多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the stances in the entire conversation of the speaker who said ‘how to balance your own gaming’ and the speaker who said ‘he has indeed changed quite a lot’? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Strongly opposes "Tianjian's" lifestyle, believing he is addicted to games. Speaker B: Is concerned about "Tianjian's" lifestyle, believing he exercises too much.
- B. Speaker A: Analyzed "Tianjian's" lifestyle objectively. Speaker B: Expressed a complex and contradictory view on "Tianjian's" lifestyle.
- C. Speaker A: Holds a supportive and explanatory attitude towards "Tian Jian's" lifestyle, affirming the changes it has brought to the family. Speaker B: Holds a teasing and curious attitude towards "Tian Jian's" lifestyle, exploring how he balances his hobbies.
- D. Speaker A: Has a teasing and curious attitude toward "Tianjian's" lifestyle, exploring how he balances his hobbies. Speaker B: Has a defensive and explanatory attitude toward "Tianjian's" lifestyle, affirming the changes he has made for the family.

Speaker A: Has a teasing and curious attitude toward "Tian Jian's" lifestyle, exploring how he balances his hobbies.
Speaker B: Has a defensive and explanatory attitude toward "Tian Jian's" lifestyle, affirming the changes he has made for his family.

那你那你就是怎么样去平衡你自己的打游戏和你跑步或运动的时间呢？


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the respective stances of the first speaker and the second speaker in the entire conversation? Please choose the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Has a teasing and curious attitude towards "Tian Jian's" lifestyle, exploring how he balances his hobbies. Speaker B: Has a defensive and explanatory attitude towards "Tian Jian's" lifestyle, affirming the changes he made for the family.
- B. Speaker A: Holds a supportive and explanatory attitude toward "Tianjian's" lifestyle, affirming the changes it brought to the family. Speaker B: Holds a teasing and curious attitude toward "Tianjian's" lifestyle, exploring how he balances his hobbies.
- C. Speaker A: Strongly opposes "Tianjian's" lifestyle, believing he is addicted to games. Speaker B: Is concerned about "Tianjian's" lifestyle, believing he over-exercises.
- D. Speaker A: Objectively analyzes the "Tianjian" lifestyle. Speaker B: Expresses a complex and contradictory view of the "Tianjian" lifestyle.

Speaker A: Holds a teasing and curious attitude towards "Tianjian's" lifestyle, exploring how he balances his hobbies.
Speaker B: Holds a defensive and explanatory attitude towards "Tianjian's" lifestyle, affirming the changes he has made for his family.

那你那你就是怎么样去平衡你自己的打游戏和你跑步或运动的时间呢？

对，所以他其实还是还是还是因为有有有家庭，然后还有一些东西要平衡，确实他还改变了挺多的，他原来可能打游戏时间会更多，然后玩的会更复杂的游戏，他现在就是玩这种。


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the stance in the entire conversation of the speaker who said ‘how to balance your own gaming’ from 63.15 to 67.87 seconds in the audio, and the speaker who said ‘indeed, he has changed quite a lot’ from 85.59 to 98.79 seconds? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Is defensive and explanatory about "Tianjian's" lifestyle, affirming the changes it has brought to the family. Speaker B: Is teasing and curious about "Tianjian's" lifestyle, exploring how he balances his hobbies.
- B. Speaker A: Strongly opposes "Tian Jian's" lifestyle, believing he is addicted to games. Speaker B: Is concerned about "Tian Jian's" lifestyle, believing he exercises too much.
- C. Speaker A: Is teasing and curious about "Tianjian's" lifestyle, inquiring how he balances his hobbies. Speaker B: Defends and explains "Tianjian's" lifestyle, affirming the changes he made for his family.
- D. Speaker A: Provided an objective analysis of "Tianjian's" lifestyle. Speaker B: Expressed complex and contradictory views on "Tianjian's" lifestyle.

Speaker A: Has a teasing and curious attitude toward "Tianjian's" lifestyle, exploring how he balances his hobbies.
Speaker B: Has a defensive and explanatory attitude toward "Tianjian's" lifestyle, affirming the changes he has made for the family.

那你那你就是怎么样去平衡你自己的打游戏和你跑步或运动的时间呢？


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in the two speakers' stances throughout the entire conversation in the audio below? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Towards "Tian Jian's" lifestyle: From [believing his hobbies are contradictory and teasing him] → [shifting to exploring how he balances different hobbies]. Speaker B: Towards "Tian Jian's" lifestyle: Attitude has consistently been [to defend it positively and explain his positive changes].
- B. Speaker A: Regarding "Tian Jian's" lifestyle: attitude has always been [positive and supportive, explaining its positive changes]. Speaker B: Regarding "Tian Jian's" lifestyle: from [finding his hobbies contradictory and teasing him about it] → [shifts to exploring how he balances different hobbies].
- C. Speaker A: On "Tianjian's" lifestyle: from 【supporting him playing games】→【to opposing him playing any games】. Speaker B: On "Tianjian's" lifestyle: from 【not understanding his exercise habits】→【to encouraging him to exercise more】.
- D. Speaker A: On the "Tianjian" lifestyle: their viewpoint wavered multiple times, ultimately reaching no conclusion. Speaker B: On the "Tianjian" lifestyle: constantly reconciles different viewpoints.

Speaker A: Regarding "Tian Jian's" lifestyle: From [thinking his hobbies were contradictory and teasing him about it] → [to exploring how he balances his different hobbies].
Speaker B: Regarding "Tian Jian's" lifestyle: His attitude has always been to [positively defend it and explain his positive changes].

那你那你就是怎么样去平衡你自己的打游戏和你跑步或运动的时间呢？


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in viewpoint in the stance dialogue for the speaker who talks from 63.15 seconds to 67.87 seconds and the speaker who talks from 85.59 seconds to 98.79 seconds in the audio? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Regarding "Tian Jian's" lifestyle: attitude has always been【positive and supportive, explaining its positive changes】. Speaker B: Regarding "Tian Jian's" lifestyle: from【believing their hobbies are contradictory and teasing them】→【exploring how they balance different hobbies】.
- B. Speaker A: Regarding "Tianjian's" lifestyle: From [believing his hobbies are contradictory and teasing him about it] → [to exploring how he balances his different hobbies]. Speaker B: Regarding "Tianjian's" lifestyle: Attitude has always been [supportive, and explaining his positive changes].
- C. Speaker A: Regarding the "Tianjian" lifestyle: the viewpoint wavered multiple times and ultimately remained inconclusive. Speaker B: Regarding the "Tianjian" lifestyle: was always reconciling different viewpoints.
- D. Speaker A: Regarding "Tianjian's" lifestyle: From [supporting him playing games] → [to opposing him playing any games]. Speaker B: Regarding "Tianjian's" lifestyle: From [not understanding his exercise habits] → [to encouraging him to exercise more].

Speaker A: Regarding "Tianjian's" lifestyle: From [believing his hobbies are contradictory and teasing him about it] → [shifting to exploring how he balances his different hobbies].
Speaker B: Regarding "Tianjian's" lifestyle: Attitude has always been [positively defending it and explaining his positive changes].

那你那你就是怎么样去平衡你自己的打游戏和你跑步或运动的时间呢？


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: In the audio, what is the change in stance throughout the entire conversation for the speaker who said ‘how to balance your own gaming’ and the speaker who said ‘he has indeed changed a lot’? Please select the best option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Regarding "Tianjian's" lifestyle: From 【supporting him playing games】→【to opposing him playing any games】. Speaker B: Regarding "Tianjian's" lifestyle: From 【not understanding his exercise habits】→【to encouraging him to exercise more】.
- B. Speaker A: Regarding "Tianjian's" lifestyle: attitude has always been 【to positively defend it, and explain its positive changes】. Speaker B: Regarding "Tianjian's" lifestyle: from 【thinking his hobbies are contradictory and teasing him about them】→【to exploring how he balances different hobbies】.
- C. Speaker A: Regarding "Tianjian's" lifestyle: From 【thinking his hobbies are contradictory and teasing him】→【to exploring how he balances different hobbies】. Speaker B: Regarding "Tianjian's" lifestyle: Attitude has always been 【supportive and explaining his positive changes】.
- D. Speaker A: Regarding “Tian Jian’s” lifestyle: Their opinion has wavered multiple times, without reaching a definitive conclusion. Speaker B: Regarding “Tian Jian’s” lifestyle: Is always mediating between different viewpoints.

Speaker A: Regarding "Tian Jian's" lifestyle: From【believing his hobbies to be contradictory and teasing him about them】→【to exploring how he balances his different hobbies】.
Speaker B: Regarding "Tian Jian's" lifestyle: The attitude has always been【to positively defend it and explain his positive changes】.

那你那你就是怎么样去平衡你自己的打游戏和你跑步或运动的时间呢？


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the respective changes in the stances of the first speaker and the second speaker throughout the conversation? Please select the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Regarding "Tianjian's" lifestyle: From [finding his hobbies contradictory and teasing him about it] → [to exploring how he balances his different hobbies]. Speaker B: Regarding "Tianjian's" lifestyle: His attitude has always been [to positively defend it and explain his positive changes].
- B. Speaker A: Regarding “Tianjian’s” lifestyle: Attitude has always been [positive and supportive, and explains its positive changes]. Speaker B: Regarding “Tianjian’s” lifestyle: From [believing their hobbies are contradictory and teasing them] → [to exploring how they balance different hobbies].
- C. Speaker A: Regarding the “Tianjian” lifestyle: His/her viewpoint wavered multiple times and was ultimately inconclusive. Speaker B: Regarding the “Tianjian” lifestyle: Always mediated between different viewpoints.
- D. Speaker A: Attitude towards "Tianjian's" lifestyle: From 【supporting him playing games】→【opposing him playing any games】. Speaker B: Attitude towards "Tianjian's" lifestyle: From 【not understanding his exercise habits】→【encouraging him to exercise more】.

