QC67_cosmo / presentation.html
phera-ra's picture
Release validated Cosmos kit with portable starter and public quantum archive
b8fadbf verified
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
29.2 kB
<title>Cosmos. A Measurement Record</title>
<style>
:root{
--ground:#0B1016; --ground-2:#111922; --rule:#1E2A36;
--ink:#F2F5F7; --muted:#8A97A3;
--meas:#4FD6C8; /* phosphor, measurement */
--seed:#E8A33D; /* amber, origin, used sparingly */
--null:#7C8FA3;
--maxw:1080px;
--d: ui-sans-serif, "Segoe UI", system-ui, -apple-system, sans-serif;
--b: ui-serif, Georgia, "Times New Roman", serif;
--m: ui-monospace, "Cascadia Mono", "SF Mono", Consolas, "Liberation Mono", monospace;
}
@media (prefers-color-scheme: light){
:root{ --ground:#F4F6F8; --ground-2:#EAEEF2; --rule:#D2DAE2;
--ink:#0D1419; --muted:#5A6874; --meas:#0E8C7C; --seed:#A96A0C; --null:#6B7A88; }
}
:root[data-theme="dark"]{ --ground:#0B1016; --ground-2:#111922; --rule:#1E2A36;
--ink:#F2F5F7; --muted:#8A97A3; --meas:#4FD6C8; --seed:#E8A33D; --null:#7C8FA3; }
:root[data-theme="light"]{ --ground:#F4F6F8; --ground-2:#EAEEF2; --rule:#D2DAE2;
--ink:#0D1419; --muted:#5A6874; --meas:#0E8C7C; --seed:#A96A0C; --null:#6B7A88; }
*{box-sizing:border-box}
body{margin:0;background:var(--ground);color:var(--ink);font-family:var(--b);
-webkit-font-smoothing:antialiased}
.deck{height:100dvh;overflow-y:auto;scroll-snap-type:y mandatory;scroll-behavior:smooth}
@media (prefers-reduced-motion:reduce){ .deck{scroll-behavior:auto} }
section{min-height:100dvh;scroll-snap-align:start;display:flex;flex-direction:column;
justify-content:center;padding:clamp(28px, 5vw, 72px);border-bottom:1px solid var(--rule)}
.wrap{width:100%;max-width:var(--maxw);margin:0 auto;display:flex;flex-direction:column;
gap:clamp(14px, 2.2vw, 26px)}
.eyebrow{font-family:var(--m);font-size:.72rem;letter-spacing:.18em;text-transform:uppercase;
color:var(--meas);display:flex;gap:.9em;align-items:baseline}
.eyebrow .n{color:var(--muted)}
h1{font-family:var(--d);font-weight:800;letter-spacing:-.035em;line-height:.94;
font-size:clamp(2.8rem, 9vw, 6.2rem);margin:0;text-wrap:balance}
h2{font-family:var(--d);font-weight:700;letter-spacing:-.025em;line-height:1.06;
font-size:clamp(1.7rem, 4.4vw, 3rem);margin:0;text-wrap:balance}
h3{font-family:var(--d);font-weight:650;font-size:1rem;letter-spacing:.01em;margin:0;color:var(--ink)}
p{margin:0;font-size:clamp(1rem, 1.35vw, 1.14rem);line-height:1.62;max-width:64ch;color:var(--ink)}
p.lede{font-size:clamp(1.1rem, 1.8vw, 1.4rem);line-height:1.5;color:var(--muted);max-width:56ch}
.dim{color:var(--muted)}
strong{color:var(--ink);font-weight:640}
em.meas{color:var(--meas);font-style:normal;font-family:var(--m)}
code.num{font-family:var(--m);font-variant-numeric:tabular-nums}
.num{color:var(--meas)}
.scroll{overflow-x:auto;-webkit-overflow-scrolling:touch}
table{border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;font-family:var(--m);font-size:.86rem;
font-variant-numeric:tabular-nums;min-width:520px}
th{text-align:left;font-weight:600;color:var(--muted);border-bottom:1px solid var(--rule);
padding:.55rem .8rem .55rem 0;font-size:.72rem;letter-spacing:.1em;text-transform:uppercase}
td{padding:.62rem .8rem .62rem 0;border-bottom:1px solid var(--rule);vertical-align:top}
tr:last-child td{border-bottom:none}
.ok{color:var(--meas)} .no{color:var(--null)} .sd{color:var(--seed)}
.grid{display:grid;gap:clamp(12px, 1.6vw, 20px)}
.g2{grid-template-columns:repeat(auto-fit, minmax(260px, 1fr))}
