RoboSPA: Can VLA Models Go Beyond Simple Scenes and Short-Horizon Tasks?
Abstract
RoboSPA is a large-scale robotic manipulation benchmark that evaluates vision-language-action models on fine-grained spatial reasoning and long-horizon procedural planning across progressively harder task variants.
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have shown promising progress in language-conditioned robotic manipulation. However, existing datasets and benchmarks mainly evaluate task completion under predefined settings, offering limited insight into model reasoning under increasing spatial and procedural complexity. We introduce RoboSPA (Robot Spatial-Procedural Assessment), a large-scale robotic manipulation dataset and benchmark for diagnosing embodied reasoning in VLA models. RoboSPA focuses on two core dimensions, Fine-Grained Spatial Reasoning and Long-Horizon Procedural Planning, covering 10 task categories and 56 base tasks. Each task is instantiated across five difficulty levels, yielding 280 variants with increasing spatial ambiguity and procedural complexity. We collect 527K trajectories across multiple embodiments and diverse scenes. Beyond binary success rate, RoboSPA introduces diagnostic metrics for more detailed evaluation. Experiments on representative VLA models show that current systems still struggle with complex spatial relations, precise low-level execution, and memory-intensive planning. These results establish RoboSPA as a challenging diagnostic benchmark for developing more capable, reliable, and generalizable embodied agents. Our data and code are available at https://github.com/fanzhenxuan/RoboSPA.
Community
Can VLA models go beyond simple scenes and short-horizon tasks?
We introduce RoboSPA, a large-scale diagnostic benchmark for evaluating VLA models on fine-grained spatial reasoning and long-horizon procedural planning. It contains 56 tasks across 10 capability categories, 5 difficulty levels, 5 robotic embodiments, and 527K+ trajectories.
Evaluating RDT, GO-1, π0.5, and X-VLA reveals a clear capability gap: performance drops sharply as spatial ambiguity and task horizon increase, with all models achieving <25% average success at the highest difficulty level.
RoboSPA further supports step-level evaluation and failure diagnosis, enabling more fine-grained analysis beyond binary task success.
Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper