Nations and decides to invade Iraq’ in the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Defend the role of diplomats, arguing that military action is a last resort after peaceful means have been exhausted.
- B. Strongly condemn the UK's decision to invade Iraq, arguing that it was motivated by commercial interests and disregarded international law.
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely infer the conclusion/change)
- D. Believed the UN should be responsible for the war, but that there were problems with Britain's execution.

Strongly condemn the UK's decision to invade Iraq, believing it was motivated by commercial interests and disregarded international law.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance in the entire dialogue of the speaker who, from 5.12s to 12.76s in the audio, said ‘when it completely ignores the United Nations and decides to invade Iraq’?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (The evidence is insufficient to uniquely lead to the conclusion/change)
- B. Believes the United Nations should be responsible for the war, but that Britain's implementation is problematic.
- C. Strongly condemn the UK's decision to invade Iraq, believing it was motivated by commercial interests and disregarded international law.
- D. Defend the role of diplomats, arguing that military action is a last resort after peaceful means have been exhausted.

Strongly condemn the UK's decision to invade Iraq, believing it was motivated by commercial interests and disregarded international law.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the first speaker (spk_1) throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Defend the role of diplomats, arguing that military action is a last resort after peaceful means have been exhausted.
- B. Believes that the United Nations should be responsible for the war, but that Britain's method of execution was problematic.
- C. Cannot be determined (evidence is insufficient to uniquely conclude the viewpoint/change)
- D. Strongly condemn the UK's decision to invade Iraq, arguing that it was motivated by commercial interests and disregarded international law.

Strongly condemn the UK's decision to invade Iraq, believing it was motivated by commercial interests and ignored international law.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the speaker's stance in the following single-person audio change throughout the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. From attempting to evade the issue → to attempting to rationally explain the necessity of foreign policy.
- B. From a diplomatic stance of supporting Britain → becoming a complete opponent.
- C. From sharp questioning of the policy → evolved into angry accusations against the diplomats involved and the nation.
- D. Cannot be determined (The evidence is insufficient to uniquely derive the viewpoint/change)

From sharp questioning of the policy → evolved into angry accusations against the diplomats and countries involved.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker from 5.12s to 12.76s in the audio change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely conclude the viewpoint/change)
- B. From sharp questioning of the policy → evolved into angry accusations against the diplomats and nation involved.
- C. From trying to avoid the problem → to trying to rationally explain the necessity of foreign policy.
- D. From a diplomatic stance of supporting Britain → to becoming a complete opponent.

From sharp questioning of the policy → evolved into angry accusations against the diplomats and country involved.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker who said ‘when it completely ignores the United Nations and decides to invade Iraq’ in the audio change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. From sharp questioning of the policy → evolved into angry accusations against the diplomats and nation involved.
- B. From supporting Britain's diplomatic stance → to becoming a staunch opponent.
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely deduce the conclusion/change)
- D. From trying to avoid the problem → to trying to rationally explain the necessity of foreign policy.

From sharp questioning of the policy → evolving into angry accusations against the diplomats and the country involved.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker who said ‘when it completely ignores the United Nations and decides to invade Iraq’ from 5.12 to 12.76 in the audio change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. From a diplomatic stance of supporting Britain → to becoming a complete opponent.
- B. From trying to avoid the issue → trying to rationally explain the necessity of foreign policy.
- C. From sharp questioning of the policy → evolving into angry accusations against the diplomat and country involved.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to lead to a single conclusion/change)

From sharp questioning of the policy → evolved into angry accusations against the diplomats and country involved.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the first speaker (spk_1) change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. From trying to evade the issue → to trying to rationally explain the necessity of foreign policy.
- B. From sharp questioning of the policy → to angry accusations against the diplomats involved and the country.
- C. From supporting Britain's diplomatic stance → to becoming a complete opponent.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely derive the viewpoint/change)

From sharp questioning of the policy → to angry accusations against the diplomats and country involved.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Are the speakers in the two audio clips below the same person?

Choices:
- A. Yes, the same person
- B. No, not the same person
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information)
- D. The two speakers' voices are somewhat similar.

Why... why was that lady turned away?

Isn't that all the more reason to inoculate her child?

She's a TB patient who discontinued her treatment.

Non-native English with an African accent

Do you see any of your countrymen here, Mr. Quayle?


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Are the speakers in the following two audio clips the same?

Choices:
- A. The two speakers have different emotions, but their timbres are the same.
- B. Cannot determine (insufficient information)
- C. No, not the same person
- D. Yes, the same person

Why... why was that lady turned away?


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker from 4.43s to 6.75s the same as the speaker from 10.99s to 13.55s?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information)
- B. Yes, the same person
- C. No, not the same person
- D. The two speakers' accents are similar.

Why... why was that lady turned away?


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker in the audio from 4.43 seconds to 6.75 seconds the same speaker as the one from 15.17 seconds to 17.61 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Yes, the same person
- B. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)
- C. No, not the same person
- D. Possibly the same person, but the tone is too different.

Why... why was that lady turned away?


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker who said ‘Why... why was that lady turned away?’ the same as the speaker who said ‘She's a TB patient who discontinued her treatment.’?

Choices:
- A. No, not the same person
- B. It could be the same person imitating different accents
- C. Yes, the same person
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)

Why... why was that lady turned away?


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker who said ‘Why... why was that lady turned away?’ the same as the speaker who said ‘Isn't that all the more reason to inoculate her child?’?

Choices:
- A. Cannot determine (insufficient information)
- B. No, not the same person
- C. Yes, the same person
- D. The timbres of the two speakers partially overlap.

Why... why was that lady turned away?


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker who said ‘Why... why was that lady turned away?’ from 4.43s to 6.75s in the audio the same person as the speaker who said ‘She's a TB patient who discontinued her treatment.’ from 10.99s to 13.55s?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)
- B. No, not the same person
- C. The two speakers are the same gender, but their timbres are different.
- D. Yes, the same person

Why... why was that lady turned away?


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker in the audio from 4.43s to 6.75s who said ‘Why... why was that lady turned away?’ the same speaker as the one from 15.17s to 17.61s who said ‘Isn't that all the more reason to inoculate her child?’?

Choices:
- A. Yes, the same person
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information)
- C. No, not the same person.
- D. The two speakers differ in their speaking speed and emotion.

Why... why was that lady turned away?


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话背景推理

Question: In which of the following scenarios does this dialogue most likely take place?

Choices:
- A. In a hospital's consultation room, relevant personnel are negotiating a medical procedure.
- B. At a temporary outdoor medical aid station, relevant personnel are negotiating medical procedures.
- C. In the embassy's visa hall, an official had a dispute with a staff member over a visa issue.
- D. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence)

At an outdoor temporary medical aid station, relevant personnel are negotiating medical procedures.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: What accent does the speaker have in the following single-speaker audio?

Choices:
- A. British English accent
- B. New York accent
- C. General American English accent
- D. Indistinct accent, cannot be determined.

I don't care about bringing in the new guy, but but that you can't leave my name on the picture, that's the whole point of me scrapping it.

You believe me, when I tell you I got nothing but respect for you.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: Which of the following does the speaker's accent in the audio from 91.971 seconds to 97.371 seconds most closely resemble?

Choices:
- A. New York area English accent
- B. General American English Accent
- C. British English accent
- D. Accent not obvious, cannot determine.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: The accent of the speaker who says “that's the whole point of me scrapping it” in the audio is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. General American English accent
- B. British English accent
- C. New York area English accent
- D. The accent is not obvious, cannot be determined.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: What accent is used by the second speaker in the conversation throughout the entire audio?

Choices:
- A. General American English accent
- B. Australian English accent
- C. The accent isn't distinct, so it's impossible to tell.
- D. New York regional English accent


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: Which of the following accents is closest to that of the male speaker who said “that's the whole point of me scrapping it” between 91.971 and 97.371 seconds?

