The dataset viewer is not available for this subset.
Exception: SplitsNotFoundError
Message: The split names could not be parsed from the dataset config.
Traceback: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/inspect.py", line 286, in get_dataset_config_info
for split_generator in builder._split_generators(
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
StreamingDownloadManager(base_path=builder.base_path, download_config=download_config)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
)
^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/packaged_modules/folder_based_builder/folder_based_builder.py", line 246, in _split_generators
raise ValueError(
"`file_name`, `*_file_name`, `file_names` or `*_file_names` must be present as dictionary key in metadata files"
)
ValueError: `file_name`, `*_file_name`, `file_names` or `*_file_names` must be present as dictionary key in metadata files
The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/job_runners/config/split_names.py", line 68, in compute_split_names_from_streaming_response
for split in get_dataset_split_names(
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
path=dataset,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
config_name=config,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
token=hf_token,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
)
^
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/inspect.py", line 340, in get_dataset_split_names
info = get_dataset_config_info(
path,
...<6 lines>...
**config_kwargs,
)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/inspect.py", line 291, in get_dataset_config_info
raise SplitsNotFoundError("The split names could not be parsed from the dataset config.") from err
datasets.inspect.SplitsNotFoundError: The split names could not be parsed from the dataset config.Need help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.
YAML Metadata Warning:empty or missing yaml metadata in repo card
Check out the documentation for more information.
UFO-Bench
UFO-Bench is a benchmark for evaluating subject-driven and personalized image generation/editing systems under text-image conditioned scenarios.
The benchmark is designed to evaluate not only visual quality, but also whether a generated image faithfully preserves the identity, semantic attributes, and structural components of the reference subject while correctly following textual editing instructions.
In contrast to conventional subject-driven generation benchmarks, UFO-Bench places particular emphasis on complex editing instructions and conflicting text-image conditions, providing a more challenging and comprehensive evaluation setting for modern image generation and editing models.
Overview
Subject-driven image generation aims to generate images that preserve a specific subject from one or more reference images while following a textual prompt.
A successful model needs to satisfy multiple requirements simultaneously:
- Subject consistency: preserve the identity and visual characteristics of the reference subject.
- Attribute preservation: maintain important subject-level attributes such as color, shape, clothing, hairstyle, and other semantic properties.
- Text instruction following: correctly execute the requested modifications.
- Local editing capability: modify specific parts or attributes while preserving the rest of the subject.
- Global editing capability: perform scene-level or subject-level transformations.
- Complex condition interaction: correctly resolve interactions and potential conflicts between the reference image and textual instructions.
UFO-Bench is designed around these requirements.
Benchmark Statistics
| Property | UFO-Bench |
|---|---|
| Total cases | 660 |
| Subject categories | 7 |
| Editing paradigms | 4 |
| Reference images | 86 unique subjects |
| Ground-truth annotations | T_gt |
| Question annotations | Question_list |
| Generated results | generated/ |
| Reference images | reference/ |
| Metadata | metadata.jsonl |
Subject Categories
UFO-Bench covers seven representative subject categories:
- Rigid Object
- Soft Object
- Human
- Full-body Character
- Animal
- Logo
- Scene
These categories cover both object-centric and scene-level subject-driven generation scenarios.
Editing Paradigms
The benchmark contains four major editing paradigms:
1. Non-Editing
The model is required to preserve the reference subject while generating the requested scene or context without explicitly modifying the subject.
This setting primarily evaluates:
- subject identity preservation
- visual consistency
- text-image alignment
2. Local Editing
The instruction modifies a specific part, attribute, or local region of the subject.
Examples include:
- changing clothing color
- modifying hairstyle
- changing an object component
- modifying a specific visual attribute
This setting evaluates whether the model can perform fine-grained localized editing while preserving unrelated subject characteristics.
3. Global Editing
The instruction introduces a broader transformation affecting the subject or surrounding scene.
This evaluates the model's ability to perform large-scale semantic changes while maintaining the underlying subject identity.
4. Complex Editing
Complex Editing contains multiple interacting editing requirements and is designed to stress-test the model's ability to jointly satisfy multiple conditions.
These cases may involve:
- multiple subject attributes
- multiple editing operations
- interactions between subject and scene
- conflicting text-image conditions
Complex Editing is one of the key challenging components of UFO-Bench.
Conflicting Text-Image Conditions
A major feature of UFO-Bench is the inclusion of conflicting text-image conditions.
In these cases, the textual instruction may explicitly request a property that differs from the corresponding property observed in the reference image.
For example:
Reference image: a red object
Text instruction: a blue object
A capable model should understand that the textual instruction specifies an edit, rather than simply copying the original visual attribute.
This setting evaluates whether a model can correctly reason over the interaction between:
- reference-image information
- textual instructions
- requested modifications
UFO-Bench contains a substantially larger proportion of such challenging cases than several existing subject-driven generation benchmarks.
Dataset Structure
The dataset is organized as follows:
UFO-Bench/
βββ generated/
β βββ ...
β βββ ...
β
βββ Question_list/
β βββ ...
β βββ ...
β
βββ reference/
β βββ ...
β βββ ...
β
βββ T_gt/
β βββ ...
β βββ ...
β
βββ metadata.jsonl
- Downloads last month
- 33