多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the stance in the entire conversation of the speaker from 26.64 to 31.46 seconds and the speaker from 39.63 to 44.56 seconds in the audio? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: On the dating activity design: Advocates for adding segments that allow the man to guide/protect the woman, creating a romantic and heart-fluttering feeling; Speaker B: On the dating activity design: Initially questioned the "protection" theme, but ultimately accepted the activity concept aimed at building trust and interaction.
- B. Speaker A: On the dating event design: initially questioned the "protection" theme, but ultimately approved of the concept of activities designed to enhance trust and interaction; Speaker B: On the dating event design: advocates for adding segments that showcase men guiding/protecting women and create romantic, heart-fluttering feelings.
- C. Speaker A: For the dating event design: proposed multiple complex plans; Speaker B: For the dating event design: discussed some details of the plans.
- D. Speaker A: On planning a date: believes swimming is the best choice because it can quickly build intimacy; Speaker B: On planning a date: insists that all activities should be centered on female independence and opposes any form of interaction between men and women.

Speaker A: Regarding the dating event design: Advocates for adding segments that allow men to guide/protect women and create a romantic, heart-fluttering feeling.
Speaker B: Regarding the dating event design: Initially questioned the "protection" theme, but ultimately approved of the activity concept aimed at enhancing trust and interaction.

增加一个环节就是，体现男性去保护女性的这样一个活动状态。

但我觉得现在都是成年人了，还需要什么保护？现在女生都自立自强了呀。


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the stances in the entire conversation of the speaker who said ‘a dynamic that embodies men protecting women’ and the speaker who said ‘Nowadays, girls are all independent and strong!’? Please choose the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: On the dating event design: Initially questioned the “protection” theme, but ultimately approved of the activity concept aimed at enhancing trust and interaction; Speaker B: On the dating event design: Advocates for adding segments that showcase men guiding/protecting women and create a romantic, heart-fluttering feeling.
- B. Speaker A: For the dating activity design: proposed multiple complex plans; Speaker B: For the dating activity design: discussed some details of the plans.
- C. Speaker A: Regarding the dating activity design: advocates for adding segments that reflect men guiding/protecting women and create romantic, heart-fluttering feelings; Speaker B: Regarding the dating activity design: initially questioned the "protection" theme, but ultimately approved of the activity concept aimed at enhancing trust and interaction.
- D. Speaker A: On date activity design: believes swimming is the best choice, as it can quickly build intimacy; Speaker B: On date activity design: insists that all activities should be centered on female independence, opposing any form of male-female interaction.

Speaker A: Regarding the dating event design: Proposes adding segments that reflect men guiding/protecting women and create a romantic, heart-fluttering feeling; Speaker B: Regarding the dating event design: Initially questioned the "protection" theme, but ultimately approved of the activity concept aimed at enhancing trust and interaction.

增加一个环节就是，体现男性去保护女性的这样一个活动状态。

但我觉得现在都是成年人了，还需要什么保护？现在女生都自立自强了呀。


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the respective stances of the first speaker and the second speaker in the entire dialogue? Please choose the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: On dating activity design: believes swimming is the best choice because it can quickly foster intimacy; Speaker B: On dating activity design: insists that all activities should be centered on female independence and opposes any form of male-female interaction.
- B. Speaker A: Regarding the dating activity design: Initially questioned the "protection" theme, but ultimately endorsed the activity concept aimed at enhancing trust and interaction; Speaker B: Regarding the dating activity design: Advocates for adding segments that allow men to guide/protect women and create a romantic, heart-fluttering feeling.
- C. Speaker A: Regarding the date activity design: proposed multiple complex plans; Speaker B: Regarding the date activity design: discussed some details of the plans.
- D. Speaker A: On the design of the dating activity: advocates for adding segments that showcase men leading/protecting women and create a romantic, heart-fluttering feeling; Speaker B: On the design of the dating activity: initially questioned the "protection" theme, but ultimately accepted the activity concept aimed at enhancing trust and interaction.

Speaker A: Regarding the dating activity design: advocates for adding segments that reflect men guiding/protecting women and create romantic, heart-fluttering feelings; Speaker B: Regarding the dating activity design: initially questioned the "protection" theme, but ultimately approved of the activity concept aimed at enhancing trust and interaction.

增加一个环节就是，体现男性去保护女性的这样一个活动状态。

但我觉得现在都是成年人了，还需要什么保护？现在女生都自立自强了呀。


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the stances in the entire conversation of the speaker who said ‘embodies men protecting women’ from 26.64 to 31.46 seconds in the audio, and the speaker who said ‘women are independent and strong now’ from 39.63 to 44.56 seconds? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: On the design of the dating activity: advocates for adding segments that reflect men guiding/protecting women and create romantic, heart-fluttering feelings; Speaker B: On the design of the dating activity: initially questioned the "protection" theme, but ultimately approved of the activity concept, which is aimed at enhancing trust and interaction.
- B. Speaker A: On designing the date activity: believes swimming is the best choice because it can quickly enhance intimacy; Speaker B: On designing the date activity: insists that all activities should be centered on female independence and opposes any form of interaction between men and women.
- C. Speaker A: Regarding the dating activity design: initially questioned the “protection” theme, but ultimately endorsed the activity concept aimed at fostering trust and interaction; Speaker B: Regarding the dating activity design: advocates for adding segments where men guide/protect women to create a romantic spark.
- D. Speaker A: Regarding the date activity design: proposed multiple complex plans; Speaker B: Regarding the date activity design: discussed some details of the plans.

Speaker A: On the dating event design: proposes adding segments that reflect men guiding/protecting women and create romantic, heart-fluttering feelings; Speaker B: On the dating event design: initially questioned the “protection” theme, but ultimately approved of the activity concept aimed at enhancing trust and interaction.

增加一个环节就是，体现男性去保护女性的这样一个活动状态。

但我觉得现在都是成年人了，还需要什么保护？现在女生都自立自强了呀。


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in the stances of the two speakers in the following audio throughout the entire conversation? Please select the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: On the design of "man leads/protects woman" activities: shifted from [questioning them for not fitting the image of a modern, independent woman] → [to recognizing they can enhance trust and interaction, and proactively proposing new suggestions]; Speaker B: On the design philosophy for dating activities: the attitude has always been [to design segments that create romantic, heart-fluttering feelings and promote interaction].
- B. Speaker A: Philosophy for dating activities: from 【advocating for stimulating, adventurous activities】→【supporting quiet, indoor activities】；Speaker B: On designing "the man leads/protects the woman" type activities: from 【full support】→【opposing them due to cost concerns】.
- C. Speaker A: On the design concept for dating activities: Attitude has consistently been 【to design segments that create romantic, heart-fluttering feelings and promote interaction】; Speaker B: On "man leads/protects woman" type activities: Shifted from 【questioning them for not conforming to the image of a modern, independent woman】→【to recognizing they can enhance trust and interaction, and proactively proposing new suggestions】.
- D. Speaker A: Regarding the design philosophy for dating activities: their stance has wavered multiple times; Speaker B: Regarding the design of activities where "the man leads/protects the woman": has consistently maintained a cautious and wait-and-see attitude.

Speaker A: On the design concept for dating activities: The attitude has always been 【to design segments that can create romantic, heart-fluttering feelings and promote interaction】.
Speaker B: On the design of "the man guides/protects the woman" type activities: From 【questioning them for not fitting the image of a modern, independent woman】 → 【to recognizing their ability to enhance trust and interaction, and proactively offering new suggestions】.

增加一个环节就是，体现男性去保护女性的这样一个活动状态。

但我觉得现在都是成年人了，还需要什么保护？现在女生都自立自强了呀。


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in stance throughout the entire dialogue for the speaker who speaks from 26.64 seconds to 31.46 seconds and the speaker who speaks from 39.63 seconds to 44.56 seconds in the audio? Please select the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: On the design philosophy for dating activities: their attitude has consistently been 【to design segments that create romantic, heart-fluttering feelings and promote interaction】; Speaker B: On the design of "man leads/protects woman" type activities: from 【questioning them for being inconsistent with the image of a modern, independent woman】→【to acknowledging their ability to enhance trust and interaction, and proactively proposing new suggestions】.
- B. Speaker A: Regarding the design philosophy of dating activities: their position has wavered multiple times; Speaker B: Regarding the design of "man leads/protects woman" type activities: has always maintained a cautious and wait-and-see attitude.
- C. Speaker A: On the design of "man leads/protects woman" type activities: from 【questioning them for not conforming to the image of a modern, independent woman】→【to recognizing their ability to enhance trust and interaction, and proactively offering new suggestions】; Speaker B: On the design philosophy of dating activities: the attitude has always been【to design segments that can create romantic, heart-fluttering feelings and promote interaction】.
- D. Speaker A: Regarding the design philosophy for dating activities: from [advocating stimulating and adventurous activities] → [shifting to supporting quiet indoor activities]; Speaker B: Regarding the design of "man leads/protects woman" type activities: from [complete support] → [shifting to opposition due to cost concerns].

Speaker A: Regarding the design philosophy for dating activities: The attitude has consistently been [to design segments that can create romantic, heart-fluttering feelings and promote interaction]; Speaker B: Regarding the design of "male leads/protects female" type activities: From [questioning them for not aligning with the image of a modern, independent woman] → [to recognizing they can enhance trust and interaction, and proactively proposing new suggestions].

