Hugging Face's logo
Wreepa Trynka's picture

Wreepa Trynka

Grimble
12 4

AI & ML interests

None yet

Recent Activity

new activity 8 days ago
PocketAiHub/Qwen3.8-27B-Abliterated-MTPLX-Optimized-Speed:MTPLX warning/error
new activity 20 days ago
xixxix-HF/NikkiObsession:Nikki not working
reacted to aufklarer's post with 🔥 2 months ago
Voice cloning models measured across five languages: OmniVoice, Chatterbox, VoxCPM2, Fish Audio I published a new Soniqo benchmark post for local voice cloning models across five languages: https://www.soniqo.audio/blog/voice-cloning-benchmarks Models: - OmniVoice int8 - Chatterbox Multilingual fp16 - VoxCPM2 bf16 - Fish Audio S2 Pro fp16 Languages: - English - German - Modern Standard Arabic - Spanish - Mandarin Chinese The benchmark uses Google FLEURS test clips as dataset references. Each row includes the reference audio, generated audio, speaker similarity, WER/CER, generated audio length, and RTF. Main result in this run: OmniVoice was the strongest all-around row set, with 0.707 mean speaker cosine across all five languages, 0.0% ASR error, and mean RTF 0.45. VoxCPM2 bf16 was especially strong on Arabic speaker match. Fish Audio S2 Pro showed strong German/Arabic similarity but slower RTF. Chatterbox Multilingual was competitive on Arabic and Spanish. This is an engineering benchmark, not a human MOS study. The speaker-similarity values should be compared within this table because every row uses the same local speaker-embedding pipeline. Try the stack locally with Speech Studio: https://www.soniqo.audio/speech-studio https://github.com/soniqo/speech-studio Underlying Swift library/CLI: https://github.com/soniqo/speech-swift Soniqo models and exports: https://huggingface.co/soniqo https://huggingface.co/aufklarer What model or language should I add next?
View all activity

Organizations

None yet