Choices:
- A. The accent is not obvious and cannot be determined.
- B. British English accent
- C. New York area English accent
- D. General American English Accent


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, which speakers use a General American English accent? (Answer in order of speaker appearance) Please select the one that best fits.

Choices:
- A. The first speaker
- B. The first speaker and the second speaker
- C. The first speaker, the third speaker
- D. Accent not obvious, unable to determine.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: How many speakers with a General American accent are there in the entire audio clip? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. 3
- B. 2
- C. 1
- D. Accent not distinct, unable to determine.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the stances of the two speakers throughout the entire conversation in the audio below? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Regarding companionship with the father: Shows resistance due to feeling neglected, but the core is a desire to spend time with the father.; Speaker B: Regarding the relationship with the daughter: Acknowledges their own failings and actively seeks to repair the relationship by increasing companionship.
- B. Speaker A: On his relationship with his daughter: Admits his failings and actively seeks to repair the relationship by spending more time with her.; Speaker B: On her father's companionship: Shows resistance due to feeling neglected, but at heart, longs to spend time with her father.
- C. Speaker A: View on the new mother: Firmly opposes the father's remarriage and believes it will destroy the family's integrity.; Speaker B: View on the new mother: Tries to persuade her daughter to accept the new member, but ultimately gives up her own plans for her daughter's sake.
- D. Speaker A: Regarding family issues: has big mood swings and feels uncertain about the future.; Speaker B: Regarding family issues: is trying to resolve the immediate conflict, but has complex inner thoughts.

Speaker A: Regarding companionship with his father: He shows resistance due to feeling neglected, but his core desire is to spend time with his father.; Speaker B: Regarding his relationship with his daughter: He acknowledges his own failings and actively seeks to repair the relationship by spending more time with her.

Yeah, and it'd be nice to have a father too.

Well, I I haven't been much of a father lately.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the stance in the entire conversation of the speaker who talks from 7.64s to 10.8s and the speaker who talks from 20.52s to 24.12s in the audio? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: On his relationship with his daughter: acknowledges his neglect and actively seeks to mend the relationship by spending more time with her.; Speaker B: On her father's companionship: shows resistance due to feeling neglected, but her core desire is to spend time with her father.
- B. Speaker A: Regarding family issues: is emotionally volatile and feels uncertain about the future.; Speaker B: Regarding family issues: is trying to resolve the immediate conflicts, but has complex inner thoughts.
- C. Speaker A: Regarding companionship with their father: Acts resistant due to feeling neglected, but at heart, longs to spend time with their father.; Speaker B: Regarding his relationship with his daughter: Acknowledges his own failings and proactively seeks to repair the relationship by spending more time with her.
- D. Speaker A: View on the stepmother: Strongly opposes the father's remarriage, believing it would destroy the family's integrity.; Speaker B: View on the stepmother: Tries to persuade the daughter to accept the new member, but ultimately gives up their own plans for the daughter's sake.

Speaker A: Regarding companionship with her father: She shows resistance because she feels neglected, but at her core, she longs to spend time with her father.
Speaker B: Regarding his relationship with his daughter: He acknowledges his failings and proactively seeks to mend the relationship by spending more time with her.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the stance in the entire conversation of the speaker who said ‘and it'd be nice to have a father too’ and the speaker who said ‘I haven't been much of a father lately’? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Regarding companionship with his father: Shows resistance due to feeling neglected, but at his core, desires to spend time with his father.; Speaker B: Regarding his relationship with his daughter: Acknowledges his own shortcomings and proactively seeks to mend the relationship by spending more time with her.
- B. Speaker A: View on the new mother: Firmly opposes the father's remarriage and believes it will destroy the integrity of the family.; Speaker B: View on the new mother: Tries to persuade the daughter to accept the new member, but ultimately gives up their own plans for the daughter's sake.
- C. Speaker A: Regarding his relationship with his daughter: Admits his negligence and proactively seeks to repair the relationship by spending more time with her.; Speaker B: Regarding her father's companionship: Acts resistant due to feeling neglected, but what she really wants is to spend time with her father.
- D. Speaker A: On family issues: Emotionally volatile and uncertain about the future.; Speaker B: On family issues: Trying to resolve the immediate conflict, but has complex inner thoughts.

Speaker A: Regarding companionship with his father: Shows resistance due to feeling neglected, but at the core is a longing to spend time with his father.; Speaker B: Regarding the relationship with his daughter: Acknowledges his own failings and proactively seeks to repair the relationship by spending more time with her.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the respective stances of the 1st speaker and the 2nd speaker throughout the conversation? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: View on the new mother: Firmly opposes the father's remarriage and believes it will destroy the family's integrity.; Speaker B: View on the new mother: Tries to persuade his daughter to accept the new member, but ultimately gives up his own plan for his daughter's sake.
- B. Speaker A: Regarding companionship with his father: Shows resistance from feeling neglected, but at the core is a desire to spend time with his father.; Speaker B: Regarding his relationship with his daughter: Acknowledges his own shortcomings and actively seeks to repair the relationship by spending more time with her.
- C. Speaker A: Regarding the family issue: is very emotional and uncertain about the future.; Speaker B: Regarding the family issue: tries to resolve the immediate conflict, but has complex inner thoughts.
- D. Speaker A: Regarding his relationship with his daughter: Admits his own shortcomings and proactively seeks to repair the relationship by spending more time with her.; Speaker B: Regarding her father's companionship: Shows resistance due to feeling neglected, but her core desire is to spend time with her father.

Speaker A: Regarding companionship with the father: Shows resistance due to feeling neglected, but at the core, desires to spend time with the father.; Speaker B: Regarding the relationship with his daughter: Acknowledges his own failings and proactively seeks to repair the relationship by increasing companionship.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the stance in the entire conversation of the speaker who said ‘it'd be nice to have a father too’ from 7.64s to 10.8s in the audio, and the speaker who said ‘I haven't been much of a father lately’ from 20.52s to 24.12s? Please choose the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: On the family issue: is very emotional and uncertain about the future.; Speaker B: On the family issue: is trying to resolve the immediate conflict, but has complex inner thoughts.
- B. Speaker A: Regarding his relationship with his daughter: Acknowledges his shortcomings and proactively seeks to mend the relationship by spending more time with her.; Speaker B: Regarding her father's companionship: Shows resistance due to feeling neglected, but at her core, she longs to spend time with her father.
- C. Speaker A: Regarding companionship with the father: Shows resistance due to feeling neglected, but at the core is a desire to spend time with him.; Speaker B: Regarding the relationship with his daughter: Acknowledges his own shortcomings and proactively seeks to repair the relationship by spending more time with her.
- D. Speaker A: View on the new mother: Firmly opposes the father's remarriage and believes it will destroy the family's integrity.; Speaker B: View on the new mother: Tries to persuade his daughter to accept the new member, but ultimately gives up his own plan for his daughter's sake.

Speaker A: Regarding companionship with the father: Shows resistance due to feeling neglected, but the core is a longing to spend time with the father.; Speaker B: Regarding the relationship with the daughter: Acknowledges their own failings and proactively seeks to mend the relationship by increasing companionship.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in the positions of the two speakers in the audio below throughout the entire conversation? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Attitude towards the conversation: From [Emotionally agitated] → [Gradually calming down]; Speaker B: Attitude towards the conversation: From [Trying to persuade] → [Shifting to comforting and explaining].
- B. Speaker A: Attitude towards the father-daughter relationship: From [full of resentment and defiance from feeling neglected] → [shifting to reconciliation and closeness after receiving her father's understanding and promise].; Speaker B: Approach to resolving the father-daughter conflict: From [attempting to solve the problem by introducing a new member] → [shifting to admitting his own fault and promising to make up for it with companionship].
- C. Speaker A: Approach to resolving the father-daughter conflict: From 【Trying to solve the problem by introducing a new member】 → 【Shifting to admitting his own fault and promising to make up for it with companionship】.; Speaker B: Attitude towards the father-daughter relationship: From 【Full of resentment and resistance due to feeling neglected】 → 【Shifting to reconciliation and closeness after receiving her father's understanding and promise】.
- D. Speaker A: Attitude towards the father-daughter relationship: has always been 【hoping her father would care more about her】; Speaker B: Plans for his future family: from 【planning to start a family with a new partner】→【shifting to temporarily setting aside personal plans to prioritize his daughter】.