增加一个环节就是，体现男性去保护女性的这样一个活动状态。

但我觉得现在都是成年人了，还需要什么保护？现在女生都自立自强了呀。


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in stance throughout the entire conversation for the speaker who said ‘reflects a dynamic state where men protect women’ and the speaker who said ‘girls are all independent and strong now’? Please choose the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Design philosophy for dating activities: From 【advocating for exciting and adventurous activities】→【shifting to supporting quiet indoor activities】; Speaker B: Regarding the design of "man guides/protects woman" activities: From 【full support】→【shifting to opposition due to cost concerns】.
- B. Speaker A: On the design philosophy for dating activities: has always held the attitude that [segments should be designed to create romantic, heart-fluttering feelings and promote interaction]; Speaker B: On the design of "male-guides/protects-female" type activities: attitude shifted from [questioning them for being inconsistent with the image of a modern, independent woman] → [to recognizing that they can enhance trust and interaction, and actively proposing new suggestions].
- C. Speaker A: On the design philosophy for dating activities: their stance has wavered multiple times; Speaker B: On the design of "the man leads/protects the woman" type activities: has always maintained a cautious and wait-and-see attitude.
- D. Speaker A: Regarding the design of "the man leads/protects the woman" type activities: from [questioning them for being inconsistent with the independent image of modern women] → [to recognizing they can enhance trust and interaction, and proactively proposing new suggestions]; Speaker B: Regarding the design philosophy for dating activities: the attitude has always been that [segments should be designed to create romantic, heart-fluttering feelings and promote interaction].

Speaker A: On the design philosophy for dating activities: the attitude has consistently been 【to design segments that create romantic, heart-fluttering feelings and promote interaction】; Speaker B: On the design of "man guides/protects woman" type activities: shifted from 【questioning them for not aligning with the independent image of modern women】→【to recognizing their ability to enhance trust and interaction, and proactively proposing new suggestions】.

增加一个环节就是，体现男性去保护女性的这样一个活动状态。

但我觉得现在都是成年人了，还需要什么保护？现在女生都自立自强了呀。


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the respective changes in the stances of the 1st speaker and the 2nd speaker throughout the conversation? Please choose the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Regarding the design concept for dating activities: their stance has wavered multiple times; Speaker B: Regarding the design of "the man leads/protects the woman" type of activities: has always maintained a cautious and wait-and-see attitude.
- B. Speaker A: On the design concept for dating activities: from 【advocating for stimulating and adventurous activities】→【shifting to supporting quiet indoor activities】; Speaker B: On the design of "man leads/protects woman" type activities: from 【complete support】→【changing to opposition due to cost concerns】.
- C. Speaker A: On the design of activities where "the man leads/protects the woman": from 【questioning them for not conforming to the modern image of an independent woman】→ to 【recognizing they can enhance trust and interaction, and proactively proposing new suggestions】; Speaker B: On the design philosophy for dating activities: has consistently held the attitude that 【segments should be designed to create romantic, heart-fluttering feelings and promote interaction】.
- D. Speaker A: On the design concept for dating activities: consistently believes in 【designing segments that create romantic, heart-fluttering feelings and promote interaction】; Speaker B: On the design of "man leads/protects woman" activities: from 【questioning them for not aligning with the image of a modern, independent woman】 → 【to recognizing their ability to enhance trust and interaction, and proactively offering new suggestions】.

Speaker A: Regarding the design philosophy for dating activities: The attitude has consistently been 【to design segments that can create romantic, heart-fluttering feelings and promote interaction】; Speaker B: Regarding the design of "male leads/protects female" type activities: From 【questioning it for not aligning with the modern image of an independent woman】→【to recognizing its ability to enhance trust and interaction, and proactively proposing new suggestions】.

增加一个环节就是，体现男性去保护女性的这样一个活动状态。

但我觉得现在都是成年人了，还需要什么保护？现在女生都自立自强了呀。


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in stance throughout the entire conversation for the speaker who said 'embodies men protecting women' from 26.64s to 31.46s and 'nowadays girls are all independent and strong' from 39.63s to 44.56s in the audio? Please choose the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: On the design philosophy for dating activities: the attitude has consistently been 【to design segments that create romantic, heart-fluttering feelings and promote interaction】; Speaker B: On the design of "man leads/protects woman" type activities: from 【questioning it for not aligning with the image of a modern, independent woman】→【to recognizing it can enhance trust and interaction, and proactively proposing new suggestions】.
- B. Speaker A: On "man leads/protects woman" type activities: shifts from [questioning them for not conforming to the image of a modern, independent woman] → [to recognizing they can enhance trust and interaction, and proactively proposing new suggestions]; Speaker B: On the design philosophy for dating activities: has consistently held the view that [they should be designed with elements that create romantic, heart-fluttering feelings and promote interaction].
- C. Speaker A: Design philosophy for dating activities: from 【advocating stimulating and adventurous activities】→【shifted to supporting quiet indoor activities】; Speaker B: On the design of "male leads/protects female" type activities: from 【complete support】→【shifted to opposition due to cost concerns】.
- D. Speaker A: On the design philosophy of dating activities: their stance has wavered multiple times; Speaker B: On the design of "man leads/protects woman" type activities: has always maintained a cautious and wait-and-see attitude.

Speaker A: Regarding the design philosophy for dating activities: The attitude has always been [to design segments that create romantic, heart-fluttering feelings and promote interaction]; Speaker B: Regarding the design of "the man leads/protects the woman" type activities: From [questioning them for not conforming to the independent image of modern women] → [to recognizing their ability to enhance trust and interaction, and proactively suggesting new ideas].

增加一个环节就是，体现男性去保护女性的这样一个活动状态。

但我觉得现在都是成年人了，还需要什么保护？现在女生都自立自强了呀。


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interaction behavior demonstrated by the two speakers in the corresponding segment of the audio below? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A proposes an idea, and Speaker B agrees and illustrates with an example.
- B. After Speaker A introduces a broad topic, Speaker B actively suggests a specific activity as a supplement.
- C. Speaker A proposes a romanticized idea, and Speaker B raises doubts from a realistic perspective.
- D. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence)

Speaker A proposes a romanticized idea, while Speaker B raises a doubt from a realistic perspective.

男性能够保护女性，就是男性，变得像一个王子，一个英雄一样能够去保护他的这个。

但我觉得现在都是成年人了，还需要什么保护？现在女生都自立自强了呀。


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior between the speaker from 33.15s to 39.74s and the speaker from 39.63s to 44.56s, as reflected in their respective segments in the audio? Please select the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A puts forward a romanticized idea, and Speaker B questions it from a realistic perspective.
- B. After Speaker A proposes a broad topic, Speaker B actively suggests a specific activity as a supplement.
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)
- D. Speaker A proposes an idea, and Speaker B agrees and illustrates with an example.

Speaker A proposes a romanticized idea, while Speaker B questions it from a realistic perspective.

男性能够保护女性，就是男性，变得像一个王子，一个英雄一样能够去保护他的这个。

但我觉得现在都是成年人了，还需要什么保护？现在女生都自立自强了呀。


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior demonstrated in the corresponding segment by the speaker who said ‘become like a prince, a hero’ and the speaker who said ‘girls are all independent and strong now’? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A proposes an idea, and Speaker B agrees and illustrates with an example.
- B. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence)
- C. After Speaker A brings up a broad topic, Speaker B actively suggests a specific activity as a supplement.
- D. Speaker A proposes a romanticized idea, while Speaker B questions it from a realistic perspective.

Speaker A proposes a romanticized idea, and Speaker B questions it from a realistic perspective.

男性能够保护女性，就是男性，变得像一个王子，一个英雄一样能够去保护他的这个。

但我觉得现在都是成年人了，还需要什么保护？现在女生都自立自强了呀。


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior demonstrated by the first speaker and the second speaker in the conversation? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)
- B. Speaker A proposes a romanticized idea, while Speaker B questions it from a realistic perspective.
- C. Speaker A proposes an idea, and Speaker B agrees and gives an example.
- D. After Speaker A brings up a broad topic, Speaker B actively suggests a specific activity as a supplement.

Speaker A proposes a romanticized idea, and Speaker B questions it from a realistic perspective.

男性能够保护女性，就是男性，变得像一个王子，一个英雄一样能够去保护他的这个。

但我觉得现在都是成年人了，还需要什么保护？现在女生都自立自强了呀。


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior demonstrated in the corresponding segments of the audio between the speaker who said ‘become like a prince, a hero, able to protect’ from 33.15s to 39.74s and the speaker who said ‘girls are all independent and strong now’ from 39.63s to 44.56s? Please choose the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. After Speaker A proposes a broad topic, Speaker B actively suggests a specific activity as a supplement.
- B. Speaker A proposes an idea, and Speaker B agrees and illustrates with an example.
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)
- D. Speaker A proposes a romanticized idea, while Speaker B raises doubts from a realistic perspective.

Speaker A proposes a romanticized idea, and Speaker B questions it from a realistic perspective.

男性能够保护女性，就是男性，变得像一个王子，一个英雄一样能够去保护他的这个。

但我觉得现在都是成年人了，还需要什么保护？现在女生都自立自强了呀。


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: In the solo audio below, what accent is the speaker using?

Choices:
- A. American English accent
- B. British English accent
- C. Indian English accent
- D. Accent not obvious, cannot be determined.

Also Im pretty sure youre supposed to cut it up into small chunks.

As long as you can mash it first. I mean you can like. I know I know I know what you mean.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: The speaker's accent in the audio from 8.8 seconds to 11.92 seconds most closely resembles which of the following?

Choices:
- A. British English accent
- B. Accent is not obvious, cannot determine.
- C. Australian accent
- D. American English accent


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: Which of the following accents is closest to that of the speaker in the audio who said “youre supposed to cut it up into small chunks”?

