说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the speaker who said ‘What's wrong with Long Er?’ in the audio?

Choices:
- A. Female
- B. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine gender)
- C. Male
- D. Undetermined gender

龙二怎么了？

哎，还不因为你家那院房啊，给龙二定了个地主。


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: In the entire conversation, what is the gender of the first speaker (spk_1)?

Choices:
- A. Uncertain gender
- B. Male
- C. Female
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine gender)

龙二怎么了？

Standard Mandarin, with a slight Northern accent

哎，还不因为你家那院房啊，给龙二定了个地主。


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: What is the gender of the speaker who said ‘What happened to Long Er?’ from 38.02 to 38.78 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Male
- B. Female
- C. Undetermined gender
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine gender)

龙二怎么了？

哎，还不因为你家那院房啊，给龙二定了个地主。


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, which speakers are female? (Answer with spk_index) Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. spk_1
- B. spk_3
- C. spk_1、spk_3
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine gender)

龙二怎么了？

哎，还不因为你家那院房啊，给龙二定了个地主。


说话人属性识别能力-性别识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, how many male speakers are there? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. 1
- B. 4
- C. 5
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine gender)

龙二怎么了？

哎，还不因为你家那院房啊，给龙二定了个地主。


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: In the single-speaker audio below, the speaker's profile is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Gender: Female voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: Standard Mandarin
- B. Unable to determine (insufficient information to determine)
- C. Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Fearful; Accent: Standard Mandarin, with a slight Northern accent
- D. Gender: Female voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Happy; Accent: Standard Mandarin

Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Fear; Accent: Standard Mandarin, with a slight northern accent

啊，不对不对，不是我们家的木头啊，那是反革命的木头。

哎，还不因为你家那院房啊，给龙二定了个地主。


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: Which of the following best describes the speaker's profile for the person speaking in the audio from 76.53 seconds to 80.37 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine)
- B. Gender: Female voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Happy; Accent: Standard Mandarin
- C. Gender: Female voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: Standard Mandarin
- D. Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Fear; Accent: Standard Mandarin, with a slight northern accent

Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Fearful; Accent: Standard Mandarin, with a slight northern accent

啊，不对不对，不是我们家的木头啊，那是反革命的木头。

哎，还不因为你家那院房啊，给龙二定了个地主。


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: The profile of the speaker in the audio who said ‘This isn't our family's wood, that's counter-revolutionary wood’ is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Fear; Accent: Standard Mandarin, with a slight Northern accent
- B. Gender: Female; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Happy; Accent: Standard Mandarin
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)
- D. Gender: Female; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: Standard Mandarin

Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Fear; Accent: Standard Mandarin, with a slight northern accent

啊，不对不对，不是我们家的木头啊，那是反革命的木头。

哎，还不因为你家那院房啊，给龙二定了个地主。


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: What is the gender of the first speaker in the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. Child's voice
- B. Male voice
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine)
- D. Female voice

啊，不对不对，不是我们家的木头啊，那是反革命的木头。

哎，还不因为你家那院房啊，给龙二定了个地主。


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: Which of the following speaker profiles is the closest match for the speaker who said ‘啊，不对不对，不是我们家的木头啊’ between 76.53 and 80.37 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Gender: Female; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Happy; Accent: Standard Mandarin
- B. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine)
- C. Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Fear; Accent: Standard Mandarin, with a slight Northern accent
- D. Gender: Female voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: Standard Mandarin

Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Fear; Accent: Standard Mandarin, with a slight Northern accent

啊，不对不对，不是我们家的木头啊，那是反革命的木头。

哎，还不因为你家那院房啊，给龙二定了个地主。


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: Throughout the entire audio, which speakers have the profile “Gender: Male; Age: Middle-aged”? (Answer with spk_index) Please select the one that best fits.

Choices:
- A. spk_1、spk_2、spk_4
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine)
- C. spk_1、spk_2、spk_4、spk_5
- D. spk_1、spk_2、spk_3、spk_4、spk_5

啊，不对不对，不是我们家的木头啊，那是反革命的木头。

哎，还不因为你家那院房啊，给龙二定了个地主。


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: In the entire audio, how many speakers are there with the profile "Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged"? Please choose the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information)
- B. 4
- C. 3
- D. 10

啊，不对不对，不是我们家的木头啊，那是反革命的木头。

哎，还不因为你家那院房啊，给龙二定了个地主。


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the speaker in the following single-person audio, throughout the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. Believed that they deceived and resisted imperial officials, an unpardonable crime that must be severely punished.
- B. Believed they were at fault, but was moved by the deep bond between the father and son and ultimately decided not to hold them responsible.
- C. Believed that although they were at fault, there were extenuating circumstances, and decided to take them to the capital to make amends through meritorious service.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely lead to the conclusion/change).

Moved by the deep bond between the father and son, it was ultimately decided to no longer hold them responsible.

本官再问你一次。

你到底肯不肯跟我上京？

本官那么赏识你，你居然太叫我失望。

来人，把他们抓起来。

乃念你们父慈子孝，本官不追究这件事，你就留在这吧。

你的胆子可真不小，居然连我师傅也敢骗。

师傅，这个人出尔反尔，还存心欺骗，一定要严加治罪。

师傅，他们以下犯上，不能就这么算了呀！


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the speaker from 5.26s to 6.42s in the audio, throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Believed that they deceived and resisted imperial officials, that their crime was unforgivable, and that they must be severely punished.
- B. Believed that although they were at fault, it was excusable, and decided to take them to the capital to redeem themselves.
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine the viewpoint/change).
- D. Believed that although they were at fault, was touched by their deep father-son bond and ultimately decided not to hold them responsible.

Moved by the deep bond between the father and son, they ultimately decided not to hold him accountable.

本官再问你一次。

你到底肯不肯跟我上京？

本官那么赏识你，你居然太叫我失望。

来人，把他们抓起来。

乃念你们父慈子孝，本官不追究这件事，你就留在这吧。

你的胆子可真不小，居然连我师傅也敢骗。

师傅，这个人出尔反尔，还存心欺骗，一定要严加治罪。

师傅，他们以下犯上，不能就这么算了呀！


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance in the entire dialogue of the speaker in the audio who says, ‘I will ask you one more time’?

Choices:
- A. Believed that although they were at fault, it was excusable, and decided to take them to the capital to make amends.
- B. Cannot be determined (The evidence is insufficient to uniquely derive the conclusion/change).
- C. Acknowledged their fault, but, moved by their deep father-son bond, ultimately decided not to hold them responsible.
- D. Believed they deceived and resisted court-appointed officials, an unforgivable crime that must be severely punished.

Moved by the deep bond between the father and son, they ultimately decided to no longer hold him responsible.

本官再问你一次。

你到底肯不肯跟我上京？

本官那么赏识你，你居然太叫我失望。

来人，把他们抓起来。

乃念你们父慈子孝，本官不追究这件事，你就留在这吧。

你的胆子可真不小，居然连我师傅也敢骗。

师傅，这个人出尔反尔，还存心欺骗，一定要严加治罪。

师傅，他们以下犯上，不能就这么算了呀！


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance in the entire dialogue of the speaker who says ‘I will ask you one more time’ between 5.26s and 6.42s in the audio?

Choices:
- A. Acknowledged that they were at fault, but was moved by their deep father-son bond and decided to no longer hold them responsible.
- B. Believed that they deceived and resisted imperial officials, an unforgivable crime that must be severely punished.
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely deduce the conclusion/change).
- D. Believed that although they were at fault, their actions were excusable, and decided to take them to the capital to make amends.

Moved by their deep father-son bond, they ultimately decided not to hold them responsible.

本官再问你一次。

你到底肯不肯跟我上京？

本官那么赏识你，你居然太叫我失望。

来人，把他们抓起来。

乃念你们父慈子孝，本官不追究这件事，你就留在这吧。

你的胆子可真不小，居然连我师傅也敢骗。

师傅，这个人出尔反尔，还存心欺骗，一定要严加治罪。

师傅，他们以下犯上，不能就这么算了呀！


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the 3rd speaker to appear (spk_3) throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Believed that although they were at fault, it was excusable, and decided to take them to the capital to redeem themselves.
- B. Believed that they deceived and resisted court officials, an unforgivable crime that must be severely punished.
- C. Believed they were at fault, but was moved by their deep father-son bond and ultimately decided not to hold them accountable.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine the conclusion/change).

Moved by their deep father-son bond, they ultimately decided not to hold them accountable.

本官再问你一次。

你到底肯不肯跟我上京？

本官那么赏识你，你居然太叫我失望。

来人，把他们抓起来。

乃念你们父慈子孝，本官不追究这件事，你就留在这吧。

你的胆子可真不小，居然连我师傅也敢骗。

师傅，这个人出尔反尔，还存心欺骗，一定要严加治罪。

师傅，他们以下犯上，不能就这么算了呀！


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the speaker's stance change throughout the entire conversation in the single-person audio below?

Choices:
- A. Always insist that the other party has gone back on their word and been deliberately deceptive, and advocate that they must be severely punished.
- B. From initial appreciation and invitation → to final disappointment, and deciding to take both the father and son away.
- C. Cannot be determined (The evidence is insufficient to uniquely lead to the conclusion/change).
- D. From initial disappointment and anger, deciding to capture and punish them → to ultimately being moved by the deep bond between father and son and deciding to forgive them.

From initial disappointment and anger, and deciding to capture and punish them → to finally being moved by the deep bond between the father and son and deciding to forgive them.

本官再问你一次。

你到底肯不肯跟我上京？

本官那么赏识你，你居然太叫我失望。

来人，把他们抓起来。

乃念你们父慈子孝，本官不追究这件事，你就留在这吧。

你的胆子可真不小，居然连我师傅也敢骗。

师傅，这个人出尔反尔，还存心欺骗，一定要严加治罪。

师傅，他们以下犯上，不能就这么算了呀！


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker from 5.26 to 6.42 seconds in the audio change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely lead to the viewpoint/change).
- B. From initial disappointment and anger, deciding to arrest and punish them → to ultimately being moved by the deep bond between the father and son and deciding to forgive them.
- C. To firmly maintain that the other party is duplicitous and deliberately deceptive, and advocate for their severe punishment.
- D. From initial admiration and invitation → to final disappointment and the decision to take both the father and son away.

From initial disappointment and anger, deciding to capture and punish them → to finally being moved by the deep father-son bond and deciding to forgive them.

本官再问你一次。

你到底肯不肯跟我上京？

本官那么赏识你，你居然太叫我失望。

来人，把他们抓起来。

乃念你们父慈子孝，本官不追究这件事，你就留在这吧。

你的胆子可真不小，居然连我师傅也敢骗。

师傅，这个人出尔反尔，还存心欺骗，一定要严加治罪。

师傅，他们以下犯上，不能就这么算了呀！


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker, who said ‘本官再问你一次’ in the audio, change throughout the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. From initial disappointment and anger, deciding to capture and punish them → to finally being moved by the deep bond between the father and son and deciding to forgive them.
- B. From initial appreciation and invitation → to final disappointment, and deciding to take both the father and son away.
- C. Firmly maintaining that the other party has gone back on their word and is deliberately deceptive, and arguing that they must be severely punished.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely support the viewpoint/change).

