说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the 3rd speaker to appear (spk_3) throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Experienced an explosion firsthand and felt time slow down, like "bullet time" in the movies.
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely deduce the conclusion/change).
- C. Initially doubted the authenticity of the story, but was later convinced by the details.
- D. Believes that perceiving "slow motion" in critical moments is a real and common phenomenon, and strongly identifies with the narrator's experience.

Believes that the perception of “slow motion” in critical moments is a real and common phenomenon, and strongly identifies with the narrator's experience.

Aw. Oh my gosh.

Oh fuck, you were like Neo! Yes!


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker in the following audio of a single person speaking change throughout the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. From an objective account of the explosion → to a detailed description of the “slow-motion” psychological activity during the near-death moment.
- B. From initial surprise at the event → to a strong identification with and excitement for the “slow-motion” experience of the person involved.
- C. From worrying about the safety of the person involved → to casually joking about the entire incident.
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence to uniquely deduce the viewpoint/change).

From initial surprise at the event → shifting to strong identification with and excitement for the “slow-motion” experience of the person involved.

No, no no no its so true. Like when something bad happens y- everything is like almost like milliseconds, like you can feel it.

Aw. Oh my gosh.

Oh fuck, you were like Neo! Yes!

I was so certain that I was about to burn to death and die that this felt like slow motion. I actually had like time to consider what Im gonna do when I hit the ground. So Im like thinking okay, Im gonna be, my clothes are gonna be blazing, my skin is gonna be burning off, I gotta hit the ground rolling as hard as I can just to save my life.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker from 55.24 to 64.07 in the audio change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. From initial surprise at the event → to expressing strong identification with and excitement about the person involved's "slow-motion" experience.
- B. Cannot be determined (The evidence is insufficient to uniquely derive the conclusion/change).
- C. From an objective description of the explosion → to a detailed description of the "slow-motion" psychological activity during a near-death moment.
- D. From worrying about the safety of the person involved → to casually joking about the entire event.

From being initially surprised by the event → to expressing strong identification with and excitement for the "slow-motion" experience of the person involved.

Aw. Oh my gosh.

Oh fuck, you were like Neo! Yes!


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker who said ‘its so true. Like when something bad happens’ in the audio change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. From worrying about the person's safety → to teasing the entire event in a lighthearted and joking manner.
- B. From an objective statement about the explosion's occurrence → shifting to a detailed description of the "slow-motion" psychological activity during the near-death moment.
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely derive the conclusion/change).
- D. From initial surprise at the event → a shift to strong identification with and excitement for the person involved's "slow-motion" experience.

From initially feeling surprised by the event → to a shift towards expressing strong identification with and excitement for the person's "slow-motion" experience.

Aw. Oh my gosh.

Oh fuck, you were like Neo! Yes!


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker who says ‘its so true. Like when something bad happens’ from 55.24 to 64.07 in the audio change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (The evidence is insufficient to uniquely deduce the conclusion/change).
- B. From worrying about the safety of the person involved → to joking about the entire event in a lighthearted way.
- C. From initial surprise at the event → to expressing strong identification with and excitement about the person's "slow-motion" experience.
- D. From an objective statement of the explosion → a detailed description of the “slow-motion” psychological activity during the near-death moment.

From initially being surprised by the event → to expressing strong identification with and excitement for the person's "slow-motion" experience.

Aw. Oh my gosh.

Oh fuck, you were like Neo! Yes!


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the third speaker (spk_3) change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. From an objective statement of the explosion → a shift to a detailed description of the "slow-motion" psychological activity during the near-death moment.
- B. From initial surprise at the event → to expressing strong identification with and excitement about the person's “slow-motion” experience.
- C. From worrying about the safety of the person involved → to casually joking about the entire incident.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely conclude the viewpoint/change).

From an initial surprise at the event → to a strong sense of identification with and excitement for the person's "slow-motion" experience.

Aw. Oh my gosh.

Oh fuck, you were like Neo! Yes!


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: In the dialogue, what is the emotion of the first speaker (<spk_1>) in the key segment? What impact did this emotion have on others?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Happy/Excited; Impact: The remark made <spk_3> extremely excited, and they loudly agreed with this metaphor.
- B. Emotion: Annoyance/Impatience; Impact: The statement made <spk_3> impatient because it deviated from the topic, and they attempted to pull the topic back.
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence for a unique determination).
- D. Emotion: Happy/Excited; Impact: The statement made <spk_2> feel surprised and ask for more details about the event.

Emotion: Happy/Excited; Impact: This statement made <spk_3> extremely excited, and they loudly agreed with this metaphor.

Yeah. Its like I wanted to like bullet time in matrix almost.

Oh fuck, you were like Neo! Yes!


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What is the emotion of the speaker (<spk_1>) from 62.25s to 65.52s in the audio? What effect did this emotion have on others in the conversation?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Happy/Excited; Impact: This statement made <spk_3> extremely excited and loudly agree with this metaphor.
- B. Emotion: Annoyance/Impatience; Impact: The utterance made <spk_3> impatient because it was off-topic.
- C. Emotion: Happy/Excited; Impact: The statement made <spk_2> feel confused, and they tried to change the topic.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine).

Emotion: Happy/Excited; Impact: This statement made <spk_3> extremely excited, and they loudly agreed with this metaphor.

Oh fuck, you were like Neo! Yes!


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What emotion is the speaker (<spk_1>), who says "Its like I wanted to like bullet time in matrix almost" in the audio, expressing? What effect did this emotion have on others in the conversation?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine).
- B. Emotion: Happy/Excited; Impact: The statement confused <spk_2>, and they tried to propose another metaphor.
- C. Emotion: Happy/Excited; Impact: The statement caused <spk_3> to become extremely excited and loudly agree with the metaphor.
- D. Emotion: Cold/Distant; Impact: The statement made <spk_3> feel he was arrogant, causing the atmosphere of the conversation to become tense.

Emotion: Happy/Excited; Impact: This remark made <spk_3> extremely excited, and they loudly agreed with the metaphor.

Oh fuck, you were like Neo! Yes!


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What emotion is the speaker (<spk_1>) expressing when saying "Its like I wanted to like bullet time in matrix almost" from 62.25s to 65.52s in the audio? What effect did this emotion have on others?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Happy/Excited; Impact: The statement caused <spk_2> to also start sharing similar movie experiences.
- B. Emotion: Sadness/Feeling wronged; Impact: The statement made <spk_3> try to comfort him.
- C. Emotion: Happy/Excited; Impact: The remark made <spk_3> extremely excited, and they loudly agreed with this metaphor.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine).

Emotion: Happy/Excited; Impact: This statement made <spk_3> extremely excited and loudly agree with this metaphor.

Oh fuck, you were like Neo! Yes!


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the positions of the two speakers in the following audio throughout the entire conversation? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: On the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: considers it a real personal experience and describes it in detail; Speaker B: On the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: expresses strong agreement, believing it is a real phenomenon.
- B. Speaker A: On the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: strongly agrees, believing it is a real phenomenon; Speaker B: On the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: considers it a real personal experience and describes it in detail.
- C. Speaker A: On the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: is skeptical, considering it a memory embellishment; Speaker B: On the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: believes it is just an exaggeration to enhance the storytelling effect.
- D. Speaker A: Experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: shares a thrilling story; Speaker B: Experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: expresses curiosity about what happened next.

Speaker A: Regarding the experience of "time slowing down" during a crisis: Considers it a real personal experience and describes it in detail.
Speaker B: Regarding the experience of "time slowing down" during a crisis: Expresses strong agreement, believing it to be a real phenomenon.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the stance in the entire conversation of the speaker who talks from 32.89 to 51.75 seconds and the speaker who talks from 55.24 to 64.07 seconds in the audio? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Is skeptical of the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis, viewing it as a memory bias; Speaker B: Believes it is just a storytelling exaggeration.
- B. Speaker A: on the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: considers it a real personal experience and describes it in detail; Speaker B: on the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: expresses strong agreement, believing it is a real phenomenon.
- C. Speaker A: Experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: Shared an interesting story; Speaker B: Experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: Curious about the details of the story.
- D. Speaker A: Regarding the experience of “time slowing down” in a crisis: Expresses strong agreement and believes it is a real phenomenon; Speaker B: Regarding the experience of “time slowing down” in a crisis: Considers it a real personal experience and describes it in detail.

Speaker A: Regarding the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: Considers it a real personal experience and describes it in detail; Speaker B: Regarding the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: Expresses strong agreement, believing it is a real phenomenon.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the stance of the speaker who said “I was so certain that I was about to burn to death” and the speaker who said “its so true. Like when something bad happens” in the entire conversation? Please choose the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: On the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: Expresses strong agreement, believing it to be a real phenomenon; Speaker B: On the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: Considers it a real personal experience and describes it in detail.
- B. Speaker A: On the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: shared a thrilling personal story; Speaker B: On the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: expressed concern for others' experiences.
- C. Speaker A: Regarding the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: believes it is a real personal experience and describes it in detail; Speaker B: Regarding the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: expresses strong agreement and believes it is a real phenomenon.
- D. Speaker A: On the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: believes the phenomenon is not credible; Speaker B: On the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: encourages Speaker A to continue speaking.

Speaker A: On the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: Considers it a real personal experience and describes it in detail;
Speaker B: On the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: Expresses strong agreement, believing it to be a real phenomenon.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: In the entire conversation, what are the respective stances of the first speaker and the third speaker? Please choose the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: On the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: believes it is a real personal experience and describes it in detail; Speaker B: On the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: expresses strong agreement, believing it is a real phenomenon.
- B. Speaker A: Regarding the experience of “time slowing down” in a crisis: believes it's just an exaggeration to enhance the storytelling effect; Speaker B: Regarding the experience of “time slowing down” in a crisis: is skeptical, believing it to be memory embellishment.
- C. Speaker A: Regarding the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: expresses strong agreement, believing it is a real phenomenon; Speaker B: Regarding the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: considers it a real personal experience and describes it in detail.
- D. Speaker A: On the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: discussed this phenomenon in the conversation; Speaker B: On the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: participated in the discussion on the related topic.