Choices:
- A. The accent is not obvious, making it impossible to determine.
- B. British English accent
- C. American English accent
- D. Indian English accent


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, what accent does the first speaker who appears in the conversation use?

Choices:
- A. Australian English accent
- B. American English accent
- C. British English accent
- D. Accent not obvious, cannot judge.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: For the male speaker who said “Also Im pretty sure” between 8.8 and 11.92 seconds, which of the following does his accent most closely resemble?

Choices:
- A. British English accent
- B. American English accent
- C. Accent not obvious, cannot be determined.
- D. Indian English accent


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: Which speakers in the entire audio use an American English accent? (Answer in order of speaker appearance) Please select the best option.

Choices:
- A. First speaker, second speaker, third speaker, fourth speaker
- B. The first speaker, the third speaker
- C. Accent not obvious, cannot determine.
- D. the second speaker, the fifth speaker

First speaker, Second speaker, Third speaker, Fourth speaker


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: How many speakers with an American English accent are there in the entire audio? Please select the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. 1
- B. 3
- C. 4
- D. No obvious accent, cannot be determined.


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: In the single-speaker audio below, the speaker's age group is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Middle-aged (30-59 years old)
- B. Young people (18-29 years old)
- C. Teenager (13-17 years old)
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)

Didnt you wanna make gnocchi?


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: Which of the following is closest to the age group of the speaker in the audio from 8.8 to 11.92 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Young adults (18-29 years old)
- B. Middle-aged people (30-59 years old)
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)
- D. Elderly (60 years and over)

Didnt you wanna make gnocchi?


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: Which of the following is the closest age group of the speaker who said ‘youre supposed to cut it up into small chunks’ in the audio?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine the age group)
- B. Middle-aged people (30-59 years old)
- C. Young adults (18-29 years old)
- D. Teenager (13-17 years old)

Didnt you wanna make gnocchi?


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: In the entire conversation, which of the following is closest to the age range of the 3rd speaker to appear (spk_3)?

Choices:
- A. Middle-aged (30-59 years old)
- B. Young adults (18-29 years old)
- C. Elderly (60 years and over)
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)

Didnt you wanna make gnocchi?


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: Which of the following is the closest age group for the male speaker who said ‘youre supposed to cut it up into small chunks’ between 8.8 and 11.92 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Teenager (13-17 years old)
- B. Middle-aged people (30-59 years old)
- C. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine the age group)
- D. Young people (18-29 years old)

Didnt you wanna make gnocchi?


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: Which speakers in the entire audio are in the Young Adult (18-29 years old) age group? (Answer using the global speaker order) Please select the one that best fits.

Choices:
- A. spk_1、spk_2
- B. spk_1、spk_2、spk_3、spk_4
- C. spk_1、spk_5
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)

Didnt you wanna make gnocchi?


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, how many speakers are there in the Young Adult (18-29 years old) age group? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. 1
- B. 4
- C. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine the age group)
- D. 3

Didnt you wanna make gnocchi?


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: In the following solo speech audio, which of the following is the speaker's emotion closest to?

Choices:
- A. Surprised
- B. Anger
- C. Happy
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to determine emotion)

What do you mean Im better?

Who me? Oh.


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: The emotion of the speaker in the audio from 39.06 to 40.12 seconds is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Unable to judge (insufficient evidence to determine the emotion)
- B. Surprise
- C. Happy
- D. Anger

What do you mean Im better?

Who me? Oh.


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: In the audio, the emotion of the speaker who said ‘What do you mean Im better?’ is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Happy
- B. Anger
- C. Cannot determine (Insufficient evidence to determine the emotion)
- D. Surprised

What do you mean Im better?

Who me? Oh.


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: The emotion of the speaker who said ‘What do you mean Im better?’ from 39.06 seconds to 40.12 seconds is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Anger
- B. Happy
- C. Surprised
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence to determine emotion)

What do you mean Im better?

Who me? Oh.


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, which speakers have expressed the emotion of surprise? (Answer using the global speaker order) Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. spk_1、spk_2、spk_3
- B. Unable to determine (Insufficient evidence to determine emotion)
- C. spk_1、spk_2、spk_4
- D. spk_1、spk_4、spk_5

What do you mean Im better?

Who me? Oh.


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: In the entire audio clip, how many speakers in total expressed the emotion surprise? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. 2
- B. 3
- C. 5
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient evidence to determine emotion)

What do you mean Im better?

Who me? Oh.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the speaker in the following solo audio throughout the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. Act as a confident cooking instructor, giving specific and unquestionable operating instructions.
- B. Act as a cautious advisor, but avoid direct confrontation and insisting on one's own opinion.
- C. Believes that the cooking process should strictly follow the recipe, without any impromptu changes.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine the conclusion/change).

Act as a cautious advisor, but avoid direct conflict and insisting on one's own opinion.

Cuz Im pretty sure for those types of steaks youre supposed to put em in the oven.

Its easier for you to just hold on to the lid with the gloves and open it a little bit.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the speaker from 289.04s to 291.52s in the audio throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Act as a cautious advisor, but avoid direct confrontation and insisting on one's own opinion.
- B. Be a confident cooking instructor, giving specific and unquestionable instructions.
- C. Believes that the cooking process should strictly follow the recipe, not accepting any impromptu changes.
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence to uniquely conclude the viewpoint/change).

Acts as a cautious advisor, but avoids direct confrontation and insisting on one's own opinion.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance in the entire conversation of the speaker who said ‘youre supposed to put em in the oven’?

Choices:
- A. Believes that the cooking process should strictly follow the recipe, without any impromptu changes.
- B. Be a confident cooking instructor and give specific, unquestionable instructions.
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely deduce the conclusion/change).
- D. Act as a cautious advisor, but avoid direct confrontation and insisting on one's own opinion.

Act as a cautious advisor, but will avoid direct confrontation and insisting on one's own opinion.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance throughout the entire conversation of the speaker who, between 289.04 and 291.52 seconds in the audio, said ‘Cuz Im pretty sure for those types of steaks youre supposed to put em in the oven’?

Choices:
- A. Act as a confident cooking instructor, giving specific and authoritative instructions.
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely support the viewpoint/change).
- C. Act as a cautious advisor, but avoid direct confrontation and insisting on one's own opinion.
- D. Believes that the cooking process should strictly follow the recipe, without any impromptu changes.

Act as a cautious advisor, but avoid direct confrontation and insisting on one's own opinion.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the first speaker (spk_1) in the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Act as a cautious advisor, but avoid direct confrontation and insisting on one's own opinion.
- B. Acting as a confident cooking instructor, giving specific and unquestionable instructions.
- C. Believes that the cooking process should strictly follow the recipe, without any impromptu changes.
- D. Cannot be determined (The evidence is insufficient to uniquely deduce the conclusion/change).

Acts as a cautious advisor, but avoids direct confrontation and insisting on one's own opinion.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker in the following single-person audio change throughout the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. From proposing what they believed was the correct cooking method → to giving up the argument and agreeing to wait and see.
- B. From initially asking others for help → to ultimately adopting a completely new plan proposed by others.
- C. Cannot be determined (The evidence is insufficient to uniquely support the viewpoint/change).
- D. From being uncertain about the cooking method at first → to later insisting on using specific tools.

From proposing the cooking method they believed to be correct → to abandoning the argument and agreeing to wait and see.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker from 289.04 to 291.52 seconds in the audio change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. From initially asking for help → to ultimately adopting a brand new plan proposed by others.
- B. From being uncertain about cooking methods at first → to later insisting on using specific tools.
- C. From proposing the cooking method they considered correct → to giving up the argument and agreeing to wait and see.
- D. Cannot be determined (The evidence is insufficient to uniquely derive the conclusion/change).

From proposing what they believed to be the correct cooking method → to giving up the argument and agreeing to wait and see.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker who said ‘youre supposed to put em in the oven’ in the audio change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to draw a unique conclusion/change).
- B. From proposing the cooking method they thought was correct → to giving up the argument and agreeing to wait and see.
- C. From being uncertain about cooking methods at first → to later insisting on using specific tools.
- D. From initially asking others for help → to ultimately adopting an entirely new solution proposed by them.

From proposing the cooking method one believes is correct → to giving up the argument and agreeing to wait and see.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker who said ‘Cuz Im pretty sure for those types of steaks youre supposed to put em in the oven’ from 289.04 to 291.52 seconds in the audio change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. From being uncertain about cooking methods at first → to later insisting on using specific tools.
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely deduce the conclusion/change).
- C. From initially asking others for help → to eventually adopting a completely new solution proposed by others.
- D. From proposing what one considers the correct cooking method → to giving up the argument and agreeing to wait and see.

From proposing the cooking method they thought was correct → to giving up the argument and agreeing to wait and see.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the first speaker's (spk_1) stance change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. From initially asking others for help → to finally adopting a brand-new solution proposed by others.
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine the conclusion/change).
- C. 从最初对烹饪方法不确定 → 到后来坚持必须使用特定的工具。
- D. From proposing the cooking method they believed to be correct → to giving up the argument and agreeing to wait and see.

From proposing the cooking method one believes to be correct → to giving up the argument and agreeing to wait and see.


说话人识别能力-说话人计数任务

Question: How many different speakers are there in this audio?

Choices:
- A. 4 bits
- B. 7 bits
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)
- D. 3 people

Leave it.

Can you ?