From initial disappointment and anger, deciding to capture and punish them → to ultimately deciding to forgive them, moved by the deep bond between the father and son.

本官再问你一次。

你到底肯不肯跟我上京？

本官那么赏识你，你居然太叫我失望。

来人，把他们抓起来。

乃念你们父慈子孝，本官不追究这件事，你就留在这吧。

你的胆子可真不小，居然连我师傅也敢骗。

师傅，这个人出尔反尔，还存心欺骗，一定要严加治罪。

师傅，他们以下犯上，不能就这么算了呀！


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How did the stance of the speaker who said ‘本官再问你一次’ from 5.26s to 6.42s in the audio change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. From initial admiration and invitation → to final disappointment, and deciding to take both the father and son away.
- B. 始终坚持对方出尔反尔、存心欺骗，主张必须严加治罪。
- C. From initial disappointment and anger, deciding to capture and punish them → to ultimately being moved by the deep father-son bond and forgiving them.
- D. Cannot be determined (The evidence is insufficient to lead to a single viewpoint/change).

From initial disappointment and anger, deciding to capture and punish them → to finally deciding to forgive them, moved by the deep bond between the father and son.

本官再问你一次。

你到底肯不肯跟我上京？

本官那么赏识你，你居然太叫我失望。

来人，把他们抓起来。

乃念你们父慈子孝，本官不追究这件事，你就留在这吧。

你的胆子可真不小，居然连我师傅也敢骗。

师傅，这个人出尔反尔，还存心欺骗，一定要严加治罪。

师傅，他们以下犯上，不能就这么算了呀！


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the third speaker to appear (spk_3) change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (The evidence is insufficient to uniquely determine the conclusion/change).
- B. From the initial disappointment and anger, and the decision to arrest and punish them → to finally being moved by the deep father-son bond and deciding to forgive them.
- C. From initial appreciation and invitation → to final disappointment, and deciding to take both the father and son away.
- D. Always insisting that the other party has broken their word and is intentionally deceptive, and advocating for their severe punishment.

From the initial disappointment and anger, and deciding to arrest and punish them → to ultimately being moved by the deep bond between the father and son and deciding to forgive them.

本官再问你一次。

你到底肯不肯跟我上京？

本官那么赏识你，你居然太叫我失望。

来人，把他们抓起来。

乃念你们父慈子孝，本官不追究这件事，你就留在这吧。

你的胆子可真不小，居然连我师傅也敢骗。

师傅，这个人出尔反尔，还存心欺骗，一定要严加治罪。

师傅，他们以下犯上，不能就这么算了呀！


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the position of the two speakers throughout the entire conversation in the following audio? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Ultimately deciding to fight the other person to the death at any cost to protect his son; Speaker B: Forcing the other person to fight by threatening and humiliating their son.
- B. Speaker A: Hopes to persuade the other party through negotiation to avoid unnecessary bloodshed; Speaker B: Tries to find out the secret about the other party's son, and therefore constantly probes them.
- C. Speaker A: has a complex attitude, hesitating between fighting and backing down; Speaker B: is surprised by the direction of the conversation and is trying to control the situation.
- D. Speaker A: Forces the other person to fight by threatening and humiliating their son; Speaker B: To protect their son, ultimately decides to fight the other person to the death at any cost.

Speaker A: To protect his son, he ultimately decides to fight the other party to the death at any cost; Speaker B: Forces the other party to fight by threatening and humiliating their son.

他是我儿子，不是狗！

秦一刀，我只要把刀拔了，你徒弟就没命了。


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the stance throughout the entire conversation of the speaker who speaks from 61.75 seconds to 64.63 seconds and the speaker who speaks from 45.31 seconds to 50.11 seconds in the audio? Please choose the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Forces the other party to fight by threatening and humiliating their son; Speaker B: To protect their son, ultimately decides to fight the other party to the death at any cost.
- B. Speaker A: To protect his son, ultimately decides to fight the other party to the death at any cost; Speaker B: Forces the other party to accept the challenge by threatening and humiliating their son.
- C. Speaker A: Hopes to persuade the other party through negotiation to avoid unnecessary bloodshed; Speaker B: Tries to uncover the secret about the other party's son, and therefore constantly probes them.
- D. Speaker A: Has a complex attitude, hesitating between fighting and retreating; Speaker B: Is surprised by the direction of the conversation and tries to control the situation.

Speaker A: To protect his son, he ultimately decides to fight the other party to the death at all costs; Speaker B: He forces the other party to fight by threatening and humiliating their son.

他是我儿子，不是狗！

秦一刀，我只要把刀拔了，你徒弟就没命了。


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the stance in the entire conversation of the speaker who said ‘He is my son, not a dog’ and the speaker who said ‘If I pull out the knife, your apprentice will die’ in the audio? Please choose the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Has a complex attitude, wavering between fighting and retreating; Speaker B: Is surprised by the direction of the conversation and is trying to control the situation.
- B. Speaker A: Forces the other person to fight by threatening and humiliating their son; Speaker B: To protect their son, ultimately decides to fight the other person to the death at any cost.
- C. Speaker A: To protect his son, ultimately decides to fight the opponent to the death at all costs; Speaker B: Threatens and humiliates the opponent's son to force them to fight.
- D. Speaker A: Hopes to persuade the other party through negotiation to avoid unnecessary bloodshed; Speaker B: Tries to find out the secret about the other party's son, and therefore constantly probes them.

Speaker A: To protect his son, he ultimately decides to fight his opponent to the death at any cost; Speaker B: Provokes the opponent into fighting by threatening and humiliating their son.

他是我儿子，不是狗！

秦一刀，我只要把刀拔了，你徒弟就没命了。


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the respective stances of the 1st speaker and the 2nd speaker in the entire conversation? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: To protect his son, ultimately decides to fight the opponent to the death at all costs; Speaker B: Forces the opponent to fight by threatening and humiliating their son.
- B. Speaker A: Forces the other party to fight by threatening and humiliating their son; Speaker B: To protect their son, ultimately decides to fight the other party to the death at any cost.
- C. Speaker A: Has a complex attitude, hesitating between fighting and retreating; Speaker B: Is surprised by the direction of the conversation and tries to control the situation.
- D. Speaker A: Hopes to persuade the other party through negotiation to avoid unnecessary bloodshed and conflict; Speaker B: Is trying to find out the secret about the other party's son, and therefore constantly probes the other party.

Speaker A: To protect his son, he ultimately decided to fight the other party to the death at all costs; Speaker B: Forced the other party to fight by threatening and humiliating their son.

他是我儿子，不是狗！

秦一刀，我只要把刀拔了，你徒弟就没命了。


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the stance in the entire dialogue of the speaker who said ‘He is my son, not a dog’ from second 61.75 to 64.63 in the audio, and the speaker who said ‘If I pull out the knife, your apprentice will die’ from second 45.31 to 50.11? Please choose the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Hopes to persuade the other party through negotiation and avoid unnecessary bloodshed; Speaker B: Tries to find out the secret about the other party's son, and therefore constantly probes them.
- B. Speaker A: To protect his son, he ultimately decides to fight the opponent to the death at any cost; Speaker B: Forces the opponent to fight by threatening and humiliating the opponent's son.
- C. Speaker A: Forces the other party to accept the challenge by threatening and humiliating their son; Speaker B: To protect his son, ultimately decides to fight the other party to the death at any cost.
- D. Speaker A: Has a complex attitude, wavering between fighting and retreating; Speaker B: Is surprised by the direction of the conversation and is trying to control the situation.

Speaker A: To protect his son, he ultimately decides to fight his opponent to the death at any cost; Speaker B: Forces his opponent to fight by threatening and humiliating their son.

他是我儿子，不是狗！

秦一刀，我只要把刀拔了，你徒弟就没命了。


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in the stances of the two speakers in the following audio throughout the entire conversation? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Regarding whether to fight: from [firmly refusing due to past sacrifices] → [resolving to fight to protect his son]; Speaker B: Regarding forcing the other party to act: his attitude has always been [unscrupulous and resolute execution].
- B. Speaker A: On forcing the other party to act: attitude has always been 【unscrupulous, resolute in execution】; Speaker B: On whether to fight back: from 【firmly refusing due to past sacrifices】→【determined to fight to protect his son】.
- C. Speaker A: Attitude towards his son: From [denying the relationship] → [acknowledging the father-son relationship]; Speaker B: Attitude towards the duel: From [a mere provocation] → [becoming a real life-or-death struggle].
- D. Speaker A: Emotional change: from [sadness and lament] → [anger and determination]; Speaker B: Dialogue strategy: from [direct command] → [psychological pressure].

Speaker A: Regarding whether to fight: From 【firmly refusing due to past sacrifices】→【determined to fight to protect his son】; Speaker B: Regarding forcing the other party to act: Attitude has always been 【unscrupulous, and resolute in execution】.

他是我儿子，不是狗！

秦一刀，我只要把刀拔了，你徒弟就没命了。


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in the stances of the speaker who speaks from 61.75s to 64.63s and the speaker who speaks from 45.31s to 50.11s in the dialogue in the audio? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Emotional change: from [Sorrow and lament] → [Anger and determination]; Speaker B: Dialogue strategy: from [Direct command] → [Psychological pressure].
- B. Speaker A: Regarding whether to fight: from [resolutely refusing due to past sacrifices] → [determined to fight to protect his son]; Speaker B: Regarding forcing the other party to make a move: his attitude has always been [by any means necessary, resolute in execution].
- C. Speaker A: Regarding forcing the other party to act: the attitude has always been 【By any means necessary, resolute in execution】; Speaker B: Regarding whether to accept the challenge: from 【Resolutely refusing due to past sacrifices】→【Resolving to fight in order to protect their son】.
- D. Speaker A: Attitude towards his son: from [denying the relationship] → [acknowledging the father-son relationship]; Speaker B: Attitude towards the duel: from [a mere provocation] → [becoming a true life-and-death struggle].

Speaker A: Regarding whether to fight: from [firmly refusing due to past sacrifices] → [determined to fight to protect his son]; Speaker B: Regarding forcing the other party to act: the attitude has always been [by any means necessary, resolute execution].

他是我儿子，不是狗！

秦一刀，我只要把刀拔了，你徒弟就没命了。


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in the stances of the speaker who said ‘He is my son, not a dog’ and the speaker who said ‘Once I pull out the knife, your apprentice will die’ throughout the entire conversation? Please choose the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: On forcing the opponent to make a move: the attitude has always been 【By any means necessary, and resolute in execution】; Speaker B: On whether to accept the challenge: from 【Firmly refusing due to past sacrifices】 → 【Resolving to fight to protect their son】.
- B. Speaker A: Attitude towards his son: from 【denying the relationship】→【acknowledging the father-son relationship】; Speaker B: Attitude towards the duel: from 【mere provocation】→【becoming a genuine fight to the death】.
- C. Speaker A: On whether to fight: from [resolutely refusing due to past sacrifices] → [determined to fight to protect his son]; Speaker B: On forcing the opponent to act: his attitude has always been [unscrupulous and resolute in execution].
- D. Speaker A: Emotional change: from [Sorrow and lament] -> [Anger and determination]; Speaker B: Dialogue strategy: from [Direct command] -> [Applying psychological pressure].