Speaker A: On the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: Believes it to be a real personal experience and describes it in detail;
Speaker B: On the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: Expresses strong agreement, believing it to be a real phenomenon.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the stances in the entire conversation of the speaker who said “I gotta hit the ground rolling as hard as I can” from 32.89s to 51.75s in the audio, and the speaker who said “everything is like almost like milliseconds” from 55.24s to 64.07s? Please choose the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Considers the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis a real personal experience and describes it in detail; Speaker B: Expresses strong agreement, believing it to be a real phenomenon.
- B. Speaker A: On the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: expresses strong agreement, believing it to be a real phenomenon; Speaker B: On the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: considers it a real personal experience and describes it in detail.
- C. Speaker A: Regarding the experience of “time slowing down” in a crisis: believes it is fictional; Speaker B: Regarding the experience of “time slowing down” in a crisis: doubts its authenticity.
- D. Speaker A: Regarding the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: attitude is ambiguous, no clear stance has been taken; Speaker B: Regarding the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: believes it requires further exploration.

Speaker A: On the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: considers it a real personal experience and describes it in detail; Speaker B: On the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: expresses strong agreement, believing it to be a real phenomenon.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in the stances of the two speakers in the following audio throughout the entire conversation? Please choose the option that fits best.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: from 【uncertainty】 → 【convinced it's a real experience】; Speaker B: Experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: from 【surprise】 → 【complete belief】.
- B. Speaker A: Regarding the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: attitude has consistently been 【Strongly agreeing and expressing resonance】; Speaker B: Regarding the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: attitude has consistently been 【Believing and elaborating on its authenticity】.
- C. Speaker A: Regarding the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: their attitude has consistently been [to believe in and elaborate on its authenticity]; Speaker B: Regarding the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: their attitude has consistently been [to strongly agree and express resonance].
- D. Speaker A: On the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: the viewpoint has not clearly changed; Speaker B: On the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: the viewpoint has undergone multiple changes.

Speaker A: Regarding the experience of “time slowing down” in a crisis: attitude has always been [to believe in and elaborate on its authenticity]; Speaker B: Regarding the experience of “time slowing down” in a crisis: attitude has always been [to strongly agree and express resonance].


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in stance throughout the entire conversation for the speaker from 32.89s to 51.75s and the speaker from 55.24s to 64.07s in the audio? Please select the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Regarding the experience of “time slowing down” in a crisis: attitude has always been 【believing in and elaborating on its authenticity】; Speaker B: Regarding the experience of “time slowing down” in a crisis: attitude has always been 【strongly agreeing and expressing resonance】.
- B. Speaker A: Regarding the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: attitude has consistently been 【Strong agreement and resonance】; Speaker B: Regarding the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: attitude has consistently been 【Belief and detailed elaboration on its truthfulness】.
- C. Speaker A: On the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: from 【objective statement】 → 【subjective belief】; Speaker B: On the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: from 【skepticism】 → 【complete agreement】.
- D. Speaker A: The experience of "time slowing down" during a crisis: their change in viewpoint is unknown; Speaker B: The experience of "time slowing down" during a crisis: their change in viewpoint is unknown.

Speaker A: Regarding the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: attitude has consistently been [to believe in and elaborate on its authenticity]; Speaker B: Regarding the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: attitude has consistently been [to strongly agree and express resonance].


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in stance of the speaker who said “I was so certain that I was about to burn to death” and the speaker who said “its so true. Like when something bad happens” throughout the entire conversation? Please choose the one that best fits.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: On the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: viewpoint has no clear change; Speaker B: On the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: viewpoint has no clear change.
- B. Speaker A: On the experience of “time slowing down” in a crisis: from 【Doubt】→【Belief】; Speaker B: On the experience of “time slowing down” in a crisis: from 【Curiosity】→【Agreement】.
- C. Speaker A: Regarding the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: attitude has consistently been 【Strongly identifies with and expresses resonance】; Speaker B: Regarding the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: attitude has consistently been 【Believes in and elaborates on its authenticity】.
- D. Speaker A: Regarding the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: attitude has always been [believing and elaborating on its authenticity]; Speaker B: Regarding the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: attitude has always been [strongly agreeing and expressing resonance].

Speaker A: On the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: attitude has always been [believing in it and elaborating on its authenticity]; Speaker B: On the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: attitude has always been [strongly agreeing and expressing resonance].


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the respective changes in the stances of the first and third speakers throughout the conversation? Please select the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Regarding the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: attitude has always been [to believe in and elaborate on its authenticity]; Speaker B: Regarding the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: attitude has always been [to strongly agree and express resonance].
- B. Speaker A: On the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: viewpoint is always consistent; Speaker B: On the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: viewpoint wavers multiple times.
- C. Speaker A: experience of “time slowing down” in a crisis: from 【recounting an experience】→【proposing a theory】; Speaker B: experience of “time slowing down” in a crisis: from 【expressing surprise】→【providing supporting evidence】.
- D. Speaker A: Regarding the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: attitude has consistently been 【Strongly agrees and expresses resonance】; Speaker B: Regarding the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: attitude has consistently been 【Believes and elaborates on its authenticity】.

Speaker A: Regarding the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: attitude has consistently been [to believe in and elaborate on its authenticity]; Speaker B: Regarding the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: attitude has consistently been [to strongly agree and express resonance].


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in stance throughout the entire conversation for the speaker in the audio who said “I gotta hit the ground rolling as hard as I can” from 32.89s to 51.75s, and the speaker who said “everything is like almost like milliseconds” from 55.24s to 64.07s? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Regarding the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: attitude has always been 【believing and elaborating on its authenticity】; Speaker B: Regarding the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: attitude has always been 【strongly agreeing and expressing resonance】.
- B. Speaker A: Regarding the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: their attitude has always been one of 【Strong agreement and resonance】; Speaker B: Regarding the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: their attitude has always been one of 【Belief and detailed elaboration on its authenticity】.
- C. Speaker A: On the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: from [uncertain of its authenticity] → [convinced of its authenticity]; Speaker B: On the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: always disbelieves the phenomenon.
- D. Speaker A: The experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: their change in stance cannot be determined; Speaker B: The experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: their change in stance cannot be determined.

Speaker A: Regarding the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: attitude has consistently been 【to believe in and elaborate on its authenticity】; Speaker B: Regarding the experience of "time slowing down" in a crisis: attitude has consistently been 【to strongly agree and express resonance】.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: The following is a monologue segment from a speaker. In the complete dialogue, the most likely response to this utterance is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B: So you saw the whole thing from the window?
- B. Speaker B: Aw. Oh my gosh.
- C. Speaker B: Oh really, you were there?
- D. Speaker B: Cannot determine (Insufficient information to identify the response)

Yes. It was and and meanwhile, I was inside the house.

Oh really, you were there?


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: According to the dialogue, the response from others to the speaker's statement between 70.51 and 74.75 seconds is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B: So you saw the whole thing from the window?
- B. Speaker B: Aw. Oh my gosh.
- C. Speaker B: Oh really, you were there?
- D. Speaker B: Cannot determine (Insufficient information to pinpoint the response)

Oh really, you were there?


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: Based on the conversation, the response from others to a speaker's statement 'I was inside the house' is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B: So you saw the whole thing from the window?
- B. Speaker B: Aw. Oh my gosh.
- C. Speaker B: Oh really, you were there?
- D. Speaker B: Cannot determine (Insufficient information to locate the response)

Oh really, you were there?


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: Based on the dialogue, the response from others to the speaker's statement ‘I was inside the house’ from 70.51 to 74.75 seconds is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B: So you saw the whole thing from the window?
- B. Speaker B: Aw. Oh my gosh.
- C. Speaker B: Oh really, you were there?
- D. Speaker B: Cannot determine (Insufficient information to pinpoint the reply)

Oh really, you were there?


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: In the given audio clip, what is the emotion of the first speaker (<spk_1>)? How did this emotion affect others throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Anger/Displeasure; Impact: Caused <spk_2> to feel very awkward and try to ease the tension.
- B. Emotion: Disgust/Dissatisfaction; Impact: Causes <spk_5> to be angered and have a fierce argument with <spk_1>.
- C. Cannot be determined (evidence is insufficient to uniquely determine)
- D. Emotion: Disgust/Dissatisfaction; Impact: Leads to <spk_5> not being provoked, but instead counterattacking and provoking with a playful tone.

Emotion: Disgust/Dissatisfaction; Impact: Causes <spk_5> not to be angered, but instead to counterattack and provoke in a playful tone.

上次青岛还没跳够脱衣舞啊，就算你还想跳，我也没兴趣不想看了。

我想看你跳啊，冤家。

放好了，走。


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What is the emotion of the speaker (<spk_1>) in the audio from 129.93 to 134.73 seconds? What impact did this emotion have on others in the conversation?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Disgust/Dissatisfaction; Effect: Caused <spk_5> to be angered and have a fierce argument with <spk_1>.
- B. Emotion: Disgust/Displeasure; Effect: Causes <spk_5> not to be provoked, but instead to counter-attack and taunt in a playful tone.
- C. Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Impact: <spk_2> felt very awkward and attempted to ease the tension.
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence to uniquely determine)

Emotion: Disgust/Dissatisfaction; Effect: Causes <spk_5> not to be angered, but instead to counterattack and provoke with a playful tone.

上次青岛还没跳够脱衣舞啊，就算你还想跳，我也没兴趣不想看了。

我想看你跳啊，冤家。

放好了，走。


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What emotion is the speaker (<spk_1>), who says in the audio "Even if you still want to dance, I'm not interested and don't want to watch anymore," expressing? What impact did this emotion have on others in the conversation?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Disgust/Dissatisfaction; Effect: Causes <spk_5> not to be angered, but instead to counterattack and provoke with a playful tone.
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine)
- C. Emotion: Disgust/Dissatisfaction; Impact: Causes <spk_5> to be provoked and have a heated argument with <spk_1>.
- D. Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Impact: Caused <spk_2> to feel very awkward and attempt to ease the atmosphere.

Emotion: Anger/Discontent; Impact: Instead of being angered, <spk_5> counter-attacks and provokes with a playful tone.

上次青岛还没跳够脱衣舞啊，就算你还想跳，我也没兴趣不想看了。

我想看你跳啊，冤家。

放好了，走。


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What emotion was the speaker (<spk_1>) expressing from 129.93 to 134.73 seconds in the audio when they said, 'Even if you still want to dance, I'm not interested and don't want to watch'? What effect did this emotion have on others?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine)
- B. Emotion: Anger/Displeasure; Impact: Caused <spk_2> to feel very awkward and attempt to ease the tension.
- C. Emotion: Disgust/Dissatisfaction; Effect: Leads to <spk_5> not being provoked, but instead counterattacking and taunting with a playful tone.
- D. Emotion: Disgust/Displeasure; Impact: Causes <spk_5> to be angered and get into a heated argument with <spk_1>.