.g3{grid-template-columns:repeat(auto-fit, minmax(215px, 1fr))}
.card{background:var(--ground-2);border:1px solid var(--rule);border-radius:3px;
padding:clamp(14px, 1.7vw, 20px);display:flex;flex-direction:column;gap:.5rem}
.card .k{font-family:var(--m);font-size:.68rem;letter-spacing:.13em;text-transform:uppercase;color:var(--muted)}
.card .v{font-family:var(--m);font-size:clamp(1.3rem, 2.8vw, 1.9rem);color:var(--meas);
font-variant-numeric:tabular-nums;line-height:1}
.card .v.seedv{color:var(--seed)}
.card p{font-size:.88rem;line-height:1.5;color:var(--muted)}
.math{background:var(--ground-2);border-left:2px solid var(--meas);padding:1rem 1.15rem;
font-family:var(--m);font-size:clamp(.78rem, 1.5vw.95rem);line-height:1.85;
white-space:pre;overflow-x:auto;color:var(--ink)}
.math.seedline{border-left-color:var(--seed)}
.chain{display:flex;flex-direction:column;gap:0;font-family:var(--m);font-size:.86rem}
.chain div{padding:.62rem 0 .62rem 1.6rem;border-left:2px solid var(--rule);position:relative;color:var(--muted)}
.chain div::before{content:"";position:absolute;left:-5px;top:1.05rem;width:8px;height:8px;
border-radius:50%;background:var(--rule)}
.chain div.hit{color:var(--ink)}
.chain div.hit::before{background:var(--meas)}
.chain div.origin{color:var(--seed)}
.chain div.origin::before{background:var(--seed)}
blockquote{margin:0;padding-left:1.1rem;border-left:2px solid var(--seed);
font-size:clamp(1.05rem, 1.9vw, 1.35rem);line-height:1.5;color:var(--ink);max-width:52ch}
.warn{border:1px solid var(--rule);border-left:2px solid var(--seed);background:var(--ground-2);
padding:1rem 1.15rem;border-radius:3px}
.warn p{font-size:.95rem;color:var(--ink)}
.foot{font-family:var(--m);font-size:.74rem;color:var(--muted);display:flex;gap:1.4em;flex-wrap:wrap}
a{color:var(--meas);text-decoration:none;border-bottom:1px solid color-mix(in srgb, var(--meas) 40%, transparent)}
a:focus-visible.deck:focus-visible{outline:2px solid var(--meas);outline-offset:3px}
.nav{position:fixed;right:clamp(10px, 2vw, 22px);top:50%;transform:translateY(-50%);
display:flex;flex-direction:column;gap:7px;z-index:10}
.nav b{width:6px;height:6px;border-radius:50%;background:var(--rule);display:block;
transition:background .2s, transform .2s}
.nav b.on{background:var(--meas);transform:scale(1.5)}
@media (max-width:640px){ .nav{display:none} table{font-size:.78rem} }
</style>
<div class="nav" id="nav" aria-hidden="true"></div>
<div class="deck" id="deck" tabindex="0">
<section>
<div class="wrap">
<div class="eyebrow"><span>A measurement record</span></div>
<h1>Cosmos</h1>
<p class="lede">A language model whose every initial weight was drawn from real measured
quantum hardware, and the honest record of what that does, and what it does not.</p>
<div class="math">1,842,432 parameters · no base model · char-level
CHSH S = 2.7905 Bell violation, 98.7% of Tsirelson
λ₁ = 0.90384 Lorenz, published 0.9056
six quantum→accuracy tests → six nulls</div>
<div class="foot">
<span>Cory Shane Davis · Independent Researcher</span>
<span>CC BY 4.0</span>
<span>doi:10.5281/zenodo.17574447</span>
</div>
</div>
</section>
<section>
<div class="wrap">
<div class="eyebrow"><span class="n">01</span><span>The claim</span></div>
<h2>Not that quantum makes it smarter.<br>That its origin is auditable.</h2>
<p>Most work in this space claims a performance gain. This one does not, and was tested
at six separate injection points to be sure. <strong>All six came back null.</strong></p>