说话人识别能力-说话人计数任务

Question: How many different speakers appeared in the audio between 18 and 23 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)
- B. 4 bits
- C. 3 digits
- D. 1 bit

Leave it.

Can you ?


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the positions of the two speakers in the audio below throughout the entire conversation? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Advocates for cooking the potatoes a bit longer; Speaker B: Advocates for taking the potatoes out directly by hand.
- B. Speaker A: suggests using a pot lid to help drain the water; Speaker B: suggests using a strainer to drain the water.
- C. Speaker A: Suggests using a strainer to drain the water; Speaker B: Suggests using the pot lid to drain the water directly.
- D. Speaker A: Is uncertain about the draining method and is seeking help; Speaker B: Doubts whether the existing tools are suitable.

Speaker A: Advocates for using a strainer to drain water; Speaker B: Advocates for using the pot lid to assist in pouring the water out directly.

Can you hold up the strainer for me?


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the stance in the entire dialogue of the speaker talking from 152.67 seconds to 153.99 seconds and the speaker talking from 154.29 seconds to 159.17 seconds in the audio? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: advocates for using the pot lid to help pour the water out directly; Speaker B: advocates for using a strainer to drain the water.
- B. Speaker A: is uncertain about the draining method and is seeking help; Speaker B: expresses doubt about whether the existing tool is suitable.
- C. Speaker A: suggests cooking the potatoes longer; Speaker B: suggests taking out the potatoes directly by hand.
- D. Speaker A: advocates using a strainer to drain the water; Speaker B: advocates using the pot lid to help pour the water out directly.

Speaker A: Advocates for using a strainer to drain the water; Speaker B: Advocates for using the pot lid to help pour the water out directly.

Can you hold up the strainer for me?


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the stance of the speaker who said “Can you hold up the strainer for me?” and the speaker who said “open it a little bit” in the entire conversation? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Advocates for using a strainer to drain the water; Speaker B: Advocates for using the pot lid to help pour the water out directly.
- B. Speaker A: Suggests using a pot lid to help pour the water out; Speaker B: Suggests using a strainer to drain the water.
- C. Speaker A: suggests cooking the potatoes a little longer; Speaker B: suggests taking the potatoes out directly by hand.
- D. Speaker A: uncertain about the draining method and seeking help; Speaker B: doubting whether the existing tool is suitable.

Speaker A: Advocates using a strainer to drain the water; Speaker B: Advocates using the pot lid to help pour the water out directly.

Can you hold up the strainer for me?


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the respective stances of the 3rd speaker and the 2nd speaker in the entire dialogue? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: advocates using the pot lid to help pour out the water; Speaker B: advocates using a strainer to drain the water.
- B. Speaker A: Advocates using a strainer to drain the water; Speaker B: Advocates using the pot lid to pour the water out directly.
- C. Speaker A: suggests boiling the potatoes a little longer; Speaker B: suggests taking the potatoes out directly by hand.
- D. Speaker A is uncertain about the draining method and is seeking help; Speaker B doubts whether the existing tool is suitable.

Speaker A: Advocates for using a strainer to drain the water; Speaker B: Advocates for pouring the water out directly with the help of the pot lid.

Can you hold up the strainer for me?


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the stance in the entire conversation between the speaker who said “Can you hold up the strainer” from 152.67 to 153.99 seconds in the audio and the speaker who said “open it a little bit” from 154.29 to 159.17 seconds? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: is uncertain about the draining method and is seeking help; Speaker B: doubts whether the existing tool is suitable.
- B. Speaker A: suggests cooking the potatoes for a bit longer; Speaker B: suggests taking the potatoes out directly by hand.
- C. Speaker A: advocates using a strainer to drain the water; Speaker B: advocates using the pot lid to help drain the water directly.
- D. Speaker A: advocates using the pot lid to help pour out the water; Speaker B: advocates using a strainer to drain the water.

Speaker A: Advocates using a strainer to drain the water; Speaker B: Advocates using the pot lid to help pour the water out directly.

Can you hold up the strainer for me?


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in the two speakers' stances throughout the entire conversation in the audio below? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: On the potato draining method: from [advocating for a strainer] → [switched to accepting scooping them out directly]; Speaker B: On the potato draining method: the stance has always been [to advocate for using the pot lid to help drain].
- B. Speaker A: Regarding the method for draining potatoes: attitude has always been 【advocating for using a pot lid to help pour out the water】; Speaker B: Regarding the method for draining potatoes: from 【advocating for using a strainer】 → 【switched to accepting the method of scooping them out directly】.
- C. Speaker A: Regarding the potato draining method: from 【hesitant】 → 【finally agrees to use the pot lid to drain the water】; Speaker B: Regarding the potato draining method: from 【suggests using the pot lid】 → 【changes mind after discovering the danger】.
- D. Speaker A: Regarding the method for draining potatoes: their opinion changed multiple times and was ultimately undecided; Speaker B: Regarding the method for draining potatoes: always stuck to their own opinion, but the conversation did not reach a clear conclusion.

Speaker A: On the method for draining potatoes: Changed from [advocating for using a strainer] → [to accepting the solution of scooping them out directly].
Speaker B: On the method for draining potatoes: Attitude was consistently [advocating for using the pot lid to help pour out the water].

Can you hold up the strainer for me?


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in the conversational stance of the speaker talking from 152.67s to 153.99s and the speaker talking from 154.29s to 159.17s in the audio? Please select the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Regarding the method for draining potatoes: opinion changed multiple times, ultimately undecided; Speaker B: Regarding the method for draining potatoes: consistently stuck to their own opinion, but the conversation had no clear result.
- B. Speaker A: On draining the potatoes: from [hesitant] → [finally agrees to use the lid to drain]; Speaker B: On draining the potatoes: from [suggesting using the lid] → [changes mind after realizing the danger].
- C. Speaker A: Regarding the method for draining potatoes: has always been 【in favor of using a pot lid to help drain the water】; Speaker B: Regarding the method for draining potatoes: changed from 【advocating for a strainer】→【to accepting the method of scooping them out directly】.
- D. Speaker A: on the potato draining method: from【advocating for using a strainer】→【switched to accepting the solution of scooping them out directly】; Speaker B: on the potato draining method: attitude has consistently been【to advocate for using the pot lid to assist in pouring out the water】.

Speaker A: Regarding the method for draining potatoes: from 【advocating for using a strainer】→【switched to accepting the method of scooping them out directly】; Speaker B: Regarding the method for draining potatoes: attitude has always been 【to advocate for using the pot lid to help pour out the water】.

Can you hold up the strainer for me?


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in the stances of the speaker who said “Can you hold up the strainer for me?” and the speaker who said “open it a little bit” throughout the entire conversation in the audio? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Regarding the method for draining potatoes: changed from [advocating for a strainer] → [to accepting the method of scooping them out directly]; Speaker B: Regarding the method for draining potatoes: has always advocated [using the pot lid to assist with draining].
- B. Speaker A: Regarding the method for draining potatoes: has consistently held the position of 【advocating for using a pot lid to assist in pouring out the water】; Speaker B: Regarding the method for draining potatoes: shifted from 【advocating for using a strainer】→【to accepting the solution of scooping them out directly】.
- C. Speaker A: On the method for draining potatoes: from [hesitant] → [finally agreeing to use the lid to pour out the water]; Speaker B: On the method for draining potatoes: from [suggesting using the lid] → [changing mind after discovering it was dangerous].
- D. Speaker A: Regarding the potato draining method: their opinion changed multiple times and was ultimately undecided; Speaker B: Regarding the potato draining method: they consistently stuck to their own opinion, but the conversation had no clear outcome.

Speaker A: On the method for draining potatoes: from [advocating using a strainer] → [switched to accepting the method of scooping them out directly]; Speaker B: On the method for draining potatoes: attitude has consistently been [advocating using the pot lid to help pour out the water].

Can you hold up the strainer for me?


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the respective changes in stance of the 3rd speaker and the 2nd speaker in the conversation? Please choose the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: On the potato draining method: has always 【advocated using the pot lid to help drain】; Speaker B: On the potato draining method: shifted from 【advocating for a colander】 → 【to accepting the method of scooping them out directly】.
- B. Speaker A: Regarding the method for draining potatoes: their opinion changed multiple times and was ultimately undecided; Speaker B: Regarding the method for draining potatoes: consistently stuck to their own opinion, but the conversation did not reach a clear conclusion.
- C. Speaker A: Regarding the method for draining potatoes: from [advocating for using a strainer] → [shifts to accepting the solution of scooping them out directly]; Speaker B: Regarding the method for draining potatoes: attitude has always been [to advocate for using the pot lid to assist in pouring out the water].
- D. Speaker A: On the method for draining potatoes: from [hesitant] → [finally agrees to use the lid to drain the water]; Speaker B: On the method for draining potatoes: from [suggesting to use the lid] → [changes mind after discovering the danger].

Speaker A: On the method for draining potatoes: From 【advocating using a strainer】→【switched to accepting the plan to scoop them out directly】; Speaker B: On the method for draining potatoes: attitude has consistently been 【to advocate using the pot lid to help pour out the water】.

Can you hold up the strainer for me?