Speaker A: Regarding "Tianjian's" lifestyle: from [thinking his hobbies are contradictory and teasing him about them] → [to exploring how he balances his different hobbies].
Speaker B: Regarding "Tianjian's" lifestyle: attitude has always been one of [positive support and explaining his positive changes].

那你那你就是怎么样去平衡你自己的打游戏和你跑步或运动的时间呢？


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in stance throughout the entire conversation of the speaker who, in the audio, said ‘how to balance your own gaming’ from 63.15s to 67.87s and ‘he has indeed changed quite a lot’ from 85.59s to 98.79s? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: On the "Tianjian" lifestyle: Their viewpoint has wavered multiple times, ultimately reaching no conclusion. Speaker B: On the "Tianjian" lifestyle: They are always trying to reconcile the different viewpoints.
- B. Speaker A: Regarding "Tianjian's" lifestyle: From [supporting him playing games] → [to opposing him playing any games]. Speaker B: Regarding "Tianjian's" lifestyle: From [not understanding his exercise habits] → [to encouraging him to exercise more].
- C. Speaker A: On "Tianjian's" lifestyle: attitude has always been 【defending it positively and explaining its positive changes】. Speaker B: On "Tianjian's" lifestyle: from 【finding his hobbies contradictory and teasing him about them】→【shifting to exploring how he balances different hobbies】.
- D. Speaker A: Regarding “Tian Jian’s” lifestyle: from 【thinking his hobbies are contradictory and teasing him】 → 【to exploring how he balances his different hobbies】. Speaker B: Regarding “Tian Jian’s” lifestyle: has always been 【supportive, explaining his positive changes】.

Speaker A: Regarding "Tianjian's" lifestyle: from [believing his hobbies are contradictory and teasing him about them] → [to exploring how he balances his different hobbies].
Speaker B: Regarding "Tianjian's" lifestyle: attitude has always been [supportive, and explaining his positive changes].

那你那你就是怎么样去平衡你自己的打游戏和你跑步或运动的时间呢？


说话人识别能力-说话人反向检索任务

Question:
In the statements below, what did the 1st speaker in the dialogue say? Please select the most fitting option.
Candidate statements:
1) He just does what he wants.
2) And it's great.
3) It's post-freedom.
4) His loyalty to Sabriel was always clear.
5) Well yeah, 'cause it's also post-
6) Other than Golden Hand.

Choices:
- A. 1, 2, 4, 6
- B. 1, 2, 3, 6
- C. 1, 2, 5, 6
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine)

And if he had wanted, if he had wanted Sabriel dead, it would have happened.

He did try then, like Mogget totally unbounded is not cool with everything, but Mogget with, I mean he tried to escape.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the speaker in the single-speaker audio below, throughout the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. Believes that the character Mogget is subject to the same strict control by the magic collar in all books, with no essential difference.
- B. Believes that the character Mogget's freedom differs significantly between books, being much less restricted in "Sabriel" than in "Clariel".
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely deduce the conclusion/change).
- D. Believes the key distinction in the character Mogget's behavior is his autonomous choice, particularly his voluntary silence in the presence of certain characters.

Believes the character Mogget's freedom differs significantly between books, with him being much less restricted in 《Sabriel》 than in 《Clariel》.

There's just a big difference, and and the difference that we see in Clariel versus Sabriel versus Golden Hand is that in Clariel's world, Mogget was figuratively and magically literally under lock and key, even when he was running away.

That's true, but uh my my argument for why like I personally would vote for Sabriel on that is just because of how different he is around the dog.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the speaker from 70.325 seconds to 87.975 seconds in the audio, throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Argues that the key distinction in Mogget's behavior is his autonomous choice, especially his voluntary silence in the presence of certain characters.
- B. Cannot determine (Insufficient evidence to draw a definitive conclusion/determine the change).
- C. Believes the character Mogget's freedom varies significantly between books, with far fewer restrictions in *Sabriel* than in *Clariel*.
- D. Believes that the character Mogget is under the same strict control from the magic collar in all the books, with no essential difference.

Believes that the character Mogget's degree of freedom differs significantly in different books, being much less restricted in *Sabriel* than in *Clariel*.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance in the entire conversation of the speaker in the audio who said ‘the difference that we see in Clariel versus Sabriel’?

Choices:
- A. Believes the character Mogget's freedom differs significantly between books, being far less restricted in Sabriel than in Clariel.
- B. Believes that the character Mogget is under the same strict control from the magic collar in all the books, with no essential difference.
- C. Believes the key difference in the character Mogget's behavior is his autonomous choice, especially that he voluntarily chooses to remain silent in the presence of specific characters.
- D. Cannot be determined (The evidence is insufficient to uniquely lead to the conclusion/change).

Believes that the character Mogget's freedom differs significantly between the books, as he is much less restricted in *Sabriel* than in *Clariel*.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance in the entire conversation of the speaker who, from second 70.325 to second 87.975 in the audio, said ‘in Clariel's world, Mogget was figuratively and magically literally under lock and key’?

Choices:
- A. Argues that the key distinction in Mogget's behavior is his autonomous choice, particularly his decision to voluntarily remain silent in the presence of a specific character.
- B. Believes the character Mogget's freedom differs significantly between books, being far less restricted in *Sabriel* than in *Clariel*.
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine the conclusion/change).
- D. Believes that the character Mogget is under the same strict control by the magic collar in all books, with no essential difference.

Believes the character Mogget's freedom varies significantly between books, being much less restricted in《Sabriel》than in《Clariel》.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the first speaker (spk_1) throughout the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. Believes that the character Mogget is equally and strictly controlled by the magic collar in all the books, with no essential difference.
- B. Believes that the character Mogget's freedom differs significantly between books, being far less restricted in *Sabriel* than in *Clariel*.
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely conclude the viewpoint/change).
- D. Believes the key distinction in the character Mogget's behavior is his autonomous choice, particularly that he voluntarily remains silent in the presence of certain characters.

Believes the character Mogget's freedom differs significantly between books, being far less restricted in 《Sabriel》 than in 《Clariel》.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the speaker's stance in the following monologue audio change throughout the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (The evidence is insufficient to draw a unique conclusion/change).
- B. From thinking the character was always strictly constrained → to thinking he completely broke free from all control at the end of the story.
- C. From arguing that the character is freest in 《Sabriel》 → to conceding they may be freer at the end of 《Abhorsen》, but still maintaining that 《Sabriel》 is the best embodiment of their freedom.
- D. From initially being skeptical of the idea of character freedom → to later firmly believing that a character's autonomous choice is the key, not external constraints.

From arguing that the character is freest in "Sabriel" → to acknowledging that they might be freer at the end of "Abhorsen," but still maintaining that "Sabriel" is the best embodiment of their state of freedom.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: For the speaker from 70.325 to 87.975 seconds in the audio, how does their stance change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. From arguing that the character is freest in *Sabriel* → to admitting they might be freer at the end of *Abhorsen*, but still believing that *Sabriel* is the best representation of their state of freedom.
- B. From believing the character was always under strict restraint → to believing he completely broke free from all control at the end of the story.
- C. From initial skepticism about the concept of character freedom → to a later firm belief that the character's autonomous choice is the key, not external constraints.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely deduce the conclusion/change).

From arguing the character is freest in "Sabriel" → to acknowledging they may be freer at the end of "Abhorsen," but still believing that "Sabriel" is the best representation of their state of freedom.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker who said ‘the difference that we see in Clariel versus Sabriel’ in the audio change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. From initially being skeptical of the idea of character freedom → to later becoming convinced that a character's autonomous choice is the key, not external constraints.
- B. Cannot be determined (The evidence is insufficient to uniquely lead to the conclusion/change).
- C. From believing the character was always strictly constrained → to believing that he completely broke free from all control at the end of the story.
- D. From arguing that the character is freest in *Sabriel* → to conceding they might be freer at the end of *Abhorsen*, but still maintaining that *Sabriel* is the best embodiment of their freedom.

From arguing that the character is freest in *Sabriel* → to acknowledging they might be freer at the end of *Abhorsen*, but still believing that *Sabriel* is the best representation of their state of freedom.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker who said ‘in Clariel's world, Mogget was figuratively and magically literally under lock and key’ from 70.325s to 87.975s in the audio change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. From arguing that the character is freest in 《Sabriel》 → to conceding she may be freer at the end of 《Abhorsen》, but still maintaining that 《Sabriel》 is the best representation of her state of freedom.
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine the conclusion/change).
- C. Initially skeptical of the idea of character free will → later became convinced that a character's autonomous choices are key, not external constraints.
- D. From believing the character was always under strict control → to believing he completely breaks free from all control at the end of the story.

