Hugging Face's logo
yano's picture

yano

yano2mch
128 1 31
lulavc's profile picture Crownelius's profile picture Bogi1999's profile picture
·

AI & ML interests

LLM's for Roleplay and Story generation. And of course good image generation too.

Recent Activity

repliedto RDTvlokip's post 2 days ago
I added recurrent depth, a gated memory, and Squeeze-and-Excitation to a chess network with no search. Same one forward pass, no tree — a deeper claim about what three architectural changes buy together. Confirmed on three independent seeds at 1.38M games. Then, extending it, I found two bugs in my own protocol: cudnn.benchmark=True was silently undoing my determinism seed, and a comparison's random seed was derived from the model path being tested — two checkpoints played different openings against the same opponent. Both fixed, nine already-run matches discarded and rerun. Only then did I extend one seed across 8.8x more data. Four instruments, and they don't agree: puzzles ahead 8/8, Maia ahead 23/24, a 91-pair round-robin (27,300 games) ahead 7/7 — all single-pass, no search. Minimax, the one opponent that actually searches: ahead on only 4/8, no stable direction, every swing confirmed on a second draw before I believed it. The lesson isn't "it works." It's that an opponent that searches gives a different verdict than one that doesn't — and the two bugs that could have hidden that were caught by rules written before this run, not by anything clever during it. Every number, including the ones minimax contradicts 👇 🤗 https://huggingface.co/RDTvlokip/RDTChess 💻 https://github.com/RDTvlokip/RDTChess ♟️ https://lichess.org/@/RDTChessBot
reacted to RDTvlokip's post with 🔥 2 days ago
I added recurrent depth, a gated memory, and Squeeze-and-Excitation to a chess network with no search. Same one forward pass, no tree — a deeper claim about what three architectural changes buy together. Confirmed on three independent seeds at 1.38M games. Then, extending it, I found two bugs in my own protocol: cudnn.benchmark=True was silently undoing my determinism seed, and a comparison's random seed was derived from the model path being tested — two checkpoints played different openings against the same opponent. Both fixed, nine already-run matches discarded and rerun. Only then did I extend one seed across 8.8x more data. Four instruments, and they don't agree: puzzles ahead 8/8, Maia ahead 23/24, a 91-pair round-robin (27,300 games) ahead 7/7 — all single-pass, no search. Minimax, the one opponent that actually searches: ahead on only 4/8, no stable direction, every swing confirmed on a second draw before I believed it. The lesson isn't "it works." It's that an opponent that searches gives a different verdict than one that doesn't — and the two bugs that could have hidden that were caught by rules written before this run, not by anything clever during it. Every number, including the ones minimax contradicts 👇 🤗 https://huggingface.co/RDTvlokip/RDTChess 💻 https://github.com/RDTvlokip/RDTChess ♟️ https://lichess.org/@/RDTChessBot
repliedto kostakoff's post 4 days ago
Canceling My Pro Subscription I'm officially canceling my Hugging Face Pro subscription today. I supported this platform because it stood for true openness and neutrality. This acquisition by NVIDIA fundamentally changes that. Here’s why I’m against this deal: - Neutrality is dead. NVIDIA is a US-based company. This means US regulations will inevitably dictate platform policies, creating direct pressure on Chinese developers and anyone building open-weight models outside the US. - Community over bureaucracy. NVIDIA is a massive, slow-moving corporation. This acquisition will likely drown the community in corporate processes and commercial interests. Soon, uploading a simple finetune might become a bureaucratic nightmare. - Open vs. Proprietary. Hugging Face was built on open-source ideals. NVIDIA? They are a fiercely proprietary hardware company with a minimal track record of meaningful open-source contributions. They sell chips, not freedom. - And to add insult to injury, NVIDIA has practically abandoned consumer RTX GPUs in 2026 to chase data center profits. Why would I pay them for "openness" when they've turned their back on the very developers who built this ecosystem? I paid for openness. Not for a corporate takeover. 🤗 was about community.
View all activity

Organizations

None yet