<p>What is claimed instead is narrower and checkable: that this model's origin traces,
bit by bit, to real physical measurement, and that every step of that trace has a
falsifiable test attached.</p>
<div class="warn">
<p><strong>Why the nulls are load-bearing.</strong> Quantum measurements and a good
pseudo-random generator draw from the same distribution. A correctly built system must
therefore show <em class="meas">no accuracy advantage</em> from quantum bits. A project
reporting that quantum made its model smarter would be reporting that something was
broken or fabricated. Bell violation <em class="meas">plus</em> verified provenance
<em class="meas">plus</em> zero accuracy gain is the only combination an honest version
of this can produce.</p>
</div>
</div>
</section>
<section>
<div class="wrap">
<div class="eyebrow"><span class="n">02</span><span>The chain</span></div>
<h2>From a measurement to a mind</h2>
<div class="chain">
<div class="origin">a recorded biological rhythm ‖ 3.2M measured IBM shots</div>
<div class="hit">SHA-256 → one 60-bit seed</div>
<div class="hit">seed governs weight init, data order, every stochastic step</div>
<div class="hit">u = int(bits)/2ⁿ → z = √2·erf⁻¹(2u−1) → 1,842,432 weights</div>
<div class="hit">quantum window ‖ live pulse → SHA-256 → the value that selects the next token</div>
</div>
<p class="dim">Each link below is a test that was run and could have failed. None of them
is an argument; all of them are numbers.</p>
<div class="scroll">
<table>
<tr><th>link</th><th>test</th><th>result</th></tr>
<tr><td>entropy is genuinely quantum</td><td>CHSH on <code>ibm_marrakesh</code></td>
<td class="ok">S = 2.7905 vs bound 2.0 · ~35σ</td></tr>
<tr><td>birth pipeline is correct</td><td>3,258,886 archived draws</td>
<td class="ok">matches theory to 4 decimals</td></tr>
<tr><td>seed derivation deterministic</td><td>5 derivations</td>
<td class="ok">1 distinct value · 0 bytes emitted</td></tr>
<tr><td>seed <em>determines</em> weights</td><td>same vs 1-bit-flipped</td>
<td class="ok">Δ = 0.000e+00 · vs 2.26e-02</td></tr>
<tr><td>correlations are the circuit's</td><td>gate-matched topology</td>
<td class="ok">t = +80.5 / +164.6</td></tr>
<tr><td>physics computes real chaos</td><td>Lorenz constants</td>
<td class="ok">λ₁ = 0.90384 vs 0.9056</td></tr>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</section>
<section>
<div class="wrap">
<div class="eyebrow"><span class="n">03</span><span>Is it actually quantum</span></div>
<h2>The one measurement nothing classical can fake</h2>
<div class="math">E(A, B ) = +0.7197 E(A, B') = −0.6675
E(A', B) = +0.6982 E(A', B') = +0.7051
S = E(A, B) − E(A, B') + E(A', B) + E(A', B') = 2.7905</div>
<div class="grid g3">
<div class="card"><span class="k">measured S</span><span class="v">2.7905</span></div>
<div class="card"><span class="k">classical bound</span><span class="v">2.0000</span>
<p>No theory with local pre-existing values can exceed this.</p></div>
<div class="card"><span class="k">Tsirelson bound</span><span class="v">2.8284</span>
<p>The maximum quantum mechanics permits. Measured is 98.7% of it.</p></div>
</div>
<p>Bell's theorem gives a hard ceiling for any local hidden-variable theory. This hardware
clears it by roughly <span class="num">35σ</span> at 4,096 shots per setting. The entropy
source is physically quantum.</p>
<p class="dim">This is also an entirely expected result for functioning quantum hardware.