From arguing that the character is freest in 《Sabriel》 → to acknowledging they might be freer at the end of 《Abhorsen》, but still maintaining that 《Sabriel》 is the best representation of their state of freedom.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the first speaker's (spk_1) stance change throughout the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. From initially doubting the concept of character freedom → to later firmly believing that a character's autonomous choices are key, not external constraints.
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to draw a unique conclusion/change).
- C. From believing the character was always under strict constraints → to believing he completely broke free from all control at the end of the story.
- D. From arguing that the character is most free in *Sabriel* → to acknowledging they may be freer at the end of *Abhorsen*, but still maintaining that *Sabriel* is the best representation of their state of freedom.

From arguing that the character was freest in *Sabriel* → to conceding that she might be freer at the end of *Abhorsen*, but still maintaining that *Sabriel* is the best representation of her freedom.


说话人识别能力-说话人计数任务

Question: How many different speakers are there in this audio?

Choices:
- A. 5 digits
- B. 3 digits
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)
- D. 2 bits

And because of that, uh, Mogget wasn't really very restricted, because Sabriel kind of had to rely on him to be her safeguard and protector and backup and guide and everything. Magically, Abhorsen wise, she was fine.

Oh.


说话人识别能力-说话人计数任务

Question: How many different speakers appeared in the audio between 57 and 59 seconds?

Choices:
- A. 3 digits
- B. Unable to determine (Insufficient information)
- C. 2 digits
- D. 1 bit

Oh.


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: Based on the entire conversation, what is the relationship between the two speakers in the following audio? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Book friend (Book club member)
- B. Podcast co-host (recording a show together)
- C. Spellcaster—Controlled Magical Creature
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient evidence)

Podcast partner (recording a show together)

And also, she knew enough to be wary of Mogget, she knew who Mogget was when they first met, she, you know, like was kind of muddling her way through uh controlling him as the person with in power in the moment.

But there's a huge difference between Mogget, who could just slip off and walk away, and come back, and Sabriel gets upset that he he went without telling her, and has nothing that she knows how to do about it.

Like with the paperweight, when he took it over.

Though to be fair, he did try.


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship in the entire conversation between the speaker who talks from 24.155s to 37.685s and the speaker who talks from 104.815s to 106.855s? Please select the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Book friend (Book club member)
- B. Podcast partner (recording a show together)
- C. Spellcaster—Controlled magical creature
- D. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence)

Podcast partner (recording the show together)

Though to be fair, he did try.


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship in the entire conversation between the speaker who said ‘she knew who Mogget was when they first met’ and the speaker who said ‘Like with the paperweight, when he took it over.’? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Book Friend (Book Club Member)
- B. Podcast co-host (co-recording a show)
- C. Spellcaster—Controlled magical creature
- D. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence)

Podcast co-host (recording the show together)

Though to be fair, he did try.


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship between the first speaker and the second speaker in the entire conversation? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Book friend (book club member)
- B. Podcast partner (co-recording a program)
- C. Spellcaster—Controlled Magical Creature
- D. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence)

Podcast co-host (recording a show together)

Though to be fair, he did try.


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship in the entire conversation between the speaker who said ‘she knew who Mogget was when they first met’ from 24.155s to 37.685s in the audio, and the speaker who said ‘Like with the paperweight, when he took it over.’ from 104.815s to 106.855s? Please choose the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. Book friend (Book club member)
- B. Podcast co-host (co-record a show)
- C. Spellcaster—Controlled magical creature
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)

Though to be fair, he did try.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: In the following single-speaker audio, what accent does the speaker use?

Choices:
- A. British English accent
- B. African American English accent
- C. Australian English accent
- D. The accent is not pronounced, making it impossible to judge.

when you when you finally like get a massage, that's when you like you re- you realize, man, you, man, look, you got some blockages that you gotta fix.

General American English, with prosodic features of African American English

Yes, y'all was tonguing it down in the elevator.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: Which of the following is the speaker's accent in the audio from 97.235 to 106.105 seconds closest to?

Choices:
- A. Australian accent
- B. Accent not obvious, impossible to tell.
- C. British accent
- D. African American English accent


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: The speaker in the audio who said ‘you got some blockages that you gotta fix’ has an accent closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. African American English accent
- B. British English accent
- C. The accent is not obvious, making it impossible to judge.
- D. Australian English accent


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, what accent does the first speaker in the conversation use?

Choices:
- A. The accent is not obvious, unable to determine.
- B. Australian English accent
- C. African American English accent
- D. British English accent


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: For the male speaker who said ‘you got some blockages that you gotta fix’ between 97.235 and 106.105 seconds, his accent is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. British English accent
- B. Australian English accent
- C. The accent is not obvious and cannot be determined.
- D. African American English accent


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: Throughout the audio, which speakers use an African American accent? (Answer in order of speaker appearance) Please select the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. The first speaker
- B. The first speaker, the second speaker
- C. The first speaker, the third speaker
- D. The accent is not obvious, making it impossible to determine.


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: How many speakers with an African American English accent are there in the entire audio? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. 3
- B. Accent not obvious, unable to judge
- C. 1
- D. 2


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: The most likely response in a complete dialogue to the following monologue segment from a speaker is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B: um, It helps to minimize like dark circles and puffiness in your eyes.
- B. Speaker B: That's the reflexology.
- C. Speaker B: It's a common ingredient in health drinks for detoxing.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to identify the response)

Speaker B: um, It helps to minimize like dark circles and puffiness in your eyes.

What is the significance with the cucumber?


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: Based on the dialogue content, the response from others to what a speaker said from 152.075s to 154.715s is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B: That's the reflexology.
- B. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to provide a response)
- C. Speaker B: um, It helps to minimize like dark circles and puffiness in your eyes.
- D. Speaker B: It's a common ingredient in health drinks for detoxing.

Speaker B: um, It helps to minimize like dark circles and puffiness in your eyes.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: Based on the dialogue, the reply from others to a speaker's statement about ‘the significance with the cucumber’ is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B: It's a common ingredient in health drinks for detoxing.
- B. Speaker B: That's the reflexology.
- C. Cannot determine (insufficient information to identify the response)
- D. Speaker B: um, It helps to minimize like dark circles and puffiness in your eyes.

Speaker B: um, It helps to minimize like dark circles and puffiness in your eyes.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: According to the conversation, the response from other people to the speaker's statement from 152.075 to 154.715 seconds regarding ‘the significance with the cucumber’ is:

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the response)
- B. Speaker B: um, It helps to minimize like dark circles and puffiness in your eyes.
- C. Speaker B: It's a common ingredient in health drinks for detoxing.
- D.     Speaker B: That's the reflexology.

B: um, It helps to minimize like dark circles and puffiness in your eyes.


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: The speaker's age group in the single-person audio below is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Middle-aged people (30-59 years old)
- B. Young adults (18-29 years old)
- C. Teenager (13-17 years old)
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)

He about to put his head in this machine.

or had it that they would be exactly in the same place. So I said to myself, probably not. It has to be the machine.


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: The age group of the speaker in the audio from 9.83s to 11.27s is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Teenager (13-17 years old)
- B. Middle-aged (30-59 years old)
- C. Young adults (18-29 years old)
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: Which of the following is closest to the age range of the speaker in the audio who said ‘He about to put his head in this machine’?

Choices:
- A. Middle-aged people (30-59 years old)
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)
- C. Seniors (60 and over)
- D. Young adults (18-29 years old)


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: In the entire conversation, the age group of the 3rd speaker (spk_3) is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Young adults (18-29 years old)
- B. Middle-aged people (30-59 years old)
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)
- D. Seniors (60 and over)


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: For the female speaker who said ‘He about to put his head in this machine’ between 9.83 and 11.27 seconds, which of the following is her age group closest to?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)
- B. Middle-aged people (30-59 years old)
- C. Young people (18-29 years old)
- D. Adolescent (13-17 years old)


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: Throughout the entire audio, which speakers are in the Middle-aged (30-59 years old) age group? (Answer using the global speaker order) Please select the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. spk_1、spk_3
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)
- C. spk_3、spk_4
- D. spk_3、spk_4、spk_6


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, how many speakers are in the Young Adult (18-29 years old) age group? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. 2
- B. 3
- C. 5
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the speaker in the following single-speaker audio?

Choices:
- A. Male
- B. Female
- C. Uncertain gender
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine gender)

You just told that woman she was dying and it's your machine was fucked up.

General American English, with features of African American Vernacular English

Now he smokin' cigarettes.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the speaker in the audio from 27.49 seconds to 31.69 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Uncertain gender
- B. Male
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine gender)
- D. Female

Now he smokin' cigarettes.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: In the audio, what is the gender of the speaker who said ‘You just told that woman she was dying’?

Choices:
- A. Male
- B. Cannot be determined (Not enough information to determine gender)
- C. Female
- D. Undetermined gender

Now he smokin' cigarettes.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the first speaker (spk_1) in the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Female
- B. Uncertain gender
- C. Male
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine gender)

Now he smokin' cigarettes.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the speaker who said ‘You just told that woman she was dying and it's your machine was fucked up.’ between 27.49s and 31.69s?