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in stance throughout the entire conversation between the speaker in the audio who said "Can you hold up the strainer" from 152.67s to 153.99s and the speaker who said "open it a little bit" from 154.29s to 159.17s? Please select the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: on the method for draining potatoes: from【hesitant】→【finally agreeing to use the pot lid to drain the water】; Speaker B: on the method for draining potatoes: from【suggesting using the pot lid】→【changing mind after discovering the danger】.
- B. Speaker A: On the method for draining potatoes: From 【advocating for using a strainer】→【switched to accepting the plan to scoop them out directly】; Speaker B: On the method for draining potatoes: attitude has always been 【to advocate for using the pot lid to assist in pouring out the water】.
- C. Speaker A: Regarding the method for draining potatoes: has consistently advocated 【using a pot lid to assist in draining】; Speaker B: Regarding the method for draining potatoes: changed from 【advocating for a strainer】→【to accepting the solution of scooping them out directly】.
- D. 说话人A：对土豆沥水方法：观点多次变化，最终未定；说话人B：对土豆沥水方法：始终坚持自己的看法，但对话没有明确结果。

Speaker A: On the method for draining potatoes: from [advocating the use of a strainer] → [to accepting the solution of scooping them out directly]; Speaker B: On the method for draining potatoes: attitude has always been [to advocate using the pot lid to assist in pouring out the water].

Can you hold up the strainer for me?


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话背景推理

Question: This conversation most likely takes place in which of the following scenarios?

Choices:
- A. A professional chef prepares dishes for customers in the restaurant's back kitchen.
- B. A family is discussing which ingredients to buy in the fresh food section of a supermarket.
- C. Friends are cooking and chatting together in a home kitchen.
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence).

Friends are cooking and chatting together in a home kitchen.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: What accent is the speaker using in the following solo audio?

Choices:
- A. British English accent
- B. American accent
- C. Indian English accent
- D. The accent is not obvious, so it cannot be determined.

Theres no point. No one can build anything without brick and only blue has brick right now.

I get no sheep and I get no brick.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: Which of the following does the speaker's accent in the audio from 14.07 seconds to 19.05 seconds most closely resemble?

Choices:
- A. Australian English accent
- B. British English accent
- C. American English accent
- D. The accent is not obvious, so it's impossible to tell.

I get no sheep and I get no brick.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: The accent of the speaker who said ‘No one can build anything without brick’ in the audio is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. American English accent
- B. Indian English accent
- C. British accent
- D. The accent is not obvious, so it cannot be determined.

I get no sheep and I get no brick.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: In the entire audio clip, what accent does the 3rd speaker in the conversation use?

Choices:
- A. Australian accent
- B. American English accent
- C. British English accent
- D. Accent not obvious, cannot determine.

I get no sheep and I get no brick.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: The accent of the male speaker who said ‘Theres no point’ from 14.07 to 19.05 seconds is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. British English accent
- B. Indian English accent
- C. Accent is not obvious, impossible to tell.
- D. American English accent

I get no sheep and I get no brick.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: Which speakers in the entire audio use an American English accent? (Answer in order of speaker appearance) Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. First speaker, Second speaker, Third speaker, Fourth speaker
- B. The first speaker, the third speaker
- C. Accent not obvious, cannot be determined.
- D. the first speaker, the second speaker, the fifth speaker

First Speaker, Second Speaker, Third Speaker, Fourth Speaker

I get no sheep and I get no brick.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: How many speakers with an American English accent are there in the entire audio? Please select the best option.

Choices:
- A. 2
- B. 4
- C. 1
- D. The accent is not obvious and cannot be determined.

I get no sheep and I get no brick.


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: In the monologue audio below, which of the following is closest to the speaker's age group?

Choices:
- A. Teenager (13-17 years old)
- B. Middle-aged people (30-59 years old)
- C. Young adults (18-29 years old)
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine the age group)

Oh yeah, you have no sheep, so theres no point for you getting that either.

I, that wouldve been good for me actually, but I dont have sheep so


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: The age group of the speaker in the audio from 20.46 to 22.84 seconds is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Young people (18-29 years old)
- B. Middle-aged people (30-59 years old)
- C. Adolescent (13-17 years old)
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: Which of the following is closest to the age group of the speaker in the audio who said ‘you have no sheep, so theres no point for you getting that either’?

Choices:
- A. Teenager (13-17 years old)
- B. Young adults (18-29 years old)
- C. Middle-aged (30-59 years old)
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: Throughout the entire conversation, which of the following is closest to the age range of the second speaker (spk_2)?

Choices:
- A. Middle-aged adults (30-59 years old)
- B. Teenager (13-17 years old)
- C. Cannot determine (insufficient information to determine the age group)
- D. Young adults (18-29 years old)


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: Which of the following is the closest age group for the male speaker who said ‘you have no sheep, so theres no point’ between 20.46 and 22.84 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Adolescent (13-17 years old)
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)
- C. Young people (18-29 years old)
- D. Middle-aged people (30-59 years old)


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, which speakers are in the Young Adult (18-29 years old) age group? (Answer using the global speaker order) Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. spk_1、spk_2、spk_3、spk_4
- B. spk_1、spk_2、spk_3
- C. spk_1、spk_2、spk_3、spk_5
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, how many speakers are in the Young Adult (18-29 years old) age group? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. 3
- B. 4
- C. 2
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: In the following single-speaker audio, the speaker's emotion is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Sorrow
- B. Surprise
- C. Calm
- D. Unable to determine (insufficient evidence to determine the emotion)

Oh right right, actually no I didnt see that. . Yeah yeah.


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: The emotion of the speaker from 9.94 to 13.88 seconds in the audio is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Surprised
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to determine the emotion)
- C. Sad
- D. Calm


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: The emotion of the speaker who said ‘actually no I didnt see that’ in the audio is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Calm
- B. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence to determine the emotion)
- C. Sorrow
- D. Surprised


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: The emotion of the speaker who said ‘actually no I didnt see that’ between 9.94 and 13.88 seconds is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Sorrow
- B. Surprised
- C. Cannot determine (Insufficient evidence to determine the emotion)
- D. Calm


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: In the single-speaker audio below, the speaker's profile is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Gender: Female voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Disgust; Accent: General American English
- B. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine)
- C. Gender: Male; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Happy; Accent: General American English
- D. Gender: Male; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Sad; Accent: General American English

Gender: Male; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Happy; Accent: General American English

See, you got it.


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: Which of the following is closest to the speaker profile of the speaker in the audio from 5.64 to 6.46 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Gender: Male voice; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Happy; Accent: General American English
- B. Gender: Male voice; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Sad; Accent: General American English
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine)
- D. Gender: Female; Age: Elderly; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American English

Gender: Male voice; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Happy; Accent: General American English

See, you got it.


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: Which of the following is the best description of the speaker who said ‘See, you got it.’ in the audio?

Choices:
- A. Gender: Male voice; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Sad; Accent: General American English
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine)
- C. Gender: Female; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Happy; Accent: General American English
- D. Gender: Male Voice; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Happy; Accent: General American English

Gender: Male voice; Age: Young adult; Emotion: Happy; Accent: General American English

See, you got it.


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: For the speaker who said ‘See, you got it.’ between 5.64 and 6.46 seconds, which of the following speaker profiles is the closest match?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine)
- B. Gender: Male; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Sad; Accent: General American English
- C. Gender: Male voice; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Happy; Accent: General American English
- D. Gender: Male; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Happy; Accent: General American English

Gender: Male voice; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Happy; Accent: General American English

See, you got it.


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: In the entire audio, which speakers have the profile “Gender: Male; Age: Young adult; Accent: General American English”? (Answer with spk_index) Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. spk_1、spk_2、spk_3
- B. spk_1、spk_2、spk_3、spk_4
- C. spk_1、spk_2、spk_3、spk_4、spk_5
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine)

See, you got it.


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: In the entire audio, how many speakers are there with the profile “Gender: Male voice; Age: Young adult; Accent: General American English”? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. 4
- B. 3
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine)
- D. 10

See, you got it.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: In the audio below, what is the speaker's emotion? How did this emotion affect the other people throughout the conversation?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Happy; Impact: Caused laughter and teasing from the other players.
- B. Emotion: Dissatisfaction; Impact: Caused <spk_3> to apologize and explain their actions.
- C. Emotion: Dissatisfaction; Effect: causes <spk_1> to start defending <spk_3>'s behavior.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine).

Emotion: Dissatisfaction; Impact: Caused <spk_3> to apologize and explain their actions.

Thats so mean.

Im sorry. I needed brick.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What is the emotion of the speaker (<spk_2>) from 54.94 seconds to 55.86 seconds in the audio? What effect did this emotion have on others in the conversation?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Dissatisfaction; Impact: Causes <spk_1> to start defending <spk_3>'s behavior.
- B. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence to uniquely determine).
- C. Emotion: Dissatisfaction; Impact: Led <spk_3> to apologize for their actions and offer an explanation.
- D. Emotion: Happy; Impact: Caused laughter and teasing from other players.

Emotion: Dissatisfaction; Impact: Led <spk_3> to apologize and explain their actions.

Thats so mean.

Im sorry. I needed brick.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What is the emotion of the speaker (<spk_2>) who says ‘Thats so mean.’ in the audio? What effect did this emotion have on others in the conversation?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (The evidence is insufficient for a unique determination).
- B. Emotion: Dissatisfaction; Impact: Causes <spk_1> to start defending <spk_3>'s behavior.
- C. Emotion: Happy; Impact: Caused laughter and teasing from other players.
- D. Emotion: Dissatisfaction; Impact: Causes <spk_3> to apologize for and explain their actions.

Emotion: Dissatisfaction; Impact: Caused <spk_3> to apologize and explain their actions.

Thats so mean.