Speaker A: Regarding whether to fight: from [resolutely refusing due to past sacrifices] → [determined to fight to protect his son]; Speaker B: Regarding forcing the other party to act: his attitude has always been [unscrupulous and resolute in execution].

他是我儿子，不是狗！

秦一刀，我只要把刀拔了，你徒弟就没命了。


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: Throughout the entire conversation, what are the respective changes in the stances of the first speaker and the second speaker? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Regarding whether to fight: from [resolutely refusing due to past sacrifices] → [determined to fight to protect their son]; Speaker B: Regarding forcing the other party to fight: attitude has always been [unscrupulous, and resolute in execution].
- B. Speaker A: Emotional change: from [Sadness and lamentation] → [Anger and determination]; Speaker B: Dialogue strategy: from [Direct command] → [Psychological pressure].
- C. Speaker A: On forcing the other party to act: attitude has always been [by any means necessary, resolute in execution]; Speaker B: On whether to fight back: from [firmly refusing due to past sacrifices] → [determined to fight to protect their son].
- D. Speaker A: Attitude towards his son: from [denying the relationship] → [admitting the father-son relationship]; Speaker B: Attitude towards the duel: from [simple provocation] → [becoming a real life-and-death struggle].

Speaker A: Regarding whether to fight: From [resolutely refusing due to past sacrifices] → [determined to fight to protect his son];
Speaker B: Regarding forcing the other party to make a move: His attitude has always been [by any means necessary, resolutely execute].

他是我儿子，不是狗！

秦一刀，我只要把刀拔了，你徒弟就没命了。


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in stance throughout the entire conversation between the speaker who said 'He is my son, not a dog' from 61.75s to 64.63s and the speaker who said 'If I just pull out the knife, your apprentice will die' from 45.31s to 50.11s? Please choose the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Attitude towards his son: From 【Denying the relationship】→【Acknowledging the father-son relationship】; Speaker B: Attitude towards the duel: From 【Mere provocation】→【Turning into a real life-and-death battle】。
- B. Speaker A: Emotional Change: From 【Sadness and Lament】→【Anger and Determination】; Speaker B: Dialogue Strategy: From 【Direct Command】→【Psychological Pressure】.
- C. Speaker A: Regarding forcing the other party to act: attitude has always been【By any means necessary, resolutely carried out】; Speaker B: Regarding whether to fight back: from【Firmly refusing due to past sacrifices】→【Determined to fight to protect their son】.
- D. Speaker A: Regarding whether to fight: From 【firmly refusing due to past sacrifices】→【determined to fight to protect his son】; Speaker B: Regarding forcing the other party to act: attitude has always been 【to use any means necessary and execute with resolve】.

Speaker A: Regarding whether to accept the challenge: from [resolutely refusing due to past sacrifices] → [determined to fight to protect his son]; Speaker B: Regarding forcing the other party to fight: the attitude has always been [to use any means necessary and execute it resolutely].

他是我儿子，不是狗！

秦一刀，我只要把刀拔了，你徒弟就没命了。


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the speaker in the following single-speaker audio throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely deduce the conclusion/change)
- B. Feeling regret and self-blame for taking their anger out on others, and trying to comfort their companion.
- C. Feeling contempt and despair for the status quo, believing their qualifications are useless.
- D. Believes they should resist immediately and calls on their companions to leave together.

Regretting and blaming oneself for taking their anger out on others, and trying to comfort their companion.

你真是没心没肺呀！

我们是有毕业证书的。

解开裤腰带的时候当然不需要了。

你没看见每张麻将台的抽屉都有一千块钱放在里面了吗？

那些男人，他们拼命在你的胸部那蹭来蹭去的，你没有感觉的吗？

我这一辈子也忘不了吃过一顿这样的饭。

我我神经病，我也不知道自己在骂谁，我是生我自己的气，对不起。

哼，我们艺训班那几个礼拜都是吃便当。

有证书又有什么了不起的？

啊？谁要我们解开裤腰带啊？

怎么会沦落成这样？


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance in the entire conversation of the speaker from 28.3 to 29.9 seconds in the audio?

Choices:
- A. Feeling contempt and despair for the current situation, believing their qualifications are useless.
- B. Believes they should resist immediately and calls on their companions to leave together.
- C. Feels regret and self-blame for taking their anger out on others, and tries to comfort their companion.
- D. Cannot be determined (The evidence is insufficient to uniquely deduce the conclusion/change)

Regretting and blaming oneself for taking one's anger out on others, and trying to comfort a companion.

你真是没心没肺呀！

我们是有毕业证书的。

解开裤腰带的时候当然不需要了。

你没看见每张麻将台的抽屉都有一千块钱放在里面了吗？

那些男人，他们拼命在你的胸部那蹭来蹭去的，你没有感觉的吗？

我这一辈子也忘不了吃过一顿这样的饭。

我我神经病，我也不知道自己在骂谁，我是生我自己的气，对不起。

哼，我们艺训班那几个礼拜都是吃便当。

有证书又有什么了不起的？

啊？谁要我们解开裤腰带啊？

怎么会沦落成这样？


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance in the entire conversation of the speaker in the audio who said ‘You're so heartless!’?

Choices:
- A. Believes they should resist immediately and calls on their companions to leave together.
- B. Cannot be determined (The evidence is insufficient to uniquely deduce the viewpoint/change)
- C. Feeling contempt and despair toward the current situation, believing their qualifications are useless.
- D. Feeling regret and self-blame for taking one's anger out on others, and trying to comfort one's companion.

Feeling regret and self-blame for taking one's anger out on others, and trying to comfort a companion

你真是没心没肺呀！

我们是有毕业证书的。

解开裤腰带的时候当然不需要了。

你没看见每张麻将台的抽屉都有一千块钱放在里面了吗？

那些男人，他们拼命在你的胸部那蹭来蹭去的，你没有感觉的吗？

我这一辈子也忘不了吃过一顿这样的饭。

我我神经病，我也不知道自己在骂谁，我是生我自己的气，对不起。

哼，我们艺训班那几个礼拜都是吃便当。

有证书又有什么了不起的？

啊？谁要我们解开裤腰带啊？

怎么会沦落成这样？


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the first speaker (spk_1) throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Regretting and blaming oneself for taking one's anger out on others, and trying to comfort a companion.
- B. Feel contempt and despair for the status quo, believing their qualifications are useless.
- C. Believes they should resist immediately and calls on their companions to leave together
- D. Cannot be determined (The evidence is insufficient to lead to a single conclusion/change)

Feeling regretful and blaming oneself for taking out their anger on others, and trying to comfort their companion.

你真是没心没肺呀！

我们是有毕业证书的。

解开裤腰带的时候当然不需要了。

你没看见每张麻将台的抽屉都有一千块钱放在里面了吗？

那些男人，他们拼命在你的胸部那蹭来蹭去的，你没有感觉的吗？

我这一辈子也忘不了吃过一顿这样的饭。

我我神经病，我也不知道自己在骂谁，我是生我自己的气，对不起。

哼，我们艺训班那几个礼拜都是吃便当。

有证书又有什么了不起的？

啊？谁要我们解开裤腰带啊？

怎么会沦落成这样？


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker in the following single-person audio change throughout the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely support the viewpoint/change)
- B. From angrily reprimanding his companion out of humiliation → to feeling self-blame, apologizing, and expressing empathy after seeing his companion break down
- C. From initial pride and confidence → a transformation to complete despair and giving up on reality
- D. Throughout the entire time, showed a cynical and contemptuous attitude toward the situation, and his/her viewpoint did not change.

From initially scolding his companion in anger out of humiliation → to feeling self-blame, apologizing, and expressing empathy after seeing his companion break down

你真是没心没肺呀！

我们是有毕业证书的。

解开裤腰带的时候当然不需要了。

你没看见每张麻将台的抽屉都有一千块钱放在里面了吗？

那些男人，他们拼命在你的胸部那蹭来蹭去的，你没有感觉的吗？

我这一辈子也忘不了吃过一顿这样的饭。

我我神经病，我也不知道自己在骂谁，我是生我自己的气，对不起。

哼，我们艺训班那几个礼拜都是吃便当。

有证书又有什么了不起的？

啊？谁要我们解开裤腰带啊？

怎么会沦落成这样？


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker from 28.3s to 29.9s in the audio change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Showed a cynical and contemptuous attitude toward the situation the entire time, with no change in viewpoint.
- B. From initial pride and self-confidence → to complete despair and giving up on reality
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely derive the conclusion/change)
- D. From angrily rebuking the companion out of humiliation at first → shifting to feeling self-reproach, apologizing, and expressing empathy after seeing the companion break down

From initially lashing out at his companion in anger due to humiliation → to feeling self-blame, apologizing, and expressing empathy after seeing his companion break down

你真是没心没肺呀！

我们是有毕业证书的。

解开裤腰带的时候当然不需要了。

你没看见每张麻将台的抽屉都有一千块钱放在里面了吗？

那些男人，他们拼命在你的胸部那蹭来蹭去的，你没有感觉的吗？

我这一辈子也忘不了吃过一顿这样的饭。

我我神经病，我也不知道自己在骂谁，我是生我自己的气，对不起。

哼，我们艺训班那几个礼拜都是吃便当。

有证书又有什么了不起的？

啊？谁要我们解开裤腰带啊？

怎么会沦落成这样？


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How did the stance of the speaker who said ‘You’re so heartless’ in the audio change throughout the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. From angrily scolding a companion out of humiliation → to feeling self-reproach, apologizing, and expressing empathy after seeing the companion break down
- B. Cannot be determined (The evidence is insufficient to uniquely lead to the conclusion/change)
- C. Maintained a cynical and contemptuous attitude toward the situation throughout, and the viewpoint did not change.
- D. From initial pride and confidence → to complete despair and giving up on reality

From initially scolding his companion in anger out of humiliation → to feeling guilty, apologizing, and expressing empathy after seeing his companion break down

你真是没心没肺呀！

我们是有毕业证书的。

解开裤腰带的时候当然不需要了。

你没看见每张麻将台的抽屉都有一千块钱放在里面了吗？

那些男人，他们拼命在你的胸部那蹭来蹭去的，你没有感觉的吗？

我这一辈子也忘不了吃过一顿这样的饭。

我我神经病，我也不知道自己在骂谁，我是生我自己的气，对不起。

哼，我们艺训班那几个礼拜都是吃便当。

有证书又有什么了不起的？

啊？谁要我们解开裤腰带啊？

怎么会沦落成这样？


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the first speaker (spk_1) change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. From initial pride and self-confidence → a turn to complete despair and abandonment
- B. From initially scolding the companion in anger due to humiliation → to feeling guilty, apologizing, and expressing empathy after seeing the companion break down
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine the conclusion/change)
- D. Maintained a cynical and contemptuous attitude toward the situation throughout, and his perspective did not change.