Emotion: Anger/Discontent; Impact: <spk_5> is not provoked; instead, they counter-attack and provoke with a playful tone.

上次青岛还没跳够脱衣舞啊，就算你还想跳，我也没兴趣不想看了。

我想看你跳啊，冤家。

放好了，走。


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: In the following audio of a single person speaking, what is the speaker's accent?

Choices:
- A. Mandarin with a Minnan accent
- B. Mandarin with a Cantonese accent
- C. Mandarin with a Northeastern accent
- D. The accent is not obvious, and it is impossible to determine.

我被人捏得多，也会一点点。

我从来不靠那些东西的。


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: The accent of the speaker in the audio from 29.72 to 31.52 seconds is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Mandarin with a Sichuan accent
- B. Mandarin with a Taiwanese accent
- C. Mandarin with a Cantonese accent
- D. The accent is not distinct, unable to determine.

我被人捏得多，也会一点点。

我从来不靠那些东西的。


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: The accent of the speaker who said ‘我被人捏得多’ in the audio is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Mandarin with a Wu accent
- B. Mandarin with a Shandong accent
- C. The accent is not distinct enough to tell.
- D. Mandarin with a Cantonese accent

我被人捏得多，也会一点点。

我从来不靠那些东西的。


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, what accent does the second speaker in the dialogue use?

Choices:
- A. Mandarin with a Hunan accent
- B. Mandarin with a Cantonese accent
- C. Mandarin with a Beijing accent
- D. The accent is not obvious, unable to determine.

我被人捏得多，也会一点点。

我从来不靠那些东西的。


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: The accent of the male speaker who said ‘也会一点点’ between 29.72 and 31.52 is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Singaporean-accented Mandarin
- B. The accent is not distinct, cannot be determined.
- C. Mandarin with a Henan accent
- D. Mandarin with a Cantonese accent

我被人捏得多，也会一点点。

我从来不靠那些东西的。


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: Which speakers in the entire audio speak Mandarin with a Cantonese accent? (Answer in the order of the speakers' appearance) Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. First Speaker, Second Speaker, Third Speaker
- B. No obvious accent, impossible to determine
- C. First speaker, second speaker, third speaker, fourth speaker
- D. the first speaker, the fifth speaker

First speaker, Second speaker, Third speaker, Fourth speaker

我被人捏得多，也会一点点。

我从来不靠那些东西的。


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, how many speakers are there who speak Mandarin with a Cantonese accent? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. 1
- B. 3
- C. 4
- D. The accent is not obvious; cannot be determined.

我被人捏得多，也会一点点。

我从来不靠那些东西的。


说话人识别能力-说话人计数任务

Question: How many different speakers are there in this audio clip?

Choices:
- A. 3 digits
- B. 8-bit
- C. 4-bit
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)

先坐下。

我从来不靠那些东西的。


说话人识别能力-说话人计数任务

Question: How many different speakers are there in the audio between 132 seconds and 140 seconds?

Choices:
- A. 4 bits
- B. 1 bit
- C. Cannot determine (insufficient information)
- D. 3 digits

先坐下。

我从来不靠那些东西的。


说话人识别能力-说话人计数任务

Question: How many different speakers are there in the audio from second 316 to second 330?

Choices:
- A. 5 digits
- B. 3 digits
- C. 2 digits
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)

先坐下。

我从来不靠那些东西的。


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话背景推理

Question: In which of the following scenarios is this conversation most likely to take place?

Choices:
- A. Family and friends are having a meal together in a private restaurant room, welcoming one of their members back.
- B. Several friends are at a winery, tasting wine and discussing their lives.
- C. Family and friends having a family gathering at someone's residence/home.
- D. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence)

Family and friends having a family gathering at someone's residence/home.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the stances of the two speakers in the following audio throughout the entire conversation? Please select the best option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: firmly supports it, believing it is for the store's benefit; Speaker B: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: firmly opposes it, believing employees should be protected.
- B. Speaker A: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: strongly opposes, believing the employee should be protected; Speaker B: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: strongly supports, believing it is in the store's interest.
- C. Speaker A: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: expresses understanding, but hopes for financial compensation; Speaker B: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: believes it should be decided by a vote of all employees.
- D. Speaker A: has a personal view on store management; Speaker B: has a different opinion on personnel arrangements.

Speaker A: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: strongly opposes, believes employees should be protected; Speaker B: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: strongly supports, believes it is in the store's interest.

她发生那样的事已经够难过了，你还要她走？

好好的一盆花，怎么能让枯枝给毁了呢？


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the stance in the entire dialogue of the speaker who speaks from 47.16 to 49.72 seconds and the speaker who speaks from 56.18 to 60.82 seconds in the audio? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: strongly supports, believing it is for the store's benefit; Speaker B: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: strongly opposes, believing employees should be protected.
- B. Speaker A: has their own views on store management; Speaker B: has a different opinion on the staffing arrangements.
- C. Speaker A: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: Understands, but hopes for financial compensation; Speaker B: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: Believes it should be decided by a vote of all employees.
- D. Speaker A: On the decision to fire Hana: strongly opposes, believing employees should be protected; Speaker B: On the decision to fire Hana: strongly supports, believing it is for the benefit of the store.

Speaker A: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: Strongly opposes, believes the employee should be protected; Speaker B: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: Strongly supports, believes it is in the best interest of the shop.

她发生那样的事已经够难过了，你还要她走？

好好的一盆花，怎么能让枯枝给毁了呢？


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the stance in the entire conversation of the speaker in the audio who said ‘It's sad enough that something like that happened to her’ and the speaker who said ‘How can we let it be ruined by a dead branch?’? Please choose the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: firmly against, believing employees should be protected; Speaker B: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: strongly in favor, believing it is in the store's best interest.
- B. Speaker A: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: understands, but hopes for financial compensation; Speaker B: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: believes it should be decided by a vote of all employees.
- C. Speaker A: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: in strong support, believing it is for the store's benefit; Speaker B: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: in strong opposition, believing employees should be protected.
- D. Speaker A: has a personal opinion on store management; Speaker B: has a different opinion on personnel arrangements.

Speaker A: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: strongly opposes, believes employees should be protected; Speaker B: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: strongly supports, believes it is for the benefit of the store.

她发生那样的事已经够难过了，你还要她走？

好好的一盆花，怎么能让枯枝给毁了呢？


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the respective stances of the 1st speaker and the 2nd speaker in the entire dialogue? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: On the decision to fire Hana: strongly supports, believing it is for the store's benefit; Speaker B: On the decision to fire Hana: strongly opposes, believing employees should be protected.
- B. Speaker A: has a personal view on store management; Speaker B: has a different opinion on the personnel arrangements.
- C. Speaker A: Strongly opposes the decision to fire Hana, believing the employee should be protected; Speaker B: Strongly supports the decision to fire Hana, believing it is for the benefit of the store.
- D. Speaker A: Regarding the decision to dismiss Hana: understands, but hopes for financial compensation; Speaker B: Regarding the decision to dismiss Hana: believes it should be decided by a vote of all employees.

Speaker A: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: firmly opposes, believes employees should be protected; Speaker B: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: firmly supports, believes it is in the store's best interest.

她发生那样的事已经够难过了，你还要她走？

好好的一盆花，怎么能让枯枝给毁了呢？


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the stance in the entire conversation of the speaker who, from 47.16s to 49.72s in the audio, said ‘It's already sad enough that something like that happened to her,’ and the speaker who, from 56.18s to 60.82s, said ‘How can we let it be ruined by a dead branch?’? Please choose the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: expresses understanding, but hopes for financial compensation; Speaker B: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: believes it should be decided by a vote of all employees.
- B. Speaker A: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: strongly opposes, believing the employee should be protected; Speaker B: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: strongly supports, believing it is for the store's benefit.
- C. Speaker A: has a personal view on store management; Speaker B: has a different opinion on personnel arrangements.
- D. Speaker A: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: strongly supports, believing it is for the benefit of the store; Speaker B: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: strongly opposes, believing that employees should be protected.

Speaker A: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: strongly opposes, believes employees should be protected; Speaker B: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: strongly supports, believes it is for the benefit of the store.

她发生那样的事已经够难过了，你还要她走？

好好的一盆花，怎么能让枯枝给毁了呢？


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in the stances of the two speakers throughout the conversation in the audio below? Please select the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: has always been 【Supportive】, always prioritizing the store's interests; Speaker B: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: has always been 【Opposed】, always advocating for protecting employees.
- B. Speaker A: Regarding the decision to expel Hana: from 【hesitant】→【strongly opposed】; Speaker B: Regarding the decision to expel Hana: from 【strongly supportive】→【wavering due to the argument】.
- C. Speaker A: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: wavers between emotion and reason; Speaker B: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: the two sides had an in-depth discussion on the matter.
- D. Speaker A: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: has always been 【opposed】, always advocating for protecting employees; Speaker B: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: has always been 【in favor】, always advocating for putting the store's interests first.

Speaker A: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: attitude has always been [Opposed], always advocating to protect employees; Speaker B: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: attitude has always been [Supportive], always advocating to put the store's interests first.

她发生那样的事已经够难过了，你还要她走？

好好的一盆花，怎么能让枯枝给毁了呢？


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in stance throughout the entire conversation for the speaker from 47.16 to 49.72 seconds and the speaker from 56.18 to 60.82 seconds in the audio? Please select the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: On the decision to fire Hana: has always been 【Opposed】, always advocating for protecting the employee; Speaker B: On the decision to fire Hana: has always been 【Supportive】, always advocating for prioritizing the store's interests.
- B. Speaker A: On the decision to expel Hana: from [Hesitation] → [Firm opposition]; Speaker B: On the decision to expel Hana: from [Firm support] → [Wavering due to the argument].
- C. Speaker A: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: attitude has always been [Support], always advocating for prioritizing the store's interests; Speaker B: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: attitude has always been [Oppose], always advocating for protecting the employee.
- D. Speaker A: On the decision to dismiss Hana: stance wavers between emotion and reason; Speaker B: On the decision to dismiss Hana: both sides had an in-depth discussion on the matter.

Speaker A: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: has always been [opposed], consistently advocating for protecting the employee; Speaker B: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: has always been [supportive], consistently advocating for prioritizing the store's interests.