Choices:
- A. Male
- B. Female
- C. Cannot determine (insufficient information to determine gender)
- D. Uncertain gender

Now he smokin' cigarettes.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, which speakers are female? (Answer using spk_index) Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. spk_1、spk_5
- B. spk_2、spk_3、spk_4
- C. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine gender)
- D. spk_1

Now he smokin' cigarettes.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: How many male speakers are there in the entire audio? Please choose the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. 2
- B. 5
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine gender)
- D. 3

Now he smokin' cigarettes.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: In the single-speaker audio below, what is the speaker's gender?

Choices:
- A. Male
- B. Unspecified gender
- C. Female
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine gender)

um, But I mean really, what what is it gonna take?

uh, He'd he'd be at the top of my list too.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the speaker in the audio from 2.905 to 4.425 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Male
- B. Female
- C. Unspecified gender
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine gender)


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: In the audio, what is the gender of the speaker who said “But I mean really, what what is it gonna take?”?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine gender)
- B. Uncertain gender
- C. Female
- D. Male


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the first speaker to appear (spk_1) in the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Female
- B. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine gender)
- C. Male
- D. Undetermined gender


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the speaker who said “But I mean really, what what is it gonna take?” from 2.905 to 4.425 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Uncertain gender
- B. Female
- C. Male
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine gender)


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: In the entire audio clip, which speakers are female? (Answer using spk_index) Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. spk_1、spk_3
- B. spk_1
- C. spk_1、spk_4
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine gender)


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: How many female speakers are there in the entire audio? Please choose the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. 1
- B. 2
- C. 4
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine gender)


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: Which of the following is closest to the speaker's emotion in the single-speaker audio below?

Choices:
- A. Happy
- B. Sadness
- C. Anger
- D. Unable to determine (Insufficient evidence to determine the emotion)

um, And the last few elections have been really upsetting in terms of um if you're really passionate about a candidate, it's easy to see your voice get squashed.

Oh my goodness, he would be at the top of my list.


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: The speaker's emotion in the audio from 145.355 to 154.795 seconds is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Happy
- B. Anger
- C. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence to determine emotion)
- D. Sadness


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: Which of the following is closest to the emotion of the speaker who said “the last few elections have been really upsetting” in the audio?

Choices:
- A. Sorrow
- B. Happy
- C. Cannot determine (Insufficient evidence to determine emotion)
- D. Anger


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: Which of the following is closest to the emotion of the speaker who said “it's easy to see your voice get squashed” from 145.355 to 154.795 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Happy
- B. Sorrow
- C. Anger
- D. Unable to judge (evidence is insufficient to determine the emotion)


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, which speakers have expressed the emotion of sadness? (Answer using the global speaker order) Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. spk_1
- B. spk_3
- C. Cannot determine (Insufficient evidence to determine the emotion)
- D. spk_1、spk_3


说话人属性识别能力-情感识别任务

Question: Throughout the entire audio, how many speakers in total expressed the emotion 'happy'? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. 1
- B. Unable to determine (Insufficient evidence to determine emotion)
- C. 3
- D. 2


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Are the speakers in the following two audio clips the same person?

Choices:
- A. Yes, they are the same person.
- B. The two voice clips may be from the same person, but in one of them, the voice is deliberately imitated or altered.
- C. Cannot determine (insufficient information)
- D. No, not the same person

Is it just is it just gonna be uh running somebody like, what is the what are the chances that she actually is vulnerable right now?

uh, because the district is is is diverse, and it's your district you ran in is um the upper east side as well, it's very wealthy.

um We we have a lot of great progressives um There's some current people serving at the state legislature that I think would be great like Senator Martín Quesada.

um, I think he'd be a great candidate, and there's probably somebody out there that that hasn't stepped up to to um to run yet.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Are the speakers in the two audio clips below the same?

Choices:
- A. No, they are not the same person.
- B. Yes, they are the same person.
- C. The two voice clips may be from the same person, but one of them has been deliberately imitated or altered.
- D. Cannot determine (insufficient information)


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker from 4.505 seconds to 11.545 seconds the same as the speaker from 31.145 seconds to 38.425 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Yes, they are the same person.
- B. No, not the same person.
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information)
- D. The two voice clips may be from the same person, but one is a deliberate imitation or alteration of the voice.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: In the audio, is the speaker from 4.505 seconds to 11.545 seconds the same speaker as the one from 93.025 seconds to 100.225 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information)
- B. No, not the same person
- C. Yes, it's the same person.
- D. The two voice clips may be from the same person, but one of them has been deliberately imitated or altered.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker who said ‘what are the chances that she actually is vulnerable right now?’ the same as the speaker who said ‘There's some current people serving at the state legislature’?

Choices:
- A. No, not the same person
- B. The two voice clips may be from the same person, but in one, the voice was deliberately imitated or altered.
- C. Yes, it is the same person.
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker who said ‘what are the chances that she actually is vulnerable right now?’ the same speaker who said ‘the upper east side as well, it's very wealthy’?

Choices:
- A. No, they are not the same person.
- B. Yes, it is the same person.
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)
- D. The two voice clips may be from the same person, but in one of them the voice was deliberately imitated or changed.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker in the audio from 4.505s to 11.545s who said ‘what are the chances that she actually is vulnerable right now?’ the same as the speaker from 31.145s to 38.425s who said ‘There's some current people serving at the state legislature’?

Choices:
- A. The two voice clips may be from the same person, but in one of them the voice was deliberately imitated or changed.
- B. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)
- C. No, not the same person
- D. Yes, they are the same person.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker who said ‘what are the chances that she actually is vulnerable right now?’ in the audio from 4.505 to 11.545 seconds the same as the speaker who said ‘the upper east side as well, it's very wealthy’ from 93.025 to 100.225 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Yes, they are the same person.
- B. No, they are not the same person.
- C. The two voice clips may be from the same person, but in one of them, the voice is deliberately imitated or altered.
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Are the speakers in the two audio clips below the same person?

Choices:
- A. The two speakers' voices are similar in some segments, but their overall timbre is different.
- B. No, not the same person.
- C. Yes, the same person
- D. Cannot determine (insufficient information)

I personally though, I'm in and maybe I'm in the minority, I don't think so, maybe Matt disagrees, but I I would I would move away from the pistol.

A couple thoughts here and a couple different topics, but first, I I think with Arroyo, I don't doubt his ability to design plays.

But if you do allow the quarterback to run, like we saw in the Utah game in the Pac-12 championship, and then against Wisconsin in the Rose Bowl.

you know, there were certainly moments throughout each game where things were going well, and there were certain mo- there were certain games that the offense was really humming.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Are the speakers in the two audio clips below the same person?

Choices:
- A. The two speakers' voices are similar in some segments, but their overall timbres are different.
- B. Yes, the same person
- C. No, not the same person
- D. Unable to determine (insufficient information)


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker from 1.3 to 9.1 seconds in the audio the same as the speaker from 32.47 to 40.63 seconds?

Choices:
- A. No, not the same person
- B. Yes, the same person
- C. The two speakers' voices are similar in certain segments, but their overall timbres are different.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information)


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker in the audio from 1.3s to 9.1s the same as the speaker from 180.44s to 188.4s?

Choices:
- A. The two speakers' voices are similar in certain segments, but their overall timbres are different.
- B. Cannot determine (insufficient information)
- C. No, not the same person
- D. Yes, the same person


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker who said ‘I personally though, I'm in and maybe I'm in the minority, I don't think so, maybe Matt disagrees, but I I would I would move away from the pistol.’ the same person as the one who said ‘But if you do allow the quarterback to run, like we saw in the Utah game in the Pac-12 championship, and then against Wisconsin in the Rose Bowl.’?

Choices:
- A. Cannot determine (insufficient information)
- B. Yes, the same person
- C. No, not the same person
- D. The two speakers' voices are similar in certain segments, but their overall timbre is different.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker who said ‘I personally though, I'm in and maybe I'm in the minority, I don't think so, maybe Matt disagrees, but I I would I would move away from the pistol.’ the same as the speaker who said ‘A couple thoughts here and a couple different topics, but first, I I think with Arroyo, I don't doubt his ability to design plays.’?

Choices:
- A. Yes, the same person
- B. No, not the same person
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)
- D. The two speakers' voices are similar in some segments, but their overall timbres are different.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker in the audio from 1.3s to 9.1s who said ‘I personally though, I'm in and maybe I'm in the minority, I don't think so, maybe Matt disagrees, but I I would I would move away from the pistol.’ the same as the speaker from 32.47s to 40.63s who said ‘But if you do allow the quarterback to run, like we saw in the Utah game in the Pac-12 championship, and then against Wisconsin in the Rose Bowl.’?

Choices:
- A. Yes, the same person
- B. Cannot determine (insufficient information)
- C. The two speakers' voices are similar in certain segments, but their overall timbres are different.
- D. No, not the same person


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker in the audio who said ‘I personally though, I'm in and maybe I'm in the minority, I don't think so, maybe Matt disagrees, but I I would I would move away from the pistol.’ from 1.3 seconds to 9.1 seconds, the same speaker as the one who said ‘A couple thoughts here and a couple different topics, but first, I I think with Arroyo, I don't doubt his ability to design plays.’ from 180.44 seconds to 188.4 seconds?