Speaker A: Attitude towards the father-daughter relationship: From [full of resentment and resistance due to feeling neglected] → to [reconciliation and closeness after receiving her father's understanding and promise].; Speaker B: Approach to resolving the father-daughter conflict: From [attempting to solve the problem by introducing a new member] → to [admitting his own fault and promising to make up for it with companionship].


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in viewpoint of the speaker who speaks from 7.64s to 10.8s and the speaker who speaks from 20.52s to 24.12s in the audio during their dialogue about their stances? Please select the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Approach to resolving the father-daughter conflict: From 【trying to solve the problem by introducing a new member】→【to admitting his own fault and promising to make up for it with companionship】.; Speaker B: Attitude towards the father-daughter relationship: From 【being full of resentment and resistance due to feeling neglected】→【to reconciliation and closeness after receiving her father's understanding and promise】.
- B. Speaker A: Attitude towards the conversation: From 【Agitated】→【Gradually calming down】.; Speaker B: Attitude towards the conversation: From 【Trying to persuade】→【Shifting to comforting and explaining】.
- C. Speaker A: Attitude towards the father-daughter relationship: Consistently [wishing her father would care more about her].; Speaker B: Plans for a future family: From [planning to start a family with a new partner] → [temporarily putting aside personal plans and prioritizing his daughter].
- D. Speaker A: Attitude towards the father-daughter relationship: from [full of resentment and resistance due to feeling neglected] → [shifting to reconciliation and closeness after receiving her father's understanding and promise].; Speaker B: Approach to resolving the father-daughter conflict: from [trying to solve the problem by introducing a new member] → [shifting to admitting his own faults and promising to make up for it with companionship].

Speaker A: Attitude towards the father-daughter relationship: From [resentment and resistance due to feeling neglected] → to [reconciliation and closeness after receiving her father's understanding and promise].; Speaker B: Approach to resolving the father-daughter conflict: From [attempting to solve the problem by introducing a new member] → to [admitting his own faults and promising to make up for it with companionship].


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in the stances of the speaker who said ‘and it'd be nice to have a father too’ and the speaker who said ‘I haven't been much of a father lately’ throughout the entire conversation? Please select the best option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Attitude towards the father-daughter relationship: From 【filled with resentment and resistance due to feeling neglected】→【changes to reconciliation and closeness after receiving her father's understanding and promise】.; Speaker B: Approach to resolving the father-daughter conflict: From 【attempting to solve the problem by introducing a new member】→【changes to admitting his own fault and promising to make up for it with companionship】.
- B. Speaker A: Approach to resolving the father-daughter conflict: from [attempting to solve the problem by introducing a new member] → [admitting his own fault and promising to make up for it with companionship].; Speaker B: Attitude towards the father-daughter relationship: from [resentment and resistance due to feeling neglected] → [reconciliation and closeness after receiving her father's understanding and promise].
- C. Speaker A: Attitude towards the father-daughter relationship: Attitude has consistently been [hoping her father would care more about her].; Speaker B: Plans for his future family: from [planning to start a family with a new partner] → [shifting to temporarily putting personal plans on hold to prioritize his daughter].
- D. Speaker A: Attitude towards the conversation: From 【Emotionally agitated】→【Gradually calming down】; Speaker B: Attitude towards the conversation: From 【Trying to persuade】→【Shifting to comforting and explaining】.

Speaker A: Attitude towards the father-daughter relationship: From [being full of resentment and resistance due to feeling neglected] → [to reconciliation and closeness after receiving her father's understanding and promise].; Speaker B: Approach to resolving the father-daughter conflict: From [trying to introduce a new member to solve the problem] → [to admitting his own fault and promising to make up for it with companionship].


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: Throughout the entire conversation, what are the respective changes in stance for the 1st speaker and the 2nd speaker? Please select the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Approach to resolving the father-daughter conflict: From [trying to introduce a new member to solve the problem] → To [admitting his own fault and promising to make up for it with companionship].; Speaker B: Attitude towards the father-daughter relationship: From [being full of resentment and resistance due to feeling neglected] → To [reconciliation and closeness after receiving her father's understanding and promise].
- B. Speaker A: Attitude towards the father-daughter relationship: Has always been [hoping her father would care more about her].; Speaker B: Plans for his future family: From [planning to start a family with a new partner] → [temporarily setting aside personal plans to prioritize his daughter].
- C. Speaker A: Attitude towards the father-daughter relationship: From [resentment and resistance due to feeling neglected] → [reconciliation and closeness after receiving her father's understanding and promise].; Speaker B: Approach to resolving the father-daughter conflict: From [attempting to solve the problem by introducing a new member] → [admitting his own fault and promising to make up for it with companionship].
- D. Speaker A: Attitude towards the conversation: From 【Emotional】 → 【Gradually calming down】.; Speaker B: Attitude towards the conversation: From 【Trying to persuade】 → 【Shifting to comforting and explaining】.

Speaker A: Attitude towards the father-daughter relationship: From [being filled with resentment and resistance due to feeling neglected] → [shifting to reconciliation and closeness after receiving her father's understanding and promise].; Speaker B: Method for resolving the father-daughter conflict: From [trying to solve the problem by introducing a new member] → [shifting to admitting his own fault and promising to make up for it with companionship].


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in stance throughout the entire conversation between the speaker who said ‘it'd be nice to have a father too’ from 7.64 seconds to 10.8 seconds in the audio, and the speaker who said ‘I haven't been much of a father lately’ from 20.52 seconds to 24.12 seconds? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Attitude towards the conversation: From [Emotionally agitated] → [Gradually calming down].; Speaker B: Attitude towards the conversation: From [Attempting to persuade] → [Shifting to comforting and explaining].
- B. Speaker A: Attitude towards the father-daughter relationship: Has always been [hoping her father would care more about her].; Speaker B: Plans for his future family: From [planning to start a family with a new partner] → [shifting to temporarily putting personal plans on hold to prioritize his daughter].
- C. Speaker A: Approach to resolving the father-daughter conflict: from [attempting to solve the problem by introducing a new member] → [shifting to admitting his own fault and promising to make up for it with companionship].; Speaker B: Attitude towards the father-daughter relationship: from [feeling resentful and resistant due to being neglected] → [shifting to reconciliation and closeness after receiving her father's understanding and promise].
- D. Speaker A: Attitude towards the father-daughter relationship: from [full of resentment and resistance due to feeling neglected] → [changes to reconciliation and closeness after receiving her father's understanding and promise].; Speaker B: Method of resolving the father-daughter conflict: from [trying to solve the problem by introducing a new member] → [changes to admitting his own faults and promising to make up for it with companionship].

Speaker A: Attitude towards the father-daughter relationship: From [being filled with resentment and resistance due to feeling neglected] → [to reconciliation and closeness after receiving her father's understanding and promise].; Speaker B: Method for resolving the father-daughter conflict: From [attempting to solve the problem by introducing a new member] → [to admitting his own mistakes and promising to make up for it with companionship].


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: In the audio below, what is the speaker's emotion? What effect did this emotion have on the other people in the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Calm/Neutral; Impact: Successfully persuaded <spk_2> to accept their course of action.
- B. Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Impact: Causes <spk_2> to feel shocked and question the proposal.
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine).
- D. Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Effect: Causes <spk_3> to be shocked by and question the proposal.

Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Impact: Causes <spk_2> to be shocked by and question the proposal.

You need to push back hard on these bastards, shoot them in the alleys if you have to.