她发生那样的事已经够难过了，你还要她走？

好好的一盆花，怎么能让枯枝给毁了呢？


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in stance throughout the entire conversation for the speaker in the audio who said ‘She’s already sad enough about what happened to her’ and the speaker who said ‘How can we let it be ruined by a dead branch?’? Please choose the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: their stance wavers between emotion and reason; Speaker B: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: the two sides had an in-depth discussion on the matter.
- B. Speaker A: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: attitude has always been 【support】, always prioritizing the store's interests; Speaker B: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: attitude has always been 【opposition】, always advocating for protecting employees.
- C. Speaker A: Has always been 【opposed】 to the decision to fire Hana, consistently advocating for protecting the employee; Speaker B: Has always 【supported】 the decision to fire Hana, consistently advocating for prioritizing the store's interests.
- D. Speaker A: Regarding the decision to expel Hana: From [hesitation] → [firm opposition]; Speaker B: Regarding the decision to expel Hana: From [firm support] → [wavering due to the argument].

Speaker A: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: Attitude has consistently been [Opposed], always advocating for protecting the employee; Speaker B: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: Attitude has consistently been [Supportive], always advocating for prioritizing the store's interests.

她发生那样的事已经够难过了，你还要她走？

好好的一盆花，怎么能让枯枝给毁了呢？


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the respective changes in the stances of the first speaker and the second speaker throughout the conversation? Please select the option that fits best.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: from [hesitant] → [became firmly opposed]; Speaker B: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: from [firmly supportive] → [wavered due to the argument].
- B. Speaker A: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: has always been [opposed], always advocating for protecting the employee; Speaker B: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: has always been [supportive], always advocating for prioritizing the store's interests.
- C. Speaker A: On the decision to expel Hana: their stance wavers between emotion and reason; Speaker B: On the decision to expel Hana: the two parties had an in-depth discussion on the matter.
- D. Speaker A: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: attitude has always been [Supportive], always prioritizing the store's interests; Speaker B: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: attitude has always been [Opposed], always advocating for protecting employees.

Speaker A: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: Attitude has always been [Opposed], always advocating for protecting the employee; Speaker B: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: Attitude has always been [Supportive], always advocating for prioritizing the store's interests.

她发生那样的事已经够难过了，你还要她走？

好好的一盆花，怎么能让枯枝给毁了呢？


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in stance throughout the entire conversation of the speaker who, from 47.16s to 49.72s in the audio, said ‘It's already sad enough for her that something like that happened’ and, from 56.18s to 60.82s, said ‘How can we let a dead branch ruin it?’? Please choose the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: attitude has always been [opposed], consistently advocating for protecting the employee; Speaker B: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: attitude has always been [supportive], consistently advocating for prioritizing the store's interests.
- B. Speaker A: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: has always been [Supportive], consistently prioritizing the store's interests; Speaker B: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: has always been [Opposed], consistently advocating for protecting the employee.
- C. Speaker A: On the decision to dismiss Hana: their stance wavers between emotion and reason; Speaker B: On the decision to dismiss Hana: the two parties held an in-depth discussion on this matter.
- D. Speaker A: Regarding the decision to expel Hana: from 【Hesitant】→【Became firmly opposed】; Speaker B: Regarding the decision to expel Hana: from 【Firmly supportive】→【Began to waver due to the argument】.

Speaker A: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: Stance has always been [Oppose], always advocating for protecting the employee; Speaker B: Regarding the decision to fire Hana: Stance has always been [Support], always advocating for prioritizing the store's interests.

她发生那样的事已经够难过了，你还要她走？

好好的一盆花，怎么能让枯枝给毁了呢？


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: The following is a single-turn utterance from a speaker. In the complete dialogue, the most likely response to this utterance is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B: Is such an ideal combination really possible on a real battlefield?
- B. Speaker B: Indeterminate (Insufficient information to locate the response)
- C. Speaker B: Isn't that a good thing?
- D. Speaker B: Indeed. It's actually unsettling when things go too smoothly.

这个组合，你、我、吴哲、齐桓，你不觉得太理想，太过于默契吗？

那不是好事吗？


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: Based on the dialogue, the reply from other people to what a speaker said between 85.54 and 93.86 seconds is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B: Isn't that a good thing?
- B. Speaker B: Indeed, it's unsettling when things go too smoothly.
- C. Speaker B: Is such an ideal combination really possible on the battlefield?
- D. Speaker B: Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to locate the response)

这个组合，你、我、吴哲、齐桓，你不觉得太理想，太过于默契吗？

那不是好事吗？


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: Based on the dialogue, the reply from other people to a speaker's statement, 'Don't you think it's too ideal, too much in sync?', is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B: Indeed, it's actually unsettling when things go too smoothly.
- B. Speaker B: Isn't that a good thing?
- C. Speaker B: Cannot determine (Insufficient information to pinpoint a response)
- D. Speaker B: On a real battlefield, is such an ideal combination possible?

这个组合，你、我、吴哲、齐桓，你不觉得太理想，太过于默契吗？

那不是好事吗？


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: According to the dialogue, the response from other people to the statement made by a speaker between 85.54 and 93.86 seconds regarding ‘being too in sync’ is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B: Cannot determine (Insufficient information to locate the reply)
- B. Speaker B: Is such an ideal combination even possible on a real battlefield?
- C. Speaker B: Indeed, it's actually unsettling when things go too smoothly.
- D. Speaker B: Isn't that a good thing?

这个组合，你、我、吴哲、齐桓，你不觉得太理想，太过于默契吗？

那不是好事吗？


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior demonstrated by the two speakers in the corresponding segment of the audio below? Please select the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A makes a hostile accusation, while Speaker B shows panic and confusion.
- B. Speaker A makes a serious declaration of principle, while Speaker B counters and questions with a sarcastic tone.
- C. Speaker A pours out their emotions, while Speaker B rationally analyzes the pros and cons.
- D. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence)

Speaker A makes a serious declaration of principles, while Speaker B counters and questions with a sarcastic tone.

我曾经承诺过他，会比任何人都忠于他。

他（tā）是你谁啊？


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior demonstrated by the speaker talking from 68.68s to 72.36s and the speaker talking from 73.89s to 74.73s in their respective segments of the audio? Please select the best fit.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A pours out their feelings, while Speaker B rationally analyzes the pros and cons.
- B. Speaker A makes a hostile accusation, while Speaker B shows panic and confusion.
- C. Speaker A makes a serious declaration of principle, while Speaker B retorts and questions with a mocking tone.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence)

Speaker A makes a serious declaration of principles, while Speaker B counterattacks and questions it with a mocking tone.

我曾经承诺过他，会比任何人都忠于他。

他（tā）是你谁啊？


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior demonstrated in the corresponding audio segment between the speaker who said ‘will be more loyal to him than anyone else’ and the speaker who said ‘Who is he (tā) to you?’? Please choose the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A makes a solemn declaration of principle, while Speaker B counters and questions it with a mocking tone.
- B. Speaker A pours out their feelings, while Speaker B rationally analyzes the pros and cons.
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)
- D. Speaker A makes a hostile accusation, while Speaker B shows panic and confusion.

Speaker A makes a solemn declaration of principles, while Speaker B counter-attacks and questions with a mocking tone.

我曾经承诺过他，会比任何人都忠于他。

他（tā）是你谁啊？


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior between the first speaker and the second speaker in the dialogue? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A is pouring out their emotions, while Speaker B rationally analyzes the pros and cons.
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence)
- C. Speaker A makes a hostile accusation, while Speaker B expresses panic and confusion.
- D. Speaker A makes a serious declaration of principle, while Speaker B counters and questions in a sarcastic tone.

Speaker A makes a solemn declaration of principle, while Speaker B counterattacks and questions with a mocking tone.

我曾经承诺过他，会比任何人都忠于他。

他（tā）是你谁啊？


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior demonstrated in the corresponding audio segments between the speaker who said ‘I once promised him that I would be more loyal to him than anyone else’ from 68.68 seconds to 72.36 seconds, and the speaker who said ‘Who is he（tā）to you?’ from 73.89 seconds to 74.73 seconds? Please choose the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A makes a hostile accusation, while Speaker B shows panic and confusion.
- B. Speaker A is pouring out their emotions, while Speaker B rationally analyzes the pros and cons.
- C. Speaker A makes a serious declaration of principle, while Speaker B retorts and challenges it with a sarcastic tone.
- D. Unable to determine (insufficient evidence)

Speaker A makes a serious declaration of principles, while Speaker B retorts and questions with a sarcastic tone.

我曾经承诺过他，会比任何人都忠于他。

他（tā）是你谁啊？


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship between the two speakers in the following audio, based on the entire conversation? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Colleague
- B. Police officer—Suspect
- C. Police officer—Person involved in the case
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)

Police Personnel—Person Involved in the Case

你们有多久没有联络了？

我们是中山分局的，苏庆怡是你女儿？

你可以跟我们讲一下她怎么样狠心自私吗？

自从她离开家以后，

忘了。

人生啊，不要记得太清楚比较好过。


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship in the entire conversation between the speaker who talks from 153.35 to 154.67 seconds and the speaker who talks from 155.19 to 156.83 seconds? Please choose the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Police officer—Suspect
- B. Police officer—Case-related person
- C. Colleague
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)

Police personnel—Person relevant to the case

你们有多久没有联络了？

我们是中山分局的，苏庆怡是你女儿？

你可以跟我们讲一下她怎么样狠心自私吗？

自从她离开家以后，

忘了。

人生啊，不要记得太清楚比较好过。


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship in the entire conversation between the speaker who said ‘How long has it been since you've been in contact?’ and the speaker who said ‘Ever since she left home,’? Please choose the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Colleague
- B. Police Officer—Case-related Person
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)
- D. Police officer—Suspect

Police officer—Person related to the case

你们有多久没有联络了？

我们是中山分局的，苏庆怡是你女儿？

你可以跟我们讲一下她怎么样狠心自私吗？

自从她离开家以后，

忘了。

人生啊，不要记得太清楚比较好过。


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: In the audio, what is the relationship in the entire conversation between the speaker who said "How long has it been since you've been in contact?" from 153.35 to 154.67 seconds, and the speaker who said "Ever since she left home," from 155.19 to 156.83 seconds? Please select the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Police officer—Suspect
- B. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence)
- C. Colleague
- D. Police officer—Person involved in the case

Police officer—Person involved in the case

你们有多久没有联络了？

我们是中山分局的，苏庆怡是你女儿？

你可以跟我们讲一下她怎么样狠心自私吗？

自从她离开家以后，

忘了。

人生啊，不要记得太清楚比较好过。


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the speaker in the following audio of a single speaker, throughout the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. Conduct an investigation with an objective and neutral attitude, aiming to find out the truth.
- B. Admits to having an extramarital affair, but argues it is not bigamy, and attempts to seek help from the police.
- C. Adamantly deny having two wives and try to cover up the truth with various lies.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely establish the conclusion/change)

Firmly denied having two wives and tried to cover up the facts with various lies.