Choices:
- A. No, not the same person
- B. The two speakers' voices are similar in some segments, but their overall timbres are different.
- C. Yes, the same person
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: Based on the entire conversation, what is the relationship between the two speakers in the following audio? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Coach—Player
- B. Journalist—Coach
- C. Podcast co-host (sports commentary)
- D. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence)

One hundred percent. The touchdown to Mycah Pittman on fourth down at Washington.


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship in the entire conversation between the speaker from 180.44 seconds to 188.4 seconds and the speaker from 194.72 seconds to 197.97 seconds in the audio? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Reporter—Coach
- B. Podcast co-host (Sports commentary)
- C. Coach—Player
- D. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence)


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship in the entire conversation between the speaker who said ‘I don't doubt his ability to design plays’ and the speaker who said ‘The touchdown to Mycah Pittman on fourth down at Washington’? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Reporter—Coach
- B. Coach—Player
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)
- D. Podcast co-host (Sports commentator)


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship between the first speaker and the second speaker in the entire dialogue? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Podcast co-host (Sports commentary)
- B. Reporter—Coach
- C. Coach—Player
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话身份识别任务

Question: What is the relationship in the entire conversation between the speaker who said ‘I don't doubt his ability to design plays’ from 180.44s to 188.4s in the audio and the speaker who said ‘The touchdown to Mycah Pittman on fourth down at Washington’ from 194.72s to 197.97s? Please choose the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)
- B. Journalist—Coach
- C. Podcast co-host (sports commentary)
- D. Coach—Player


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the speaker in the following single-speaker audio, throughout the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. Believing that a star player's individual ability is enough to overcome all difficulties and lead a new team to win the highest honor.
- B. Believes that the competition in a certain division is exceptionally fierce, making it very unlikely for a team with star players to ultimately win the championship.
- C. Believes that the key to the team's strength lies in the stability of the core lineup and not losing talented players.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely deduce the viewpoint/change)

To believe that a certain region is so competitive that a team with star players has a low chance of ultimately winning the championship.

But I would say right now, the AFC, nor, uh excuse me, the AFC East is the second toughest division, arguably could argue be the toughest one, if Tua stays healthy.

Super Bowl, I don't think so.

The Buffalo lost some some talent, so they fell back to the pack a little bit.

In in in Green Bay, where everything is a lot less of a pressure cooker than New York.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the speaker from 54.295s to 64.855s throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Believes that the competition in a certain region is exceptionally fierce, making it highly unlikely for a team with star players to ultimately win the championship.
- B. Believe that the star player's individual ability is enough to overcome all difficulties and lead the new team to the highest honor.
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to establish a single conclusion/change)
- D. Believes that the key to the team's strength lies in the stability of the core lineup and not losing talented players.

Believes that a certain region is so fiercely competitive that a team with star players has a very low probability of ultimately winning the championship.

Super Bowl, I don't think so.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance in the entire conversation of the speaker who said ‘the AFC East is the second toughest division’?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence to uniquely determine the conclusion/change)
- B. Believes that the key to the team's strength is the stability of the core lineup and not losing talented players.
- C. Believes that a certain division is exceptionally competitive, making it highly unlikely for a team with star players to ultimately win the championship.
- D. Believing that a star player's individual ability is enough to overcome all difficulties and lead the new team to win the highest honor.

Believes that a certain division is so fiercely competitive that a team with star players has a very low probability of ultimately winning the championship.

Super Bowl, I don't think so.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the first speaker to appear (spk_1) in the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Believes that the key to the team's strength lies in the stability of the core lineup and not losing talented players.
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to lead to a unique conclusion/change)
- C. Believe that a star player's individual ability is enough to overcome all difficulties and lead their new team to win the highest honor.
- D. Believing that a particular region is so competitive that a team with star players has a low probability of winning the championship.

To believe that the competition in a certain region is exceptionally fierce, leading to a very low probability of a team with star players ultimately winning the championship.

Super Bowl, I don't think so.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the speaker's stance in the following monologue change throughout the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. From analyzing which region is the toughest → to expressing pessimism about a certain star team's ultimate championship prospects.
- B. From questioning a star player's individual ability → to gradually realizing that his team's overall strength is very strong.
- C. From initially thinking a team was average → to being convinced after a conversation and admitting the team is a championship contender.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely derive the conclusion/change)

From analyzing which division is the toughest → to expressing pessimism about a certain star team's final championship prospects.

Super Bowl, I don't think so.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker from 54.295 seconds to 64.855 seconds in the audio change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely derive the conclusion/change)
- B. From questioning a star player's individual ability → gradually realizing that his team's overall strength is very strong.
- C. From analyzing which division is the toughest → to expressing pessimism about a certain star team's ultimate championship prospects.
- D. From initially thinking a team was average → to being convinced after the conversation and admitting the team has championship potential.

From analyzing which region is the toughest → to becoming pessimistic about a certain star team's championship prospects.

Super Bowl, I don't think so.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker who said ‘the AFC East is the second toughest division’ change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. From initially thinking a team was average → to being persuaded after the conversation and admitting the team has the strength to contend for the championship.
- B. From analyzing which division is the toughest → shifting to pessimism about a particular star team's ultimate championship prospects.
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to support a single conclusion/change)
- D. From questioning a star player's individual ability → to gradually realizing that his team's overall strength is very strong.

From analyzing which region is the toughest → to shifting to pessimism about a certain star team's prospects of ultimately winning the championship.

Super Bowl, I don't think so.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the first speaker (spk_1) change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. From questioning a star player's individual ability → gradually realizing that his team's overall strength is very strong.
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely derive the conclusion/change)
- C. From initially believing a team was average → to being persuaded after a conversation to admit the team is a championship contender.
- D. From analyzing which division is the toughest → to expressing pessimism about a certain star team's final championship prospects.

From analyzing which region is the toughest → to becoming pessimistic about a certain star team's ultimate championship prospects.

Super Bowl, I don't think so.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: In the audio below, what is the speaker's emotion? What effect did this emotion have on the other people throughout the conversation?

Choices:
- A. Speaker <spk_1> expresses anxiety/nervousness, which confuses <spk_2> because it contrasts with the previously calm atmosphere of the discussion.
- B. Speaker <spk_1> expresses exaggerated anger/dissatisfaction, which makes <spk_2> feel amused and look forward to what happens next.
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence to uniquely determine).
- D. Speaker <spk_2> provoked <spk_1> with a gloating tone, causing <spk_1> to express genuine anger and dissatisfaction.

Speaker <spk_1> expresses exaggerated anger/dissatisfaction, which <spk_2> finds amusing and looks forward to what happens next.

Hey, hey, hey, I tell you what you wanna relax, but hey, you know, you could take your relax and stick it up your relax ass.

I tell you New York, New York radio is gonna be a lot of fun to listen to.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What is the emotion of this speaker (<spk_1>) from 235.055 to 241.535 seconds in the audio? What effect did this emotion have on others in the conversation?

Choices:
- A. Speaker <spk_1> expresses exaggerated anger/dissatisfaction, which amuses <spk_2> and makes them look forward to what happens next.
- B. Speaker <spk_2> provoked <spk_1> with a gloating tone, causing <spk_1> to express genuine anger and dissatisfaction.
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence for a unique conclusion).
- D. Speaker <spk_1> expresses anxiety/nervousness, which confuses <spk_2> because this is inconsistent with the previously calm atmosphere of the discussion.

Speaker <spk_1> displays exaggerated anger/dissatisfaction, which <spk_2> finds amusing and expresses anticipation for what happens next.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What emotion is the speaker (<spk_1>), who says "you could take your relax and stick it up your relax ass" in the audio, expressing? What impact did this emotion have on others in the conversation?

Choices:
- A. Speaker <spk_2> provoked <spk_1> with a gloating tone, causing <spk_1> to express genuine anger and dissatisfaction.
- B. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence to uniquely determine).
- C. Speaker <spk_1> expresses exaggerated anger/dissatisfaction, which amuses <spk_2> and makes them look forward to what happens next.
- D. Speaker <spk_1> shows anxiety/nervousness, which confuses <spk_2> because this is inconsistent with the previously calm atmosphere of the discussion.

Speaker <spk_1> shows exaggerated anger/dissatisfaction, which makes <spk_2> feel amused and look forward to the upcoming scene.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: In the latter half of the dialogue, the first speaker (<spk_1>) expressed an intense emotion. What was this emotion, and what effect did it have on <spk_2>?

Choices:
- A. Speaker <spk_1> expresses exaggerated anger/dissatisfaction, which amuses <spk_2> and makes them look forward to what happens next.
- B. Speaker <spk_1> shows anxiety/nervousness, which confuses <spk_2> because this is inconsistent with the previously calm atmosphere of the discussion.
- C. Speaker <spk_2> provoked <spk_1> with a gloating tone, causing <spk_1> to express genuine anger and dissatisfaction.
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence to uniquely determine).

Speaker <spk_1> expresses exaggerated anger/dissatisfaction, which <spk_2> finds amusing and looks forward to what happens next.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What was the emotion of the speaker (<spk_1>) who, from 235.055s to 241.535s in the audio, said “you could take your relax and stick it up your relax ass”? What impact did this emotion have on others?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine).
- B. Speaker <spk_1> shows anxiety/nervousness, which confuses <spk_2> because this is inconsistent with the previously calm atmosphere of the discussion.
- C. Speaker <spk_2> angered <spk_1> with a gloating tone, causing <spk_1> to express real anger and dissatisfaction.
- D. Speaker <spk_1> expresses exaggerated anger/dissatisfaction, which amuses <spk_2> and makes them look forward to what will happen next.

