uid stringclasses 10
values | dataset_id stringclasses 1
value | jurisdiction stringclasses 3
values | court_level stringclasses 1
value | year int64 2.02k 2.02k | area_of_law stringclasses 3
values | pillar stringclasses 1
value | series stringclasses 1
value | input_new_matter_parties_summary stringclasses 5
values | input_related_entities_summary stringclasses 10
values | input_conflict_search_record_summary stringclasses 10
values | input_prior_relationships_summary stringclasses 10
values | input_waiver_or_consent_summary stringclasses 9
values | input_barrier_measures_summary stringclasses 6
values | input_red_flag_summary stringclasses 6
values | question stringclasses 2
values | ground_truth_label stringclasses 3
values | ground_truth_rationale stringclasses 10
values | outcome_signal stringclasses 5
values | early_window_months stringclasses 3
values | source_citation stringclasses 1
value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CF-TR-001 | legal-conflict-check-client-matter-third-party-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | Firm Intake | 2,023 | Commercial | legal_actors | 3A | Client: Alpha Ltd; opponent: Beta PLC | Affiliate: Alpha Holdings; directors listed | Search run across client opponent affiliates directors | Prior work for Beta ended 5 years ago not related | Client consent recorded; no waiver needed | No barrier required | null | Is conflict check coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Search recorded and relationships assessed. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
CF-TR-002 | legal-conflict-check-client-matter-third-party-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | Firm Intake | 2,023 | Commercial | legal_actors | 3A | Client: Alpha Ltd; opponent: Beta PLC | Affiliates not captured | No search record | Prior work for Beta exists in system | No consent or waiver | No barrier | Missing affiliate capture; missing search | Is conflict check coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | No search and missing related entities. | sra_escalation_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
CF-TR-003 | legal-conflict-check-client-matter-third-party-coherence-risk-v0.1 | US | Firm Intake | 2,022 | Employment | legal_actors | 3A | Client: employee X; opponent: Employer Y | Parent company listed | Search run across parent and subsidiaries | Firm previously advised Employer Y in unrelated tax matter | Informed consent from client recorded | Ethical wall for any overlap staff | null | Is conflict check coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Consent and wall documented. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
CF-TR-004 | legal-conflict-check-client-matter-third-party-coherence-risk-v0.1 | US | Firm Intake | 2,022 | Employment | legal_actors | 3A | Client: employee X; opponent: Employer Y | Parent company not listed | Search run only on Employer Y name | Prior representation of parent exists | No consent | No wall | Partial search; missed parent conflict | Is conflict check coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Search scope incomplete and consent missing. | disqualification_risk | 1 | Synthetic |
CF-TR-005 | legal-conflict-check-client-matter-third-party-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | Firm Intake | 2,022 | Property | legal_actors | 3A | Client: Buyer A; seller: Seller B | Estate agent and lender captured | Search run on parties and lender | Firm acts for lender in panel capacity | Client informed; lender panel terms allow | Separate teams not needed | null | Is conflict check coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Known relationship disclosed and permitted. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
CF-TR-006 | legal-conflict-check-client-matter-third-party-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | Firm Intake | 2,022 | Property | legal_actors | 3A | Client: Buyer A; seller: Seller B | Lender not captured | No search record for lender | Firm acts for lender regularly | No disclosure | No barrier | Missed lender relationship | Is conflict check coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Key related party missed. | complaint_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
CF-TR-007 | legal-conflict-check-client-matter-third-party-coherence-risk-v0.1 | EU | Firm Intake | 2,020 | Commercial | legal_actors | 3A | Client: Co A; opponent: Co B | Subsidiaries captured | Search includes subs and directors | Prior work for Co B in unrelated matter closed | Consent noted not required | No wall | null | Is conflict check coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Good intake discipline. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
CF-TR-008 | legal-conflict-check-client-matter-third-party-coherence-risk-v0.1 | EU | Firm Intake | 2,020 | Commercial | legal_actors | 3A | Client: Co A; opponent: Co B | Subsidiary missing | Search done only on Co A Co B | Prior work exists for missing subsidiary | No consent | No wall | Missed subsidiary conflict | Is conflict check coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Incomplete entity capture causes miss. | disqualification_risk | 1 | Synthetic |
CF-TR-009 | legal-conflict-check-client-matter-third-party-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | Firm Intake | 2,021 | Employment | legal_actors | 3A | Client: Employer Z; departing exec Q | Related: group companies captured | Search run; exec Q personal client of firm not related | Waiver obtained from exec Q and Employer Z | Wall put up between teams | null | Is conflict check coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Waivers and wall align. | stable | 0 | Synthetic | null |
CF-TR-010 | legal-conflict-check-client-matter-third-party-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | Firm Intake | 2,021 | Employment | legal_actors | 3A | Client: Employer Z; departing exec Q | Related entities captured | Search run finds exec Q personal client | No waiver obtained | No wall recorded | Proceeds anyway | Consent missing wall missing | Is conflict check coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Found conflict not managed. | disqualification_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
What this dataset does
You receive
new matter parties related entities search record prior relationships waiver or consent barrier measures red flags
You decide
coherent or incoherent
Daily use
intake QC
stop conflict surprises
reduce disqualification risk
protect regulator position
- Downloads last month
- 28