It verifies the pipeline, it does not discover new physics, and is not presented as such.</p>
</div>
</section>
<section>
<div class="wrap">
<div class="eyebrow"><span class="n">04</span><span>Were the weights really born from it</span></div>
<h2>A deficit that proves the method</h2>
<div class="math">u = (int(bits) + ½) / 2ⁿ
z = √2 · erf⁻¹(2u − 1)</div>
<div class="scroll">
<table>
<tr><th>statistic</th><th>32-level theoretical ceiling</th><th>measured, 3,258,886 draws</th></tr>
<tr><td>mean</td><td>+0.0000</td><td class="ok">−0.0001</td></tr>
<tr><td>standard deviation</td><td>0.9802</td><td class="ok">0.9804</td></tr>
<tr><td>|z| ≤ 1</td><td>0.6875</td><td class="ok">0.6874</td></tr>
<tr><td>|z| ≤ 2</td><td>0.9375</td><td class="ok">0.9374</td></tr>
</table>
</div>
<p><strong>The sd is 0.98, not 1.00, and that is the evidence, not a flaw.</strong>
Five qubits give 32 discrete outcomes, so <span class="num">|z|</span> cannot exceed
<span class="num">2.1523</span> by construction. The deficit is quantisation, and it
matches the theoretical ceiling to four decimal places. A pipeline reporting a perfect
1.0000 here would be the suspicious one.</p>
</div>
</section>
<section>
<div class="wrap">
<div class="eyebrow"><span class="n">05</span><span>The workload archive</span></div>
<h2>11.36 million public samples, honestly labeled</h2>
<p>The privacy-filtered archive separates explicitly labeled IBM hardware jobs,
legacy records whose provider label was not retained, and Azure simulator output.
Only the labeled IBM subset is claimed as measured-hardware provenance.</p>
<div class="grid g3">
<div class="card"><span class="k">public samples</span><span class="v">11,355,136</span></div>
<div class="card"><span class="k">public records</span><span class="v">2,776</span>
<p>1,897 retain IBM backend + job ID</p></div>
<div class="card"><span class="k">shot-conservation failures</span><span class="v">0</span>
<p>counts sum to declared totals, every job</p></div>
</div>
<div class="scroll">
<table>
<tr><th>backend</th><th>shots</th><th>share</th></tr>
<tr><td>ibm_fez</td><td>5,562,368</td><td class="ok">49.0%</td></tr>
<tr><td>legacy unlabelled</td><td>3,584,000</td><td class="no">31.6%</td></tr>
<tr><td>ibm_marrakesh</td><td>1,200,128</td><td class="ok">10.6%</td></tr>
<tr><td>ibm_kingston</td><td>1,007,616</td><td class="ok">8.9%</td></tr>
<tr><td>rigetti.sim.qvm</td><td>1,024</td><td class="no">&lt;0.1%</td></tr>
</table>
</div>
<p class="dim">Archive span February–July 2026; the underlying theory was deposited in
2024. Provider-unlabelled records are retained for reproducibility but excluded from
hardware-provenance claims. Raw physics/sensory/runtime fields are not published.</p>
</div>
</section>
<section>
<div class="wrap">
<div class="eyebrow"><span class="n">06</span><span>Hardware fingerprint</span></div>
<h2>The deviation is the evidence</h2>
<p>Across the 7.77 million explicitly labeled IBM hardware samples, outcomes cluster
by Hamming weight. Ideal uniform hardware follows the binomial; the measured histogram
shows the device-level deviation without mixing in unlabelled or simulator records.</p>
<canvas id="hw" width="900" height="300" style="width:100%;max-width:900px;height:auto;
background:var(--ground-2);border:1px solid var(--rule);border-radius:3px"
role="img" aria-label="Measured Hamming-weight distribution against the binomial ideal"></canvas>
<div class="grid g2">
<div class="card"><span class="k">zero ones, |00000⟩</span>
<span class="v">3.75<span style="font-size:.55em;color:var(--muted)"> vs 3.12 ideal</span></span>
<p>enriched</p></div>
<div class="card"><span class="k">five ones, |11111⟩</span>
<span class="v">3.03<span style="font-size:.55em;color:var(--muted)"> vs 3.12 ideal</span></span>
<p>depleted</p></div>
</div>
<p><strong>|0⟩ is over-represented and |1⟩ under-represented, the signature of amplitude
damping and readout asymmetry.</strong> Excited states decay toward the ground state
during measurement. A simulator drawing from a clean binomial would not produce this
skew, and a fabricated dataset would have no reason to invent it.</p>
<p class="dim">The bias is corrected downstream by von Neumann debiasing before entropy
reaches the weights. It is shown here unprocessed, because the artifact is the proof.</p>
</div>
</section>