From initially lashing out at his companion in anger due to humiliation → to feeling guilty, apologizing, and expressing empathy after seeing his companion break down

你真是没心没肺呀！

我们是有毕业证书的。

解开裤腰带的时候当然不需要了。

你没看见每张麻将台的抽屉都有一千块钱放在里面了吗？

那些男人，他们拼命在你的胸部那蹭来蹭去的，你没有感觉的吗？

我这一辈子也忘不了吃过一顿这样的饭。

我我神经病，我也不知道自己在骂谁，我是生我自己的气，对不起。

哼，我们艺训班那几个礼拜都是吃便当。

有证书又有什么了不起的？

啊？谁要我们解开裤腰带啊？

怎么会沦落成这样？


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: In the following audio, what is the speaker's emotion? How did this emotion affect the other people throughout the conversation?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: happy/excited; Impact: Causes <spk_2> to also find the joke funny.
- B. Emotion: Annoyed/Impatient; Impact: Causes <spk_2> to become angry and rebut vehemently.
- C. Emotion: Annoyance/Impatience; Effect: Caused <spk_3> to intervene and stop the argument.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine)

Emotion: Annoyance/Impatience; Impact: Causes <spk_2> to become angry and argue back fiercely.

放屁。

我放你个屁呀，放屁。


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What is the emotion of the speaker (<spk_1>) from 35.16 to 35.72 seconds in the audio? What impact did this emotion have on others in the conversation?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Annoyance/Impatience; Impact: Causes <spk_3> to intervene and stop the argument.
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine)
- C. Emotion: Happy/Excited; Impact: Causes <spk_2> to also think this joke is very funny.
- D. Emotion: Annoyance/Impatience; Impact: Causes <spk_2> to become angry and rebut vehemently.

Emotion: Annoyance/Impatience; Impact: Caused <spk_2> to become angry and rebut fiercely.

放屁。

我放你个屁呀，放屁。


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What emotion is the speaker (<spk_1>), who says ‘bullshit’ in the audio, expressing? What effect did this emotion have on others in the conversation?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Annoyed/Impatient; Impact: Causes <spk_2> to become angry and rebut fiercely.
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine)
- C. Emotion: Happy/Excited; Impact: Causes <spk_2> to also find this joke very funny.
- D. Emotion: Annoyance/Impatience; Impact: Causes <spk_3> to intervene and stop the argument.

Emotion: Annoyance/Impatience; Impact: Causes <spk_2> to become angry and rebut fiercely.

放屁。

我放你个屁呀，放屁。


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What is the main emotion expressed by the first speaker to appear in the audio (spk_1) in a particular part of their speech? What impact did this emotion have on others in the conversation?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Annoyance/Impatience; Effect: Causes <spk_3> to intervene and stop the argument.
- B. Emotion: Annoyance/Impatience; Impact: Causes <spk_2> to become angry and rebut vehemently.
- C. Emotion: Happy/Excited; Impact: Causes <spk_2> to also think this joke is very funny.
- D. Unable to determine (insufficient evidence for a unique determination)

Emotion: Annoyance/Impatience; Impact: Causes <spk_2> to become angry and retort vehemently.

放屁。

我放你个屁呀，放屁。


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What was the emotion of the speaker (<spk_1>) when saying ‘nonsense’ from 35.16s to 35.72s in the audio? What effect did this emotion have on others?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine)
- B. Emotion: Annoyance/Impatience; Impact: Causes <spk_3> to intervene and stop the argument.
- C. Emotion: Happy/Excited; Impact: Causes <spk_2> to also find the joke very funny.
- D. Emotion: Annoyance/Impatience; Impact: Causes <spk_2> to become angry and rebut vehemently.

Emotion: Annoyance/Impatience; Impact: Causes <spk_2> to become angry and retort fiercely.

放屁。

我放你个屁呀，放屁。


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: In the following audio of a single speaker, what accent is used?

Choices:
- A. Taiwanese Mandarin
- B. Mandarin with a Cantonese accent
- C. Mandarin with a Northeastern accent
- D. Accent not obvious, unable to determine.

哎呀，不行不行，这样说不行，你们要说第几名才行，第几才行啊。

听我说听我说，那旋转餐厅我没有去嘛，你生气我知道，所以我特地买了巧克力来给你的嘛。


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: The speaker's accent in the audio from 18.89 to 22.61 seconds is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Mandarin with a Northeastern accent
- B. Accent not obvious, impossible to judge
- C. Mandarin with a Cantonese accent
- D. Mandarin with a Sichuan accent

哎呀，不行不行，这样说不行，你们要说第几名才行，第几才行啊。


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: The accent of the speaker in the audio who said “你们要说第几名才行” most closely resembles which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Mandarin with a Cantonese accent
- B. Accent is not obvious, cannot be determined.
- C. Mandarin with a Taiwanese accent
- D. Mandarin with a Northeastern accent

哎呀，不行不行，这样说不行，你们要说第几名才行，第几才行啊。


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, what accent does the second speaker in the conversation use?

Choices:
- A. Accent not obvious, unable to judge.
- B. Mandarin with a Northeastern accent
- C. Taiwanese Mandarin
- D. Mandarin with a Cantonese accent

哎呀，不行不行，这样说不行，你们要说第几名才行，第几才行啊。


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: The female speaker who said "你们要说第几名才行" (You have to say what rank it is) between 18.89 and 22.61 seconds, which of the following is her accent closest to?

Choices:
- A. The accent is not obvious and cannot be determined.
- B. Mandarin with a Cantonese accent
- C. Mandarin with a Sichuan accent
- D. Mandarin with a Northeastern accent

哎呀，不行不行，这样说不行，你们要说第几名才行，第几才行啊。


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: Which speakers in the entire audio speak Mandarin with a Cantonese accent? (Answer in order of speaker appearance) Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. first speaker, second speaker, third speaker, fourth speaker
- B. The second speaker, the third speaker
- C. The accent is not obvious, unable to judge.
- D. The first speaker, the second speaker

哎呀，不行不行，这样说不行，你们要说第几名才行，第几才行啊。


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: How many speakers in the entire audio speak Mandarin with a Cantonese accent? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. 1
- B. 4
- C. 2
- D. Accent is not obvious, unable to judge.

哎呀，不行不行，这样说不行，你们要说第几名才行，第几才行啊。


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话背景推理

Question: In which of the following scenarios is this conversation most likely to take place?

Choices:
- A. In a high-end art gallery, one party is recruiting another to create art forgeries.
- B. In a large warehouse, one party is recruiting another to participate in making counterfeit art.
- C. In the reception room of an antique shop, the owner is introducing a rare antique collectible to a customer.
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)

In a large warehouse, one party is recruiting another to participate in making art forgeries.


多说话人对话场景推理能力-对话背景推理

Question: In which of the following scenarios would this conversation most likely take place?

Choices:
- A. The accountant visited the party's home to explain the details of the salary deductions and got into a heated argument with them.
- B. In the mediation room of the police station, a police officer is mediating a financial dispute between the two parties.
- C. In the company's finance office, several of the parties involved got into a fierce dispute with the accountant over wage deductions.
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)

In the company's finance office, several individuals had a heated dispute with the accountant over an issue with wage deductions.


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: The following is a monologue segment from a speaker. In the complete conversation, the most likely response to this audio is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B: Director Wang treated you well in the past.
- B. Speaker B: Don't blame me for this, it was Director Yan's instruction.
- C. Speaker B: A rule is a rule, and I'm just going by the book.
- D. Cannot determine (insufficient information to locate the response)

Speaker B: Don't blame me for this, it was Director Yan's instruction.

李会计，明明是姓严的欺负人啊，报纸上都批了，明明是他的错，你怎么能扣钱呢？

这事别怪我，是严馆长的指示。


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: According to the conversation, the reply from others to what a speaker said between 43.39 and 49.43 seconds is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B: Curator Wang was very good to you in the past.
- B. Speaker B: Rules are rules, and I'm just following procedure.
- C. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to locate the response)
- D. Speaker B: Don't blame me for this, it was Director Yan's instruction.

Speaker B: Don't blame me for this, it was Director Yan's instruction.

李会计，明明是姓严的欺负人啊，报纸上都批了，明明是他的错，你怎么能扣钱呢？

这事别怪我，是严馆长的指示。


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: Based on the dialogue, the response from others to the statement 'It's clearly his fault, how can you deduct money?' is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B: Rules are rules, and I'm just doing things by the book.
- B. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to provide a response)
- C. Speaker B: Don't blame me for this; it was Director Yan's instruction.
- D. Speaker B: Director Wang treated you very well in the past.

Speaker B: Don't blame me for this, it was Director Yan's instruction.

李会计，明明是姓严的欺负人啊，报纸上都批了，明明是他的错，你怎么能扣钱呢？

这事别怪我，是严馆长的指示。


多说话人对话结构分析能力-问答结构识别

Question: According to the dialogue, the response from others to the speaker's statement between 43.39 and 49.43 seconds, ‘It's clearly his fault, how can you deduct money?’, is:

Choices:
- A. Speaker B: Don't blame me for this, it was Director Yan's instruction.
- B. Speaker B: Rules are rules. I'm just following procedure.
- C. Speaker B: Director Wang was good to you in the past.
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to locate the response)

Speaker B: Don't blame me for this, it was Director Yan's instruction.

李会计，明明是姓严的欺负人啊，报纸上都批了，明明是他的错，你怎么能扣钱呢？

这事别怪我，是严馆长的指示。


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Are the speakers in the two audio clips below the same person?

Choices:
- A. Yes, the same person
- B. The speakers' voice timbres in the two audio clips are clearly different, but it cannot be determined if they are the same person.
- C. No, not the same person
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)

不信赢不了，通通不准要，让他爆掉。

Mandarin with a Hong Kong and Taiwanese accent.

以老子以前的脾气啊，早把你膝盖踢碎了。

哎，老大，我只有四点而已。

Mandarin with a Hong Kong and Taiwan accent.

老大，是你说不能要的，你不能捶我啊！


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Are the speakers in the two audio clips below the same?

Choices:
- A. Yes, the same person
- B. The speakers' emotions in the two audio clips are too different to determine if they are the same person.
- C. No, not the same person
- D. Cannot determine (insufficient information)

不信赢不了，通通不准要，让他爆掉。

以老子以前的脾气啊，早把你膝盖踢碎了。

哎，老大，我只有四点而已。

老大，是你说不能要的，你不能捶我啊！


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker from 0.0 to 2.24 seconds the same as the speaker from 2.52 to 4.68 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Yes, the same person
- B. No, not the same person.
- C. The voice timbres of the speakers in the two audio clips are significantly different, but it cannot be determined whether they are the same person.
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient information)

不信赢不了，通通不准要，让他爆掉。

以老子以前的脾气啊，早把你膝盖踢碎了。

哎，老大，我只有四点而已。

老大，是你说不能要的，你不能捶我啊！


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker from 0.0 to 2.24 seconds the same person as the speaker from 42.76 to 45.56 seconds?