这个世界上同名同姓的人很多，你要先查清楚啊。

呃，不可能，绝对不可能。

你马上到祖儿家去，如果有人找我，就说你是朱定发，但别让他知道你在假扮我。

哎，我刚刚忘了告诉你，我正在神经病院，我就是在这里查到那个神经病是从这里逃走的。

我是来问问看，你是不是有两个老婆？

那一定是那个女的搞错了，我到平安路去查查看。


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the speaker from 18.01 to 20.73 in the audio throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely deduce the conclusion/change)
- B. Conduct an investigation with an objective and neutral attitude to find out the truth.
- C. Admitted to having an extramarital affair, but argued it was not bigamy, and sought help from the police.
- D. Adamantly deny having two wives and try to cover up the truth with various lies.

Adamantly denies having two wives and tries to cover up the truth with various lies.

这个世界上同名同姓的人很多，你要先查清楚啊。

呃，不可能，绝对不可能。

你马上到祖儿家去，如果有人找我，就说你是朱定发，但别让他知道你在假扮我。

我是来问问看，你是不是有两个老婆？

那一定是那个女的搞错了，我到平安路去查查看。


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance in the entire conversation of the speaker in the audio who said ‘There are many people with the same given name and surname in this world’?

Choices:
- A. Admitted to having an extramarital affair, but argued that it was not bigamy, and attempted to seek help from the police.
- B. Firmly deny having two wives and try to cover up the facts with various lies.
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely deduce the conclusion/change)
- D. Conduct an investigation with an objective and neutral attitude, aiming to ascertain the truth.

Adamantly denied having two wives and tried to cover up the facts with various lies.

这个世界上同名同姓的人很多，你要先查清楚啊。

呃，不可能，绝对不可能。

你马上到祖儿家去，如果有人找我，就说你是朱定发，但别让他知道你在假扮我。

我是来问问看，你是不是有两个老婆？

那一定是那个女的搞错了，我到平安路去查查看。


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance in the entire conversation of the speaker who, between 18.01s and 20.73s in the audio, says ‘You should check first and be sure’?

Choices:
- A. Adamantly denies having two wives and tries to cover up the truth with various lies.
- B. Conduct an investigation with an objective and neutral attitude, aiming to ascertain the truth.
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to lead to a single conclusion/change)
- D. Admitted to having an extramarital affair, but argued it was not bigamy and attempted to seek help from the police.

He adamantly denies having two wives and tries to cover up the truth with various lies.

这个世界上同名同姓的人很多，你要先查清楚啊。

呃，不可能，绝对不可能。

你马上到祖儿家去，如果有人找我，就说你是朱定发，但别让他知道你在假扮我。

我是来问问看，你是不是有两个老婆？

那一定是那个女的搞错了，我到平安路去查查看。


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the first speaker to appear (spk_1) in the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Admitted to having an extramarital affair, but argued it was not bigamy, and attempted to seek help from the police.
- B. Conduct an investigation with an objective and neutral attitude, aiming to ascertain the facts.
- C. Firmly denies having two wives and tries to cover up the truth with various lies.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine the conclusion/change)

He adamantly denies having two wives and is trying to cover up the truth with all kinds of lies.

这个世界上同名同姓的人很多，你要先查清楚啊。

呃，不可能，绝对不可能。

你马上到祖儿家去，如果有人找我，就说你是朱定发，但别让他知道你在假扮我。

我是来问问看，你是不是有两个老婆？

那一定是那个女的搞错了，我到平安路去查查看。


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker in the following single-person audio change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. From initial shock and denial → to fabricating complex lies and asking a friend to impersonate them to cover up the truth.
- B. From an initial strong denial → to a later emotional breakdown, finally confessing everything to his wife.
- C. From initially suspecting the other party → to believing their story and deciding to end the investigation.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely deduce the conclusion/change)

From initial shock and denial → progressing to fabricating complex lies and asking a friend to impersonate them to cover up the truth.

这个世界上同名同姓的人很多，你要先查清楚啊。

呃，不可能，绝对不可能。

你马上到祖儿家去，如果有人找我，就说你是朱定发，但别让他知道你在假扮我。

我是来问问看，你是不是有两个老婆？

那一定是那个女的搞错了，我到平安路去查查看。


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker from 18.01s to 20.73s in the audio change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. From a strong denial at first → to an emotional breakdown, finally confessing everything to his wife.
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely derive the conclusion/change)
- C. From initial shock and denial → to fabricating complex lies and asking a friend to impersonate them to cover up the truth.
- D. From initially suspecting the other party → to believing their account and deciding to end the investigation.

From initial shock and denial → to fabricating complex lies and asking a friend to impersonate them to cover up the truth.

这个世界上同名同姓的人很多，你要先查清楚啊。

呃，不可能，绝对不可能。

你马上到祖儿家去，如果有人找我，就说你是朱定发，但别让他知道你在假扮我。

我是来问问看，你是不是有两个老婆？

那一定是那个女的搞错了，我到平安路去查查看。


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker, who said ‘There are many people with the same name in this world’ in the audio, change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. From initially suspecting the other party → to believing their explanation and deciding to end the investigation.
- B. From initial shock and denial → progressing to fabricating complex lies and asking a friend to impersonate them to cover up the truth.
- C. From an initial strong denial → to a later emotional breakdown, finally confessing everything to his wife.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely deduce the conclusion/change)

From initial shock and denial → developing into fabricating complex lies and asking a friend to pose as them to cover up the truth.

这个世界上同名同姓的人很多，你要先查清楚啊。

呃，不可能，绝对不可能。

你马上到祖儿家去，如果有人找我，就说你是朱定发，但别让他知道你在假扮我。

我是来问问看，你是不是有两个老婆？

那一定是那个女的搞错了，我到平安路去查查看。


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker who said ‘You should check it carefully first’ from 18.01 to 20.73 seconds in the audio change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely deduce the conclusion/change)
- B. From a strong denial at the beginning → to a later emotional breakdown, ultimately confessing everything to his wife.
- C. From initially suspecting the other party → to believing their story and deciding to end the investigation.
- D. From initial shock and denial → to fabricating complex lies and asking a friend to impersonate them to cover up the truth.

From initial shock and denial → progressing to concocting complex lies and asking a friend to impersonate them to cover up the truth.

这个世界上同名同姓的人很多，你要先查清楚啊。

呃，不可能，绝对不可能。

你马上到祖儿家去，如果有人找我，就说你是朱定发，但别让他知道你在假扮我。

我是来问问看，你是不是有两个老婆？

那一定是那个女的搞错了，我到平安路去查查看。


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the first speaker (spk_1) change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. From a strong denial at first → to an emotional breakdown, ultimately confessing everything to his wife.
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely deduce the conclusion/change)
- C. From initial shock and denial → to fabricating complex lies and asking friends to impersonate them to cover up the truth.
- D. From initially suspecting the other party → to believing their story and deciding to end the investigation.

From initial shock and denial → to fabricating complex lies and asking a friend to impersonate them to cover up the truth.

这个世界上同名同姓的人很多，你要先查清楚啊。

呃，不可能，绝对不可能。

你马上到祖儿家去，如果有人找我，就说你是朱定发，但别让他知道你在假扮我。

我是来问问看，你是不是有两个老婆？

那一定是那个女的搞错了，我到平安路去查查看。


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: In the following solo audio, what accent does the speaker use?

Choices:
- A. American English accent
- B. Indian English accent
- C. Hong Kong-accented English
- D. The accent is not obvious and cannot be determined.

Any questions?

Yes sir。


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: Which of the following is closest to the accent of the speaker in the audio from 269.88s to 270.5s?

Choices:
- A. Accent not obvious, impossible to determine.
- B. English with a Hong Kong accent
- C. American accent
- D. Indian English accent

Any questions?

Yes sir。


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: The accent of the speaker who said ‘Any questions?’ in the audio is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Hong Kong-accented English
- B. The accent is not obvious, and it's impossible to determine.
- C. American English accent
- D. Singapore English accent

Any questions?

Yes sir。


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, what accent does the 9th speaker in the conversation use?

Choices:
- A. American English accent
- B. Accent is not obvious, unable to determine.
- C. Mandarin with a Taiwanese accent
- D. Hong Kong English

Any questions?

Yes sir。


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: For the male speaker who said ‘Any questions?’ between 269.88 and 270.5 seconds, which of the following does his accent most closely resemble?

Choices:
- A. Indian English accent
- B. Hong Kong-accented English
- C. American English accent
- D. The accent is not pronounced, making it impossible to determine.

Any questions?

Yes sir。


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: Which speakers in the entire audio use a Hong Kong English accent? (Answer in order of speaker appearance.) Please choose the best option.

Choices:
- A. Ninth speaker, Tenth speaker, Eleventh speaker, Fifth speaker
- B. The accent is not obvious, cannot be determined.
- C. the ninth speaker, the tenth speaker, the eleventh speaker, the fourteenth speaker
- D. the ninth speaker, the eleventh speaker, the fifteenth speaker

Ninth speaker, tenth speaker, eleventh speaker, fourteenth speaker

Any questions?

Yes sir。


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, how many speakers are there with a Hong Kong accent in English? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. 1
- B. 4
- C. 3
- D. Accent is not pronounced, unable to tell.

Any questions?

Yes sir。


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: In the single-speaker audio below, which of the following best describes the speaker's profile?