Im sorry. I needed brick.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What is the emotion of the speaker (<spk_2>) who says ‘Thats so mean.’ in the audio from 54.94 to 55.86 seconds? What impact did this emotion have on others?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Dissatisfaction; Impact: Causes <spk_3> to apologize for and explain their actions.
- B. Emotion: Happy; Impact: Caused laughter and teasing from other players.
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence for a definitive conclusion).
- D. Emotion: Dissatisfaction; Impact: Leads <spk_1> to start defending <spk_3>'s behavior.

Emotion: Dissatisfaction; Impact: Caused <spk_3> to apologize and explain their actions.

Thats so mean.

Im sorry. I needed brick.


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: In the following solo speech audio, the speaker's emotion is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Aversion
- B. Sadness
- C. Happy
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence to determine emotion)

These cameras are in terrible spots.

Lets make food.


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: The emotion of the speaker talking from 33.1s to 35.36s in the audio is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Sorrow
- B. Happy
- C. Disgust
- D. Unable to determine (insufficient evidence to determine the emotion)

These cameras are in terrible spots.

Lets make food.


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: The emotion of the speaker who said "These cameras are in terrible spots" in the audio is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Happy
- B. Aversion
- C. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence to determine the emotion)
- D. Sorrow

These cameras are in terrible spots.

Lets make food.


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: For the speaker who said “These cameras are in terrible spots” between 33.1 and 35.36 seconds, which of the following is their emotion closest to?

Choices:
- A. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence to determine emotion)
- B. Sorrow
- C. Happy
- D. Aversion

These cameras are in terrible spots.

Lets make food.


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: Which speakers expressed the emotion of surprise in the entire audio? (Answer in global speaker order) Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. spk_1、spk_4
- B. spk_2、spk_3
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to determine the emotion)
- D. spk_1、spk_2

These cameras are in terrible spots.

Lets make food.


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, how many speakers in total expressed the emotion disgust? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. 1
- B. 2
- C. 3
- D. Unable to determine (Insufficient evidence to determine emotion)

These cameras are in terrible spots.

Lets make food.


说话人识别能力-说话人反向检索任务

Question:
Which of the following statements was made by the first speaker in the dialogue? Please select the most fitting option.
1) That never actually comes out very well.
2) It's a common mistake for new businesses.
3) Leasing space that you re-lease to others.
4) Pigeon holes her a little bit.
5) Thats not sustainable

Choices:
- A. 1, 3, 5
- B. 1, 4, 5
- C. 1, 2, 4
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)

Thats not sustainable

Not fun.


说话人识别能力-说话人计数任务

Question: How many different speakers are there in this audio?

Choices:
- A. 3 digits
- B. 8-bit
- C. 4 digits
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)

Thats what you wanna put my  looks like right now?

No its what your hair looks like.


说话人识别能力-说话人计数任务

Question: How many different speakers appeared in the audio between 0 and 10 seconds?

Choices:
- A. 6 digits
- B. 3 digits
- C. 2 bits
- D. Unable to determine (insufficient information)

No its what your hair looks like.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interaction between the two speakers in the corresponding segment of the audio below? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A expresses a positive feeling about an item, and Speaker B immediately rebuts with a completely opposite negative opinion.
- B. Speaker A asks for an opinion on the cooking steps, and Speaker B agrees and is willing to carry them out.
- C. Speaker A states their feelings about an item, and Speaker B expresses doubt and asks for details.
- D. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence)

Speaker A states a positive feeling about an item, and Speaker B immediately refutes it with a completely opposite, negative opinion.

These earbuds are actually not as uncomfortable as I thought they were gonna be.

No I dont think theyre comfortable at all.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior demonstrated by the speaker from 25.4s to 28.1s and the speaker from 27.46s to 29.4s in the audio during their corresponding segments? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A asks for an opinion on the cooking steps, and Speaker B agrees and is willing to carry them out.
- B. Speaker A describes their feeling about an item, and Speaker B expresses doubt and asks for details.
- C. Speaker A states a positive feeling about an item, and Speaker B immediately rebuts it with a completely opposite negative opinion.
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)

Speaker A states a positive feeling about an item, and Speaker B immediately counters with a completely opposite negative opinion.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior demonstrated in the corresponding segment by the speaker who said ‘These earbuds are actually not as uncomfortable’ and the speaker who said ‘No I dont think theyre comfortable at all’? Please choose the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A states their feelings about a certain item, and Speaker B expresses doubt and asks for more details.
- B. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)
- C. Speaker A asks for an opinion on the cooking steps, and Speaker B agrees and is willing to carry them out.
- D. Speaker A states a positive feeling about an item, and Speaker B immediately refutes it with a completely opposite negative opinion.

Speaker A states a positive feeling about an item, and Speaker B immediately refutes it with a completely opposite negative opinion.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

Question: What is the interactive behavior demonstrated in the corresponding segments between the speaker who said ‘These earbuds are actually not as uncomfortable’ from 25.4s to 28.1s in the audio, and the speaker who said ‘No I dont think theyre comfortable at all’ from 27.46s to 29.4s? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A states a positive feeling about an item, and Speaker B immediately refutes it with a completely opposite, negative opinion.
- B. Speaker A expresses their feelings about an item, and Speaker B is skeptical and asks for more details.
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)
- D. Speaker A asks for advice on the cooking steps, and Speaker B agrees and is willing to carry them out.

Speaker A states a positive feeling about an item, and Speaker B immediately counters with a completely opposite, negative opinion.


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship between the two speakers in the following audio, based on the entire conversation? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Brother and sister
- B. Friend
- C. Couple
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)

Oh can I cut these? Should I wait?

Yeah babe, its high.

Yeah cut em cut em bring em over.

Too high?


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship in the entire conversation between the speaker who talks from 172.11s to 173.85s and the speaker who talks from 173.21s to 175.97s in the audio? Please choose the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Couple
- B. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence)
- C. Brother and sister
- D. Friend

Oh can I cut these? Should I wait?

Yeah babe, its high.

Yeah cut em cut em bring em over.

Too high?


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship in the entire conversation between the speaker who said ‘Oh can I cut these? Should I wait?’ and the speaker who said ‘Yeah cut em cut em bring em over.’? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Friend
- B. Couple
- C. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence)
- D. Brother and sister

Oh can I cut these? Should I wait?

Yeah babe, its high.

Yeah cut em cut em bring em over.

Too high?


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship in the entire conversation between the speaker who, in the audio from 172.11 to 173.85 seconds, said ‘Oh can I cut these? Should I wait?’, and the speaker who, from 173.21 to 175.97 seconds, said ‘Yeah cut em cut em bring em over.’? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Brother and sister
- B. Friend
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)
- D. Couple

Oh can I cut these? Should I wait?

Yeah babe, its high.

Yeah cut em cut em bring em over.

Too high?


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: Below is a monologue segment from a speaker; in the full conversation, the most likely response to this utterance is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B: No, wait until the other ones are ready.
- B. Speaker B: Sure
- C. Speaker B: Yeah cut em cut em bring em over.
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to locate the reply)

Speaker B: Yeah cut em cut em bring em over.

Oh can I cut these? Should I wait?

Yeah cut em cut em bring em over.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: Based on the dialogue, the reply from others to what a speaker said from 172.11 to 173.85 seconds is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B: Yeah cut em cut em bring em over.
- B. Speaker B: No, wait until the other ones are ready.
- C. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to provide a response)
- D. Speaker B: Sure

Speaker B: Yeah cut em cut em bring em over.

Oh can I cut these? Should I wait?

Yeah cut em cut em bring em over.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: Based on the conversation, the response from other people to a speaker's statement, ‘Oh can I cut these? Should I wait?’, is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B: Sure
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the response)
- C. Speaker B: Yeah cut em cut em bring em over.
- D. Speaker B: No, wait until the other ones are ready.

Speaker B: Yeah cut em cut em bring em over.

Oh can I cut these? Should I wait?

Yeah cut em cut em bring em over.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: Based on the dialogue, the response from others to the speaker's statement 'Should I wait?' between 172.11 and 173.85 seconds is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B: No, wait until the other ones are ready.
- B. Speaker B: Sure
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to pinpoint the response)
- D. Speaker B: Yeah cut em cut em bring em over.

Speaker B: Yeah cut em cut em bring em over.

Oh can I cut these? Should I wait?

Yeah cut em cut em bring em over.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the speaker's gender in the following solo audio?

Choices:
- A. Female
- B. Male
- C. Undetermined gender
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine gender)

Shes helped us so much already so she might as well

We should find out what they were gonna do with it.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the speaker in the audio from 2.9 to 4.9 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Female
- B. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine gender)
- C. Male
- D. Unspecified gender


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the speaker who said ‘Shes helped us so much already so she might as well’ in the audio?

Choices:
- A. Male
- B. Uncertain gender
- C. Female
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine gender)


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the first speaker to appear (spk_1) in the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine gender)
- B. Female
- C. Uncertain gender
- D. Male


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the speaker who said ‘Shes helped us so much already so she might as well’ between 2.9 and 4.9 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Female
- B. Undetermined gender
- C. Male
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine gender)


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: Who are the male speakers in the entire audio? (Answer using spk_index) Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. spk_2、spk_4
- B. spk_1、spk_4
- C. spk_1、spk_4、spk_5
- D. Cannot determine (insufficient information to determine gender)


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: How many female speakers are there in total in the entire audio? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. 1
- B. 4
- C. 2
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine gender)


说话人识别能力-说话人检索任务

Question: The speaker in the audio from 6.72 to 10.48 seconds, what is their order of appearance in the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. spk_2
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to identify the speaker)
- C. spk_5
- D. spk_1

Think Im just gonna let Im just gonna let Kevus and Herb fight out with it. Just put it in the middle

He was like ray of frosting it the whole time.