Choices:
- A. No, not the same person
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information)
- C. Yes, the same person
- D. The speakers' emotions in the two audio clips are very different, making it impossible to determine if they are the same person.

不信赢不了，通通不准要，让他爆掉。

以老子以前的脾气啊，早把你膝盖踢碎了。

哎，老大，我只有四点而已。

老大，是你说不能要的，你不能捶我啊！


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: In the audio, is the speaker who said ‘Unbelievable that I could lose; I don't want any of it’ the same as the speaker who said ‘I only have four points’?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)
- B. The timbres of the speakers in the two audio clips are significantly different, but it cannot be determined whether they are the same person.
- C. Yes, the same person
- D. No, they are not the same person.

不信赢不了，通通不准要，让他爆掉。

以老子以前的脾气啊，早把你膝盖踢碎了。

哎，老大，我只有四点而已。

老大，是你说不能要的，你不能捶我啊！


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: In the audio, are the speaker who said ‘Let him explode’ and the speaker who said ‘I would have shattered your kneecaps long ago’ the same speaker?

Choices:
- A. No, it's not the same person.
- B. Cannot determine (insufficient information)
- C. The speaker's emotion differs significantly between the two audio clips, making it impossible to determine if it's the same person.
- D. Yes, the same person

不信赢不了，通通不准要，让他爆掉。

以老子以前的脾气啊，早把你膝盖踢碎了。

哎，老大，我只有四点而已。

老大，是你说不能要的，你不能捶我啊！


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Are the speaker in the audio from 0.0 to 2.24 seconds who said ‘I don't believe I can't win, I don't want any of them’ and the speaker from 2.52 to 4.68 seconds who said ‘Hey, boss, I only have four points’ the same speaker?

Choices:
- A. No, not the same person
- B. Yes, the same person
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information)
- D. The speakers' timbres in the two audio clips are significantly different, but it cannot be determined whether they are the same person.

不信赢不了，通通不准要，让他爆掉。

以老子以前的脾气啊，早把你膝盖踢碎了。

哎，老大，我只有四点而已。

老大，是你说不能要的，你不能捶我啊！


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker who said ‘Let him blow up’ from 0.0s to 2.24s in the audio the same speaker as the one who said ‘With my old temper, I would have shattered your kneecaps long ago’ from 42.76s to 45.56s?

Choices:
- A. No, they are not the same person.
- B. Yes, the same person
- C. There is a significant emotional difference between the speakers in the two audio clips, making it impossible to determine if they are the same person.
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)

不信赢不了，通通不准要，让他爆掉。

以老子以前的脾气啊，早把你膝盖踢碎了。

哎，老大，我只有四点而已。

老大，是你说不能要的，你不能捶我啊！


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: In the monologue audio below, what accent does the speaker use?

Choices:
- A. Mandarin with a Northeastern accent
- B. Mandarin with a Beijing accent
- C. The accent is not obvious and cannot be judged.
- D. Mandarin with a Sichuan accent

是，忘是不会忘，嗯，可是我就想着吧，您那是逗着我玩呢，您吓唬我。


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: Which of the following does the speaker's accent between 14.2 and 17.68 seconds in the audio most closely resemble?

Choices:
- A. Accent not obvious, cannot be determined
- B. Mandarin with a Sichuan accent
- C. Mandarin with a Beijing accent
- D. Mandarin with a Northeastern accent

是，忘是不会忘，嗯，可是我就想着吧，您那是逗着我玩呢，您吓唬我。


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: The accent of the speaker in the audio who said ‘The rent cannot be reduced’ most closely resembles which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Mandarin with a Beijing accent
- B. Mandarin with a Sichuan accent
- C. Mandarin with a Northeastern accent
- D. Accent not obvious, impossible to determine.

是，忘是不会忘，嗯，可是我就想着吧，您那是逗着我玩呢，您吓唬我。


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: In the entire audio, what accent does the first speaker in the conversation use?

Choices:
- A. Mandarin with a Northeastern accent
- B. Accent is not obvious, unable to determine.
- C. Mandarin with a Beijing accent
- D. Mandarin with a Sichuan accent

是，忘是不会忘，嗯，可是我就想着吧，您那是逗着我玩呢，您吓唬我。


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: The accent of the male speaker who said ‘I don't care whether you make money or not’ from 14.2 to 17.68 seconds is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Mandarin with a Beijing accent
- B. Accent is not obvious, cannot be determined.
- C. Mandarin with a Sichuan accent
- D. Mandarin with a Northeastern accent

是，忘是不会忘，嗯，可是我就想着吧，您那是逗着我玩呢，您吓唬我。


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: In the entire audio clip, which speakers use Beijing-accented Mandarin? (Answer in the order of the speakers' appearance) Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. The first speaker
- B. The first speaker, the second speaker
- C. The first speaker, the third speaker
- D. The accent is not obvious, unable to determine.

是，忘是不会忘，嗯，可是我就想着吧，您那是逗着我玩呢，您吓唬我。


说话人属性识别能力-口音识别任务

Question: How many speakers with a Beijing accent are there in the entire audio? Please select the one that best fits.

Choices:
- A. 1
- B. 3
- C. 2
- D. The accent is not obvious, making it impossible to judge.

是，忘是不会忘，嗯，可是我就想着吧，您那是逗着我玩呢，您吓唬我。


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: In the following audio, what is the speaker's emotion? What effect did this emotion have on the other people throughout the conversation?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Happy/Excited; Impact: Prompted <spk_2> to also start joking, easing the tense atmosphere of the conversation.
- B. Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Impact: Causes <spk_2> to feel afraid and begin defending themself nervously.
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence to uniquely determine).
- D. Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Impact: This makes <spk_1> more agitated, but <spk_2> has no obvious reaction.

Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Impact: Caused <spk_2> to feel scared and start nervously defending themselves.

还提三两七？

是，忘是不会忘，嗯，可是我就想着吧，您那是逗着我玩呢，您吓唬我。


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What is the emotion of the speaker (<spk_1>) in the audio from 26.6 seconds to 27.52 seconds? What impact did this emotion have on others in the conversation?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Impact: Caused <spk_2> to feel fear and start defending themself nervously.
- B. Emotion: Happy/Excited; Impact: Prompted <spk_2> to also make a joke, easing the tension in the conversation.
- C. Emotion: Anger/Displeasure; Impact: This made <spk_1> more agitated, but <spk_2> showed no obvious reaction.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine).

Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Impact: Causes <spk_2> to feel afraid and start nervously defending themselves.

还提三两七？

是，忘是不会忘，嗯，可是我就想着吧，您那是逗着我玩呢，您吓唬我。


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What emotion is the speaker (<spk_1>), who says "Still bringing up three liang seven?" in the audio, expressing? What effect did this emotion have on others in the conversation?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Impact: This makes <spk_1> even more agitated, but <spk_2> shows no obvious reaction.
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine).
- C. Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Impact: Causes <spk_2> to feel fear and start to nervously defend themself.
- D. Emotion: Happy/Excited; Effect: Prompted <spk_2> to also make a joke, easing the tense atmosphere of the conversation.

Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Impact: Caused <spk_2> to feel scared and start nervously defending themself.

还提三两七？

是，忘是不会忘，嗯，可是我就想着吧，您那是逗着我玩呢，您吓唬我。


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What is the emotion expressed in a particular utterance by the first speaker (<spk_1>) in the dialogue? What effect did this emotion have on others?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: happy/excited; Impact: Prompted <spk_2> to also make a joke, easing the tense atmosphere of the conversation.
- B. Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Impact: This made <spk_1> more agitated, but <spk_2> showed no obvious reaction.
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence to uniquely determine).
- D. Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Impact: Causes <spk_2> to feel fear, and start nervously defending themself.

Emotion: Anger/Discontent; Impact: Caused <spk_2> to feel fear and start nervously defending themself.

还提三两七？

是，忘是不会忘，嗯，可是我就想着吧，您那是逗着我玩呢，您吓唬我。


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人情感交互

Question: What is the emotion of the speaker (<spk_1>) who said "还提三两七？" from 26.6 seconds to 27.52 seconds in the audio? What impact did this emotion have on others?

Choices:
- A. Emotion: Happy/Excited; Impact: Prompted <spk_2> to also make a joke, easing the tense atmosphere of the conversation.
- B. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence for a single conclusion).
- C. Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Impact: This made <spk_1> even more agitated, but <spk_2> showed no obvious reaction.
- D. Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Impact: Caused <spk_2> to feel fearful and start nervously defending themselves.

Emotion: Anger/Dissatisfaction; Impact: Caused <spk_2> to feel scared and start nervously defending themself.

还提三两七？

是，忘是不会忘，嗯，可是我就想着吧，您那是逗着我玩呢，您吓唬我。


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: Which of the following is the closest age group for the speaker in the single-person audio below?

Choices:
- A. Middle-aged people (30-59 years old)
- B. Youth (18-29 years old)
- C. Seniors (60 years or older)
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)

得了得了得了，我问你，你是不是拿人唐铁嘴一翠扳指？

哎哎，干嘛打人呢？


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: Which of the following is the age group of the speaker in the audio from 36.92s to 43.12s closest to?

Choices:
- A. Young people (18-29 years old)
- B. Middle-aged people (30-59 years old)
- C. Seniors (60 years or older)
- D. Cannot determine (insufficient information to determine the age group)

得了得了得了，我问你，你是不是拿人唐铁嘴一翠扳指？

哎哎，干嘛打人呢？


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: Which of the following is closest to the age range of the speaker in the audio who said ‘Did you take Tang Tiezui's jade thumb ring’？

Choices:
- A. Young people (18-29 years old)
- B. Seniors (60 years or older)
- C. Middle-aged adults (30-59 years old)
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)

得了得了得了，我问你，你是不是拿人唐铁嘴一翠扳指？

哎哎，干嘛打人呢？


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: In the entire conversation, the age group of the first speaker to appear (spk_1) is closest to which of the following?

Choices:
- A. Middle-aged people (30-59 years old)
- B. Young adults (18-29 years old)
- C. Adolescent (13-17 years old)
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)

得了得了得了，我问你，你是不是拿人唐铁嘴一翠扳指？

哎哎，干嘛打人呢？


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: For the male speaker who said ‘Did you take Tang Tie Zui's jade thumb ring?’ between 36.92 and 43.12 seconds, which of the following is the closest age group?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)
- B. Young people (18-29 years old)
- C. Seniors (60 years or older)
- D. Middle-aged people (30-59 years old)

得了得了得了，我问你，你是不是拿人唐铁嘴一翠扳指？

哎哎，干嘛打人呢？


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: Throughout the entire audio, who are the speakers in the Young Adult (18-29 years old) age group? (Answer using the global speaker order) Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. spk_1
- B. spk_3
- C. spk_1、spk_3
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine the age group)

得了得了得了，我问你，你是不是拿人唐铁嘴一翠扳指？

哎哎，干嘛打人呢？


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: In the entire audio clip, how many speakers are in the Middle-aged (30-59 years old) age group? Please select the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. 1
- B. 4
- C. 3
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)

得了得了得了，我问你，你是不是拿人唐铁嘴一翠扳指？

哎哎，干嘛打人呢？


说话人识别能力-说话人检索任务

Question: The speaker from 17.57 to 22.13 seconds in the audio, what is their order of appearance in the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. spk_1
- B. spk_2
- C. spk_4
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the speaker)

光包工就花了七百吊大钱呐，好碾坊啊！

要是为我，我要好好想一想，过些日子再说吧。


说话人识别能力-说话人检索任务

Question: The speaker in the audio who said ‘光包工就花了七百吊大钱呐，好碾坊啊！’ is which speaker (in order of appearance) in the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. spk_4
- B. spk_3
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to identify the speaker)
- D. spk_2

光包工就花了七百吊大钱呐，好碾坊啊！

要是为我，我要好好想一想，过些日子再说吧。


说话人识别能力-说话人检索任务

Question: What is the order of appearance in the entire conversation for the male speaker who says ‘光包工就花了七百吊大钱呐，好碾坊啊！’ between 17.57 and 22.13 seconds in the audio?