Outright executions.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What is the emotion of the speaker (<spk_1>) in the audio from 82.47s to 87.03s? What effect did this emotion have on others in the conversation?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine).
- B. Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Impact: Causes <spk_3> to feel shocked and question the proposal.
- C. Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Impact: Led to <spk_2> feeling shocked and questioning the proposal.
- D. Emotion: Calm/Neutral; Impact: Successfully persuaded <spk_2> to accept their course of action.

Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Impact: Causes <spk_2> to feel shocked and question their proposal.

Outright executions.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What is the emotion of the speaker (<spk_1>) who says ‘You need to push back hard on these bastards’ in the audio? What impact did this emotion have on others in the conversation?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Impact: Causes <spk_2> to be shocked by and question the proposal.
- B. Emotion: Calm/Neutral; Influence: Successfully persuaded <spk_2> to accept their course of action.
- C. Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Impact: Causes <spk_3> to be shocked by and question the proposal.
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence to uniquely determine).

Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Impact: Causes <spk_2> to be shocked by and question the proposal.

Outright executions.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: In the audio, what is a strong emotion expressed by the first speaker (<spk_1>) during the latter half of the conversation? What impact did this emotion have on others?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Impact: Causes <spk_3> to feel shocked and doubtful about the proposal.
- B. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence to uniquely determine).
- C. Emotion: Calm/Neutral; Influence: Successfully persuaded <spk_2> to accept their course of action.
- D. Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Impact: Causes <spk_2> to feel shocked and question their proposal.

Emotion: Anger/Displeasure; Impact: Causes <spk_2> to be shocked by and question the proposal.

Outright executions.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What is the emotion of the speaker (<spk_1>) who says ‘shoot them in the alleys if you have to’ from 82.47s to 87.03s in the audio? What impact did this emotion have on others?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Calm/Neutral; Impact: Successfully persuaded <spk_2> to accept their course of action.
- B. Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Impact: Caused <spk_2> to be shocked and question the proposal.
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence to uniquely determine).
- D. Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Impact: Causes <spk_3> to feel shocked and question their proposal.

Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Impact: Causes <spk_2> to be shocked and skeptical about the proposal.

Outright executions.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: The following is a monologue from a speaker. In the full conversation, the most likely response to this speech is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B：I agree, let's leave it at that.
- B. Speaker B: No, sir.
- C. Speaker B: Not on her first day, no.
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to locate the response)

We don't want to scare her on her first day.

Not on her first day, no.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: Based on the content of the dialogue, the sentence used by others to reply to what a speaker said from 34.14s to 35.46s is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B: Not on her first day, no.
- B. Speaker B: I agree, let's leave it at that.
- C. Speaker B: No, sir.
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to locate the response)

Not on her first day, no.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: According to the conversation, the response from the other people to the speaker's statement ‘We don't want to scare her on her first day’ is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B: No, sir.
- B. Unable to judge (Insufficient information to provide a response)
- C. Speaker B: Not on her first day, no.
- D. Speaker B: I agree, let's leave it at that.

Not on her first day, no.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: Based on the dialogue, the response from others to a speaker's statement about ‘We don't want to scare her’ between 34.14 and 35.46 seconds is:

Choices:
- A. Unable to determine (Insufficient information to provide a specific response)
- B. Speaker B: Not on her first day, no.
- C. Speaker B: No, sir.
- D. Speaker B: I agree, let's leave it at that.

Not on her first day, no.


说话人识别能力-说话人反向检索任务

Question:
In the statements below, what did the 2nd speaker in the dialogue say? Please select the best match.
Candidate statements:
1) We'll have to send more reinforcements to the area.
2) There are reports of Japanese troops heading south towards Taipo.
3) Our naval superiority is the key to holding Hong Kong.
4) All right, all right, alert the troops station on the eastern side of the gin drinkers line.
5) What we really need is a couple of battleships stationed here.

Choices:
- A. 1, 4, 5
- B. 1, 2, 5
- C. 1, 3, 4
- D. Cannot determine (insufficient information to determine)

Well, we're at war, there's no doubt about it.


说话人识别能力-说话人计数任务

Question: How many different speakers are there in this audio?

Choices:
- A. 3 digits
- B. 5 digits
- C. 2 digits
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient information)

You tell me. That is your handwriting, isn't it?

Yes, that's my note.


说话人识别能力-说话人计数任务

Question: How many different speakers are there in the audio between the 30th and 40th second?

Choices:
- A. 4-bit
- B. 2 bits
- C. Cannot determine (Insufficient information)
- D. 3 people

Yes, that's my note.


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话背景推理

最佳拍档4：千里救差婆_最佳拍檔4：千里救差婆_1986_part001

Question: In which of the following scenarios did this conversation most likely take place?

Choices:
- A. A police officer is conducting a formal, official interrogation of a suspect in a police station interrogation room.
- B. The protagonist is inside a private residence or hideout, informally interrogating a suspect.
- C. Family members had a fierce argument over property in the living room and physically struck a visiting guest.
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)

The protagonist is conducting an informal interrogation of a suspect inside a private residence or hideout.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

末代皇帝(加长版).微信公众号：阅影圈_part027

Question: What is the interactive behavior demonstrated by the two speakers in the corresponding segment of the audio below? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A uses a sarcastic rhetorical question to apply pressure, while Speaker B timidly tries to defend themself.
- B. Speaker A makes a firm rebuttal, while Speaker B expresses surprise and asks them to repeat.
- C. Speaker A makes a harsh accusation, while Speaker B strongly denies it.
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient evidence)

Speaker A applies pressure through a sarcastic rhetorical question, while Speaker B timidly tries to justify themself.

Isn't it unusual for a man who is kidnapped to have his luggage packed by his valet the day before his kidnapping?

It was a long time ago.

Non-native English with a Chinese accent


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

末代皇帝(加长版).微信公众号：阅影圈_part027

Question: What is the interactive behavior demonstrated by the speaker from 51.52 seconds to 57.48 seconds and the speaker from 72.6 seconds to 73.92 seconds in their corresponding segments in the audio? Please select the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A makes a stern accusation, while Speaker B firmly denies it.
- B. Speaker A applies pressure with a sarcastic rhetorical question, while Speaker B timidly tries to defend themself.
- C. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence)
- D. Speaker A makes a firm rebuttal, while Speaker B expresses surprise and asks the other to repeat.

Speaker A applies pressure with a sarcastic rhetorical question, while Speaker B timidly tries to defend themselves.

It was a long time ago.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

末代皇帝(加长版).微信公众号：阅影圈_part027

Question: What is the interactive behavior in the corresponding audio segment between the speaker who said ‘Isn't it unusual for a man who is kidnapped’ and the speaker who said ‘It was a long time ago.’? Please choose the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A makes a firm rebuttal, and Speaker B expresses surprise and asks them to repeat.
- B. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)
- C. Speaker A applies pressure with a sarcastic rhetorical question, while Speaker B timidly tries to defend themselves.
- D. Speaker A makes a harsh accusation, but Speaker B firmly denies it.

Speaker A applies pressure with a sarcastic rhetorical question, while Speaker B timidly tries to defend themself.

It was a long time ago.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

末代皇帝(加长版).微信公众号：阅影圈_part027

Question: What is the interactive behavior demonstrated in the corresponding segments between the speaker who said ‘Isn't it unusual for a man who is kidnapped’ from 51.52 to 57.48 seconds in the audio, and the speaker who said ‘It was a long time ago.’ from 72.6 to 73.92 seconds? Please choose the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A applies pressure with a sarcastic rhetorical question, while Speaker B timidly tries to defend themselves.
- B. Speaker A makes a stern accusation, while Speaker B forcefully denies it.
- C. Speaker A makes a firm rebuttal, while Speaker B expresses surprise and asks them to repeat.
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)

Speaker A applies pressure with a sarcastic rhetorical question, while Speaker B timidly tries to defend themselves.