说话人识别能力-说话人检索任务

Question: The speaker in the audio who said ‘Think Im just gonna let Im just gonna let Kevus and Herb fight out with it’ is which speaker by order of appearance in the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. spk_1
- B. spk_2
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to identify the speaker)
- D. spk_5


说话人识别能力-说话人检索任务

Question: The male speaker in the audio who said ‘Just put it in the middle’ between 6.72 and 10.48 seconds, which speaker is he by order of appearance in the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine the speaker)
- B. spk_2
- C. spk_1
- D. spk_5


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What is the emotion of the speaker (<spk_1>) who says "Now Im like the weakest attack person." in the audio? What effect did this emotion have on others in the conversation?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Happy/Excited; Impact: Triggered friendly banter from <spk_2>.
- B. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence to uniquely determine)
- C. Emotion: Sadness/Grievance; Impact: Causes <spk_2> to be surprised by and question their statement.
- D. Emotion: Sadness/Feeling wronged; Impact: Led to <spk_4> comforting them.

Emotion: Sadness/Feeling wronged; Impact: Causes <spk_2> to be surprised by their statement and raise questions.

Now Im like the weakest attack person.

Really?

Why?


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: In the dialogue, what emotion does the first speaker (<spk_1>) express in a certain segment, and how does this emotion affect others?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Sadness / Grievance; Impact: Led to <spk_4> comforting them.
- B. Emotion: Sadness/Feeling wronged; Impact: Causes <spk_2> to be surprised and raise questions about their statement.
- C. Emotion: happy/excited; Impact: Triggered playful banter from <spk_2>.
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence to uniquely determine)

Emotion: Sadness/Feeling wronged; Impact: Causes <spk_2> to be surprised by and question their statement.

Now Im like the weakest attack person.

Really?

Why?


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What was the emotion of the speaker (<spk_1>) who said ‘Now Im like the weakest attack person.’ from 221.8s to 223.44s in the audio? What impact did this emotion have on others?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Sadness/Aggrieved; Impact: Causes <spk_2> to be surprised by their statement and raise questions.
- B. Emotion: Happy/Excited; Impact: Triggered good-natured teasing from <spk_2>.
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence to uniquely determine)
- D. Emotion: Sadness/Grievance; Impact: Led to <spk_4> comforting them.

Emotion: Sadness/Grievance; Impact: Caused <spk_2> to be surprised by the statement and raise questions.

Now Im like the weakest attack person.

Really?

Why?


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What is the emotion of the speaker (<spk_1>) from 221.8 to 223.44 seconds in the audio? What impact did this emotion have on others in the conversation?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: sadness/feeling wronged; Impact: led <spk_4> to comfort them.
- B. Emotion: Happy/Excited; Effect: Led to friendly banter from <spk_2>.
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to make a unique determination)
- D. Emotion: Sadness/Feeling wronged; Effect: Causes <spk_2> to be surprised by and question their statement.

Emotion: Sadness/Grievance; Impact: Caused <spk_2> to be surprised by the statement and raise questions.

Now Im like the weakest attack person.

Really?

Why?


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship between the two speakers in the following audio, based on the entire conversation? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Gamer (teammate)
- B. Game Master—Player
- C. Voice actor
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)

Well I know he just really didnt wanna get caught without any spells I think he was being

As a team than you did at the start

You know what though? At least he didnt like burn them all and then wizzler wizard is useless.

I wanted to I wanted to cast um like I have like this scroll of silence


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship throughout the entire conversation between the speaker talking from 31.25s to 35.39s and the speaker talking from 54.35s to 58.47s in the audio? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Gamer (Teammate)
- B. Voice actor
- C. Game Host—Player
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence)

As a team than you did at the start


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship in the entire conversation between the speaker who said ‘he just really didnt wanna get caught without any spells’ and the speaker who said ‘At least he didnt like burn them all’? Please select the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Game Host—Player
- B. Gamer (Teammate)
- C. Voice actor
- D. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence)

As a team than you did at the start


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship in the entire conversation between the speaker who said ‘he just really didnt wanna get caught without any spells’ from 31.25 to 35.39 seconds in the audio, and the speaker who said ‘At least he didnt like burn them all’ from 54.35 to 58.47 seconds? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Voice actor
- B. Game Master—Player
- C. Gamer (Teammate)
- D. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence)

As a team than you did at the start


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Are the speakers in the two audio clips below the same person?

Choices:
- A. Yes, the same person
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information)
- C. No, not the same person.
- D. The two speakers' voice characteristics partially overlap.

Yeah yeah okay so Im sitting there and it takes a long time when you go there but Im sitting there waiting to see the doctor and Im just like, poking at my face and so its like ouch.

He holds up his hand, hes got a board, right here, he has a gigantic industrial staple through his finger and his finger is stapled to the board.

See the thing is, so yesterday with D and D, I think the thing was, I feel like I got intoxicated more quickly because of the fact that I had like no water.

Or something had happened, something had happened. Anyways, I found I nobody probably noticed but I brought the accent out a little bit more.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Are the two audio clips below from the same speaker?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)
- B. The voice characteristics of the two speakers partially overlap.
- C. Yes, the same person
- D. No, not the same person


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: In the audio, is the speaker from 47.34s to 55.92s the same as the speaker from 193.03s to 203.73s?

Choices:
- A. No, not the same person
- B. Yes, the same person
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information)
- D. The voice characteristics of the two speakers partially overlap.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker in the audio from 47.34 seconds to 55.92 seconds the same as the speaker from 67.23 seconds to 77.08 seconds?

Choices:
- A. The two speakers' voice characteristics partially overlap.
- B. No, not the same person
- C. Yes, the same person
- D. Cannot determine (insufficient information)


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker who said ‘poking at my face and so its like ouch’ the same as the speaker who said ‘I got intoxicated more quickly’?

Choices:
- A. Yes, the same person
- B. No, not the same person
- C. The vocal features of the two speakers partially overlap.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information)


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker who said ‘poking at my face and so its like ouch’ the same as the speaker who said ‘his finger is stapled to the board’?

Choices:
- A. No, they are not the same person.
- B. The vocal features of the two speakers partially overlap.
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)
- D. Yes, the same person


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker who said ‘poking at my face and so its like ouch’ from 47.34s to 55.92s in the audio the same as the speaker who said ‘I got intoxicated more quickly’ from 193.03s to 203.73s?

Choices:
- A. The voice characteristics of the two speakers partially overlap
- B. Cannot determine (insufficient information)
- C. Yes, the same person
- D. No, not the same person


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker who said ‘poking at my face and so its like ouch’ from 47.34s to 55.92s in the audio the same as the speaker who said ‘his finger is stapled to the board’ from 67.23s to 77.08s?

Choices:
- A. Yes, the same person
- B. No, they are not the same person.
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)
- D. The two speakers' voice features partially overlap


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the stances of the two speakers in the following audio throughout the entire dialogue? Please choose the one that best fits.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Believes using accents would ruin the game's atmosphere; Speaker B: Believes it requires professional training to do well.
- B. Speaker A: Ultimately decides to give using an accent a try; Speaker B: Has always been encouraging and supportive of using an accent.
- C. Speaker A and Speaker B had an in-depth discussion about whether to use an accent, but did not reach a clear consensus.
- D. Speaker A: Always holds an encouraging and supportive attitude towards using an accent; Speaker B: Ultimately decides to be willing to give it a try.

Speaker A: Regarding whether to use an accent, ultimately decided to give it a try; Speaker B: Regarding whether to use an accent, always maintained an encouraging and supportive attitude.

Okay. All right  hes like its okay, its not too late. Okay Ill do it.

You should just do it, you should just go all in and just be total English accent.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the stance in the entire conversation of the speaker from 259.65s to 263.97s and the speaker from 218.19s to 222.05s in the audio? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Ultimately decides to give using an accent a try; Speaker B: Is always encouraging and supportive about it.
- B. Speaker A and Speaker B had an in-depth discussion about whether to use an accent, but did not reach a clear consensus.
- C. Speaker A: Always maintains an encouraging and supportive attitude toward using an accent; Speaker B: Ultimately decides to be willing to try.
- D. Speaker A: Believes that using an accent would ruin the game's atmosphere; Speaker B: Believes that it requires professional training to do one well.

Speaker A: Regarding whether to use an accent, ultimately decided to give it a try; Speaker B: Regarding whether to use an accent, has always been encouraging and supportive.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the stance of the speaker who said ‘Okay Ill do it’ and the speaker who said ‘you should just go all in’ in the entire conversation? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: always holds an encouraging and supportive attitude towards the use of an accent; Speaker B: ultimately decides to give it a try.
- B. Speaker A: Believes that using accents would ruin the game's atmosphere; Speaker B: Believes that it requires professional training to be done well.
- C. Speaker A and Speaker B had an in-depth discussion about whether to use an accent, but did not reach a clear consensus.
- D. Speaker A: Regarding whether to use an accent, ultimately decides to give it a try; Speaker B: Consistently maintains an encouraging and supportive attitude.

Speaker A: Regarding whether to use an accent, ultimately decided to give it a try; Speaker B: Regarding whether to use an accent, was always encouraging and supportive.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the respective stances of the 3rd speaker and the 1st speaker in the entire dialogue? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Regarding whether to use an accent, ultimately decides to give it a try; Speaker B: Regarding whether to use an accent, is always encouraging and supportive.
- B. Speaker A: Always holds an encouraging and supportive attitude towards using an accent; Speaker B: Ultimately decides to be willing to try.
- C. Speaker A: Believes that using accents would ruin the game's atmosphere; Speaker B: Believes that it requires professional training to be done well.
- D. Speaker A and Speaker B had an in-depth discussion about whether to use an accent, but did not reach a clear consensus.