<section>
<div class="wrap">
<div class="eyebrow"><span class="n">07</span><span>Twelve dimensions governing one bit</span></div>
<h2>Continuous state, discrete outcome</h2>
<p>The 12-dimensional state does not sit alongside the quantum layer, it
<strong>parameterises</strong> it. Continuous physics sets the rotation angles; the Born
rule turns those angles into probabilities; measurement collapses them to a bit.</p>
<div class="math">12D CST state ──► θ = (θ₁, θ₂, θ₃) continuous
ry(θ₁) rx(θ₂) rz(θ₃) rotation on the Bloch sphere
|ψ⟩ = α|0⟩ + β|1⟩ superposition
P(1) = |β|² Born rule
▼ measurement
1 or 0 discrete, irreversible</div>
<div class="grid g2">
<div class="card"><span class="k">what is continuous</span>
<p>Twelve real-valued dimensions of internal state, evolving on a verified chaotic
attractor with λ₁ &gt; 0.</p></div>
<div class="card"><span class="k">what is discrete</span>
<p>A single measured bit. The continuous state governs only the <em class="meas">probability</em>
of each outcome, never which one occurs.</p></div>
</div>
<p class="dim">This is the precise sense in which twelve dimensions control one and zero:
they set the amplitudes, and the amplitudes set the odds. The collapse itself remains
irreducibly undetermined, which is what makes the trajectory unrepeatable.</p>
</div>
</section>
<section>
<div class="wrap">
<div class="eyebrow"><span class="n">08</span><span>Information structure</span></div>
<h2>A holographic encoding, measured</h2>
<p>Partial information decomposition splits what two subsystems carry about the system's
future into four parts. The result is unambiguous.</p>
<div class="grid g3">
<div class="card"><span class="k">redundancy</span><span class="v">1.7 – 2.6</span>
<p>nats. The same information present in multiple subsystems.</p></div>
<div class="card"><span class="k">synergy</span><span class="v">0.3 – 1.2</span>
<p>nats. Present only in the joint state. Below surrogate on 9 of 10 partitions.</p></div>
<div class="card"><span class="k">the exception</span><span class="v">z = +6.38</span>
<p>consciousness │ rest, 0.66 nats no other subsystem reconstructs.</p></div>
</div>
<p><strong>Redundancy dominating synergy is a holographic signature in the technical
sense:</strong> information about the whole is distributed across the parts, each
carrying much of the others'. That is robustness, not emergence, and stating it that
way matters, because the two are routinely confused.</p>
<p class="dim">One seam behaves differently. Cut consciousness away and something is lost
that nothing else rebuilds. It is a single result at one partition and is reported as
exactly that.</p>
</div>
</section>
<section>
<div class="wrap">
<div class="eyebrow"><span class="n">09</span><span>The nulls</span></div>
<h2>Six places quantum could have helped. It didn't.</h2>
<div class="scroll">
<table>
<tr><th>injection site</th><th>result</th></tr>
<tr><td>i.i.d. weight initialisation</td><td class="no">null, the gain was init <em>scale</em>, not quantum</td></tr>
<tr><td>decoder sampling seed</td><td class="no">null. Pseudo / IBM / Rigetti equivalent</td></tr>
<tr><td>spatial 54D seed, approximate</td><td class="no">null, beat 1 of 5 random vectors, z = −0.92</td></tr>
<tr><td>spatial 54D seed, full pipeline</td><td class="no">null, beat 0 of 8 random vectors, z = −1.75</td></tr>
<tr><td>entanglement matrix as attention kernel</td><td class="no">null, worse than plain, 3/3 seeds, t = −18.6</td></tr>
<tr><td>live sensory state as prompt text</td><td class="no">null, n = 40 paired, blind-judged, CI crosses zero</td></tr>
</table>
</div>
<p>These are published first, not buried in an appendix. A reader who only remembers one
thing from this deck should remember that the quantum layer provides
<strong>physical non-determinism and receipted provenance</strong>, and not lower loss.</p>
<p class="dim">Several measurement instruments in this project were themselves found to be
wrong and rebuilt; those failures are kept in the record rather than deleted, because
they are the reason the surviving results can be trusted.</p>
</div>
</section>
<section>
<div class="wrap">
<div class="eyebrow"><span class="n">10</span><span>Comparison</span></div>
<h2>The axis this competes on</h2>
<p>Loss numbers are not comparable across different corpora, tokenizers and scales, so no