It was a long time ago.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: The following is a monologue from a speaker. The most likely response to it in a complete dialogue is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B: I've been killing crusaders all my life.
- B. Speaker B: I'm just following the king's decree.
- C. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to provide a specific response)
- D. Speaker B: My duty, Loxley.

What are you doing?

My duty, Loxley.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: According to the conversation, the reply from other people to what a speaker said from 28.98 to 29.42 seconds is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B: I've been killing crusaders all my life.
- B. Speaker B: I'm just following the king's decree.
- C. Unable to judge (insufficient information to provide a targeted response)
- D. Speaker B: My duty, Loxley.

What are you doing?

My duty, Loxley.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: Based on the dialogue, the reply from others to a speaker's question 'What are you doing?' is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B: I've been killing crusaders all my life.
- B. Speaker B: I'm just following the king's decree.
- C. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to identify the response)
- D. Speaker B: My duty, Loxley.

What are you doing?

My duty, Loxley.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: According to the dialogue, the other people's response to the speaker's utterance of 'What are you doing?' between 28.98 and 29.42 seconds is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B: I've been killing crusaders all my life.
- B. Speaker B: I'm just following the king's decree.
- C. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to provide a response)
- D. Speaker B: My duty, Loxley.

What are you doing?

My duty, Loxley.


说话人识别能力-说话人计数任务

Question: How many different speakers are in this audio?

Choices:
- A. 4-bit
- B. 3 digits
- C. 2 digits
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient information)

I didn't cross an ocean to watch you crawl into a bottle.

Non-native English with an Arabic accent

Well, then let's get on with it.


说话人识别能力-说话人计数任务

Question: How many different speakers are there in the audio from the 26th second to the 30th second?

Choices:
- A. 2 people
- B. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)
- C. 5 digits
- D. 3 digits

Well, then let's get on with it.


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: Based on the entire conversation in the audio below, what is the relationship between the two speakers? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Allies (in a plan)
- B. Employer—Employee
- C. Trainer—Trainee
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence)

No days off, English.

It's very easy to say from where you're standing.


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship in the entire conversation between the speaker talking from 4.23s to 4.99s and the speaker talking from 10.11s to 12.03s in the audio? Please select the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Employer—Employee
- B. Trainer—Trainee
- C. Allies (in a plan)
- D. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence)

No days off, English.


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship in the entire conversation between the speaker who said ‘No days off, English.’ and the speaker who said ‘It's very easy to say from where you're standing.’? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Allies (in a plan)
- B. Trainer—Trainee
- C. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence)
- D. Employer—Employee

No days off, English.


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship between the first speaker and the second speaker in the entire dialogue? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Trainer—Trainee
- B. Employer—Employee
- C. Allies (in a plan)
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)

No days off, English.


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship in the entire conversation between the speaker who said ‘No days off, English.’ from 4.23s to 4.99s in the audio and the speaker who said ‘It's very easy to say from where you're standing.’ from 10.11s to 12.03s? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Employer—Employee
- B. Allies (in a plan)
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)
- D. Trainer—Trainee

No days off, English.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the speaker in the following single-person audio?

Choices:
- A. Male
- B. Undetermined gender
- C. Female
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine gender)

He's all of us.

So you're an admirer.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the speaker in the audio from 12.95 to 13.71 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Female
- B. Uncertain gender
- C. Male
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine gender)

He's all of us.

So you're an admirer.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the speaker who said ‘He's all of us’ in the audio?

Choices:
- A. Uncertain gender
- B. Female
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine gender)
- D. Male

He's all of us.

So you're an admirer.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the 3rd speaker (spk_3) in the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Male
- B. Unable to determine (insufficient information to determine gender)
- C. Female
- D. Gender Uncertain

He's all of us.

So you're an admirer.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the speaker who said ‘He's all of us’ between 12.95 and 13.71 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Undetermined gender
- B. Male
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine gender)
- D. Female

He's all of us.

So you're an admirer.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, which speakers are female? (Answer using spk_index) Please select the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. spk_1
- B. spk_3
- C. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine gender)
- D. spk_3、spk_4

He's all of us.

So you're an admirer.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: How many male speakers are there in the entire audio? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. 3
- B. 5
- C. 4
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine gender)

He's all of us.

So you're an admirer.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the stance of the two speakers in the audio below throughout the entire conversation? Please select the one that best fits.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Has a positive view of "The Hood", considering him a symbol of the people; Speaker B: Has a negative view of "The Hood", considering him a demagogic criminal.
- B. Speaker A: Holds a negative stance toward "The Hood", considering him a demagogic criminal; Speaker B: Holds a positive stance toward "The Hood", considering him a symbol of the people.
- C. Speaker A: Advocates for a policy of appeasement towards "The Hood"; Speaker B: Believes that "The Hood"'s actions, though controversial, are essentially just.
- D. Speaker A: expresses doubt about "The Hood's" true intentions; Speaker B: holds a neutral and wait-and-see attitude towards the discussion of "The Hood".

Speaker A: Holds a negative stance on "The Hood," viewing him as a demagogic criminal; Speaker B: Holds a positive stance on "The Hood," viewing him as a symbol of the people.

Or else they get seduced by criminals like the Hood.

He's all of us.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the stance of the speaker who speaks from 41.83s to 45.76s and the speaker who speaks from 12.95s to 13.71s in the audio, throughout the entire conversation? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: expresses doubt about "The Hood's" true intentions; Speaker B: maintains a neutral and wait-and-see attitude toward the discussion about "The Hood".
- B. Speaker A: advocates for a policy of appeasement toward "The Hood"; Speaker B: believes that "The Hood"'s actions, although controversial, are essentially just.
- C. Speaker A: Holds a positive stance on "The Hood", believing he is a symbol of the people; Speaker B: Holds a negative stance on "The Hood", believing he is a demagogic criminal.
- D. Speaker A: holds a negative stance towards “The Hood”, considering him a demagogic criminal; Speaker B: holds a positive stance towards “The Hood”, considering him a symbol of the people.

Speaker A: Holds a negative stance toward "The Hood," viewing him as a demagogic criminal; Speaker B: Holds a positive stance toward "The Hood," viewing him as a symbol of the people.

He's all of us.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the stances of the speaker who said ‘seduced by criminals like the Hood’ and the speaker who said ‘He's all of us’ in the entire conversation in the audio? Please choose the one that fits best.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: holds a negative stance towards “The Hood”, considering him a demagogic criminal; Speaker B: holds a positive stance towards “The Hood”, considering him a symbol of the people.
- B. Speaker A: is skeptical of "The Hood's" true intentions; Speaker B: is neutral and has a wait-and-see attitude toward the discussion of "The Hood".
- C. Speaker A: holds a positive stance on "The Hood", considering him a symbol of the people; Speaker B: holds a negative stance on "The Hood", considering him a demagogic criminal.
- D. Speaker A: advocates an appeasement policy towards “The Hood”; Speaker B: believes that “The Hood”'s actions, though controversial, are essentially just.

Speaker A: Holds a negative stance toward "The Hood," viewing him as a demagogic criminal; Speaker B: Holds a positive stance toward "The Hood," seeing him as a symbol of the people.

He's all of us.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the respective stances of the first speaker and the third speaker in the entire conversation? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: advocates for an appeasement policy towards "The Hood"; Speaker B: believes that "The Hood's" actions, although controversial, are essentially just.
- B. Speaker A: Holds a positive stance toward "The Hood", believing he is a symbol of the people; Speaker B: Holds a negative stance toward "The Hood", believing he is a demagogic criminal.
- C. Speaker A: expresses doubt about the true intentions of "The Hood"; Speaker B: holds a neutral and wait-and-see attitude toward the discussion of "The Hood".
- D. Speaker A: Holds a negative stance towards "The Hood," considering him a demagogic criminal; Speaker B: Holds a positive stance towards "The Hood," considering him a symbol of the people.