Choices:
- A. Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Surprised; Accent: Standard Mandarin
- B. Gender: Female; Age: Elderly; Emotion: Fear; Accent: Standard Mandarin
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine)
- D. Gender: Female voice; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: Standard Mandarin

Gender: Female voice; Age: Young adult; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: Standard Mandarin

不方便你又来。

姑娘为何要这样作践自己？


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: The speaker profile of the speaker from 13.71s to 15.07s in the audio is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine)
- B. Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Surprised; Accent: Standard Mandarin
- C. Gender: Female voice; Age: Young adult; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: Standard Mandarin
- D. Gender: Female voice; Age: Elderly; Emotion: Fear; Accent: Standard Mandarin

Gender: Female; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: Standard Mandarin

不方便你又来。

姑娘为何要这样作践自己？


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: Which of the following is the closest speaker profile for the speaker in the audio who said ‘It's inconvenient that you've come again’?

Choices:
- A. Gender: Female voice; Age: Young adult; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: Standard Mandarin
- B. Gender: Female; Age: Elderly; Emotion: Fear; Accent: Standard Mandarin
- C. Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Surprised; Accent: Standard Mandarin
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine)

Gender: Female voice; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: Standard Mandarin

不方便你又来。

姑娘为何要这样作践自己？


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: What is the gender of the second speaker in the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine)
- B. Female voice
- C. Neutral
- D. Male voice

不方便你又来。

姑娘为何要这样作践自己？


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: The speaker who said ‘It's inconvenient that you've come again’ between 13.71 and 15.07 seconds has a speaker profile that is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Surprised; Accent: Standard Mandarin
- B. Gender: Female; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: Standard Mandarin
- C. Cannot determine (insufficient information)
- D. Gender: Female; Age: Elderly; Emotion: Fearful; Accent: Standard Mandarin

Gender: Female; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: Standard Mandarin

不方便你又来。

姑娘为何要这样作践自己？


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: In the entire audio, which speakers have the speaker profile "Gender: Female voice; Age: Young adult; Accent: Standard Mandarin"? (Answer with spk_index) Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information)
- B. spk_1、spk_6
- C. spk_1
- D. spk_1、spk_6、spk_8

不方便你又来。

姑娘为何要这样作践自己？


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: In the entire audio, how many speakers have the profile "Gender: Female voice; Age: Young adult; Accent: Standard Mandarin"? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. 1
- B. 5
- C. 2
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine)

不方便你又来。

姑娘为何要这样作践自己？


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: In the single-speaker audio below, the speaker's age group is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Middle-aged people (30-59 years old)
- B. Elderly (60 years and older)
- C. Young adults (18-29 years old)
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)

难得你这么喜欢贝儿，我怎么会不答应呢？

叹气是没有用的，做人要开心点嘛。


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: Which of the following is closest to the age range of the speaker in the audio from 46.45 to 49.01 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)
- B. Middle-aged people (30-59 years old)
- C. Young adults (18-29 years old)
- D. Seniors (60 years and over)

难得你这么喜欢贝儿，我怎么会不答应呢？

叹气是没有用的，做人要开心点嘛。


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: The age range of the speaker in the audio who said ‘How could I not agree?’ is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Young adults (18-29 years old)
- B. Elderly (60 years or older)
- C. Middle-aged (30-59 years old)
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine the age group)

难得你这么喜欢贝儿，我怎么会不答应呢？

叹气是没有用的，做人要开心点嘛。


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: In the entire dialogue, the age range of the 3rd speaker to appear (spk_3) is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Seniors (Aged 60 and over)
- B. Middle-aged people (30-59 years old)
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)
- D. Youth (18-29 years old)

难得你这么喜欢贝儿，我怎么会不答应呢？

叹气是没有用的，做人要开心点嘛。


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: For the female speaker who said ‘It's rare for you to like Belle this much’ from 46.45s to 49.01s, which of the following is the closest age group?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)
- B. Middle-aged (30-59 years old)
- C. Seniors (60 years and older)
- D. Young adults (18-29 years old)

难得你这么喜欢贝儿，我怎么会不答应呢？

叹气是没有用的，做人要开心点嘛。


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, which speakers are in the Elderly (above 60 years old) age group? (Answer using the global speaker order) Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. spk_3、spk_8
- B. spk_3、spk_4、spk_11
- C. spk_3、spk_8、spk_11
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)

难得你这么喜欢贝儿，我怎么会不答应呢？

叹气是没有用的，做人要开心点嘛。


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: In the entire audio segment, how many speakers are in the Elderly (over 60 years old) age group? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. 2
- B. 3
- C. 5
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)

难得你这么喜欢贝儿，我怎么会不答应呢？

叹气是没有用的，做人要开心点嘛。


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Are the speakers in the two audio clips below the same?

Choices:
- A. The two speakers are the same person, but one of them is intentionally changing their voice.
- B. No, not the same person.
- C. Yes, the same person
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)

哎，只不过还差六万多嘛，小意思。

东元他一定会照顾贝儿的。

啊，不用了，呃，就当是定金好了。

哎，顾先生，我要不要上去办手续啊？


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Are the speakers in the two audio clips below the same person?

Choices:
- A. No, not the same person
- B. Cannot determine (Insufficient information)
- C. Yes, the same person
- D. The two speakers are the same person, but one of them is intentionally changing their voice.

哎，只不过还差六万多嘛，小意思。

东元他一定会照顾贝儿的。

啊，不用了，呃，就当是定金好了。

哎，顾先生，我要不要上去办手续啊？


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: In the audio, are the speaker from 17.5 to 20.58 seconds and the speaker from 59.08 to 61.32 seconds the same speaker?

Choices:
- A. Yes, the same person
- B. No, not the same person
- C. Cannot determine (Insufficient information)
- D. The two speakers are the same person, but one of them is deliberately altering their voice.

哎，只不过还差六万多嘛，小意思。

东元他一定会照顾贝儿的。

啊，不用了，呃，就当是定金好了。

哎，顾先生，我要不要上去办手续啊？


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker in the audio from 17.5 to 20.58 seconds the same as the speaker from 43.61 to 45.93 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Yes, the same person
- B. The two speakers are the same person, but one of them is intentionally changing their voice.
- C. No, not the same person
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)

哎，只不过还差六万多嘛，小意思。

东元他一定会照顾贝儿的。

啊，不用了，呃，就当是定金好了。

哎，顾先生，我要不要上去办手续啊？


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker who said ‘It's just short by over sixty thousand, no big deal’ the same person as the speaker who said ‘Just treat it as a deposit’?

Choices:
- A. Cannot determine (Insufficient information)
- B. The two speakers are the same person, but one of them is deliberately changing their voice.
- C. Yes, the same person
- D. No, not the same person

哎，只不过还差六万多嘛，小意思。

东元他一定会照顾贝儿的。

啊，不用了，呃，就当是定金好了。

哎，顾先生，我要不要上去办手续啊？


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker in the audio who said ‘It’s just a little over sixty thousand short, no big deal’ the same speaker as the one who said ‘Dong Yuan will definitely take care of Bei'er’?

Choices:
- A. No, not the same person
- B. Yes, the same person
- C. The two speakers are the same person, but one of them is intentionally altering their voice.
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)

哎，只不过还差六万多嘛，小意思。

东元他一定会照顾贝儿的。

啊，不用了，呃，就当是定金好了。

哎，顾先生，我要不要上去办手续啊？


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: In the audio, is the speaker who said ‘只不过还差六万多嘛’ from 17.5 to 20.58 seconds the same speaker as the one who said ‘就当是定金好了’ from 59.08 to 61.32 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Yes, the same person
- B. The two speakers are the same person, but one of them is deliberately altering their voice.
- C. Cannot determine (insufficient information)
- D. No, not the same person

哎，只不过还差六万多嘛，小意思。

东元他一定会照顾贝儿的。

啊，不用了，呃，就当是定金好了。

哎，顾先生，我要不要上去办手续啊？


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: In the audio, is the speaker who said ‘只不过还差六万多嘛’ from 17.5 to 20.58 seconds the same person as the speaker who said ‘东元他一定会照顾贝儿的’ from 43.61 to 45.93 seconds?

Choices:
- A. No, not the same person
- B. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)
- C. The two speakers are the same person, but one of them is intentionally changing their voice.
- D. Yes, the same person

哎，只不过还差六万多嘛，小意思。

东元他一定会照顾贝儿的。

啊，不用了，呃，就当是定金好了。

哎，顾先生，我要不要上去办手续啊？


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What is the emotion of this speaker (<spk_5>) in the audio from second 260.56 to second 261.92? What impact did this emotion have on others in the conversation?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Dissatisfaction; Impact: This made <spk_1> feel panicked and immediately agree to solve the problem.
- B. Emotion: Displeasure; Impact: This made <spk_2> feel awkward and try to help ease the tension.
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence to uniquely determine).
- D. Emotion: Anxiety; Impact: This emotion also made <spk_1> feel tense, but she tried to soothe the other person by reasoning with them.

Emotion: Dissatisfaction; Impact: This made <spk_1> feel panicked and immediately agree to solve the problem.

你咋这么没打算呢？

我去我去我去我去我去买。


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What emotion is the speaker (<spk_5>), who says ‘你咋这么没打算呢？’ in the audio, expressing? What effect did this emotion have on others in the conversation?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Anxiety; Impact: This emotion also made <spk_1> feel tense, but she tried to calm the other person down by reasoning with them.
- B. Emotion: Dissatisfaction; Impact: This made <spk_2> feel awkward and try to help ease the tension.
- C. Emotion: Dissatisfaction; Impact: This made <spk_1> feel panicked and immediately agree to solve the problem.
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence to uniquely determine).

Emotion: dissatisfaction; Impact: This made <spk_1> feel panicked and immediately agree to solve the problem.

你咋这么没打算呢？

我去我去我去我去我去买。


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What emotion was the speaker (<spk_5>) expressing when they said ‘How can you be so thoughtless?’ between 260.56s and 261.92s in the audio? What impact did this emotion have on others?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence to uniquely determine).
- B. Emotion: Dissatisfaction; Impact: This makes <spk_2> feel awkward and try to help ease the tension.
- C. Emotion: Anxiety; Impact: This emotion also made <spk_1> tense, but she tried to calm the other person down by reasoning with them.
- D. Emotion: Dissatisfaction; Impact: This made <spk_1> panic and immediately agree to solve the problem.

Emotion: Dissatisfaction; Impact: This made <spk_1> feel panicked, and they immediately agreed to solve the problem.