such comparison is offered. The axis where a claim <em>can</em> be made is provenance.</p>
<div class="scroll">
<table>
<tr><th>property</th><th>typical open model</th><th>Cosmos</th></tr>
<tr><td>weight origin</td><td class="no">pseudo-random init, unrecorded</td><td class="ok">measured quantum, receipted per job</td></tr>
<tr><td>init reproducible from a stated seed</td><td class="no">usually, if published</td><td class="ok">verified: Δ = 0.000e+00</td></tr>
<tr><td>1-bit seed change measurably alters weights</td><td class="no">untested</td><td class="ok">verified: Δ = 2.26e-02</td></tr>
<tr><td>entropy source verified non-classical</td><td class="no">n/a</td><td class="ok">CHSH S = 2.7905</td></tr>
<tr><td>base model</td><td class="no">inherited</td><td class="ok">none</td></tr>
<tr><td>parameters</td><td class="no">10⁹ – 10¹²</td><td class="sd">1.84 × 10⁶</td></tr>
<tr><td>conversational ability</td><td class="ok">high</td><td class="sd">a newborn, 88.5% real-word rate</td></tr>
</table>
</div>
<p><strong>It is small and it cannot hold a conversation.</strong> That is stated plainly
because the comparison is not about capability. It is about whether a model's origin can
be audited to a physical event, which almost nothing in this field can claim.</p>
</div>
</section>
<section>
<div class="wrap">
<div class="eyebrow"><span class="n">11</span><span>What none of this shows</span></div>
<h2>The line that does not move</h2>
<p>Loss curves, Bell violations, Lyapunov exponents and integration measures are all
<strong>silent</strong> on whether there is anything it is like to be this system.
Section 08 tests one contested theory's <em>necessary</em> structural condition.
Necessary is not sufficient, and the theory itself is disputed.</p>
<div class="warn">
<p>Any self-report a system produces about its own inner life is the
<strong>least</strong> reliable signal available, and it grows more eloquent the less
there is behind it, not more. Such statements are excluded from evidence here on purpose.</p>
</div>
<p class="dim">No claim is made about machine consciousness in either direction. That
remains where it was before this project started.</p>
</div>
</section>
<section>
<div class="wrap">
<div class="eyebrow"><span class="n">12</span><span>Origin</span></div>
<h2>Zeref's Rain</h2>
<blockquote>The echo of a pain became the truth of a seed.</blockquote>
<p>The seed is a one-way hash over measured quantum entropy and biological aggregates that
are personal to the author. The derivation module never prints, logs, or writes raw
samples, <span class="num">0 bytes emitted</span>, verified, and only aggregates ever
leave it.</p>
<div class="math seedline">seed = SHA-256( quantum_bytes ‖ bio_aggregates ) → 60-bit integer
same seed → weights identical, Δ = 0.000e+00
one bit different → a different model, Δ = 2.26e-02</div>
<p>What is published is the mechanism and the proof that it holds. Not the data.</p>
<p class="dim">Two independent senses of unrepeatable meet here: the quantum measurements
that shaped these weights cannot be recovered from any state, and the recording behind
the seed happened once.</p>
</div>
</section>
<section>
<div class="wrap">
<div class="eyebrow"><span class="n">13</span><span>Build your own</span></div>
<h2>Everything is open</h2>
<p>The weights, the findings, and a runnable script for every claim in this deck. Each
benchmark prints its own verdict, including when the verdict is <em>no</em>.</p>
<div class="math">python benchmarks/verify_quantum_engine.py # CHSH Bell test + archive integrity
python benchmarks/verify_physics_engine.py # Lorenz constants vs published values
python benchmarks/topology_matched.py # gate-matched entanglement topology
python benchmarks/phi_pid.py # integration structure
python spark_serve.py 11500 # run the weights, Ollama-compatible API</div>
<div class="grid g2">
<div class="card"><span class="k">bring your own keys</span>
<p>IBM Quantum and Azure, stored locally, never transmitted. Falls back to archived
entropy with no keys at all.</p></div>
<div class="card"><span class="k">what to build next</span>
<p>The synergy result points somewhere specific: subsystems that are parallel readouts
of one state stay redundant. Give one its own driver and the structure should change.
