Papers
arxiv:2603.02099

Recursive Think-Answer Process for LLMs and VLMs

Published on Mar 2
· Submitted by
Byung-Kwan Lee
on Mar 3
Authors:
,

Abstract

Recursive Think-Answer Process enables iterative reasoning cycles that improve accuracy and reduce self-reflective errors in language and vision-language models through confidence-based reinforcement learning.

AI-generated summary

Think-Answer reasoners such as DeepSeek-R1 have made notable progress by leveraging interpretable internal reasoning. However, despite the frequent presence of self-reflective cues like "Oops!", they remain vulnerable to output errors during single-pass inference. To address this limitation, we propose an efficient Recursive Think-Answer Process (R-TAP) that enables models to engage in iterative reasoning cycles and generate more accurate answers, going beyond conventional single-pass approaches. Central to this approach is a confidence generator that evaluates the certainty of model responses and guides subsequent improvements. By incorporating two complementary rewards-Recursively Confidence Increase Reward and Final Answer Confidence Reward-we show that R-TAP-enhanced models consistently outperform conventional single-pass methods for both large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs). Moreover, by analyzing the frequency of "Oops"-like expressions in model responses, we find that R-TAP-applied models exhibit significantly fewer self-reflective patterns, resulting in more stable and faster inference-time reasoning. We hope R-TAP pave the way evolving into efficient and elaborated methods to refine the reasoning processes of future AI.

Community

Paper author Paper submitter

🧠 Can models know when they are wrong—and try again?
Think–Answer models such as DeepSeek-R1 and OpenAI o1 sometimes produce self-reflective cues like “Oops” or “Let me reconsider,” suggesting internal uncertainty. However, even when this uncertainty is evident, the model does not actually revisit its reasoning—it still outputs a final random answer after a single reasoning pass.

💡 Core Idea - R-TAP (Recursive Think-Answer Process)
Instead of stopping after one Think–Answer pair, we enable models to:
1️⃣ Generate a Think–Answer
2️⃣ Estimate its own confidence via a dedicated Confidence Generator
3️⃣ Re-run reasoning if confidence is low
4️⃣ Stop early if confidence is sufficiently high

🎁 During training, we introduce two confidence-driven rewards:
1️⃣ Recursive Confidence Increase Reward
→ Encourages confidence to improve across iterations
2️⃣ Final Answer Confidence Reward
→ Encourages high-confidence termination

Sign up or log in to comment

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2603.02099 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2603.02099 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2603.02099 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.