Speaker A: Regarding whether to use an accent, ultimately decided to give it a try; Speaker B: Regarding whether to use an accent, was always encouraging and supportive.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: In the audio, what is the stance in the entire conversation of the speaker who said ‘Okay Ill do it’ from 259.65s to 263.97s and the speaker who said ‘you should just go all in’ from 218.19s to 222.05s? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A and Speaker B had an in-depth discussion about whether to use an accent, but did not reach a clear consensus.
- B. Speaker A: Is always encouraging and supportive about using an accent; Speaker B: Finally decides to give it a try.
- C. Speaker A: Regarding whether to use an accent, ultimately decides to give it a try; Speaker B: Regarding whether to use an accent, has always been encouraging and supportive.
- D. Speaker A: Believes using accents would ruin the game's atmosphere; Speaker B: Believes doing them well requires professional training.

Speaker A: Regarding whether to use an accent, ultimately decided to give it a try; Speaker B: Regarding whether to use an accent, has always held an encouraging and supportive attitude.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in the stances of the two speakers throughout the entire conversation in the following audio? Please select the best option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Regarding whether to use an accent, goes from 【hesitant】→【decides to try】; Speaker B: Regarding whether to use an accent, has always been 【encouraging and supportive】.
- B. Speaker A: Regarding whether to use an accent, from 【firmly opposing】→【to reluctantly accepting】; Speaker B: Regarding whether to use an accent, from 【initially indifferent】→【to actively persuading】.
- C. Both Speaker A and Speaker B have wavered in their views on whether to use an accent, and their final positions have become more complex.
- D. Speaker A: Regarding using an accent, has always been [encouraging and supportive]; Speaker B: Regarding using an accent, went from [hesitant] → [deciding to try].

Speaker A: On whether to use an accent, from [hesitant] → [deciding to try]; Speaker B: On whether to use an accent, attitude has always been [encouraging and supportive].


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in viewpoint of the speaker from 259.65s to 263.97s and the speaker from 218.19s to 222.05s in the audio during their dialogue about their stances? Please select the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Both Speaker A and Speaker B's views on whether to use an accent went through some wavering, and their final positions became more complex.
- B. Speaker A: Regarding whether to use an accent, changes from [hesitant] → [deciding to try]; Speaker B: Regarding whether to use an accent, their attitude has always been [encouraging and supportive].
- C. Speaker A: Regarding whether to use an accent, their attitude has always been [encouraging and supportive]; Speaker B: Regarding whether to use an accent, they went from [hesitant] → [deciding to try].
- D. Speaker A: On whether to use an accent, from 【firmly opposed】→【changes to reluctantly accepting】; Speaker B: On whether to use an accent, from 【initially indifferent】→【changes to actively persuading】.

Speaker A: Regarding whether to use an accent, their attitude changed from [hesitant and undecided] → [decided to try].
Speaker B: Regarding whether to use an accent, their attitude has consistently been one of [encouragement and support].


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in stance of the speaker who said ‘Okay I'll do it’ and the speaker who said ‘you should just go all in’ throughout the entire conversation? Please select the best option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: On the use of an accent, from 【firmly opposed】 → 【reluctantly accepting】; Speaker B: On the use of an accent, from 【initially indifferent】 → 【actively persuading】.
- B. Speaker A: Regarding whether to use an accent, their attitude has always been [encouraging and supportive]; Speaker B: Regarding whether to use an accent, went from [hesitant] → [deciding to try].
- C. Speaker A: Regarding whether to use an accent, from 【hesitant】→【deciding to try】; Speaker B: Regarding whether to use an accent, attitude has always been 【encouraging and supportive】.
- D. The views of both Speaker A and Speaker B on whether to use an accent have wavered, and their final stances have become more complex.

Speaker A: Regarding whether to use an accent, from 【hesitant】→【decided to try】; Speaker B: Regarding whether to use an accent, their attitude has always been 【encouraging and supportive】.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: Throughout the entire conversation, what are the respective changes in the stances of the third speaker and the first speaker? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: On whether to use an accent, the attitude has always been 【encouraging and supportive】; Speaker B: On whether to use an accent, changes from 【undecided】→【deciding to try】.
- B. Both Speaker A and Speaker B's views on whether to use an accent wavered, and their final positions became more complex.
- C. Speaker A: Regarding the use of an accent, from [firm opposition] → [reluctant acceptance]; Speaker B: Regarding the use of an accent, from [initial indifference] → [active persuasion].
- D. Speaker A: Regarding whether to use an accent, from [hesitant] → [deciding to try]; Speaker B: Regarding whether to use an accent, has always been [encouraging and supportive].

Speaker A: Regarding whether to use an accent, went from 【hesitant and undecided】→【decided to try】; Speaker B: Regarding whether to use an accent, attitude has consistently been 【encouraging and supportive】.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in stance throughout the entire conversation of the speaker who said ‘Okay Ill do it’ from 259.65s to 263.97s and the speaker who said ‘you should just go all in’ from 218.19s to 222.05s in the audio? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Regarding whether to use an accent, changes from [hesitant] → [deciding to try]; Speaker B: Regarding whether to use an accent, attitude has always been [encouraging and supportive].
- B. Both Speaker A and Speaker B wavered on whether to use an accent, and their final stances became more complex.
- C. Speaker A: Regarding whether to use an accent, the attitude has always been 【encouragement and support】; Speaker B: Regarding whether to use an accent, from 【undecided】→【deciding to try】.
- D. Speaker A: On using an accent, from [firmly opposing] → [reluctantly accepting]; Speaker B: On using an accent, from [initially indifferent] → [actively persuading].

Speaker A: Regarding whether to use an accent, from [hesitant] → [decided to try]; Speaker B: Regarding whether to use an accent, their attitude has always been [encouraging and supportive].


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the speaker in the following single-speaker audio?

Choices:
- A. Female
- B. Male
- C. Uncertain gender
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine gender)

and the top one is where your pressure comes in.

Se- I have more control when Im closer to it though.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the speaker in the audio from 10.65 to 12.57 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Female
- B. Unable to determine (insufficient information to determine gender)
- C. Unspecified gender
- D. Male


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the speaker in the audio who said, "the top one is where your pressure comes in"?

Choices:
- A. Male
- B. Female
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine gender)
- D. Undetermined gender


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: In the entire dialogue, what is the gender of the first speaker to appear (spk_1)?

Choices:
- A. Female
- B. Cannot determine (insufficient information to determine gender)
- C. Male
- D. Undetermined gender


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the speaker who said “and the top one is where your pressure comes in” between 10.65 and 12.57 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Cannot determine (insufficient information to determine gender)
- B. Gender uncertain
- C. Female
- D. Male


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, who are the male speakers? (Answer using spk_index) Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. spk_1、spk_3
- B. spk_1、spk_2
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine gender)
- D. spk_1


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: Who are the female speakers in the entire audio? (Answer using spk_index) Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. spk_3、spk_4
- B. spk_1、spk_4
- C. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine gender)
- D. spk_3


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: How many male speakers are there in the entire audio? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. 1
- B. 4
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine gender)
- D. 2


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: How many female speakers are there in the entire audio? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. 3
- B. 2
- C. 0
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine gender)


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: In the single-speaker audio below, which of the following best describes the speaker's profile?

Choices:
- A. Gender: Male; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Sad; Accent: General American English
- B. Gender: Male; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Happy; Accent: General American English
- C. Gender: Female Voice; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American English
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information)

Gender: Male; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Happy; Accent: General American English

and then I was like, No, you do it this way.

It doesnt matter how, what you explain to me; I dont, I dont get it. I dont get it. I dont get it.


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: The speaker profile for the speaker from 30.02 seconds to 31.47 seconds in the audio is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Gender: Female; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American English
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information)
- C. Gender: Male voice; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Happy; Accent: General American English
- D. Gender: Male voice; Age: Young adult; Emotion: Sad; Accent: General American English

Gender: Male voice; Age: Young adult; Emotion: Happy; Accent: General American English


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: The speaker profile of the person who said ‘No, you do it this way’ in the audio is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Gender: Male; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Happy; Accent: General American English
- B. Gender: Female; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American English
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)
- D. Gender: Male Voice; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Sad; Accent: General American English

Gender: Male voice; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Happy; Accent: General American English


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: What is the gender of the 1st speaker to appear in the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. Female voice
- B. Neutral voice
- C. Male voice
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine)


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: For the speaker who said ‘and then I was like, No, you do it this way’ from 30.02s to 31.47s, which of the following speaker profiles is the most similar?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine)
- B. Gender: Male voice; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Happy; Accent: General American English
- C. Gender: Female; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: General American English
- D. Gender: Male voice; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Sad; Accent: General American English

Gender: Male; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Happy; Accent: General American English


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: In the entire audio, which speakers have the profile: "Gender: Male voice; Age: Young adult; Emotion: Happy; Accent: General American English"? (Answer with spk_index) Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. spk_1、spk_2
- B. spk_1、spk_2、spk_3
- C. spk_1
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine)


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: In the entire audio, how many speakers have the profile: "Gender: Male; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Happy; Accent: General American English"? Please choose the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. 4
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine)
- C. 1
- D. 2