你咋这么没打算呢？

我去我去我去我去我去买。


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: In the dialogue, what emotion does a key statement from the fifth speaker (<spk_5>) express? What impact did this emotion have on others?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Dissatisfaction; Impact: This made <spk_2> feel awkward and try to help ease the tension.
- B. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence to uniquely determine).
- C. Emotion: Dissatisfaction; Impact: This caused <spk_1> to panic and immediately agree to solve the problem.
- D. Emotion: Anxiety; Impact: The emotion also made <spk_1> feel tense, but she tried to calm the other person down by reasoning with them.

Emotion: Dissatisfaction; Impact: This made <spk_1> feel panicked and immediately agree to solve the problem.

你咋这么没打算呢？

我去我去我去我去我去买。


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: In the following single-speaker audio, what is the speaker's gender?

Choices:
- A. Male
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine gender)
- C. Female
- D. Gender uncertain

今天你真像个小媳妇。

你笑什么？


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the speaker in the audio from 38.21 to 40.97 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Unspecified gender
- B. Male
- C. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine gender)
- D. Female

今天你真像个小媳妇。

你笑什么？


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the speaker in the audio who said ‘Today you’re really like a little bride’?

Choices:
- A. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine gender)
- B. Female
- C. Uncertain gender
- D. Male

今天你真像个小媳妇。

你笑什么？


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the first speaker to appear (spk_1) in the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. Male
- B. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine gender)
- C. Uncertain gender
- D. Female

今天你真像个小媳妇。

你笑什么？


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the speaker who said ‘You're really like a little bride today’ between 38.21 and 40.97 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Female
- B. Undetermined gender
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine gender)
- D. Male

今天你真像个小媳妇。

你笑什么？


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, which speakers are female? (Answer with spk_index) Please choose the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine gender)
- B. spk_2
- C. spk_1
- D. spk_1、spk_10

今天你真像个小媳妇。

你笑什么？


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: How many male speakers are there in the entire audio? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. 7
- B. 8
- C. 1
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine gender)

今天你真像个小媳妇。

你笑什么？


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is it the same speaker in the two audio clips below?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information)
- B. No, not the same person
- C. Yes, the same person
- D. The two speakers' timbres are similar, but their intonations are different.

你们就知道吃，有没有想想帮阿宝哥开甜品店的事啊？

Standard Mandarin, with a slight Hong Kong/Taiwanese accent

喂，不是，我觉得啊，阿宝哥的感情问题呢，我们就可以帮他。

我今晚约了杰尼他们去西贡吃海鲜，你也去吧。

放心吧，开车送你回去很快的，OK？


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Are the speakers in the following two audio clips the same person?

Choices:
- A. Cannot determine (Insufficient information)
- B. No, not the same person
- C. Yes, the same person
- D. The emotions of the two voice clips are different, but it cannot be determined if they are from the same person.

你们就知道吃，有没有想想帮阿宝哥开甜品店的事啊？

喂，不是，我觉得啊，阿宝哥的感情问题呢，我们就可以帮他。

我今晚约了杰尼他们去西贡吃海鲜，你也去吧。

放心吧，开车送你回去很快的，OK？


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker from 45.97 seconds to 49.93 seconds the same as the speaker from 133.08 seconds to 135.68 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Yes, the same person
- B. No, they are not the same person.
- C. Unable to determine (insufficient information)
- D. The two speakers' timbres are similar, but their intonations are different

你们就知道吃，有没有想想帮阿宝哥开甜品店的事啊？

喂，不是，我觉得啊，阿宝哥的感情问题呢，我们就可以帮他。

我今晚约了杰尼他们去西贡吃海鲜，你也去吧。

放心吧，开车送你回去很快的，OK？


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker from 45.97s to 49.93s the same as the speaker from 61.18s to 65.42s in the audio?

Choices:
- A. No, not the same person
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information)
- C. The emotions in the two audio clips are different, but it cannot be determined whether they are from the same person.
- D. Yes, the same person

你们就知道吃，有没有想想帮阿宝哥开甜品店的事啊？

喂，不是，我觉得啊，阿宝哥的感情问题呢，我们就可以帮他。

我今晚约了杰尼他们去西贡吃海鲜，你也去吧。

放心吧，开车送你回去很快的，OK？


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker in the audio who said ‘All you guys know is how to eat, have you thought about helping Brother Ah Bao open a dessert shop?’ the same person as the one who said ‘I'm meeting Jenny and the others in Sai Kung for seafood tonight?’?

Choices:
- A. Yes, the same person
- B. The two speakers' timbre is similar, but their intonation is different.
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information)
- D. No, not the same person

你们就知道吃，有没有想想帮阿宝哥开甜品店的事啊？

喂，不是，我觉得啊，阿宝哥的感情问题呢，我们就可以帮他。

我今晚约了杰尼他们去西贡吃海鲜，你也去吧。

放心吧，开车送你回去很快的，OK？


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: In the audio, is the speaker who said ‘你们就知道吃’ the same person as the speaker who said ‘阿宝哥的感情问题呢’?

Choices:
- A. Yes, the same person
- B. No, not the same person
- C. The emotions of the two voice clips are different, but it cannot be determined whether they are from the same person.
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)

你们就知道吃，有没有想想帮阿宝哥开甜品店的事啊？

喂，不是，我觉得啊，阿宝哥的感情问题呢，我们就可以帮他。

我今晚约了杰尼他们去西贡吃海鲜，你也去吧。

放心吧，开车送你回去很快的，OK？


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker who said ‘有沒有想想幫阿寶哥’ (Have you thought about helping A Bao Ge?) from 45.97s to 49.93s in the audio the same speaker as the one who said ‘你也去吧’ (You go too.) from 133.08s to 135.68s?

Choices:
- A. No, not the same person
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information)
- C. Yes, the same person
- D. The two speakers have similar timbres, but different intonations.

你们就知道吃，有没有想想帮阿宝哥开甜品店的事啊？

喂，不是，我觉得啊，阿宝哥的感情问题呢，我们就可以帮他。

我今晚约了杰尼他们去西贡吃海鲜，你也去吧。

放心吧，开车送你回去很快的，OK？


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: In the audio, is the speaker who said ‘You guys only know how to eat’ from 45.97s to 49.93s the same speaker as the one who said ‘We can then help him’ from 61.18s to 65.42s?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information)
- B. Yes, the same person
- C. The emotions of the two voice clips are different, but it cannot be determined whether they are from the same person.
- D. No, not the same person

你们就知道吃，有没有想想帮阿宝哥开甜品店的事啊？

喂，不是，我觉得啊，阿宝哥的感情问题呢，我们就可以帮他。

我今晚约了杰尼他们去西贡吃海鲜，你也去吧。

放心吧，开车送你回去很快的，OK？


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the speaker in the single-speaker audio below throughout the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. Wants to sell all businesses and completely exit this industry.
- B. Insist on one's own retirement and personnel arrangements, with a firm and unquestionable attitude.
- C. Opposes an outsider taking over the business, feeling their own position is threatened.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to draw a unique conclusion/change)

Opposes outsiders taking over the business, believing their own position is threatened.

你要退休，为什么事前不跟我说一声？

说的那么容易，我跟了你十年，你还是不相信我。

在英国好吃好住，何必回来跟我争这口辛苦饭？

你不觉得刚才那个场合最适合宣布这件事了吗？

庄臣，以后你就管账，其他的事由梅姨做主。


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the speaker from 9.01 to 11.49 in the audio, throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Insisting on one's own retirement and personnel arrangements with a firm and unquestionable attitude.
- B. Hopes to sell off all businesses and completely exit this industry
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely derive the viewpoint/change)
- D. Opposes an outsider taking over the business, believing their own position is threatened.

Opposes an outsider taking over the business, feeling their own position is threatened.

你要退休，为什么事前不跟我说一声？

说的那么容易，我跟了你十年，你还是不相信我。

在英国好吃好住，何必回来跟我争这口辛苦饭？

你不觉得刚才那个场合最适合宣布这件事了吗？

庄臣，以后你就管账，其他的事由梅姨做主。


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance in the entire conversation of the speaker in the audio who said, ‘You’re going to retire, why didn’t you tell me beforehand’?

Choices:
- A. Opposes an outsider taking over the business, believing their own position is threatened.
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine the conclusion/change)
- C. Insist on one's own retirement and personnel arrangements with a firm and unquestionable attitude
- D. Hope to sell off all businesses and completely exit this industry

Opposes an outsider taking over the business, believing their own position is threatened.

你要退休，为什么事前不跟我说一声？

说的那么容易，我跟了你十年，你还是不相信我。

在英国好吃好住，何必回来跟我争这口辛苦饭？

你不觉得刚才那个场合最适合宣布这件事了吗？

庄臣，以后你就管账，其他的事由梅姨做主。


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance in the entire conversation of the speaker who, from 9.01 to 11.49 seconds in the audio, says, ‘You are going to retire, why didn't you tell me beforehand?’?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine the conclusion/change)
- B. Opposes letting an outsider take over the business, believing their own position is threatened.
- C. Hopes to sell all businesses and completely exit this industry.
- D. Insist on one's own retirement and personnel arrangements, with a resolute and unquestionable attitude.

Opposes letting an outsider take over the business, believing their own position is threatened.

你要退休，为什么事前不跟我说一声？

说的那么容易，我跟了你十年，你还是不相信我。

在英国好吃好住，何必回来跟我争这口辛苦饭？

你不觉得刚才那个场合最适合宣布这件事了吗？

庄臣，以后你就管账，其他的事由梅姨做主。


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the 1st speaker (spk_1) throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Insisting on one's own retirement and personnel arrangements, with a firm and unquestionable attitude.
- B. Hopes to sell off all businesses and exit this industry completely.
- C. Opposes an outsider taking over the business, believing their own position is threatened.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely derive the conclusion/change)

Opposes letting an outsider take over the business, believing one's own position is threatened.

你要退休，为什么事前不跟我说一声？

说的那么容易，我跟了你十年，你还是不相信我。

在英国好吃好住，何必回来跟我争这口辛苦饭？

你不觉得刚才那个场合最适合宣布这件事了吗？

庄臣，以后你就管账，其他的事由梅姨做主。


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker in the following single-speaker audio change throughout the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. From being surprised and concerned about the retirement plan to becoming hostile toward the newcomer out of a feeling of being distrusted.
- B. Always maintain authority and resolutely execute one's own retirement and personnel arrangement plans.
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine the viewpoint/change)
- D. From initial fierce opposition, to gradually understanding and fully supporting the new successor

From feeling surprised and worried about the retirement plan, to becoming hostile towards the newcomer due to feeling untrusted.