Choices:
- A. spk_2
- B. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine the speaker)
- C. spk_3
- D. spk_4

光包工就花了七百吊大钱呐，好碾坊啊！

要是为我，我要好好想一想，过些日子再说吧。


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

黄飞鸿之怒海雄风.2018.【微信公众号：影视分享汇】_part005

Question: What is the interactive behavior demonstrated by the two speakers in the corresponding audio segment? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A proposes a course of action, while Speaker B doubts its feasibility.
- B. Speaker B desperately asks for a solution, while Speaker A decisively proposes a general plan.
- C. Speaker A proposes a course of action, and Speaker B immediately asks for the specific method of implementation.
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)

Speaker A proposes a course of action, and Speaker B immediately asks for the specific implementation method.

为今之计，只有我们自己想办法救出张大人。

怎么救？


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

黄飞鸿之怒海雄风.2018.【微信公众号：影视分享汇】_part005

Question: What is the interactive behavior demonstrated by the speaker from 52.12 to 56.72 seconds and the speaker from 58.36 to 58.88 seconds in the audio, within their corresponding segments? Please select the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (insufficient evidence)
- B. Speaker A proposes a course of action, and Speaker B immediately asks for the specific method of execution.
- C. Speaker A proposes a course of action, and Speaker B expresses doubt about its feasibility.
- D. Speaker B desperately asks for a solution, while Speaker A decisively proposes a general plan.

Speaker A proposes a course of action, and Speaker B immediately asks how to specifically carry it out.

为今之计，只有我们自己想办法救出张大人。

怎么救？


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

黄飞鸿之怒海雄风.2018.【微信公众号：影视分享汇】_part005

Question: What is the interactive behavior demonstrated in the corresponding segment between the speaker who said ‘Only we ourselves can figure out a way to rescue Lord Zhang’ and the speaker who said ‘How do we rescue him?’? Please choose the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker B desperately asks what to do, while Speaker A decisively puts forward a general plan.
- B. Speaker A proposes a course of action, and Speaker B immediately asks for the specific method of execution.
- C. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence)
- D. Speaker A proposes a course of action, and Speaker B expresses doubt about its feasibility.

Speaker A proposes a course of action, and Speaker B immediately asks for the specific execution method.

为今之计，只有我们自己想办法救出张大人。

怎么救？


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

黄飞鸿之怒海雄风.2018.【微信公众号：影视分享汇】_part005

Question: What is the interactive behavior demonstrated by the first and second speakers in the conversation? Please select the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A proposes a course of action, and Speaker B immediately asks for the specific execution method.
- B. Speaker A proposes a course of action, while Speaker B expresses doubt about its feasibility.
- C. Speaker B desperately asks for a solution, while Speaker A decisively proposes a general plan.
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient evidence)

Speaker A proposes a course of action, and Speaker B immediately asks for the specific implementation method.

为今之计，只有我们自己想办法救出张大人。

怎么救？


多说话人对话结构分析能力-对话行为识别

黄飞鸿之怒海雄风.2018.【微信公众号：影视分享汇】_part005

Question: What is the interactive behavior demonstrated in the corresponding segments between the speaker who said ‘The only plan now is for us to figure out a way to rescue Lord Zhang ourselves.’ from 52.12 seconds to 56.72 seconds in the audio, and the speaker who said ‘How?’ from 58.36 seconds to 58.88 seconds? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A proposes a course of action, and Speaker B expresses doubt about its feasibility.
- B. Cannot determine (insufficient evidence)
- C. Speaker B desperately asks for a solution, while Speaker A decisively proposes a general plan.
- D. Speaker A proposes a course of action, and Speaker B immediately asks for the specific implementation method.

Speaker A proposes a course of action, and Speaker B immediately asks for the specific implementation methods.

为今之计，只有我们自己想办法救出张大人。

怎么救？


说话人识别能力-说话人计数任务

Question: How many different speakers are in this audio?

Choices:
- A. 4-bit
- B. Cannot determine (Insufficient information)
- C. 5 digits
- D. 10 digits

这腿是我女儿的。

小心一点。


说话人识别能力-说话人计数任务

Question: How many different speakers appeared in the audio between the 8th and 19th second?

Choices:
- A. 7 digits
- B. 3 digits
- C. Cannot determine (Insufficient information)
- D. 4 bits

这腿是我女儿的。

小心一点。


说话人识别能力-说话人计数任务

Question: How many different speakers are there in this audio?

Choices:
- A. 2 digits
- B. 3 digits
- C. 6 digits
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)

The journey is complete.

Non-native English with a significant Chinese accent

Is this the Dragon Well?


说话人识别能力-说话人计数任务

Question: How many different speakers are there in the audio from 175 seconds to 181 seconds?

Choices:
- A. 6 digits
- B. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)
- C. 3 digits
- D. 2 people

The journey is complete.

Is this the Dragon Well?


说话人识别能力-说话人反向检索任务

Question:
Which of the statements below was said by the second speaker in the dialogue? Please select the most appropriate option.
Candidate statements:
1) He's the main event.
2) The man is the reason everyone's here.
3) He's playin' tonight.
4) I'm afraid not.
5) Yeah, well he's not from down here.
6) Yeah, I know 'em.

Choices:
- A. 1, 3, 4, 5
- B. 1, 2, 3, 5
- C. 1, 3, 5, 6
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine)

This guy's sayin' Doctor Shirley can't eat here.

American English with a New York area accent

But these are long-standing traditions, club rules. I'm sure you understand.


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: In the single-speaker audio below, which of the following best describes the speaker's profile?

Choices:
- A. Gender: Female voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Happy; Accent: American English with a New York accent
- B. Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: Standard General American English, well-educated accent
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine)
- D. Gender: Male voice; Age: Young adult; Emotion: Surprised; Accent: New York accent with Italian-American characteristics

Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: Standard General American English, educated accent

Go home to your family.

Standard General American English, well-educated accent

Holidays, I'm sorry.

An American English accent with New York regional characteristics


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: Which of the following is closest to the speaker profile of the speaker in the audio from 46.05 seconds to 47.05 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: Standard General American English, a well-educated accent
- B. Gender: Male; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Surprised; Accent: Italian-American New York accent
- C. Gender: Female; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Happy; Accent: American English with a New York regional accent
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine)

Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: Standard General American English, educated accent

Go home to your family.

Holidays, I'm sorry.


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: Which of the following is closest to the speaker profile of the person who said ‘Go home to your family’ in the audio?

Choices:
- A. Gender: Male voice; Age: Young Adult; Emotion: Surprised; Accent: New York accent with Italian-American characteristics
- B. Cannot determine (Insufficient information)
- C. Gender: Female voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Happy; Accent: American English with a New York regional accent
- D. Gender: Male; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: Standard General American English, a well-educated accent

Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: Standard General American English, an educated accent

Go home to your family.

Holidays, I'm sorry.


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: In the entire dialogue, what is the gender of the 6th speaker to appear?

Choices:
- A. Female voice
- B. Child's voice
- C. Male voice
- D. Cannot determine (insufficient information to determine)

Go home to your family.

Holidays, I'm sorry.


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: Which of the following speaker profiles is the closest match for the speaker who said ‘Go home to your family’ between 46.05 and 47.05 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Gender: Female; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Happy; Accent: American English with a New York accent
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine)
- C. Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: Standard General American English, educated accent
- D. Gender: Male; Age: Young adult; Emotion: Surprised; Accent: New York accent with Italian-American features

Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: Standard General American English, well-educated accent

Go home to your family.

Holidays, I'm sorry.


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: In the entire audio, which speakers have the profile 'Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: Standard General American English, an educated accent'? (Answer using spk_index) Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. spk_2、spk_6
- B. Unable to determine (insufficient information)
- C. spk_6、spk_99
- D. spk_6

Go home to your family.

Holidays, I'm sorry.


说话人属性识别能力-说话人画像任务

Question: In the entire audio clip, how many speakers have the profile 'Gender: Male voice; Age: Middle-aged; Emotion: Neutral; Accent: Standard General American English, well-educated accent'? Please choose the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. 1
- B. 5
- C. 2
- D. Cannot determine (insufficient information to determine)

Go home to your family.

Holidays, I'm sorry.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Are the speakers in the two audio clips below the same person?

Choices:
- A. Yes, the same person
- B. The speakers of the two voice clips have partially similar timbres.
- C. No, not the same person
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information)

What I do know is he's our only possible link to the syndicate, and I have reason to believe he's going to be here tonight.

After that, you're on a plane, back at work Monday morning, no one is the wiser.

Please don't tell me that, because it's just another thing I will have to lie about in my weekly polygraph.

Well, if you're gonna bring me all this way, you could at least give me something a bit more, you know, dramatic.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Are the speakers in the two audio clips below the same person?

Choices:
- A. Although the timbre is similar, it might be an imitation.
- B. No, not the same person
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)
- D. Yes, the same person


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker in the audio from 56.67 seconds to 62.15 seconds the same person as the speaker from 35.46 seconds to 39.22 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Unable to determine (insufficient information)
- B. No, they are not the same person.
- C. Yes, the same person
- D. The speakers in the two audio clips have partially similar voice timbres, but they are not the same person.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker in the audio from 56.67s to 62.15s the same as the speaker from 75.55s to 79.71s?

Choices:
- A. Yes, the same person
- B. Although the timbre is similar, it might be a deliberately imitated voice.
- C. No, not the same person
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient information)


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker who said ‘our only possible link to the syndicate’ the same person as the speaker who said ‘lie about in my weekly polygraph’?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information)
- B. Their voices have similarities.
- C. Yes, the same person
- D. No, not the same person


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: Is the speaker who said ‘our only possible link to the syndicate’ the same speaker as the one who said ‘back at work Monday morning, no one is the wiser’?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)
- B. Yes, the same person
- C. Although the timbre is similar, it might be an imitation.
- D. No, not the same person.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: In the audio, is the speaker who said ‘our only possible link to the syndicate’ from 56.67s to 62.15s the same person as the speaker who said ‘lie about in my weekly polygraph’ from 35.46s to 39.22s?