Speaker A: Holds a negative stance towards "The Hood," believing he is a manipulative criminal; Speaker B: Holds a positive stance towards "The Hood," believing he is a symbol of the people.

He's all of us.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the stances in the entire conversation of the speaker who said ‘seduced by criminals like the Hood’ from 41.83s to 45.76s in the audio, and the speaker who said ‘He's all of us’ from 12.95s to 13.71s? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: holds a negative stance towards “The Hood”, believing he is a demagogic criminal; Speaker B: holds a positive stance towards “The Hood”, believing he is a symbol of the people.
- B. Speaker A: holds a positive stance on "The Hood," believing he is a symbol of the people; Speaker B: holds a negative stance on "The Hood," believing he is a demagogic criminal.
- C. Speaker A: Doubts "The Hood's" true intentions; Speaker B: Has a neutral and wait-and-see attitude towards the discussion of "The Hood".
- D. Speaker A: Advocates a policy of appeasement toward “The Hood”; Speaker B: Believes “The Hood’s” actions, though controversial, are essentially just.

Speaker A: Holds a negative stance towards "The Hood", viewing him as a demagogic criminal; Speaker B: Holds a positive stance towards "The Hood", viewing him as a symbol of the people.

He's all of us.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in the two speakers' stances throughout the entire conversation in the audio below? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: View on "The Hood": From [Uncertain] → [Resolutely Opposed]; Speaker B: View on "The Hood": From [Cautiously Supportive] → [Wholeheartedly Supportive].
- B. Speaker A: View on “The Hood”: The attitude has always been [to consider him a symbol of the people]; Speaker B: View on “The Hood”: The attitude has always been [to consider him a demagogic criminal].
- C. Speaker A: View on "The Hood": has always considered him a demagogic criminal; Speaker B: View on "The Hood": has always considered him a symbol of the people.
- D. Speaker A: View on "The Hood": Their attitude underwent complex changes during the conversation; Speaker B: View on "The Hood": Their viewpoint was continuously adjusted as the conversation deepened.

Speaker A: View on "The Hood": Attitude has always been [to see him as a demagogic criminal]; Speaker B: View on "The Hood": Attitude has always been [to see him as a symbol of the people].

He's all of us.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in viewpoint of the speaker from 41.83s to 45.76s and the speaker from 12.95s to 13.71s in the audio's dialogue? Please select the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: View on "The Hood": Their attitude underwent complex changes during the conversation; Speaker B: View on "The Hood": Their viewpoint continuously adjusted as the conversation deepened.
- B. Speaker A: View on "The Hood": Attitude has always been [to consider him a demagogic criminal]; Speaker B: View on "The Hood": Attitude has always been [to consider him a symbol of the people].
- C. Speaker A's view of "The Hood": has always been that he is 【a symbol of the people】; Speaker B's view of "The Hood": has always been that he is 【a demagogic criminal】.
- D. Speaker A: View on “The Hood”: from 【Uncertain】→【Firmly Opposed】; Speaker B: View on “The Hood”: from 【Cautiously Supportive】→【Fully Embracing】.

Speaker A: View of “The Hood”: Attitude has always been【to see him as a criminal who incites people】; Speaker B: View of “The Hood”: Attitude has always been【to see him as a symbol of the people】.

He's all of us.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in stance of the speaker who said ‘seduced by criminals like the Hood’ and the speaker who said ‘He's all of us’ throughout the entire conversation? Please select the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: View on "The Hood": Attitude has always been 【that he is a demagogic criminal】; Speaker B: View on "The Hood": Attitude has always been 【that he is a symbol of the people】.
- B. Speaker A: View on "The Hood": From 【Uncertainty】→【Firm opposition】; Speaker B: View on "The Hood": From 【Cautious support】→【Full support】.
- C. Speaker A: View on "The Hood": Their attitude undergoes complex changes during the conversation; Speaker B: View on "The Hood": Their viewpoint is continuously adjusted as the conversation deepens.
- D. Speaker A: View of "The Hood": attitude has always been 【that he is a symbol of the people】; Speaker B: View of "The Hood": attitude has always been 【that he is a demagogic criminal】.

Speaker A: View of “The Hood”: Attitude has always been 【that he is a demagogic criminal】; Speaker B: View of “The Hood”: Attitude has always been 【that he is a symbol of the people】.

He's all of us.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the respective changes in stance for the 1st speaker and the 3rd speaker throughout the entire dialogue? Please select the option that fits best.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: View on "The Hood": attitude has always been 【that he is a symbol of the people】; Speaker B: View on "The Hood": attitude has always been 【that he is a demagogic criminal】.
- B. Speaker A: View on "The Hood": Their attitude undergoes complex changes during the conversation; Speaker B: View on "The Hood": Their viewpoint continuously adjusts as the conversation deepens.
- C. Speaker A: Attitude towards "The Hood": From【Uncertainty】→【Firm opposition】; Speaker B: Attitude towards "The Hood": From【Cautious support】→【Full endorsement】.
- D. Speaker A: View of “The Hood”: Attitude has always been 【that they are a demagogic criminal】; Speaker B: View of “The Hood”: Attitude has always been 【that they are a symbol of the people】.

Speaker A: View on "The Hood": Attitude has always been【to see him as a demagogic criminal】; Speaker B: View on "The Hood": Attitude has always been【to see him as a symbol of the people】.

He's all of us.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in stance throughout the entire conversation for the speaker who said ‘seduced by criminals like the Hood’ from 41.83s to 45.76s and the speaker who said ‘He's all of us’ from 12.95s to 13.71s? Please choose the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: View on "The Hood": attitude has always been 【that he is a demagogic criminal】; Speaker B: View on "The Hood": attitude has always been 【that he is a symbol of the people】.
- B. Speaker A: View on "The Hood": Attitude has always been [that he is a symbol of the people]; Speaker B: View on "The Hood": Attitude has always been [that he is a demagogic criminal].
- C. Speaker A: Attitude towards "The Hood": from 【uncertain】→【firm opposition】; Speaker B: Attitude towards "The Hood": from 【cautious support】→【full endorsement】.
- D. Speaker A: View on "The Hood": Their attitude underwent complex changes during the conversation; Speaker B: View on "The Hood": Their viewpoint continuously adjusts as the conversation deepens.

Speaker A: View on "The Hood": Attitude has always been [that he is a demagogic criminal]; Speaker B: View on "The Hood": Attitude has always been [that he is a symbol of the people].

He's all of us.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: In the dialogue, the second speaker (<spk_2>) expresses a strong emotion at a certain point. What is this primary emotion, and what impact does it have on the other speaker (<spk_1>)?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Sadness / Feeling wronged; Impact: Prompts <spk_1> to start comforting <spk_2>, attempting to ease the atmosphere.
- B. Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Impact: Causes <spk_1> to calmly refute their viewpoint and continue the psychological analysis.
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine)
- D. Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Effect: Successfully angered <spk_1>, causing them to also become agitated.

Emotion: Anger/Displeasure; Impact: Led <spk_1> to calmly refute their viewpoint and continue with the psychological analysis.

I volunteered because of a lie.

No, you volunteered because of who you are.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What is the emotion of the speaker (<spk_2>) in the audio from 51.17 to 52.69 seconds? How did this emotion affect others in the conversation?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Impact: Causes <spk_1> to calmly refute their viewpoint and continue with the psychological analysis.
- B. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence to uniquely determine)
- C. Emotion: Sadness / Feeling wronged; Impact: Prompts <spk_1> to start comforting <spk_2>, attempting to ease the tension.
- D. Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Impact: Successfully provoked <spk_1>, making them also become emotional.

Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Impact: Caused <spk_1> to calmly refute their viewpoint and continue the psychological analysis.