Speaker <spk_1> expresses exaggerated anger/dissatisfaction, which amuses <spk_2> and makes them anticipate the upcoming situation.


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话背景推理

Question: In which of the following scenarios would this conversation most likely take place?

Choices:
- A. A team coach is conducting a post-game review and tactical analysis with the players in the locker room.
- B. Two fans are at a sports bar, watching the game and discussing the team's performance.
- C. Two sports commentators are recording a podcast about American football in a recording studio.
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)

Two sports commentators are in a recording studio, recording a podcast about American football.


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: Which of the following is closest to the speaker's age group in the single-speaker audio below?

Choices:
- A. Middle-aged people (30-59 years old)
- B. Children (under 12 years old)
- C. Adolescent (13-17 years old)
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)

um, Charles Harris, so he slams quarterbacks to the ground.

Stop it.


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: Which of the following is the closest age group for the speaker in the audio from 14.05 to 18.85 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Adolescent (13-17 years old)
- B. Middle-aged people (30-59 years old)
- C. Children (under 12 years old)
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)

Stop it.


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: The age range of the speaker who said 'Charles Harris' in the audio is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Children (under 12 years old)
- B. Middle-aged people (30-59 years old)
- C. Young adults (18-29 years old)
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)

Stop it.


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: In the entire conversation, the age group of the first speaker to appear (spk_1) is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Children (under 12 years old)
- B. Middle-aged people (30-59 years old)
- C. Young adults (18-29 years old)
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine the age group)

Stop it.


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: The age group of the male speaker who said 'Charles Harris' between 14.05 and 18.85 seconds is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Children (under 12 years old)
- B. Middle-aged people (30-59 years old)
- C. Young adults (18-29 years old)
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)

Stop it.


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, which speakers are in the middle-aged (30-59 years old) age group? (Answer using the global speaker order) Please select the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. spk_1、spk_2、spk_3
- B. spk_1、spk_2
- C. spk_1
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)

Stop it.


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, how many speakers are in the middle-aged (30-59 years old) age group? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. 1
- B. 3
- C. 2
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)

Stop it.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the speaker in the single-speaker audio below?

Choices:
- A. Female
- B. Male
- C. Gender uncertain
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine gender)

Because I'm big on who's gonna be there in the room with him?

Well, that that goes to the question.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the speaker in the audio from 9.285 seconds to 13.925 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Male
- B. Undetermined gender
- C. Female
- D. Unable to determine (insufficient information to determine gender)

Well, that that goes to the question.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the speaker who said “who's gonna be there in the room with him” in the audio?

Choices:
- A. Uncertain gender
- B. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine gender)
- C. Male
- D. Female

Well, that that goes to the question.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the first speaker (spk_1) in the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Female
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine gender)
- C. Uncertain gender
- D. Male

Well, that that goes to the question.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the speaker who said “Because I'm big on who's gonna be there in the room with him?” between 9.285 and 13.925 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Female
- B. Male
- C. Unspecified gender
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine gender)

Well, that that goes to the question.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, which speakers are male? (Answer using spk_index) Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. spk_1
- B. spk_1、spk_2
- C. spk_1、spk_3
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine gender)

Well, that that goes to the question.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: How many male speakers are there in the entire audio? Please select the best option.

Choices:
- A. 1
- B. 3
- C. 2
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine gender)

Well, that that goes to the question.


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, how many female speakers are there in total? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. 1
- B. 0
- C. 2
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine gender)

Well, that that goes to the question.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the position of the two speakers in the audio below throughout the entire conversation? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: On draft strategy: Holds a principle-based view, believing the team must prioritize its urgent need for forwards; Speaker B: On draft strategy: Holds a situational view, believing the specific choice should depend on the draft position.
- B. Speaker A: Regarding draft strategy: holds a situational view, believing the specific choice should depend on the draft position; Speaker B: Regarding draft strategy: holds a principled view, believing the team's urgent need for a forward must be prioritized.
- C. Speaker A: On draft strategy: advocates that a cornerback should be picked no matter what, as it is the most valuable choice; Speaker B: On draft strategy: believes they should trade away all high-round draft picks.
- D. Speaker A: On the draft strategy: thoroughly discussed and analyzed all possibilities; Speaker B: On the draft strategy: expressed some of their own views and interacted with the other person.

Speaker A: On draft strategy: Holds a situational view, believing the specific choice should depend on the draft position; Speaker B: On draft strategy: Holds a principled view, believing the team's urgent need for a forward must be prioritized.

I think Paris Johnson, if I'm looking at the body type, and if they stay at nine, let me put the emphasis on if they stay at nine.

I think you gotta go need before you know, if if if the cornerback whether it's Witherspoon or wherever else is is there, and you got all the tackles where whether it's Paris Johnson or Broderick Jones or what's the the the um uh the guy from Tennessee.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the stance in the entire conversation of the speaker talking from 27.665 seconds to 35.105 seconds and the speaker talking from 117.345 seconds to 133.895 seconds in the audio? Please select the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: On draft strategy: Holds a situational view, believing the specific pick should depend on the draft order; Speaker B: On draft strategy: Holds a principled view, believing the priority must be to address the team's critical need for front-line players.
- B. Speaker A: On draft strategy: holds a principled view, believing the team must prioritize its urgent need for forwards; Speaker B: On draft strategy: holds a situational view, believing the specific pick should depend on the draft position.
- C. Speaker A: Regarding the draft strategy: Both agree that the team's frontline needs should be prioritized, they just disagree on the specific player selection.
- D. Speaker A: On draft strategy: advocates for selecting the best available player in any situation; Speaker B: On draft strategy: advocates for prioritizing offensive players over defensive players.

Speaker A: On draft strategy: Holds a situational view, believing the specific choice should depend on the draft pick position; Speaker B: On draft strategy: Holds a principled view, believing the team's urgent need for a forward line must be prioritized.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the stance of the speaker who said ‘if they stay at nine, let me put the emphasis on if they stay at nine’ and the speaker who said ‘I think you gotta go need’ in the entire conversation? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: On draft strategy: holds a principled view, believing the team must prioritize its urgent need for forwards; Speaker B: On draft strategy: holds a situational view, believing the specific choice should depend on the draft position.
- B. Speaker A: On draft strategy: Believes they should trade up draft picks at all costs; Speaker B: On draft strategy: Believes they should focus on finding players with potential in the later rounds.
- C. Speaker A: On the draft strategy: Very pessimistic about the team's draft prospects; Speaker B: On the draft strategy: Full of confidence in the team management's decisions.
- D. Speaker A: On draft strategy: holds a situational view, believing the specific pick should depend on the draft position; Speaker B: On draft strategy: holds a principled view, believing the team must prioritize filling its urgent need for forwards.

Speaker A: On draft strategy: Holds a situational view, believing the specific choice should depend on the draft pick order; Speaker B: On draft strategy: Holds a principled view, believing the team's urgent need for a forward must be prioritized.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the respective stances of the first speaker and the second speaker in the entire conversation? Please select the option that best fits.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: On draft strategy: holds a situational view, believing the specific pick should depend on the draft position; Speaker B: On draft strategy: holds a principled view, believing the team's urgent need for forwards must be prioritized.
- B. Speaker A: On draft strategy: Holds a principled view, believing the team must prioritize its critical need for forwards; Speaker B: On draft strategy: Holds a situational view, believing the specific choice should depend on the draft position.
- C. Speaker A: On the draft strategy: Both sides' views are basically the same, as both believe they should prioritize selecting the best available player.
- D. Speaker A: On draft strategy: believes the team's biggest need is a quarterback; Speaker B: On draft strategy: believes the team's biggest need is a wide receiver.

Speaker A: On draft strategy: Holds a situational view, believing the specific choice should depend on the draft pick order. Speaker B: On draft strategy: Holds a principled view, believing the team's urgent need for a forward must be prioritized.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the stance in the entire conversation of the speaker who said ‘if they stay at nine, let me put the emphasis on if they stay at nine’ from 27.665s to 35.105s in the audio, and the speaker who said ‘I think you gotta go need’ from 117.345s to 133.895s? Please select the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: On the draft strategy: their discussion did not form a clear opinion; Speaker B: On the draft strategy: their discussion did not form a clear opinion.
- B. Speaker A: On the draft strategy: believes they should only consider trading the current draft picks; Speaker B: On the draft strategy: believes they must keep all of the current draft picks.
- C. Speaker A: On draft strategy: holds a principled view that the team's pressing need for forwards must be prioritized; Speaker B: On draft strategy: holds a situational view that the specific choice should depend on the draft position.
- D. Speaker A: Holds a situational view on draft strategy, believing the specific choice should depend on the draft position; Speaker B: Holds a principled view on draft strategy, believing the team must prioritize its pressing need for forwards.