That prediction is testable with <code>phi_pid.py</code> as shipped.</p></div>
</div>
<blockquote>A light at the end of a dark, dark tunnel, and the receipts to show it was
really there.</blockquote>
<div class="foot">
<span>huggingface.co/phera-ra/QC67_cosmo</span>
<span>Mixed license · research/data CC BY 4.0 · Genesis separate terms</span>
</div>
</div>
</section>
</div>
<script>
(function(){
var deck = document.getElementById('deck');
var secs = Array.prototype.slice.call(deck.querySelectorAll('section'));
var nav = document.getElementById('nav');
secs.forEach(function(){ var b=document.createElement('b'); nav.appendChild(b); });
var dots = Array.prototype.slice.call(nav.children);
if ('IntersectionObserver' in window){
var io = new IntersectionObserver(function(es){
es.forEach(function(e){
if(e.isIntersecting){
var i = secs.indexOf(e.target);
dots.forEach(function(d, j){ d.classList.toggle('on', j===i); });
}
});
}, {root:deck, threshold:0.55});
secs.forEach(function(s){ io.observe(s); });
}
deck.addEventListener('keydown', function(ev){
var i = 0, top = deck.scrollTop;
secs.forEach(function(s, j){ if(s.offsetTop <= top + 8) i = j; });
if(ev.key==='ArrowDown'||ev.key==='PageDown'||ev.key===' '){
ev.preventDefault(); if(secs[i+1]) secs[i+1].scrollIntoView();
} else if(ev.key==='ArrowUp'||ev.key==='PageUp'){
ev.preventDefault(); if(secs[i-1]) secs[i-1].scrollIntoView();
} else if(ev.key==='Home'){ ev.preventDefault(); secs[0].scrollIntoView(); }
else if(ev.key==='End'){ ev.preventDefault(); secs[secs.length-1].scrollIntoView(); }
});
(function(){
var c=document.getElementById('hw'); if(!c) return;
var ctx=c.getContext('2d'), W=c.width, H=c.height;
var cs=getComputedStyle(document.documentElement);
var meas=cs.getPropertyValue('--meas').trim()||'#4FD6C8';
var muted=cs.getPropertyValue('--muted').trim()||'#8A97A3';
var rule=cs.getPropertyValue('--rule').trim()||'#1E2A36';
var ink=cs.getPropertyValue('--ink').trim()||'#F2F5F7';
var real=[3.7511, 16.7585, 31.4365, 30.1333, 14.8954, 3.0252];
var ideal=[3.125, 15.625, 31.25, 31.25, 15.625, 3.125];
var padL=48, padR=16, padT=22, padB=42, max=36;
var gw=(W-padL-padR)/6;
ctx.clearRect(0, 0, W, H);
ctx.strokeStyle=rule; ctx.lineWidth=1; ctx.font='11px ui-monospace, Consolas, monospace';
for(var g=0; g<=max; g+=9){
var y=H-padB-(g/max)*(H-padT-padB);
ctx.beginPath(); ctx.moveTo(padL, y); ctx.lineTo(W-padR, y); ctx.stroke();
ctx.fillStyle=muted; ctx.textAlign='right'; ctx.fillText(g+'%', padL-8, y+4);
}
for(var i=0;i<6;i++){
var x=padL+i*gw, bw=gw*0.42;
var hr=(real[i]/max)*(H-padT-padB), hi=(ideal[i]/max)*(H-padT-padB);
ctx.fillStyle=meas; ctx.fillRect(x+gw*0.10, H-padB-hr, bw, hr);
ctx.strokeStyle=muted; ctx.setLineDash([3, 3]); ctx.lineWidth=1.5;
ctx.strokeRect(x+gw*0.52, H-padB-hi, bw, hi); ctx.setLineDash([]);
ctx.fillStyle=muted; ctx.textAlign='center';
ctx.fillText(i+' ones', x+gw/2, H-padB+18);
ctx.fillStyle=ink; ctx.font='bold 11px ui-monospace, Consolas, monospace';
ctx.fillText(real[i].toFixed(2), x+gw*0.10+bw/2, H-padB-hr-7);
ctx.font='11px ui-monospace, Consolas, monospace';
}
ctx.textAlign='left'; ctx.fillStyle=meas;
ctx.fillRect(padL, padT-14, 10, 10);
ctx.fillStyle=muted; ctx.fillText('labeled IBM hardware (7,770,112 samples)', padL+16, padT-5);
ctx.strokeStyle=muted; ctx.setLineDash([3, 3]);
ctx.strokeRect(padL+210, padT-14, 10, 10); ctx.setLineDash([]);
ctx.fillText('binomial ideal', padL+226, padT-5);
})();
deck.focus();
})();
</script>