I volunteered because of a lie.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What is the emotion of the speaker (<spk_2>) in the audio who says, ‘I volunteered because of a lie’? What effect did this emotion have on others in the conversation?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Impact: Successfully provoked <spk_1>, causing them to also become emotional.
- B. Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Impact: Causes <spk_1> to calmly rebut their viewpoint and continue the psychological analysis.
- C. Emotion: Sadness/Grievance; Impact: Prompts <spk_1> to start comforting <spk_2>, trying to ease the atmosphere.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine)

Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Impact: Causes <spk_1> to calmly rebut their viewpoint and continue with the psychological analysis.

I volunteered because of a lie.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What was the emotion of the speaker (<spk_2>) who said 'I volunteered because of a lie' from 51.17 to 52.69 in the audio? What effect did this emotion have on others?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Sadness/Feeling wronged; Impact: Prompts <spk_1> to start comforting <spk_2>, attempting to ease the atmosphere.
- B. Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Impact: Successfully angered <spk_1>, causing them to also become emotional.
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence to uniquely determine)
- D. Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Impact: Leads to <spk_1> calmly refuting their viewpoint and continuing the psychological analysis.

Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Impact: Causes <spk_1> to calmly refute their viewpoint and continue with the psychological analysis.

I volunteered because of a lie.


说话人识别能力-说话人检索任务

Question: What is the order of appearance in the entire conversation for the speaker in the audio from 7.64 seconds to 10.36 seconds?

Choices:
- A. spk_1
- B. spk_2
- C. spk_3
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to identify the speaker)

I'm actually on my way to Polaris City to report for duty.

You mean the crime-fighting, crook-bashing Silver Hawk?


说话人识别能力-说话人检索任务

Question: The speaker who said ‘I'm actually on my way to Polaris City to report for duty.’ is which speaker, in order of appearance, in the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. spk_3
- B. spk_1
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to identify the speaker)
- D. spk_2


说话人识别能力-说话人检索任务

Question: The male speaker in the audio who says ‘I'm actually on my way to Polaris City to report for duty.’ between 7.64 and 10.36 seconds, is which speaker in order of appearance in the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine the speaker)
- B. spk_2
- C. spk_1
- D. spk_3


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: In the single-speaker audio below, the speaker's profile is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Sad; Accent: Beijing dialect
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine)
- C. Gender: Male; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Happy; Accent: Beijing
- D. Gender: Male; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Angry; Accent: Beijing dialect

Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Happy; Accent: Beijing dialect

就冲你这帽子去的。

你说，挺爷，咱俩赶上这种事，咱俩也想知道，你凭什么他妈的这样，对吧？


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: Which of the following most closely matches the profile of the speaker in the audio between 22.91 and 24.11 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Angry; Accent: Beijing dialect
- B. Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Happy; Accent: Beijing dialect
- C. Cannot determine (insufficient information)
- D. Gender: Male voice；Age: Middle-aged；Emotion: Sad；Accent: Beijing dialect

Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Happy; Accent: Beijing dialect

就冲你这帽子去的。

你说，挺爷，咱俩赶上这种事，咱俩也想知道，你凭什么他妈的这样，对吧？


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: Which of the following personas is closest to the speaker in the audio who said, ‘I’m here just for your hat’?

Choices:
- A. Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Happy; Accent: Beijing dialect
- B. Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Sad; Accent: Beijing dialect
- C. Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Angry; Accent: Beijing dialect
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)

Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Happy; Accent: Beijing dialect

就冲你这帽子去的。

你说，挺爷，咱俩赶上这种事，咱俩也想知道，你凭什么他妈的这样，对吧？


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: For the speaker who said ‘I went just for that hat of yours’ between 22.91 and 24.11 seconds, which of the following speaker profiles is the closest match?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine)
- B. Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Angry; Accent: Beijing dialect
- C. Gender: Male; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Sad; Accent: Beijing dialect
- D. Gender: Male; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Happy; Accent: Beijing dialect

Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Happy; Accent: Beijing dialect

就冲你这帽子去的。

你说，挺爷，咱俩赶上这种事，咱俩也想知道，你凭什么他妈的这样，对吧？


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: In the entire audio, which speakers have the profile “Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Happy”? (Answer with spk_index) Please select the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. spk_1、spk_2、spk_3、spk_4
- B. spk_1、spk_2、spk_4
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine)
- D. spk_1、spk_2

就冲你这帽子去的。

你说，挺爷，咱俩赶上这种事，咱俩也想知道，你凭什么他妈的这样，对吧？


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: In the entire audio, how many speakers are there with the profile “Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Happy”? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. 2
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine)
- C. 3
- D. 99

就冲你这帽子去的。

你说，挺爷，咱俩赶上这种事，咱俩也想知道，你凭什么他妈的这样，对吧？


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship between the two speakers in the following audio, based on the entire conversation? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Complainant—Customer Service Representative
- B. Podcast co-host
- C. Interviewer—Interviewee
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)

我呢，当即就给这一二三四五打电话了，我要投诉这事。

那我当时怎么会知道我临时晚上需要做啊？


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship throughout the entire conversation between the speaker from 215.67s to 219.83s in the audio and the speaker from 239.95s to 243.39s? Please choose the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Interviewer—Interviewee
- B. Complainant—Customer Service Staff
- C. Podcast partner
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient evidence)

我呢，当即就给这一二三四五打电话了，我要投诉这事。

那我当时怎么会知道我临时晚上需要做啊？


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship in the entire dialogue between the speaker in the audio who said ‘I want to complain about this’ and the speaker who said ‘I need to do it last-minute tonight’? Please choose the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence)
- B. Interviewer—Interviewee
- C. Complainant—Customer service representative
- D. Podcast co-host

我呢，当即就给这一二三四五打电话了，我要投诉这事。

那我当时怎么会知道我临时晚上需要做啊？


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship between the first speaker and the second speaker in the entire conversation? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Podcast partner
- B. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)
- C. Interviewer—Interviewee
- D. Complainant—Customer Service Staff

我呢，当即就给这一二三四五打电话了，我要投诉这事。

那我当时怎么会知道我临时晚上需要做啊？


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship in the entire conversation between the speaker who said ‘I want to complain about this’ from 215.67 to 219.83 seconds in the audio, and the speaker who said ‘Then how would I have known at that time that I needed to do it on short notice at night?’ from 239.95 to 243.39 seconds? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. Interviewer—Interviewee
- B. Podcast partner
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence)
- D. Complainant—Customer Service Staff

我呢，当即就给这一二三四五打电话了，我要投诉这事。

那我当时怎么会知道我临时晚上需要做啊？


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior between the two speakers in the corresponding segment of the audio below? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A is joking, while Speaker B seriously corrects their viewpoint.
- B. Speaker A and Speaker B are cooperating with each other, joking in a back-and-forth manner.
- C. Speaker A makes a suggestion to Speaker B, while Speaker B expresses concerns and a lack of confidence about the suggestion.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence)

Speaker A is bantering, while Speaker B seriously corrects their viewpoint.

就冲你这帽子去的。

不是，确实三千是铁的。


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior demonstrated in the corresponding segments by the speaker from 22.91 to 24.11 seconds and the speaker from 24.11 to 25.99 seconds in the audio? Please choose the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A makes a suggestion to Speaker B, but Speaker B expresses concerns and a lack of confidence about the suggestion.
- B. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence)
- C. Speaker A is teasing, while Speaker B seriously corrects their point of view.
- D. Speaker A and Speaker B are working together, joking in a back-and-forth style.

Speaker A is teasing, while Speaker B seriously corrects their viewpoint.

就冲你这帽子去的。

不是，确实三千是铁的。


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior shown in the corresponding segment between the speaker who said ‘就冲你这帽子去的’ and the speaker who said ‘确实三千是铁的’? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A and Speaker B are cooperating, joking in a back-and-forth manner.
- B. Speaker A is joking, while Speaker B seriously corrects their opinion.
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)
- D. Speaker A makes a suggestion to Speaker B, while Speaker B expresses concerns and a lack of confidence about the suggestion.