Speaker A: On draft strategy: Holds a situational view, believing the specific pick should depend on the draft position; Speaker B: On draft strategy: Holds a principled view, believing the team's critical need for forwards must be prioritized.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in the two speakers' stances throughout the entire conversation in the following audio? Please select the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Principle on draft strategy: always make situational decisions based on draft position and player value; Speaker B: Principle on draft strategy: always prioritize addressing the team's pressing need for a forward.
- B. Speaker A: Principle on draft strategy: The stance has always been to prioritize addressing the team's pressing need for forwards; Speaker B: Principle on draft strategy: Always insists that decisions should be made situationally, based on draft position and player value.
- C. Speaker A: Stance on draft strategy: From 【thinks they should draft an offensive lineman】→【changes to think they should draft a cornerback】; Speaker B: Stance on draft strategy: From 【undecided】→【ultimately supports Speaker A's viewpoint】.
- D. Speaker A: Principle on draft strategy: The viewpoint continuously evolves as the discussion deepens; Speaker B: Principle on draft strategy: The stance is gradually clarified in the dialogue.

Speaker A: Principle on draft strategy: Always maintain that decisions should be situational, based on draft position and player value;
Speaker B: Principle on draft strategy: The stance has always been that the team must prioritize addressing its urgent need for frontline players.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in stance throughout the entire dialogue of the speaker who speaks from 27.665 to 35.105 seconds and from 117.345 to 133.895 seconds in the audio? Please select the one that fits best.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Principle on draft strategy: The stance has always been that the team must prioritize addressing its pressing need for a forward; Speaker B: Principle on draft strategy: Consistently insists that decisions should be made situationally based on draft position and player value.
- B. Speaker A: On the principles of draft strategy: His/her opinion wavers multiple times during the conversation, and no final view is formed; Speaker B: On the principles of draft strategy: Becomes increasingly uncertain about his/her own opinion.
- C. Speaker A: On the principle of draft strategy: always insists that decisions should be made situationally based on draft position and player value; Speaker B: On the principle of draft strategy: the stance has always been that the team must prioritize addressing its pressing need for frontline players.
- D. Speaker A: Principle on draft strategy: From 【supporting trading draft picks】 → 【to opposing trading draft picks】; Speaker B: Principle on draft strategy: From 【supporting drafting front-line players】 → 【to supporting drafting the best player available】.

Speaker A: On the principle of draft strategy: Always insist on making situational decisions based on draft position and player value;
Speaker B: On the principle of draft strategy: The attitude has always been that the team's urgent need for forwards must be prioritized.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in stance throughout the entire conversation for the speaker who said 'if they stay at nine, let me put the emphasis on if they stay at nine' and the speaker who said 'I think you gotta go need'? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Principle on draft strategy: From 【Uncertain】→【Firmly believes in prioritizing the forward line】; Speaker B: Principle on draft strategy: From 【Firmly believes in prioritizing the forward line】→【Shifts to supporting situational decision-making】.
- B. Speaker A: On the principle of draft strategy: always insists that decisions should be situational, based on draft position and player value; Speaker B: On the principle of draft strategy: has always maintained that the team's urgent need for forwards must be prioritized.
- C. Speaker A: Principle on draft strategy: The stance has always been to prioritize addressing the team's urgent need for forwards; Speaker B: Principle on draft strategy: Always insists that decisions should be made situationally based on draft position and player value.
- D. Speaker A: Regarding the principles of draft strategy: their views both went through a process of moving from divergence to convergence; Speaker B: Regarding the principles of draft strategy: their views both went through a process of moving from divergence to convergence.

Speaker A: Principle on draft strategy: Always insist that decisions should be made situationally based on draft position and player value;
Speaker B: Principle on draft strategy: The stance has always been that the team's urgent need for frontline players must be prioritized.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the respective changes in the stances of the 1st speaker and the 2nd speaker throughout the conversation? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Draft strategy principle: From 【prioritizing value】→【switching to prioritizing need】; Speaker B: Draft strategy principle: Always believes need should be prioritized.
- B. Speaker A: Principle of the draft strategy: The stances of both sides remain complex and constantly changing throughout the conversation; Speaker B: Principle of the draft strategy: The stances of both sides remain complex and constantly changing throughout the conversation.
- C. Speaker A: Principle on draft strategy: The attitude has always been that the team's critical need for frontline players must be prioritized; Speaker B: Principle on draft strategy: Always insisted that situational decisions should be made based on draft position and player value.
- D. Speaker A: Principle on draft strategy: always insists that decisions should be situational, based on draft position and player value; Speaker B: Principle on draft strategy: has always maintained that the team must prioritize addressing its critical need for a forward line.

Speaker A: The principle for draft strategy: Always adhere to making situational decisions based on the draft pick order and player value.
Speaker B: The principle for draft strategy: The attitude has always been that the team's critical need for forwards must be prioritized.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in stance throughout the entire conversation of the speaker who said ‘if they stay at nine, let me put the emphasis on if they stay at nine’ from 27.665 to 35.105 seconds in the audio, and the speaker who said ‘I think you gotta go need’ from 117.345 to 133.895 seconds? Please choose the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Principle on draft strategy: Always insists that decisions should be made situationally based on draft position and player value; Speaker B: Principle on draft strategy: The attitude has always been that the team's urgent need for its front line must be prioritized.
- B. Speaker A: Principle for the draft strategy: from [supporting drafting linemen] → [switched to supporting drafting cornerbacks]; Speaker B: Principle for the draft strategy: from [supporting drafting cornerbacks] → [switched to supporting drafting linemen].
- C. Speaker A: Principle on draft strategy: The stance has always been to prioritize addressing the team's critical need for frontline players; Speaker B: Principle on draft strategy: Consistently maintains that decisions should be made situationally based on draft position and player value.
- D. Speaker A: Principle of the draft strategy: The two finally reached a consensus on the draft strategy; Speaker B: Principle of the draft strategy: The two finally reached a consensus on the draft strategy.

Speaker A: Principle on draft strategy: Always adhere to making situational decisions based on draft order and player value.
Speaker B: Principle on draft strategy: The attitude has always been that the team's urgent need for forwards must be prioritized.


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: Which of the following speaker profiles best describes the speaker in the single-speaker audio below?

Choices:
- A. Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Happy; Accent: General American English
- B. Gender: Female; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Angry; Accent: General American English
- C. Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Surprised; Accent: General American
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine)

Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Surprised; Accent: General American English

um But that just seems a little, it seems a little odd to me, you know, that that these guys would wait through the spring.

I guess that MCL tore his self away from


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: Which of the following speaker profiles most closely matches the speaker in the audio from 58.425 seconds to 66.745 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Gender: Male; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Surprised; Accent: General American English
- B. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine)
- C. Gender: Male; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Happy; Accent: General American English
- D. Gender: Female voice; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Angry; Accent: General American English

Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Surprised; Accent: General American English


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: Which of the following best describes the persona of the speaker who said ‘it seems a little odd to me’ in the audio?

Choices:
- A. Gender: Female voice; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Angry; Accent: General American English
- B. Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Surprised; Accent: General American English
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine)
- D. Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Happy; Accent: General American English

Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Surprised; Accent: General American English


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: Which of the following speaker profiles is the closest match for the speaker who said ‘that just seems a little, it seems a little odd to me’ between 58.425 and 66.745 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine)
- B. Gender: Male; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Happy; Accent: General American English
- C. Gender: Female; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Angry; Accent: General American English
- D. Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Surprised; Accent: General American English

Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Surprised; Accent: General American English


说话人识别能力-说话人反向检索任务

Question:
In the following statements, which ones were said by the first speaker in the conversation? Please select the most fitting option.
Candidate statements:
1) So, they had the spring game over over this past weekend.
2) But but it puts them in a bad spot, 'cause just 'cause you hit the portal, doesn't mean somebody gonna take you.
3) Now these are all players that uh were on last year's one and eleven team.
4) The head coach must be considering some major roster changes now.
5) I'm is is everything right at Colorado right now?
6) uh, It looked like everything was clicking there, and he's decided to uh to go into the portal.

Choices:
- A. 1, 4, 6
- B. 1, 3, 5, 6
- C. 1, 2, 5, 6
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine)

Dude, if he has a killer year in Colorado, why stay?


说话人识别能力-说话人检索任务

Question: The speaker from 33.055 to 36.015 seconds, what is their order of appearance in the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. spk_2
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to identify the speaker)
- C. spk_1
- D. spk_4


说话人识别能力-说话人检索任务

Question: The speaker who said ‘So, they had the spring game over over this past weekend.’ is which speaker to appear in the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. spk_4
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to identify the speaker)
- C. spk_2
- D. spk_1


说话人识别能力-说话人检索任务

Question: The male speaker who said ‘So, they had the spring game over over this past weekend.’ in the audio between 33.055 and 36.015 seconds, which speaker is he by order of appearance in the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. spk_1
- B. spk_4
- C. spk_2
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to identify the speaker)


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: In the following audio, what is the speaker's emotion? How did this emotion affect the other people throughout the conversation?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Anger and dissatisfaction; Impact: Makes <spk_2> feel tense and try to change the topic to ease the atmosphere.
- B. Emotion: Surprise and confusion; Impact: Led to <spk_2> also expressing surprise and asking if this number set a record.
- C. Emotion: Surprise and confusion; Impact: Caused <spk_3> to find the situation suspicious and propose their own speculation.
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence to uniquely determine)

Emotion: Surprise and confusion; Impact: Caused <spk_2> to also express surprise and ask if this number set a record.

But I I just find I just find it curious um that this many this many guys are leaving, I guess thirty-one players.

Is that like a record?


