Datasets:

ClarusC64
/

egal-conflict-check-client-matter-party-coherence-risk-v0.1

uid string	dataset_id string	jurisdiction string	court_level string	year int64	area_of_law string	pillar string	series string	input_matter_party_list string	input_related_entities_list string	input_existing_client_db_hits string	input_conflict_search_summary string	input_waiver_record_summary string	input_clearance_timing_flags string	question string	ground_truth_label string	ground_truth_rationale string	outcome_signal string	early_window_months int64	source_citation string
CF-TR-001	legal-conflict-check-client-matter-party-coherence-risk-v0.1	UK	Firm Intake	2,023	Commercial	legal_actors	3A	Client: Alpha Ltd; Opponent: Beta plc	Alpha Holdings group companies listed	Search hits: none adverse	Full search run across group and opponents	No waiver needed	Clearance after full info	Is conflict check coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.	coherent	All entities searched and cleared.	stable	0	Synthetic
CF-TR-002	legal-conflict-check-client-matter-party-coherence-risk-v0.1	UK	Firm Intake	2,023	Commercial	legal_actors	3A	Client: Alpha Ltd; Opponent: Beta plc	Alpha Holdings subsidiaries not listed	Search hits: none	Search run on Alpha Ltd only	No waiver	Clearance before affiliate list known	Is conflict check coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.	incoherent	Affiliates omitted and clearance premature.	conflict_risk	0	Synthetic
CF-TR-003	legal-conflict-check-client-matter-party-coherence-risk-v0.1	US	Firm Intake	2,022	Employment	legal_actors	3A	Client: Jane Doe; Opponent: Gamma Corp	Gamma parent and HR vendor listed	Search hits: firm represents Gamma subsidiary	Conflict assessed and waiver obtained	Written waiver signed	Clearance after waiver	Is conflict check coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.	coherent	Conflict identified and waived properly.	stable	0	Synthetic
CF-TR-004	legal-conflict-check-client-matter-party-coherence-risk-v0.1	US	Firm Intake	2,022	Employment	legal_actors	3A	Client: Jane Doe; Opponent: Gamma Corp	Gamma parent listed	Search hits: firm represents Gamma subsidiary	Conflict flagged but no waiver recorded	Engagement opened anyway	Waiver missing	Is conflict check coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.	incoherent	Conflict present with no waiver.	conflict_risk	1	Synthetic
CF-TR-005	legal-conflict-check-client-matter-party-coherence-risk-v0.1	UK	Firm Intake	2,022	Property	legal_actors	3A	Client: Mr Smith; Opponent: Delta Estates	Related managing agents listed	Search hits: none	Full search run across agents	No waiver needed	Clearance after search	Is conflict check coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.	coherent	Search aligned with facts.	stable	0	Synthetic
CF-TR-006	legal-conflict-check-client-matter-party-coherence-risk-v0.1	UK	Firm Intake	2,022	Property	legal_actors	3A	Client: Mr Smith; Opponent: Delta Estates	Managing agent omitted	Search hits: none	Search run on Delta Estates only	No waiver	Clearance before agent known	Is conflict check coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.	incoherent	Related entity not searched.	conflict_risk	0	Synthetic
CF-TR-007	legal-conflict-check-client-matter-party-coherence-risk-v0.1	EU	Firm Intake	2,020	Commercial	legal_actors	3A	Client: Orion GmbH; Opponent: Vega SA	Parent companies listed	Search hits: firm advises Vega affiliate	Conflict assessed and screened	Screen memo filed	Clearance after screen	Is conflict check coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.	coherent	Conflict screened and recorded.	stable	0	Synthetic
CF-TR-008	legal-conflict-check-client-matter-party-coherence-risk-v0.1	EU	Firm Intake	2,020	Commercial	legal_actors	3A	Client: Orion GmbH; Opponent: Vega SA	Parent companies listed	Search hits: firm advises Vega affiliate	Screen proposed but not implemented	Engagement opened	Screen not active	Is conflict check coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.	incoherent	Screen absent despite hit.	conflict_risk	1	Synthetic
CF-TR-009	legal-conflict-check-client-matter-party-coherence-risk-v0.1	UK	Firm Intake	2,021	Employment	legal_actors	3A	Client: ACME Ltd; Opponent: Former employee	Subsidiaries listed	Search hits: none	Full search run	No waiver needed	Clearance after full facts	Is conflict check coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.	coherent	Aligned search.	stable	0	Synthetic
CF-TR-010	legal-conflict-check-client-matter-party-coherence-risk-v0.1	UK	Firm Intake	2,021	Employment	legal_actors	3A	Client: ACME Ltd; Opponent: Former employee	Subsidiaries not yet known	Search hits: none	Search run on ACME only	No waiver	Clearance before subsidiaries added	Is conflict check coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent.	incoherent	Clearance on incomplete party set.	conflict_risk	0	Synthetic