Choices:
- A. No, not the same person
- B. Yes, the same person
- C. Cannot be determined (insufficient information)
- D. The two people have similar speaking styles.


说话人识别能力-说话人验证任务

Question: In the audio, is the speaker who said ‘our only possible link to the syndicate’ from 56.67 to 62.15 seconds the same person as the speaker who said ‘back at work Monday morning, no one is the wiser’ from 75.55 to 79.71 seconds?

Choices:
- A. No, not the same person
- B. Cannot determine (insufficient information)
- C. Yes, the same person
- D. The two audio clips have different emotional states and cannot be compared.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the speaker in the following single-person audio throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Believes the mission is too risky and advocates for abandoning the operation entirely to ensure the team's safety.
- B. Ultimately compromised and agreed to the plan of direct confrontation, but expressed doubts about its feasibility.
- C. Insist on proactively pursuing opponents, rather than adopting a conservative warning strategy.
- D. Cannot be determined (The evidence is insufficient to uniquely determine the viewpoint/change).

Ultimately compromised, agreed to the plan of direct confrontation, but expressed doubt about its feasibility.

We have a responsibility to warn the British government, and not gamble with the Prime Minister's life, Ethan.

We are going to warn the British.

Alright, Ethan. We're gonna find Lane. But please tell me, how are we gonna do that?

No, we're gonna find Lane, we're gonna get him.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the speaker from 236.54s to 241.9s of the audio, throughout the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. Insist on actively pursuing opponents rather than adopting a conservative warning strategy.
- B. Finally compromised and agreed to the plan of direct confrontation, but expressed doubts about its feasibility.
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely deduce the conclusion/change).
- D. Believes the mission is too high-risk, and advocates for completely abandoning the operation to ensure the team's safety.

Ultimately compromised and agreed to the plan for direct confrontation, but expressed doubts about its feasibility.

We are going to warn the British.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance in the entire dialogue of the speaker who said, ‘We have a responsibility to warn the British government’?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine the conclusion/change).
- B. Insist on actively pursuing opponents, instead of adopting a conservative warning strategy.
- C. Considers the mission's risk to be too high and advocates for abandoning the operation entirely to ensure the team's safety.
- D. Finally compromised and agreed to the plan for a direct confrontation, but expressed doubt about its feasibility.

Ultimately compromised and agreed to the plan for direct confrontation, but expressed doubts about its feasibility.

We are going to warn the British.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance in the entire conversation of the speaker who says ‘We have a responsibility to warn the British government’ between 236.54 and 241.9 seconds in the audio?

Choices:
- A. Ultimately compromised and agreed to the plan for direct confrontation, but expressed doubt about its feasibility.
- B. Considers the mission's risk to be too high, and advocates for completely abandoning the operation to ensure the team's safety.
- C. Cannot be determined (The evidence is insufficient to uniquely determine the viewpoint/change).
- D. Insist on actively pursuing opponents, rather than adopting a conservative warning strategy.

Ultimately compromised and agreed to the plan of direct confrontation, but expressed doubt about its feasibility.

We are going to warn the British.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: What is the overall stance of the 6th speaker to appear (spk_6) throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Considers the mission's risk to be too high and advocates for abandoning the operation entirely to ensure the team's safety.
- B. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely derive the conclusion/change).
- C. Ultimately compromised and agreed to the plan for direct confrontation, but expressed doubts about its feasibility.
- D. Insist on actively pursuing the opponent, rather than adopting a conservative warning strategy.

Ultimately compromised and agreed to the plan for a direct confrontation, but expressed doubts about its feasibility.

We are going to warn the British.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the speaker's stance change throughout the entire dialogue in the following single-speaker audio?

Choices:
- A. From firmly insisting on reporting to superiors to avoid risk, to ultimately and reluctantly accepting a risky plan of direct confrontation.
- B. Always maintained a hard-line stance of actively pursuing the opponent, never wavering.
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely deduce the conclusion/change).
- D. Shifted from initially supporting direct action to advocating a cautious warning strategy due to the high risks.

From resolutely insisting on reporting to superiors to avoid risk, to helplessly accepting a risky plan of direct confrontation in the end.

We are going to warn the British.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker from 236.54s to 241.9s in the audio change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Always maintained a tough stance of actively pursuing the opponent, and never wavered.
- B. Shifted from initially supporting direct action to advocating for a cautious warning strategy due to the high risks.
- C. From firmly insisting on reporting to superiors to avoid risk, to finally and reluctantly accepting a risky plan of direct confrontation.
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to uniquely determine the viewpoint/change).

From firmly insisting on reporting to superiors to avoid risk, to ultimately being forced to accept a risky plan of direct confrontation.

We are going to warn the British.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker in the audio who said ‘We have a responsibility to warn the British government’ change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. From initially supporting direct action, to advocating a cautious warning strategy due to the risks being too high.
- B. Cannot determine (Insufficient evidence to uniquely conclude the viewpoint/change).
- C. Always maintained a hardline stance of actively pursuing opponents, never wavering.
- D. From firmly insisting on reporting to superiors to avoid risk, to finally and reluctantly accepting a risky plan of direct confrontation.

From firmly insisting on reporting to superiors to avoid risk, to a final, reluctant acceptance of a risky plan for direct confrontation.

We are going to warn the British.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the speaker, who said ‘We have a responsibility to warn the British government’ between 236.54 and 241.9 seconds in the audio, change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. From strongly advocating reporting to superiors to avoid risk, to eventually and reluctantly accepting a risky plan of direct confrontation.
- B. Cannot be determined (The evidence is insufficient to uniquely derive the conclusion/change).
- C. Shifted from initially supporting direct action to advocating a cautious warning strategy because the risks were too high.
- D. Always maintained a hard-line position of actively pursuing the opponent, never wavering.

From firmly advocating reporting to superiors to avoid risk, to ultimately, reluctantly accepting a risky plan of direct confrontation.

We are going to warn the British.


说话人识别能力-说话人观点总结任务

Question: How does the stance of the 6th speaker to appear (spk_6) change throughout the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. Always maintained a hardline stance of actively pursuing the opponent, and never wavered.
- B. From firmly advocating reporting to superiors to avoid risk, to eventually and reluctantly accepting a risky plan of direct confrontation.
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient evidence to draw a unique conclusion/change).
- D. Shifted from initially supporting direct action to advocating a cautious warning strategy due to the risks being too high.

From firmly insisting on reporting to superiors to avoid risk, to finally and reluctantly accepting a risky plan of direct confrontation.

We are going to warn the British.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the stance of the two speakers in the following audio throughout the entire conversation? Please choose the one that fits best.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Regarding their own violent actions: Admits their mistake and hopes to seek reconciliation. Speaker B: Regarding their view on this struggle: Steadfastly believes in their organization and hopes to persuade the other side to surrender.
- B. Speaker A: View on the struggle: Ultimately becomes disillusioned with the systems of both sides and is inclined to withdraw from the struggle. Speaker B: On their own violent actions: Views them as necessary and precise means to achieve change and defends them on this basis.
- C. Speaker A: Regarding their own violent actions: Defends them as a necessary and precise means to achieve change. Speaker B: Regarding their view of the struggle: Ultimately becomes disillusioned with the systems of both sides and is inclined to withdraw from the struggle.
- D. Speaker A: Explained their actions; their attitude is complex. Speaker B: View on this struggle: expressed multifaceted considerations and is indecisive.

Speaker A: Regarding their own violent actions: Believes them to be a necessary and precise means to achieve change, and uses this to justify them.
Speaker B: View on this struggle: Ultimately becomes disillusioned with the systems of both sides and tends to disengage from the struggle.

Killing to keep things as they were, and now I'm killing to bring about change.

We only think we're fighting for the right side, because that's what we choose to believe.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the stance of the speaker from 89.32s to 94.36s and the speaker from 282.84s to 285.92s in the audio throughout the entire conversation? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Explained their actions and has a complex attitude. Speaker B: View on this struggle: Expressed multiple considerations and is indecisive.
- B. Speaker A: On their own violent actions: Views them as a necessary and precise means to achieve change, and uses this as justification. Speaker B: On the struggle: Ultimately becomes disillusioned with the systems of both sides and tends to withdraw from it.
- C. Speaker A: View on the struggle: Ultimately became disillusioned with the systems of both sides and tended to disengage from the struggle. Speaker B: Regarding their own violent actions: Believed they were a necessary and precise means to achieve change, and defended them on that basis.
- D. Speaker A: Regarding their violent actions: Acknowledges their mistake and hopes for reconciliation. Speaker B: Regarding the struggle: Firmly believes in their organization and hopes to persuade the other side to surrender.

Speaker A: Regarding their own violent actions: Believes them to be a necessary and precise means for achieving change, and uses this to justify them.
Speaker B: Regarding their view of the struggle: Ultimately becomes disillusioned with the systems of both sides and is inclined to disengage from the struggle.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What are the stances of the speaker who said ‘now I'm killing to bring about change’ and the speaker who said ‘that's what we choose to believe’ in the entire conversation? Please choose the most suitable option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: On their own violent acts: Justifies them as a necessary and precise means for bringing about change. Speaker B: On the struggle: Ultimately becomes disillusioned with the systems of both sides and is inclined to withdraw from the struggle.
- B. Speaker A: Explained their behavior and has a complex attitude. Speaker B: View on the struggle: Expressed multifaceted considerations and is wavering.
- C. Speaker A: Regarding his own violent actions: Acknowledges his wrongdoing and hopes for reconciliation. Speaker B: Regarding the struggle: Firmly believes in his organization and hopes to persuade the other side to surrender.
- D. Speaker A: View on the struggle: Ultimately becomes disillusioned with the systems of both sides of the struggle and is inclined to withdraw from it. Speaker B: On their own violent actions: Believes it is a necessary and precise means for achieving change, and uses this to justify their actions.

Speaker A: Regarding their own violent actions: Believes they are a necessary and precise means to achieve change, and justifies them on this basis. Speaker B: Regarding their view of the struggle: Ultimately becomes disillusioned with the systems of both sides of the struggle and tends to disengage from it.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: In the entire dialogue, what are the respective stances of the first speaker and the second speaker? Please select the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: View on this struggle: Ultimately becomes disillusioned with the systems of both sides of the struggle and is inclined to disengage from it. Speaker B: On their own violent actions: Believes it was a necessary and precise means to bring about change and justifies their actions on this basis.
- B. Speaker A: Explained their behavior, and their attitude is complex. Speaker B: Expressed multifaceted considerations about the struggle and is wavering.
- C. Speaker A: Regarding their violent actions: Admits their mistake and hopes to reconcile. Speaker B: Regarding the struggle: Firmly believes in their organization and hopes to persuade the other side to surrender.
- D. Speaker A: On their own violent actions: Believes they are a necessary and precise means to achieve change, and justifies them as such. Speaker B: On the struggle: Ultimately becomes disillusioned with the systems of both sides and is inclined to withdraw from the conflict.