你要退休，为什么事前不跟我说一声？

说的那么容易，我跟了你十年，你还是不相信我。

在英国好吃好住，何必回来跟我争这口辛苦饭？

你不觉得刚才那个场合最适合宣布这件事了吗？

庄臣，以后你就管账，其他的事由梅姨做主。


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker from 9.01 to 11.49 seconds in the audio change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Always maintain authority and resolutely implement one's own retirement and staffing plans.
- B. From fierce opposition at first, to gradually understanding and fully supporting the new successor.
- C. From being surprised and concerned about the retirement plan to becoming hostile toward the newcomers due to feeling distrusted.
- D. Cannot be determined (Evidence is insufficient to uniquely lead to the conclusion/change)

From feeling surprised and concerned about the retirement plan to becoming hostile towards the newcomer out of a sense of being distrusted.

你要退休，为什么事前不跟我说一声？

说的那么容易，我跟了你十年，你还是不相信我。

在英国好吃好住，何必回来跟我争这口辛苦饭？

你不觉得刚才那个场合最适合宣布这件事了吗？

庄臣，以后你就管账，其他的事由梅姨做主。


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker in the audio who said ‘You're going to retire, why didn't you tell me beforehand?’ change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (The evidence is insufficient to lead to a unique conclusion/change)
- B. From being surprised and concerned about the retirement plan, to becoming hostile toward the newcomer out of a feeling of being distrusted.
- C. From fierce opposition at first, to gradually understanding and fully supporting the new successor
- D. Always maintain authority, resolutely implementing one's own retirement and personnel plan.

From feeling surprised and concerned about the retirement plan, to becoming hostile toward the newcomer out of a sense of being distrusted.

你要退休，为什么事前不跟我说一声？

说的那么容易，我跟了你十年，你还是不相信我。

在英国好吃好住，何必回来跟我争这口辛苦饭？

你不觉得刚才那个场合最适合宣布这件事了吗？

庄臣，以后你就管账，其他的事由梅姨做主。


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker who said ‘You're going to retire, why didn't you tell me beforehand?’ from 9.01 to 11.49 seconds in the audio change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. From initial fierce opposition, to gradually understanding and fully supporting the new successor
- B. Always maintain authority and resolutely carry out one's own retirement and personnel plans.
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely deduce the viewpoint/change)
- D. From being surprised and worried about the retirement plan to becoming hostile toward the newcomer due to feeling distrusted

From being surprised and worried about the retirement plan, to becoming hostile towards the newcomer due to feeling untrusted.

你要退休，为什么事前不跟我说一声？

说的那么容易，我跟了你十年，你还是不相信我。

在英国好吃好住，何必回来跟我争这口辛苦饭？

你不觉得刚才那个场合最适合宣布这件事了吗？

庄臣，以后你就管账，其他的事由梅姨做主。


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the first speaker's (spk_1) stance change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Always maintain authority, and resolutely implement one's own retirement and personnel plans.
- B. From being surprised and concerned about the retirement plan, to becoming hostile towards newcomers due to feeling distrusted.
- C. From initial fierce opposition to gradually understanding and fully supporting the new successor
- D. Cannot be determined (The evidence is insufficient to uniquely lead to the conclusion/change)

From being surprised and worried about the retirement plan, to becoming hostile towards the newcomer out of a feeling of being distrusted.

你要退休，为什么事前不跟我说一声？

说的那么容易，我跟了你十年，你还是不相信我。

在英国好吃好住，何必回来跟我争这口辛苦饭？

你不觉得刚才那个场合最适合宣布这件事了吗？

庄臣，以后你就管账，其他的事由梅姨做主。


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior between the two speakers in the corresponding segment? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A reports the investigation progress to a superior, and Speaker B listens and then gives instructions.
- B. Speaker A emotionally breaks down and vents their despair, and Speaker B firmly interrupts and consoles them.
- C. Speaker A raises a question, and Speaker B sternly criticizes and stops them from speaking.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence)

Speaker A has an emotional breakdown and vents despair, and Speaker B interrupts with a firm attitude to soothe them.

他为什么会在沈佳文的车上，这中间到底发生什么事情，根本就不重要，没有人在乎。

我在乎。


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior demonstrated in the corresponding segments by the speaker talking from 101.63 to 106.99 seconds and the speaker talking from 107.11 to 107.59 seconds in the audio? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A raises a question, and Speaker B harshly criticizes and stops them from speaking.
- B. Speaker A reports the progress of the investigation to a superior, and Speaker B gives instructions after listening.
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)
- D. Speaker A has an emotional breakdown and vents despair, and Speaker B interrupts with a firm attitude and provides comfort.

Speaker A has an emotional breakdown and vents despair, and Speaker B interrupts with a firm attitude to comfort them.

他为什么会在沈佳文的车上，这中间到底发生什么事情，根本就不重要，没有人在乎。

我在乎。


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior demonstrated in the corresponding audio segment between the speaker who said ‘What exactly happened in between is not important at all, nobody cares’ and the speaker who said ‘I care’? Please choose the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A is reporting the progress of the investigation to a superior, and Speaker B listens and then gives an instruction.
- B. Speaker A raises a question, and Speaker B criticizes in a stern tone and stops them from speaking.
- C. Speaker A has an emotional breakdown and vents despair, and Speaker B firmly interrupts and comforts them.
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient evidence)

Speaker A has an emotional breakdown and vents despair, and Speaker B interrupts with a firm attitude to comfort them.

他为什么会在沈佳文的车上，这中间到底发生什么事情，根本就不重要，没有人在乎。

我在乎。


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior demonstrated in the corresponding segments between the speaker who said ‘No one cares’ in the audio from 101.63 to 106.99 seconds, and the speaker who said ‘I care’ from 107.11 to 107.59 seconds? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A has an emotional breakdown and vents despair, and Speaker B firmly interrupts to console them.
- B. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)
- C. Speaker A raises a question, and Speaker B criticizes them in a stern tone and stops them from speaking.
- D. Speaker A reports on the progress of the investigation to a superior, and Speaker B listens and then issues an instruction.

Speaker A has an emotional breakdown and vents their despair, and Speaker B firmly interrupts to comfort them.

他为什么会在沈佳文的车上，这中间到底发生什么事情，根本就不重要，没有人在乎。

我在乎。


说话人识别能力-说话人反向检索任务

Question:
In the statements below, what did the first speaker in the dialogue say? Please select the most suitable option.
Candidate statements:
1) Are you hungry?
2) Why is it taking longer and longer?
3) How could it be that fast?
4) Mom will be back soon, don't worry.
5) You're hungry, go buy yourself some sesame buns at Jinmen.

Choices:
- A. 1, 4, 5
- B. 1, 3, 5
- C. 1, 2, 5
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine)

你妈在医院看你哥呢。

为什么妈这么久还不回来？

Hong Kong style Mandarin with a child's accent


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the stances of the two speakers in the following audio throughout the entire conversation? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Holds a contemptuous attitude towards Liangshan, considering them a band of rabble not to be feared.; Speaker B: Holds a cautious attitude towards Liangshan, considering them opponents not to be underestimated.
- B. Speaker A: Is cautious towards Liangshan, considering them opponents not to be underestimated.; Speaker B: Is contemptuous of Liangshan, considering them common outlaws who are not to be feared.
- C. Speaker A: Advocates for immediate peace talks with Liangshan to avoid unnecessary conflict.; Speaker B: Suggests launching a preemptive attack to eliminate the Liangshan forces.
- D. Speaker A: Has some understanding of the situation at Liangshan and is formulating a response plan.; Speaker B: Reminds the other party of potential risks, but has not indicated a specific stance.

Speaker A: Holds a contemptuous attitude towards Liangshan, considering them insignificant bandits not to be feared.; Speaker B: Holds a cautious attitude towards Liangshan, considering them opponents not to be underestimated.

哎，不过几个草寇而已，不足挂齿。

马是宝马，可那梁山的人也不好惹呀。


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the stance in the entire conversation of the speaker who speaks from 22.44s to 24.8s and the speaker who speaks from 18.84s to 22.24s in the audio? Please select the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Advocates for immediate peace talks with Liangshan to avoid unnecessary conflict.; Speaker B: Suggests a proactive attack, striking first to eliminate the Liangshan forces.
- B. Speaker A: Is cautious towards Liangshan, viewing them as a formidable opponent.; Speaker B: Is contemptuous of Liangshan, viewing them as mere bandits who pose no threat.
- C. Speaker A: Holds a contemptuous attitude towards Liangshan, considering them to be insignificant bandits who are not to be feared.; Speaker B: Holds a cautious attitude towards Liangshan, considering them to be opponents who should not be underestimated.
- D. Speaker A: Has some understanding of the situation at Liangshan and is formulating a response plan.; Speaker B: Reminds the other party of potential risks, but does not state a specific stance.

Speaker A: Holds a contemptuous attitude towards Liangshan, believing they are mere bandits who are not to be feared.; Speaker B: Holds a cautious attitude towards Liangshan, believing they are opponents who should not be underestimated.

哎，不过几个草寇而已，不足挂齿。

马是宝马，可那梁山的人也不好惹呀。


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the stances in the entire conversation of the speaker who said ‘They are just a few bandits, not worth mentioning’ and the speaker who said ‘The people from Liangshan are not to be trifled with either’? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Holds a cautious attitude toward Liangshan, considering them opponents not to be underestimated.; Speaker B: Holds a contemptuous attitude toward Liangshan, considering them mere bandits not to be feared.
- B. Speaker A: Has some understanding of the situation at Liangshan and is developing a response plan.; Speaker B: Reminds the other party of potential risks, but does not state a specific position.
- C. Speaker A: Advocates for immediate peace talks with Liangshan to avoid unnecessary conflict.; Speaker B: Suggests launching a preemptive strike to eliminate the Liangshan forces.
- D. Speaker A: Is contemptuous of Liangshan, viewing them as insignificant bandits not to be feared.; Speaker B: Is cautious towards Liangshan, viewing them as opponents not to be underestimated.

Speaker A: Holds a contemptuous attitude toward Liangshan, viewing them as mere bandits who are nothing to be feared.; Speaker B: Holds a cautious attitude toward Liangshan, considering them opponents who should not be underestimated.

哎，不过几个草寇而已，不足挂齿。

马是宝马，可那梁山的人也不好惹呀。