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What is the emotion of the speaker (<spk_1>) in the audio from 268.265 to 277.425 seconds? What impact did this emotion have on others in the conversation?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Surprise and confusion; Impact: Causes <spk_3> to believe the situation is suspicious and propose their own speculation.
- B. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence to uniquely determine)
- C. Emotion: Anger and dissatisfaction; Impact: Makes <spk_2> feel tense and try to change the subject to ease the atmosphere.
- D. Emotion: Surprise and confusion; Impact: Causes <spk_2> to also express surprise and ask if this number has set a record.

Emotion: Surprise and confusion; Impact: Caused <spk_2> to also express surprise and ask if this number set a record.

Is that like a record?


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What emotion is the speaker (<spk_1>), who says in the audio “I just find it curious um that this many this many guys are leaving”, expressing? What impact did this emotion have on others in the conversation?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Surprise and confusion; Impact: Caused <spk_2> to also express surprise and ask whether this number set a record.
- B. Emotion: Anger and dissatisfaction; Impact: Makes <spk_2> feel tense and try to change the topic to ease the atmosphere.
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence to uniquely determine)
- D. Emotion: Surprise and confusion; Impact: Causes <spk_3> to find the situation suspicious and propose their own speculation.

Emotion: Surprise and confusion; Impact: Causes <spk_2> to also express surprise and ask if this figure set a record.

Is that like a record?


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What was the emotion of the speaker (<spk_1>) who said "I just find it curious" in the audio from second 268.265 to second 277.425? What effect did this emotion have on others?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Surprise and confusion; Effect: Caused <spk_3> to think the situation was suspicious and make their own guess.
- B. Emotion: Surprise and confusion; Impact: Causes <spk_2> to also express surprise and ask if this number set a record.
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine)
- D. Emotion: Anger and dissatisfaction; Effect: Makes <spk_2> feel tense and try to change the subject to defuse the situation.

Emotion: Surprise and confusion; Impact: Caused <spk_2> to also express surprise and ask if this number set a record.

Is that like a record?


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the stances of the two speakers in the following audio throughout the entire conversation? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Plays the role of the rule-maker, supporting the development of the game concept by proposing and refining rules; Speaker B: Actively participates in the game and enthusiastically expands the game idea into a large-scale live streaming event.
- B. Speaker A: Actively participates in the game and enthusiastically expands the game concept into a large-scale live streaming event; Speaker B: Plays the role of the rule-maker, supporting the development of the game concept by proposing and refining the rules.
- C. Speaker A: Always insists on the original simple gameplay and opposes complicating the rules; Speaker B: Is indifferent to the game rules and only focuses on winning or losing.
- D. Speaker A: proposed many ideas for the game; Speaker B: agreed with the other person's views multiple times in the dialogue.

Speaker A: Actively participates in the game and enthusiastically expands the game concept into a large-scale live-streamed event; Speaker B: Plays the role of a rule-maker, supporting the development of the game concept by proposing and refining the rules.

Yeah, and then we do it on live, and then when someone, and when they're gone, I would bring a new person in, and whoever's hosting it live keeps going or Right?

I think the guy who hits it should have to flip, take a break and flip it.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the stance in the entire conversation of the speaker talking from 85.06 to 94.9 seconds and the speaker talking from 47.57 to 50.89 seconds? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Actively participates in the game and enthusiastically expands the game concept into a large-scale livestreaming event; Speaker B: Plays the role of the rule-maker, supporting the development of the game concept by proposing and refining the rules.
- B. Speaker A: Plays the role of the rule-maker, supporting the development of the game concept by proposing and refining rules; Speaker B: Actively participates in the game and enthusiastically expands the game idea into a large-scale live-streaming event.
- C. Speaker A: Is indifferent to the game rules and only focuses on winning or losing; Speaker B: Always insists on the original, simple way of playing and opposes complicating the rules.
- D. Both speakers are actively discussing the gameplay, but have not formed clear individual stances.

Speaker A: Actively participates in the game and enthusiastically expands the game concept into a large-scale live-streamed event; Speaker B: Plays the role of the rule-maker, supporting the development of the game concept by proposing and refining the rules.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the stance of the speaker who said ‘and then we do it on live’ and the speaker who said ‘the guy who hits it should have to flip’ in the entire conversation? Please choose the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: offered many constructive suggestions for the game; Speaker B: was mainly responsible for executing the game rules.
- B. Speaker A: Always sticks to the original simple gameplay and opposes complicating the rules; Speaker B: Is indifferent to the game rules, only focusing on winning or losing.
- C. Speaker A: Actively participates in the game and enthusiastically expands the game idea into a large-scale live streaming event; Speaker B: Plays the role of a rule-maker, supporting the development of the game concept by proposing and refining rules.
- D. Speaker A: Acts as the rule-setter, responsible for explaining the rules; Speaker B: As a game participant, enthusiastically pushes for the expansion of the game concept.

Speaker A: Actively participates in the game and enthusiastically expands the game idea into a large-scale live-streaming event; Speaker B: Plays the role of a rule-maker, supporting the development of the game concept by proposing and refining rules.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the respective stances of the 2nd speaker and the 3rd speaker in the dialogue? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Acts as the rule-maker, proposing and refining rules to support the development of the game concept; Speaker B: Actively participates in the game and enthusiastically expands the game concept into a large-scale live streaming event.
- B. Speaker A: Is indifferent to the rules of the game, focusing only on winning or losing; Speaker B: Always sticks to the original, simple way of playing and opposes complicating the rules.
- C. Both speakers are actively discussing the gameplay, but have not formed a clear personal stance.
- D. Speaker A: Actively participates in the game and enthusiastically expands the game concept into a large-scale livestreaming event; Speaker B: Plays the role of a rule-maker, supporting the development of the game concept by proposing and refining the rules.

Speaker A: Actively participates in the game and enthusiastically expands the game concept into a large-scale live-streaming event; Speaker B: Plays the role of a rule-maker, supporting the development of the game concept by proposing and refining rules.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the stance in the entire conversation of the speaker in the audio who said ‘and then we do it on live’ from 85.06 to 94.9 seconds, and the speaker who said ‘the guy who hits it should have to flip’ from 47.57 to 50.89 seconds? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Actively participates in the game and enthusiastically expands the game concept into a large-scale live-streaming event; Speaker B: Plays the role of the rule-maker, supporting the development of the game concept by proposing and refining the rules.
- B. Speaker A: Plays the role of the rule-maker, responsible for explaining the rules; Speaker B: As a game participant, enthusiastically pushes for the expansion of the game concept.
- C. Speaker A: proposed many ideas for the game; Speaker B: agreed with the other person's views multiple times during the conversation.
- D. Speaker A: Always sticks to the original, simple gameplay and opposes complicating the rules; Speaker B: Is indifferent to the game rules, only focusing on winning or losing.

Speaker A: Actively participates in the game and enthusiastically expands the game concept into a large-scale live streaming event;
Speaker B: Plays the role of a rule-maker, supporting the development of the game concept by proposing and refining rules.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in the stances of the two speakers throughout the entire conversation in the audio below? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Development of the game concept: From 【passively participating and understanding current rules】→【shifting to actively conceiving and proposing a large-scale live-streamed event】; Speaker B: Development of the game concept: attitude has always been 【making the game more interesting by creating and refining rules】.
- B. Speaker A: Attitude towards the game's penalty: from [readily accepting] → [to strongly resisting]; Speaker B: Attitude towards the game's rules: from [insisting on their own opinion] → [to completely giving in to the other's plan].
- C. Speaker A: Development of the game concept: Attitude has always been 【to make the game more interesting by creating and improving rules】; Speaker B: Development of the game concept: From 【passively participating in and understanding current rules】→【to actively conceiving and proposing a large-scale live stream event】.
- D. Speaker A: Changes their opinion on games as the conversation progresses; Speaker B: Shows a flexible attitude in the discussion.

Speaker A: Development of the game concept: From [passively participating and understanding current rules] → [shifting to actively conceiving and proposing a large-scale live streaming event]; Speaker B: Development of the game concept: Attitude has always been [making the game more interesting by creating and refining the rules].


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in stance throughout the entire conversation for the speaker who speaks from 85.06 to 94.9 seconds and the speaker who speaks from 47.57 to 50.89 seconds in the audio? Please select the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: On the development of the game concept: the attitude has always been to 【make the game more interesting by establishing and perfecting the rules】; Speaker B: On the development of the game concept: from 【passive participation】→【actively conceiving live stream activities】.
- B. Speaker A: Development of the game concept: from 【passively participating and understanding the current rules】→【actively conceiving and proposing a large-scale live streaming event】; Speaker B: Development of the game concept: attitude has always been 【to make the game more interesting by creating and refining the rules】.
- C. Speaker A: Their opinion on the game changes as the conversation progresses; Speaker B: Shows a flexible attitude in the discussion.
- D. Speaker A: Attitude towards the game's penalty: From [gladly accepting] → [strongly resisting]; Speaker B: Attitude towards the game's rules: From [insisting on their own view] → [completely compromising].

Speaker A: On the development of the game concept: From 【passively participating and understanding the current rules】→【shifting to actively conceiving and proposing a large-scale live streaming event】;
Speaker B: On the development of the game concept: The attitude has always been 【to make the game more interesting by establishing and perfecting the rules】.