Speaker A: Regarding their own violent actions: Believes them to be a necessary and precise means for achieving change, and uses this to justify their actions. Speaker B: View on the struggle: Ultimately becomes disillusioned with the systems of both sides, and tends to disengage from the struggle.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the stance in the entire dialogue of the speaker who said ‘now I'm killing to bring about change’ in the audio from 89.32 to 94.36 seconds, and the speaker who said ‘that's what we choose to believe’ from 282.84 to 285.92 seconds? Please select the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: On their own acts of violence: Justifies them as a necessary and precise means to achieve change. Speaker B: On the struggle: Ultimately becomes disillusioned with the systems of both sides in the conflict and is inclined to withdraw from it.
- B. Speaker A: Regarding their own violent actions: Admits their mistake and hopes to seek reconciliation. Speaker B: View on this struggle: Always firmly believes in their organization and hopes to persuade the other side to surrender.
- C. Speaker A: View on the struggle: Ultimately becomes disillusioned with the systems of both sides and is inclined to disengage from the struggle. Speaker B: On their own violent actions: Considers them a necessary and precise means for achieving change and defends them on this basis.
- D. Speaker A: Explained their actions and had a complex attitude. Speaker B: View on this struggle: Expressed multifaceted considerations, and their thoughts were wavering.

Speaker A: On their own violent actions: Believes they are a necessary and precise means to achieve change, and uses this to justify them.
Speaker B: On their view of the struggle: Ultimately becomes disillusioned with the systems of both sides of the conflict and tends to withdraw from the struggle.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in the stances of the two speakers in the following audio throughout the entire conversation? Please select the best-fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Defense of their actions: Attitude has always been 【insisting that their violent actions are a necessary means to achieve change】. Speaker B: View of the struggle: From 【clearly viewing the other side as an enemy and morally condemning them】 → 【shifting to becoming disillusioned with the entire system of struggle and advocating for disengagement】.
- B. Speaker A: View on the struggle: from [clearly viewing the other side as an enemy and morally condemning them] → [becoming disillusioned with the entire system of struggle and advocating for disengagement]. Speaker B: Defense of their actions: attitude has consistently been [insisting that their violent actions are a necessary means to achieve change].
- C. Speaker A: View on their own actions: Attitude remains basically consistent. Speaker B: View on this struggle: Shows an evolution of thought in the dialogue.
- D. Speaker A: Defense of their actions: From 【unwavering belief】 → 【starting to have self-doubt】. Speaker B: View on this struggle: From 【hesitation】 → 【turning to firmly support their own organization】.

Speaker A: Defense of their actions: Attitude has consistently been 【to insist that their violent behavior is a necessary means for achieving change】.
Speaker B: View on the struggle: From 【clearly defining the opponent as an enemy and morally condemning them】→【shifts to becoming disillusioned with the entire system of struggle and advocating for disengagement】.


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in viewpoint in the positional dialogue for the speaker speaking from 89.32s to 94.36s and the speaker speaking from 282.84s to 285.92s in the audio? Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: View on their own behavior: Attitude remains largely consistent. Speaker B: View on this struggle: Shows an evolution of thought in the dialogue.
- B. Speaker A: Defense of their actions: from 【unwavering belief】 → 【beginning to have self-doubt】. Speaker B: View on the struggle: from 【hesitation】 → 【shifting to firmly support their organization】.
- C. Speaker A: Defense of their actions: Attitude has always been to 【insist that their violent actions are a necessary means to achieve change】. Speaker B: View on the struggle: From 【clearly viewing the other side as an enemy and morally condemning them】→【to becoming disillusioned with the entire system of struggle and advocating for disengagement】.
- D. Speaker A: View on the struggle: From 【clearly viewing the other side as an enemy and morally condemning them】→【shifting to being disillusioned with the entire system of struggle and advocating for disengagement】. Speaker B: Defense of their actions: Attitude remains consistent: 【maintaining that their violent actions are a necessary means to achieve change】.

Speaker A: Defense of their actions: Their attitude has consistently been [insisting that their violent actions are a necessary means to achieve change].
Speaker B: View on the struggle: From [clearly viewing the other side as an enemy and morally condemning them] → to [becoming disillusioned with the entire system of struggle and advocating for disengagement].


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in stance throughout the entire conversation for the speaker in the audio who said ‘now I'm killing to bring about change’ and the one who said ‘that's what we choose to believe’? Please choose the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: View on this struggle: From [explicitly viewing the other side as an enemy and morally condemning them] → [shifting to feeling disillusioned with the entire system of struggle and advocating for disengagement]. Speaker B: Defense of their actions: Attitude has consistently been [maintaining that their violent actions are a necessary means to achieve change].
- B. Speaker A: Defense of their own actions: Attitude has consistently been 【insisting that their violent actions are a necessary means to achieve change】. Speaker B: View of this struggle: From 【clearly viewing the other side as an enemy and morally condemning them】→【shifting to disillusionment with the entire system of struggle and advocating for disengagement】.
- C. Speaker A: Defense of their actions: from 【Unwavering belief】→【Beginning to have self-doubt】. Speaker B: View on the struggle: from 【Hesitation】→【Turning to firmly support their organization】.
- D. Speaker A: View on their own actions: Attitude remains largely consistent. Speaker B: View on this struggle: Shows an evolution of thought during the dialogue.

Speaker A: Defense of their actions: Their attitude has consistently been [to insist that their violent actions are a necessary means to achieve change].
Speaker B: View on this struggle: From [clearly viewing the other side as the enemy and morally condemning them] → [shifting to disillusionment with the entire system of struggle and advocating for disengagement].


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: Throughout the entire conversation, what are the respective changes in the stances of the 1st speaker and the 2nd speaker? Please select the option that best fits.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: View on their own actions: Attitude remains largely consistent. Speaker B: View on this struggle: Shows an evolution of thought throughout the dialogue.
- B. Speaker A: View on this struggle: From 【explicitly viewing the other side as an enemy and morally condemning them】→【shifting to disillusionment with the entire system of struggle and advocating for disengagement】. Speaker B: Defense of their own actions: Attitude has consistently been 【insisting that their violent actions are a necessary means to achieve change】.
- C. Speaker A: Defense of their actions: their attitude has consistently been 【to insist that their violent actions are a necessary means to achieve change】. Speaker B: View on the struggle: from 【clearly viewing the opposing side as an enemy and morally condemning them】→【becoming disillusioned with the entire system of struggle and advocating for disengagement】.
- D. Speaker A: Defense of their own actions: from 【unwavering belief】 → 【starting to have self-doubt】. Speaker B: View on this struggle: from 【indecision】 → 【turns to firmly supporting their own organization】.

Speaker A: Defense of their actions: Attitude has consistently been [to insist that their violent actions are a necessary means to achieve change].
Speaker B: View on this struggle: From [clearly viewing the other side as the enemy and morally condemning them] → [shifting to becoming disillusioned with the entire system of struggle and advocating for disengagement].


多说话人上下文推理能力-多说话人观点总结

Question: What is the change in stance throughout the entire conversation for the speaker in the audio who says ‘now I'm killing to bring about change’ from 89.32 seconds to 94.36 seconds and ‘that's what we choose to believe’ from 282.84 seconds to 285.92 seconds? Please choose the most fitting option.

Choices:
- A. Speaker A: Defense of their actions: from 【unwavering belief】→【starting to have self-doubt】. Speaker B: View on this struggle: from 【hesitation】→【turning to firmly support their own organization】.
- B. Speaker A: View on their own actions: Attitude remains largely consistent. Speaker B: View on this struggle: Shows an evolution of thought in the dialogue.
- C. Speaker A: View on the struggle: From 【explicitly viewing the other side as an enemy and morally condemning them】→【becoming disillusioned with the entire system of struggle and advocating for disengagement】. Speaker B: Defense of their actions: Attitude has consistently been 【insisting that their violent actions are a necessary means to achieve change】.
- D. Speaker A: Justification for their actions: a consistent attitude of 【insisting that their violent actions are a necessary means to achieve change】. Speaker B: View of the struggle: from 【clearly defining the opposition as an enemy and morally condemning them】→【becoming disillusioned with the entire system of struggle and advocating for disengagement】.

Speaker A: Defense of their actions: The attitude has consistently been [to insist that their violent actions are a necessary means to achieve change].
Speaker B: View on this struggle: From [explicitly viewing the other side as an enemy and morally condemning them] → [becoming disillusioned with the entire system of struggle and advocating for disengagement].


说话人识别能力-说话人检索任务

Question: The speaker from 36.46s to 40.42s in the audio, which speaker are they in order of appearance in the entire dialogue?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Not enough information to determine the speaker)
- B. spk_5
- C. spk_1
- D. spk_7

So our friends from Delta have volunteered to come along and will escort the Marshals on the exchange.

Nothing will make sense to your American ears.

Non-native English with a Spanish accent


说话人识别能力-说话人检索任务

Question: The speaker who said ‘So our friends from Delta have volunteered to come along’ in the audio, is which speaker to appear in the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. spk_5
- B. spk_1
- C. spk_7
- D. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to identify the speaker)


说话人识别能力-说话人检索任务

Question: The male speaker in the audio who said ‘escort the Marshals on the exchange’ between 36.46 and 40.42 seconds, what is his order of appearance in the entire conversation?

Choices:
- A. spk_1
- B. spk_7
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the speaker)
- D. spk_5


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: Which of the following age ranges is the speaker in the audio below closest to?

Choices:
- A. Middle-aged (30-59 years old)
- B. Senior (60 years or older)
- C. Young adults (18-29 years old)
- D. Cannot determine (Insufficient information to determine the age group)

Yeah, love how we're gonna pretend like I planned this.

Now you use yourself as bait.


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: Which of the following is the closest age group for the speaker in the audio from 31.8 seconds to 34.68 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Middle-aged people (30-59 years old)
- B. Young people (18-29 years old)
- C. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)
- D. Seniors (60 and over)

Now you use yourself as bait.


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: Which of the following is closest to the age range of the speaker in the audio who said “love how we're gonna pretend”?

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (Insufficient information to determine the age group)
- B. Middle-aged people (30-59 years old)
- C. Young people (18-29 years old)
- D. Children (under 12 years old)

Now you use yourself as bait.


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: In the entire dialogue, which of the following is closest to the age group of the 11th speaker (spk_11)?

Choices:
- A. Children (under 12 years old)
- B. Young people (18-29 years old)
- C. Middle-aged adults (30-59 years old)
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine the age group)

Now you use yourself as bait.


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: Which of the following is closest to the age range of the female speaker who said “love how we're gonna pretend like I planned this” between 31.8 and 34.68 seconds?

Choices:
- A. Older adults (60 years and over)
- B. Young adults (18-29 years old)
- C. Middle-aged people (30-59 years old)
- D. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine the age group)

Now you use yourself as bait.


说话人属性识别能力-年龄段识别任务

Question: In the entire audio clip, which speakers are in the Children (under 12 years old) age group? (Answer using the global speaker order) Please select the most appropriate option.

Choices:
- A. Cannot be determined (insufficient information to determine the age group)
- B. spk_1
- C. spk_1, spk_11
- D. spk_11

Now you use yourself as bait.