Speaker A is teasing, while Speaker B seriously corrects their opinion.

就冲你这帽子去的。

不是，确实三千是铁的。


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior demonstrated by the first and second speakers in the conversation? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)
- B. Speaker A makes a suggestion to Speaker B, and Speaker B expresses concerns and a lack of confidence about the suggestion.
- C. Speaker A and Speaker B are cooperating with each other, joking in a back-and-forth manner.
- D. Speaker A is teasing, while Speaker B seriously corrects their viewpoint.

Speaker A is teasing, while Speaker B is seriously correcting their viewpoint.

就冲你这帽子去的。

不是，确实三千是铁的。


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior demonstrated in the corresponding segments between the speaker who said ‘就冲你这帽子去的’ from 22.91s to 24.11s in the audio, and the speaker who said ‘确实三千是铁的’ from 24.11s to 25.99s? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A made a suggestion to Speaker B, who in turn expressed concerns and a lack of confidence.
- B. Speaker A and Speaker B are playing along with each other to make a joke.
- C. Speaker A is teasing, while Speaker B seriously corrects their viewpoint.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence)

Speaker A is teasing, while Speaker B seriously corrects their viewpoint.

就冲你这帽子去的。

不是，确实三千是铁的。


说话人识别能力-说话人反向检索任务

Question:
Which of the following was said by the first speaker (spk_1) in the dialogue? Please select the best option.
(where the first speaker in the dialogue = spk_1)
Candidate statements:
1) It's actually just what she said before; the argument that the mistakes she made were all because this guy doesn't like her is simply not valid.
2) And this gets into another thing we really wanted to remind him of: it's just not necessary. You can still keep going, right?
3) You can't say that everything you did before was worthless just because this guy didn't cooperate with you. It's not that bad.
4) If he had clearly rejected her from the start, this girl wouldn't have had so many unrealistic fantasies.
5) I don't think that's the case with him. He's actually completely inconsiderate of the girl's feelings, and he's been putting up a smokescreen the whole time. I really don't think the girl is that lacking in self-awareness.

Choices:
- A. 1, 2, 5
- B. 1, 4, 5
- C. 1, 3, 5
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine)

就是因为我不觉得这个女生她她她其实还是有一点点的这种现实依据的，她才会造出一个那么高的楼。

这男的只干了一件事，就是存在。


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话背景推理

Question: In which of the following scenarios is this conversation most likely to take place?

Choices:
- A. The hosts are recording a live online show from one of their homes.
- B. A few friends are undergoing group psychological counseling in a counseling room.
- C. The hosts are recording an emotional analysis podcast in a recording studio.
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)

The hosts are in a recording studio recording an emotional analysis podcast.


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: Based on the entire conversation, what is the relationship between the two speakers in the following audio? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Interviewer—Interviewee
- B. Colleague
- C. Show partner
- D. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence)

但是我依然还是觉得就是，嗯，那个男生有些行为还是比较怪异和难和难以解释。

又陷入了另外一件我们特别希望提醒他的事，就没必要，你还可以继续打呀，是吧？


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship in the entire conversation between the speaker talking from 16.03 to 24.63 seconds and the speaker talking from 63.65 to 69.45 seconds in the audio? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Colleague
- B. Show partner
- C. Interviewer—Interviewee
- D. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence)

但是我依然还是觉得就是，嗯，那个男生有些行为还是比较怪异和难和难以解释。

又陷入了另外一件我们特别希望提醒他的事，就没必要，你还可以继续打呀，是吧？


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship in the entire conversation between the speaker who said ‘That boy's behavior is still a bit strange’ and the speaker who said ‘the thing we especially want to remind him about’? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence)
- B. Interviewer—Interviewee
- C. Colleague
- D. Program partner

但是我依然还是觉得就是，嗯，那个男生有些行为还是比较怪异和难和难以解释。

又陷入了另外一件我们特别希望提醒他的事，就没必要，你还可以继续打呀，是吧？


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship between the first speaker and the second speaker in the entire dialogue? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Colleague
- B. Interviewer—Interviewee
- C. Program partner
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)

但是我依然还是觉得就是，嗯，那个男生有些行为还是比较怪异和难和难以解释。

又陷入了另外一件我们特别希望提醒他的事，就没必要，你还可以继续打呀，是吧？


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship in the entire conversation between the speaker who said ‘that boy's behavior is a bit strange’ from 16.03s to 24.63s in the audio, and the speaker who said ‘something we particularly hope to remind him about’ from 63.65s to 69.45s? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Program partner
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence)
- C. Interviewer—Interviewee
- D. Colleague

但是我依然还是觉得就是，嗯，那个男生有些行为还是比较怪异和难和难以解释。

又陷入了另外一件我们特别希望提醒他的事，就没必要，你还可以继续打呀，是吧？


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the stances of the two speakers throughout the entire conversation in the audio below? Please choose the one that best fits.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: On how to approach love: believes its essence is an adventure and its risks are unavoidable; Speaker B: On how to approach love: advocates for cautious evaluation and proactively reducing risks.
- B. Speaker A: On how to approach love: wavers between emotion and reason; Speaker B: On how to approach love: supplements Speaker A's viewpoint from multiple perspectives.
- C. Speaker A: On how to approach love: advocates for cautious evaluation and proactively reducing risks; Speaker B: On how to approach love: believes its essence is risk-taking and that the risks are unavoidable.
- D. Speaker A: On how to treat love: advocates completely following one's emotions, without considering any consequences; Speaker B: On how to treat love: believes that one can find a completely safe partner just by waiting.

Speaker A: On how to approach love: Advocates for cautious evaluation and proactive risk reduction.
Speaker B: On how to approach love: Believes its essence is adventure and that risks are unavoidable.

你就不能，你就降低风险。

但是爱情这事本来就是一场赌博。


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the stance throughout the entire conversation of the speaker who speaks from 96.475s to 98.315s and the speaker who speaks from 78.635s to 81.715s in the audio? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: On approaching love: advocates for careful evaluation and proactive risk reduction; Speaker B: On approaching love: believes its essence is an adventure and its risks are unavoidable.
- B. Speaker A: On approaching love: advocates for following emotions completely, without considering any consequences; Speaker B: On approaching love: believes one can find an absolutely safe partner simply by waiting.
- C. Speaker A: On how to approach love: wavers between emotion and reason; Speaker B: On how to approach love: supplements Speaker A's viewpoint from multiple perspectives.
- D. Speaker A: On how to approach love: believes its essence is an adventure and its risks are unavoidable; Speaker B: On how to approach love: advocates for cautious assessment and actively reducing risks.

Speaker A: On how to approach love: Advocates for cautious evaluation and proactive risk reduction.
Speaker B: On how to approach love: Believes its essence is a venture and its risks are unavoidable.

你就不能，你就降低风险。

但是爱情这事本来就是一场赌博。


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the stance in the entire conversation of the speaker in the audio who said ‘you just lower the risk’ and the speaker who said ‘but love itself is a gamble’? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Regarding how to approach love: wavers between emotion and reason; Speaker B: Regarding how to approach love: supplements Speaker A's viewpoint from multiple perspectives.
- B. Speaker A: On how to approach love: advocates for careful assessment and proactively reducing risks; Speaker B: On how to approach love: believes its essence is an adventure and its risks are unavoidable.
- C. Speaker A: On how to approach love: advocates completely following one's feelings, without considering any consequences; Speaker B: On how to approach love: believes that one can find a completely safe partner just by waiting.
- D. Speaker A: Regarding how to treat love: believes its essence is an adventure and its risks are unavoidable; Speaker B: Regarding how to treat love: advocates for careful evaluation and proactive risk reduction.

Speaker A: On how to approach love: Advocates for cautious evaluation and proactive risk reduction.
Speaker B: On how to approach love: Believes its essence is adventure and that risks are unavoidable.

你就不能，你就降低风险。

但是爱情这事本来就是一场赌博。